Participación política digital y brecha digital política en España. Un estudio de las desigualdades digitales

Erreferentzia bibliografikoak

• Agresti, A. (2002): Categorical Data Analy-sis, 2nd ed., N.Y.: John. Wiley and Sons.Aldrich, J. H. y Nelson, F. D. (1994): Linear Probability, Logit and Probit Models,Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage Publica-tions, Inc.
• Almond, Gabriel A. y Verba, Sidney (1989): The civic culture: Political attitudes and democracy in five countries, Lon-don: Sage Publications.
• Bimber, Bruce (2000): “Measuring the Gen-der Gap on the Internet”, Social Scien-ce Quarterly, 81(3): 868-876.
• Bonfadelli, Heinz (2002): “The Internet and Knowledge Gaps. A Theoretical and Empirical Investigation”, European Journal of Communication, 17(1): 65-84.
• Brennan, Linda L. y Johnson, Victoria E. (2005): Social, Ethical and Policy of Information Society, Hershey: Infor-mation Science Publishing.
• Calenda, D. y Mosca, L. (2007): “The politi-cal use of the Internet some insights from two surveys of Italian students”, Information Communication & Socie-ty, Vol. 10, n.º 1, pp. 29-47.
• Castaño, Celia (2008): La segunda Brecha digital, Madrid: Cátedra.Cooper, Joel y Weaver, Kimberlee D. (2003): Gender and Computers: Understanding Digital Divide, Mahwah: Lawrence Erl-baum Associates.
• Cox, D. R. y Snell, E. J. (1989): The Analy-sis of Binary Data, London: Chapman and Hall.
• DiMaggio, P.; Hargittai, E.; Neuman, R. W. y Robinson, J. P. (2001): “Social implica-tions of the Internet”, Annual Review of Sociology, Vol. 27, pp. 307-336.
• DiMaggio, P.; Hargittai, E.; Celeste C. y Shafer, S. (2004): “From unequal ac-cess to differentiated use: A literature review and agenda for research on digital inequality”, en Neckerman, K. M. (ed.): Social Inequality, New York, NY: Russell Sage Fundation, pp. 355-387.
• Gibbons, Jean Dickinson y Chakraborti, Subhabrata (2003): Nonparametric Statistical Inference, 4th ed., CRC.
• Gunkel, David J. (2003): “Second Thoughts: Toward a Critique of the Digital Divide”, New Media & Society, 5(4): 499-522.
• Hague, B. N. y Loader, B. D. (1999): Digi-tal democracy: Discourse and decision making in the information age, New York, NY: Routledge.
• Hoffman, Donna; Novak, Thomas P. y Schlosser, Ann E. (2001): “The evo-lution of Digital divide: Examining de Relationship of Race to Internet Access and Usage over Time”, en Ben-jamin M. Compaine (ed.), The Digital Divide. Facing a Crisis or Creating a Myth?, Cambridge, Mass: The MIT Press, pp. 47-97.
• Hosmer, D. W. y Lemeshow, S. (2000): Applied Logistic Regression, 2nd ed., N.Y.: John Wiley and Sons.Jovell, A. J. (1995): Análisis de Regresión Logística, Madrid: CIS.
• Kleinbaum, D. G. (1994): Logistic Regres-sion. A Self-Learning Text, Springer.
• Margolis, M. y Resnick, D. (2000): Politics as usual: the cyberspace “revolution”,Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publica-tions.
• McCullagh, P. y Nelder, J. (1983): Gene-ralized linear models, Chapman and Hall.
• Milbrath, Lester (1977): Political Partici-pation: How and Why Do People Get Involved in Politics, Chicago: Rand Mc Nally Publishing Co.
• Mossberger, K.; Tolbert, C. J. y Mcneal, R. S. (2008): Digital Citizenship. The Internet, Society, and Participation,Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.
• Newton, Kenneth y Norris, Pippa (2000): “Confidence in Public Institutions: Faith, Culture, or Performance?”, en S. Pharr y R. Putnam (eds.), Disaffected Democracies: What’s Troubling the Trilateral Countries?, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
• Norris, P. (2001): Digital divide: Civic engagement, information poverty, and the Internet worldwide, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Norris, Pippa (2003): Democratic Phoenix: Reinventing Political Activism, Cam-brige: Cambridge University Press.
• Power, D. A. y xie, Y. (2000): Statistical Methods for Categorical Data Análisis,Academia Press.
• Robles, José Manuel; Torres, Cristóbal y Molina, Óscar (2010): “La brecha digital. Un análisis de las desigualdades tecnológicas en España”, Sistema, Vol. 218, pp. 3-22.
• Rooksby, Emma y Weckert, John (2005): “Digital Divides: their Social and Ethi-cal Implications”, pp. 29-48, en Linda L. Brennan y Victoria E. Johnson (eds), Social, Ethical and Policy of Information Society, Hershey, PA: Information Science Publishing.
• Ruiz-Maya Pérez, L. (2000): Métodos estadísticos de investigación en las ciencias sociales: Técnicas no paramétri-cas, Alfa-Centauro SA.
• Silva, L. C. y Barroso, I. M. (2004): “Regre-sión Logística”, Cuadernos de Estadística, n.º 27, Madrid: La Muralla.
• Tajfel, Henri; Fraser, C. y Jaspars, Joseph M. F. (1984): The social dimension: European studies in Social Psychology, Cambrid-ge: Cambridge University Press.
• Torcal, Mariano (2006): “Norms of good citizenship”, en J. W. Van Deth, J. Montero y A. Westholm (eds), Citi-zenship and involvement in European democracies: a comparative analysis,New York: Routledge.
• Van Dijk, J. (2005): The deepening divide: Inequality in the information society,London: Sage Publications.
• Verba, Sidney; Nie, Norman H. y Kim, Jae-on (1987): Participation and political equality: A seven-nation comparison,Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
• Walsh, Ekaterina O. (2001): “The Truth about the Digital Divide”, pp. 279-284 en Benjamin M. Compaine (ed.), The Digital Divide. Facing a Crisis or Creating a Myth?, Cambridge, Mass: The MIT Press.
• Warschauer, Mark (2004): Technology and Social Inclusion: Rethinking the Digital Divide, Cambridge, Mass: The MIT Press.