Efectos de un programa de clase en circuito en agua versus un programa de clase en circuito en suelo en personas que sufrieron un accidente cerebrovascular

  1. Pegito Pérez, Irene
Supervised by:
  1. Jamile Vivas Director

Defence university: Universidade da Coruña

Fecha de defensa: 15 September 2017

Committee:
  1. María Teresa Mingo Gómez Chair
  2. Luz González Doníz Secretary
  3. Katia Nunes Sá Committee member

Type: Thesis

Teseo: 502113 DIALNET lock_openRUC editor

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Current scientific evidence supports the use of task-oriented therapy and aquatic therapy as treatment modalities in neurorehabilitation of people who have suffered a stroke. METHODS: A randomized controlled trial was conducted to test the effects of a circuit class therapy in water versus circuit class therapy on land in people who suffered a stroke. Assessments methods were: CvMob motion analysis software, 10 Meter Walk Test, 2 Minute Walk Test, Berg Balance Scale, Fugl-Meyer Assessment, Functional Reach Test, Timed Up & Go test, Stroke Self-Efficacy Questionnaire, Activities-Specific Balance Confidence Scale and Box and Block Test. RESULTS: Both therapies have been effective in the parameters evaluated: gait, balance and upper limb function. There were significant differences between groups on the Berg balance scale after therapy, with water group improvements. CONCLUSIONS: The use of circuit class therapy in water or land is recommended to treat people who have suffered a stroke.