La imagen de la Unión Europea y sus países miembros en la prensa oficial china xinhua online: un estudio empírico

  1. Cheng, Lifen 1
  2. Chen, Potseng 1
  3. Pérez-Cheng, Shiany 1
  1. 1 Universidad de Salamanca
    info

    Universidad de Salamanca

    Salamanca, España

    ROR https://ror.org/02f40zc51

Zeitschrift:
Fonseca, Journal of Communication

ISSN: 2172-9077

Datum der Publikation: 2010

Nummer: 1

Seiten: 34-61

Art: Artikel

Andere Publikationen in: Fonseca, Journal of Communication

Zusammenfassung

his study analyzes the portrayals of European Union and its member countries depicted by the Chinese media. It aims to explore the news content from a different angle by shifting the usual western perspective to a Chinese approach. The use of quantitative content analysis method enables the researchers to observe and compare how the Chinese official information network XinhuaNet has treated news on issues related to different member countries in the European Union and their citizens.

Bibliographische Referenzen

  • Beaudoin, Christopher E. (2007). “SARS news coverage and its determinants in China and the US”, International Communication Gazette, vol. 6, nº 69, pp. 509-524.
  • Cacioppo, John T. y Bberntson, Gary G. (1994).“Relationship between attitudes and evaluative space. A critical-review, with emphasis on the separability of positive and negative substrates”, Psychological Bulletin, nº 115, pp. 401-423.
  • Cheng, Lifen, Igartua, Juan J., Palacios, Elena, Otero, José A. y Acosta, T.( 2009). “Aversión vs. aceptación, dos caras de la misma moneda. Un estudio empírico de encuadres noticiosos sobre inmigración en la prensa regional de Castilla y León”, ZER, Revista de Estudios de Comunicación, vol. 26, nº 14, pp. 35-57.
  • De Beer, Arnold S.( 2004). “News- The fleeting, elusive but essential feature of global journalism”, in Arnold S. De Beer & John C. Merrill (eds.), Global journalism: Topical issues and media systems, pp. 163-176. Boston, MA: Pearson Education.
  • De Burgh, Hugo (2005). “Introduction: Journalism and the new culture paradigm”, in Hugo de Burgh and James Curran (eds.), Making journalists: Diverse models, global issues, pp. 1-22. London: Routledge.
  • Demers, David (2002). “Global media: Menace or Messiah?” (Revised edition), Cresskill, NJ. Hampton Press.
  • Entman, Robert M.(1993). “Framing: toward a clarification of a fractured paradigm”, Journal of Communication, vol. 4, nº 43, pp. 51-58.
  • Gabrenya, William K. & Hwang, Kwang-Kuo (1996). “Chinese Social Interaction: Harmony and hierarchy on the good earth”, in Michael H. Bond (ed.), The handbook of Chinese psychology, pp. 309-321. Hong Kong: Oxford University Press.
  • Gao, Ge, Ting-Toomey, Stella & Gudykunst, William B. (1996). “Chinese communication process”, in Michael H. Bond (ed.), The handbook of Chinese psychology, pp. 280-293. Hong Kong: Oxford University Press.
  • Gans, Herbert J.(1979). Deciding what’s news. New York: Pantheon.
  • Gudykunst, William B., Ting-Toomey, Stella. & Chau, Elizabeth.(1988). Culture and interpersonal communication. Newbury Park, C.A.: Sage. Hall
  • Edward T. (1956). The silent language. Garden City, New York: Doubleday. Hofstede, Geert (1991). Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind. London: McGraw-Hill.
  • Igartua, Juan José (2006). Métodos cuantitativos de investigación en comunicación, Bosch, Barcelona.
  • Igartua, Juan J., Cheng, Lifen & Muñiz, Carlos (2005). “Framing Latin America in the Spanish Press. A cooled down friendship between two fraternal lands”, Communications: The European Journal of Communication Research, nº 30, pp. 359-372.
  • Kahaneman, Daniel, Slovic, C. P. y Tversky, Amos (1982) (eds.), Judgments under uncertainty. Heuristics and biases. New York: Cambridge University Press
  • Kim, Sei-Hill, Scheufele, Dietram A. y Shanahan, James (2002). “Think about it this way. Attribute Agenda-Setting function of the press and the public’s evaluation of a local issue”, Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, vol. 1, nº 79, pp. 7-25.
  • Kim, Young Yun (2001). “Mapping the domain of intercultural communication. An overview”, en William B. Gudykunst (ed.), The International Communication Association Annual Communication Yearbook 24, pp. 139-157
  • Kosicki, Gerald M.( 1993). “Problems and opportunities in agenda-setting research”, Journal of Communication, vol. 2, nº 43, pp. 100-127.
  • Lau, Richard R. (1985) “Two explanations for negativity effects in political-behavior”, American Journal of Political Science, nº 29, pp. 119-138.
  • Lee, Chin-Chuan; Chan, Joseph. M.; Pan, Zhongdang & So, Clement Y. K.(2002). Global media spectacle: News war over Hong Kong. Albany, N.Y.: State University of New York Press.
  • Leung, Christine C. M. & Huang, Yu (2007) “The paradox of journalistic representation of the other. The case of SARS coverage on China and Vietnam by western-led English-language media in five countries”, Journalism, vol. 6, nº 8, pp. 675–97.
  • Liang, Jingdong (2002). How U.S. Correspondents Discover, Uncover, and Cover China, New York: The Edwin Mellen Press.
  • Maher, T. Michael (2001). “Framing: an emerging paradigm or a phase of agenda setting?”, en REESE, Stephen D., GANDY, Oscar H. y GRANT, August (eds.), Framing public life. Perspective on media and our understanding of the social world, pp. 83-94.
  • Mahwah, NJ.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Marcus, George E., Neuman, Russell W., y Makuen, Michael (2000). Affective intelligence and political judgment. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • MSTTES, Jörg & Kohring, Mattias (2008). “The content analysis of media frames: Toward improving reliability and validity”, Journal of Communication, vol. 2, nº 58, pp. 258-279.