Validez estructural de las pruebas de evaluación de realización cognitiva

  1. Prieto Adánez, Gerardo
  2. Maia, José
  3. Rivero, Iolanda S.
  4. Almeida, Leandro S.
Revista:
Psicothema

ISSN: 0214-9915

Año de publicación: 2000

Volumen: 12

Número: 1

Páginas: 137-143

Tipo: Artículo

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: Psicothema

Resumen

En este artículo se discuten las contribuciones del Análisis Factorial Confirmatorio a la evaluación de los modelos estructurales de las aptitudes. Se contrasta el ajuste a varios modelos factoriales alternativos de los resultados obtenidos en una muestra de jóvenes portugueses de enseñanza media y superior (N=849), con doce pruebas que evalúan tres procesos (comprensión, razonamiento y pensamiento divergente), mediante ítems de cuatro contenidos (verbal, figurativo abstracto, espacial y numérico). Un modelo de seis factores, que refleja la importancia conjunta de los procesos cognitivos y de los contenidos, parece el más adecuado. En este contexto, se afirma que es necesario revisar de nuevo la oposición tradicional entre modelos jerárquicos y taxonómicos, puesto que ambos tipos son complementarios

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Byrne, B. M. (1989). A Primer of LISREL. Basic applications and pro gramming for confirmatory factor analytic models. New York: SpringerVerlag.
  • Carroll, J. B. (1979). How shall we study individual differences in cognition? Methodological and theoretical perspectives. In R. J. Sternberg & D. K. Detterman (Eds.), Human intelligence: Perspectives on its theory and measurement. Norwood, N.J.: Ablex.
  • Carroll, J. B. (1993). Human cognitive abilites. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
  • Detterman, D. K. (1994). Theoretical possibilities: The relation of human intelligence to basic cognitive abilities. In D. K. Detterman (Ed.), Current topics in human intelligence. Norwood, N.J.: Ablex.
  • Eysenck, H. J. (1979). The structure and measurement of inteligence. New York: Springer Verlag..
  • Guilford, J. P. (1988). Some changes in the structure-of-intellect model. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 48, 1-4.
  • Gustafsson, J. E. (1984). A unifying model for the structure of intellectual abilities. Intelligence, 8, 179-204.
  • Gustafsson, J. E. (1988a). Hierarchical models of individual differences in cognitive abilities. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Advances in the psychology of human intelligence. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Gustafsson, J. E. (1988b). Models of intelligence. In J. P. Keeves (Ed.), Educational research, methodology, and measurement. An international handbook. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
  • Gustafsson, J. E. (1994). Hierarchical models of intelligence and educational achievement. In A. Demetriou & A. Efklides (Eds.), Intelligence, mind and reasoning: Structure and development. Amsterdam: North Holland.
  • Horn, J. L. (1988). Thinking about human intelligence. In J. R. Nesselroad & R. B. Cattell (Eds.), Handbook of multivariate experimental psychology. New York: Plenum Press.
  • Jöreskog, K. G. (1969). A general approach to confirmatory maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 34, 183-202.
  • Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1993a). Lisrel 8: Structural equation modeling with the simplis command language. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1989). Lisrel VII. User´s reference gui e. Chicago: Scientific Software.
  • Kyllonen, P. C. (1994). CAM: A theoretical framework for cognitive abilities measurement. In D. K. Detterman (Ed.), Current topics in human intelligence. Norwood, N.J.: Ablex.
  • Kyllonen, P. C., & Christal, R. E. (1989). Cognitive modeling of learning abilities: A status report of LAMP. In R. Dillon & J. W. Pellegrino (Eds.), Testing: Theoretical and applied issues. New York: Freeman.
  • Kyllonen, P. C., & Christal, R. E. (1990). Reasoning skill is (little more than) working memory capacity? Intelligence, 14, 389-433.
  • Lohman, D. F., & Rocklin, T. (1995). Current and recurring issues in the assessment of intelligence and personality. In D. S. Saklofske & M. Zeider (Eds.), International handbook of personality and intelligence. New York: Plenum Press.
  • MacCallum, R. (1986). Specification searches in covariance structure modeling. Psychological Bulletin, 100 (1), 107-120.
  • MacCallum, R. (1995). Model specification: Procedures, strategies and related issues. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues and applications. London: Sage.
  • Mulaik, S. A. (1988). Confirmatory factor analysis. In J. R. Nesselroade & R. B. Cattell (Eds.), Handbook of multivariate experimental psycho ogy. New York: Plenum Press.
  • Ribeiro, I. S. (1996). Mudanças no desempenho e na estrutura das ap tidões: Contributos para o estudo da diferenciação cognitiva em jovens. Braga: Instituto de Educação e Psicologia.
  • Ribeiro, I. S., & Almeida, L. S. (1993). Provas de Avaliação da Reali ação Cognitiva. Cadernos de teste. Braga: Instituto de Educação e Psicologia.
  • Snow, R. E. (1994). A person-situation interaction theory of intelligence in outline. In A. Demetrion & A. Efklides (Eds.), Intelligence, mind and reasoning: Structure and development. Amsterdam: North Holland.
  • Spearman, C. (1927). The abilities of man. New York: MacMillan.
  • Sternberg, J. E., & Powell, J. S. (1982). Theories of intelligence. E. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of human intelligence. Cambridge. MA: Cambridge University Press.In J.
  • Sternberg, R. J. (1979). Intelligence research at the interface between differential and cognitive psychology. In R. J. Sternberg & D. K. Detterman (Eds.), Human intelligence: Perspectives on its theory and measu ement. Norwood, N. J.: Ablex Publishing.
  • Sternberg, R. J., & Gardner, M. K. (1982). A componential interpretation of the general factor in human intelligence. In H. J. Eysenck (Ed.), A model for intelligence. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
  • Thurstone, L. L. (1938). Primary mental abilities. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Vernon, P. E. (1961). The structure of human abilities. London: Methuen.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet