La organización de la práctica y su influencia en el aprendizaje escolar de tres habilidades de lanzamiento y recepción

  1. Cerro Díaz, Ignacio
  2. García Herrero, Juan Antonio
  3. Luis del Campo, Vicente
  4. Reina Vaíllo, Raúl
  5. Moreno Hernández, Francisco Javier
  6. Ruiz Gil, Antonio
Zeitschrift:
Kronos: revista universitaria de la actividad física y el deporte

ISSN: 1579-5225

Datum der Publikation: 2006

Ausgabe: 5

Nummer: 10

Seiten: 25-32

Art: Artikel

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openABACUS editor

Andere Publikationen in: Kronos: revista universitaria de la actividad física y el deporte

Zusammenfassung

El presente trabajo analizó los efectos que sobre el rendimiento tiene la organización de la práctica con interferencia contextual en tres habilidades de lanzamiento y recepción. En este estudio ha participado una muestra de 392 escolares, pertenecientes a diferentes cursos de primero, segundo y tercero de ESO. Se estudio el efecto que la organización de lo práctica, en bloque o aleatoria, pueda tener sobre el aprendizaje y retención de las tres habilidades propuestas. Los resultados han mostrado tendencias semejantes en las tres habilidades, de manera que éstos apoyarían que la interferencia contextual parece tener un menor eje la retención y en la transferencia a otras tareas. Sin embargo, estos resultados responderían al efecto de la concentración de la práctica, producido por los efectos de la práctica en bloque.

Bibliographische Referenzen

  • Adams J (1971) A closed-loop theory of motor learning. J Motor Behav 3: 111- 149.
  • Anderson JR (1980) Cognitive psychology and its implications. W.H. Freeman, San Francisco.
  • Baddeley AD y Longman DJA (1978) The influence of length and frequency of training session on the rate of learning to type. Ergonomics 21: 627-635.
  • Barreiros JM (1992) Aprendizagem Motora. Varabilidade das condiçoes de prática e interferencia contextual. Faculdade de Motricidade Humana, Lisboa. Battig WF (1966) Facilitation and interference. En: Bilodeau EA (ed) Acquisition of skill. Academic Press, New York, pp. 215-244.
  • Battig WF (1979) The flexibility of human memory. En: Cermak LS y Craik IM (eds.) Levels of processing and human memory. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, pp. 23- 44.
  • Brady F (2004) Contextual interference: a metaanalytic study. Percept Motor Skill 99: 116-126.
  • Brady F (1998) A theoretical and empirical review of the contextual interference effect and the learning of motor skills. Quest 50 (3): 266-293.
  • Czyz S y Staszak M (2004) Contextual interferences and motor learning transfer and retention in children. Human Movement 1(5): 13-18.
  • Del Rey P, Wughalter E, Dubois D y Carnes M (1982) Effects of contextual interference and retention intervals on transfer. Percept Motor Skill 54: 467-476.
  • Farrow D y Maschette W (1997) The effects of contextual interference on children learning forehand tennis groundstrokes. J Hum Movement Stud 33: 47-67.
  • Figueiredo T (2004) Interferência contextual em contexto aplicado. En: Barreiros JM, Godinho M, Melo F y Neto C (eds) Desenvolvimento e Aprendizagem. Perspectivas cruzadas (pp. 137-162). Lisboa: Universidade Técnica de Lisboa. Faculdade de Motricidade Humana.
  • Figueiredo. T. (2004). Interferencia contextual em contexto aplicado. En J. Barreiros. M. Godinho. F. Melo y C. Neto (Eds.) Desenvolvimento e aprendizagem. Perspectivas cruzadas. Faculdade de Motricidade Humana, Lisboa, pp. 137-162.
  • French KE, Rink JE y Werner PH (1990) Effects of contextual interference on retention of three volleyball skills. Percept Motor Skill 71: 179-186.
  • Giuffrida CG, Shea JB y Fairbrother JT (2002) Differential transfer benefits of increased practice for constant, blocked and serial practice schedules. J Motor Behav 4 (34): 353-365.
  • Goode S y Magill RA (1986) Contextual interference effects in learning three badminton serves. Res Q Exercise Sport 57 (4): 308-314.
  • Hall KG y Magill RA (1995) Variability of practice and contextual interference in motor skill learning. J Motor Behav 27: 299-309.
  • Jarus T y Goverover Y (1999) Effects of contextual interference and age on acquisition, retention, and transfer of motor skill. Percept Motor Skill 88: 437-447.
  • Landin D y Hebert EP (1997) A comparison of three practice schedules along the contextual interference continuum. Res Q Exercise Sport 68: 357-361.
  • Lee TD y Magill RA (1983) The locus of contextual interference in motor skill acquisition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: learning, memory and cognition 9: 730- 746.
  • Lee TD y Genovese ED (1989) Distribution of practice in motor skill acquisition: different effects for discrete and continuous tasks. Res Q Exercise Sport 60. 59-65.
  • Li Y y Lima RP (2002) Rehearsal of task variations and contextual interference effect in a field setting. Percept Motor Skill 94 (3): 750-752.
  • Magill RA y Hall KG (1990) A review of the contextual interference effect in motor skill ac-quisition. Hum Movement Sci 9: 241-289.
  • Magnuson C y Wright D (2004) Random practice can facilitate the learning of tasks that have different relative time structures. Res Q Exercise Sport 2 (75): 197-202.
  • Meira JC y Tani G (2003) Contextual interference effects assessed by extended transfer trials in the acquisition of the volleyball serve. J Hum Movement Stud 45: 449-468.
  • Meira JC, Tani G y Edison JM (2001) A estrutura da prática variada em situaçoes reais de ensino-aprendizagem. Revista Brasileña Ciencia e Movimento 4 (9): 55-63.
  • Moreno FJ, Ávila F, Damas JS, García JA, Luís V., Reina R y Ruíz A (2003) Contextual interference in learning precision skills. Percept Motor Skill 97: 121-128.
  • Moreno FJ, García JA y Luís V (2004) El efecto de la organización de la práctica en el aprendizaje de las habilidades motrices y deportivas. Habilidad Motriz 22: 37- 44.
  • Ollis S, Button Ch y Fairweather M (2005) The influence of professional expertise and task complexity upon the potency of the contextual interference effect. Acta Psychol 118: 229-244.
  • Overdorf V, Schweighardt R, Page S y McGrath R (2004) Mental and physical practice schedules in acquisition and retention of novel timing skills. Percept Motor Skill 99: 51-62.
  • Reder L y Klatzky R (1994) The effect of context on training: is learning situated? En: Druckman D y Bjork RA (eds.) Learning, remembering, believing: Enhancing Human Performance. National Academy Press, Washington DC, pp. 25-56.
  • Ste-Marie D, Sahnnon C, Findlay L y Latimer A (2004) High levels of contextual interference enhance handwriting skill acquisition. J Motor Behav 1 (36): 115-126.
  • Pollock BJ y Lee TD (1997) Dissociated contextual interference effects in children and adults. Percept Motor Skill 84: 851-858.
  • Ruiz LM (1994). Deporte y aprendizaje. Visor, Madrid. Ruiz LM (1995) Competencia Motriz. Elementos para
  • comprender el aprendizaje motor en educación física escolar. Gymnos, Madrid.
  • Schmidt RA y Lee TD (2005) Motor control and learning: a behavioral emphasis, 4th Ed. Human Kinetics, Champaign.
  • Shea JB y Morgan RL (1979) Contextual interference effects on the acquisition, retention and transfer of a motor skill. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory 5: 178-187.
  • Smith PJK y Penn GL (1999) The effect of number of practice trials on the contextual interference effect for skill variations with similar relative timing characteristics. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology 21: S-101.
  • Wegman E (1999) Contextual interference effects on the acquisition and retention of fundamental motor skills. Percep Motor Skill 88: 182-187.
  • Wright DL, Johnson J, Immink M y Shea CH (1998) The emergence of invariant relative timing as a function of the extent of contextual interference during practice. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology 20: S-27.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet