La organización de la práctica en las clases de educación físicael papel de la interferencia contextual y de la distribución de la práctica

Références bibliographiques

• Anderson, J. R. (1980). Cognitive psychology and itsimplications. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.
• Battig, W. F. (1966). Facilitation and interference.En E.A. Bilodeau (Ed) Acquisition of skills. (215-244).New York. Academic Press.
• Battig, W. F. (1979). The flexibility of human memory.En L.S. Cermak y F.I.M. Craik (Eds) Levels of processingand human memory. (23-44). Hillsdale, N. J. Erlbaum
• Barreiros, J. (1992). Aprendizagem Motora.Variabilidade das Condiçoes de Práctica. Lisboa:Facultade de Motricidade Humana.
• Brady, F. (1998) A theoretical and empirical reviewof the contextual interferente effect and the learningof motor skills. Quest, 50, 3, 266-293.
• Del Rey, P., Wughalter, E., Dubois, D. y Carnes, M.(1982). Effects of contextual interference and retentionintervals on transfer. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 54,467-476.
• Figueiredo, T. (1994). Interferência contextual:Revisao de estudos e situaçao actual do problema. En J.Barreiros (Ed.), O Efeito de Interferência Contextual(pp. 1-31) Lisboa. Facultade de Motricidade Humana.Serviço de Ediçoes. Universidade Técnica de Lisboa.
• Figueiredo, T. (2004). Interferencia contextual emcontexto aplicado. En J. Barreiros, M. Godinho, F. Meloy C. Neto (Eds.) Desenvolvimento e aprendizagem. Perspectivas cruzadas (p. 137-162). Lisboa. Facultade de Motricidade Humana. Serviço de Ediçoes. UniversidadeTécnica de Lisboa.
• Giuffrida, C. G.; Shea, J. B. y Fairbrother, J. T. (2002)Differential transfer benefits of increased practice for constant, blocked, and serial practice schedules.Journal of Motor Behavior, 34, 353-367.
• Green, S.G. y Sherwood, D.E. (1999). Movement time,practice structure, and temporal error detection capability in quick reversal movements. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 21, S-51.
• Hall, K. G. y Magill, R. A. (1995) Variability of practiceand contextual interference in motor skill learning.Journal of Motor Behavior, 27, 299-309.
• Immink, M.A. y Wright, D.L. (1999). Contextual interference: Motor response programming under random and blocked practice. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 21, S-60.
• Jarus, T. y Goverover, Y. (1999). Effects ofcontextual interference and age on acquisition, retention,and transfer of motor skill. Perceptual and Motor Skills,88, 437-447.
• Lee, T.D. y Magill, R.A. (1983). The locus of contextualinterference in motor skill acquisition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: learning, memory and cognition,9, 730-746.
• Lee, T. D.; Wulf, G. y Schmidt, R. A. (1992) Contextual interference in motor learning: Dissociated effects dueto the nature of task variations. The Quarterly Journalof Experimental Psychology, 44A, 627-644.
• Li, Y. y Vaczi, M. (1999). The locus of contextualinterference effect: Motoric or perceptual? Journal ofSport and Exercise Psychology, 21, S-76.
• Magill R. A. y Hall, K. G. (1990). A review of thecontextual interference effect in motor skill acquisition. Human Movement Science, 9, 241-289.
• Magill, R.A. y Reeve, T.G. (1978). Variability in priorpractice in learning and retention of a novel motor response. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 46, 107-110.
• Oña, A., Martínez, M., Moreno, F. y Ruiz, L.M. (1999).Control y Aprendizaje Motor. Madrid: Síntesis.
• Ruiz, L. M. (1994). Deporte y Aprendizaje. Madrid:Visor.
• Ruiz, L. M. (1995). Competencia Motriz. Elementos para comprender el aprendizaje motor en educación física escolar. Madrid: Gymnos.
• Sekiya, H.; Magill, R. A. y Anderson, D. I. (1996) The contextual interference effect in parameter modifications of the same generalized motor program.Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 67, 59-68.
• Sekiya, H.; Magill, R. A.; Sidaway, B. y Anderson, D.I. (1994) The contextual interference effect for skill variations from the same and different generalized mo-tor programs. Research Quarterly for Exercise andSport, 65, 330-338.
• Shea, J.B. y Kohl, R.M. (1990). Specificity andvariability of practice. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 61, 2, 169-177.
• Shea, J.B. y Morgan, R.L. (1979). Contextual interference effects on the acquisition retention and transfer of a motor skill. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 5, 178-187.
• Schmidt, R.A. (1975). A schema theory of discretemotor skill learning. Psychological Review, 82, 225-260.
• Schmidt, R.A. (1988). Control motor and learning: A behavioural emphasis. Champaign, ILL: Human Kinetics.
• Smith, P.J.K. y Penn, G.L. (1999). The effect of numberof practice trials on the contextual interference effectfor skill variations with similar relative timing characteristics. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 21, S-101.
• Wegman, E. (1999). Contextual interference effectson the acquisition and retention of fundamental motorskills. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 88, 182-187.
• Wulf, G. (1992) Reducing knowledge of results canproduce context effects in movements of the same class.Journal of Human Movement Studies, 22, 71-84.
• Wulf, G. y Lee, T. D. (1993) Contextual interferencein movements of the same class: Differential effectson program and parameter learning. Journal of Motor Behavior, 25, 254-263.