Análisis cognitivo de un test informatizado de visualización espacial

  1. Orgaz Baz, Begoña
  2. Fernández Pulido, Ramón
  3. Carro Ramos, Juan
  4. Prieto Adánez, Gerardo
Revista:
Psicothema

ISSN: 0214-9915

Año de publicación: 1993

Volumen: 5

Número: 2

Páginas: 293-301

Tipo: Artículo

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: Psicothema

Resumen

En este trabajo se analizan las características del procesamiento cognitivo de los items de un test computarizado de Visualización, basado en una tarea de Desarrollo de Superficies. Se considera que el número de caras de las figuras tridimensionales no es la condición de la tarea asociada con el empleo de transformaciones o plegamientos mentales. Se postula que la condición denominada "lejanía de la solución" es la que ha de ser controlada para elicitar el uso del proceso característico de la Visualización: la transformación de movimiento.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Bartram, D. (1987). The Development of an Automated Testing System for Pilot Selection: The Micropat Project. Applied Psychology, 36, 279-298.
  • Bejar, I. I. (1985). Speculations on the future of test design. En S.E. Embretson (ed.) Test Design: Developments in Psychology and Psychometrics, (pp. 279-294). New York: Academic Press.
  • Bennet, G.; Seashore, H., y Wesman, A. (1947). Differential aptitude test. New York: Psychological Corporation.
  • Carro, J. (1985). Inteligencia espacial y aptitud de vuelo: estudio desde las perspectivas psicométricas y del procesamiento de la información, Tesis Doctoral no publicada. Salamanca: Facultad de Filosofía y Ciencias de la Educación, Universidad de Salamanca.
  • Carroll, J. B. (1976) Psychometric tests and Cognitive tasks: A new "structure of intellect". En L. B. Resnick (ed.), The nature of intelligence. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Carroll, J. B. (1987). New Perspectives in the Analysis of Abilities. En R.R. Ronning, J. A. Glover, J. C. Conoley y J. C. Witt (eds), The influence of Cognitive Psychology on Testing (pp. 267-284). Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Ekstrom, R. B.; French, J. W. y Harman, H. (1979). Cognitive factors: their identification and replication. Multivariate Behavioral Research Monographs, 79-2, 3-84.
  • Eliot, J. (1987). Models of Psychological Space. New York: Springer-Verlag.
  • Embretson, S. E. (ed.) (1985). Test Design: Developments in Psychology and Psychometrics. New York: Academic Press.
  • Fowler, R. D. y Butcher, J. N. (1987). International Applications of Computer-based Testing and Interpretation. Applied Psychology, 36, 419-429.
  • French, J. W., Ekstrom, R. B. y Price, L. A. (1963). Manual for kit of reference tests for cognitive factors. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
  • Goodman, D. (1987). The complete HyperCard Handbook. Toronto: Bantam Books.
  • Green, B. F., Bock, R. D., Humphreys, L. G., Linn, R. L. y Reckase, M. (1982). Evaluation plan for the computerized adaptive vocational testing battery. (Technical Report No. 82-1). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University, Office of Naval Research, Department of Psychology.
  • Guilford, J. P. (1967). The nature of human intelligence. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  • Guttman, R.; Epstein, E. E.; Amir, M. y Guttman, L. (1990). A structural Theory of Spatial Abilities. Applied Psychological Measurement, 14 (3), 217-236
  • Harvey, G. (1988). HyperTalk Instant Reference. San Francisco: SYBEX.
  • Hunt, E. (1987). Science, Technology and Intelligence. En R. R. Ronning, J. A. Glover, J. C. ConoleyY y J. C. Witt (eds). The influence of Cognitive Psychology on Testing (pp. 11-40). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Johnson, E. S. y Meade, A. (1986). Block Counting Test. New York: Industrial Psychology Inc.
  • Kyllonen, P. C.; Lohman, D. F. y Snow, R. E. (1984). Effects of Aptitudes, Strategy Training, and Task Facets on Spatial Task Performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 1, 130-145.
  • Kyllonen, P. C., Lohman, D. F. y Woltz, D. J. (1984). Componential Modeling of Alternative Strategies for Performing Spatial Task. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 6, 1325-1345
  • Lohman, D. F. (1979). Spatial ability: A review and reanalysis of the correlational literature. (Technical Report No. 8). Aptitude Research Project, School of Education, Stanford University.
  • Lohman, D. F. (1985). Dimensions of individual differences in spatial abilities. Paper for NATO Advanced Study Institute in Cognition and Motivation, Athens.
  • Maclennan, R. R.; Jackson, D. N. y Bellantino, N. (1988). Response latencies and the computerized assessment of intelligence. Personality-and-Individual-Differences, 9 (4), 811-816
  • Macquarrie, T. W. (1925). MacQuarrie Test for Mechanical Ability. California: California Test Bureau.
  • Martín, T.A. y Wilcox, K. L. (1989). HyperCard administration of a block-design task. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments and Computers, 21 (2), 312-315.
  • Mayor, J., (Ed.) (1985). Actividad Humana y Procesos Cognitivos. Madrid: Alhambra Universidad.
  • Mumaw, R. J., Pellegrino, J. W. y Glaser, R. (1980). Some puzzling aspects of spatial ability. Paper presented at annual meetings of the Psychinomis Society, St. Louis, Mo.
  • Pellegrino, J. W. y Kail, R. (1982). Process Analyses of Spatial Aptitude. En R.J. Sternberg (ed.), Advances in the psychology of human intelligence, 1. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Pellegrino, J. W., Mumaw, R. J . y Shute, V. J. (1985) Analyses of Spatial Aptitude and Expertise. En S.E. Embretson (ed.), Test Design: Developments in Psychology and Psychometrics (pp. 45-76). New York: Academic Press.
  • Perriolat, R. (1987). L'Informatisation des Tests au Service de Psychologie de la S.N.C.F.. Applied Psychology, 36, 299-310.
  • Royce, J. R. (1973) Multivariate Analysis of Psychological Theory. London: Academic Press.
  • Shepard, R. N. y Feng, C. (1972). A chronometric study of mental paper folding. Cognitive Psychology, 3, 228-243.
  • Stiles-Davis, J., Kritchevsky, M. y Bellugi, U. (1988). Spatial Cognition, Brain Bases and Development. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Telfer, R. (1985). Micro-computer based psychological testing and record-keeping, Defence Force Journal, 54, 57-61
  • Thurstone, L. L. (1948). Minnesota Paper Form Board Test. New York: Psychological Corporation.
  • Thurstone, L. L. (1950). Some Primary Abilities in Visual Thinking, (Report, No. 5), Chicago: Psychometric Laboratory , University of Chicago.
  • Thurstone, T. G. y Thurstone, L. L. (1949). Mechanical aptitude II ; description of group tests. (Report 54). Chicago: Psychometric Laboratory, The University of Chicago.
  • Wolfe, J. H. (1986). Computerized testing technology. Advances-in-Reading Language-Research; Vol. 4, US Navy Personnel Research y Development Ctr, San Diego, CA, 71-78
  • Yela, M. (1967). El factor espacial en la estructura de la inteligencia técnica, Revista de Psicología General y Aplicada, 88-89, 609-635.
  • Yela, M. (1974). Rompecabezas Impresos, Manual. Madrid: TEA.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet