Aprendizaje informal, alfabetización mediática e inclusión social. Descripción de una experiencia

  1. Ribeiro Pessoa, María Teresa
  2. Hernández Serrano, María José
  3. Muñoz Rodríguez, José Manuel
Revista:
Profesorado: Revista de curriculum y formación del profesorado

ISSN: 1989-6395,  1138-414X

Ano de publicación: 2015

Volume: 19

Número: 2

Páxinas: 75-91

Tipo: Artigo

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDIGIBUG editor

Outras publicacións en: Profesorado: Revista de curriculum y formación del profesorado

Resumo

Se presenta la experiencia de un proyecto de educación informal, que utiliza las posibilidades de los medios sociales interactivos, Web 2.0, para crear una metodología formativa –reporteros comunitarios- que promueve la inclusión social a través de la alfabetización mediática para la construcción de ciudadanos activos. La teoría de la Flexibilidad Cognitiva sirve como sustento teórico de la plataforma formativa del proyecto, donde las competencias digitales y sociales se adquieren a lo largo de un viaje virtual, que permite generar diversas trayectorias de aprendizaje informal e inspirar a otros formadores. Los impactos generados a partir de la innovación que supone esta experiencia verifican la potencialidad de los medios sociales para generar espacios aprendizaje ubicuo, de interacción colaborativa y de construcción de comunidades. Se concluye expresando la necesidad de incluir en la agenda educativa las oportunidades del aprendizaje informal y la alfabetización mediática para la inclusión social.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Anderson, J. R., Reder, L. M. & Simon, H. (1996). Situated Learning and Education. Educational Researcher, 25 (4), 5-11.
  • Aparici, R., Campuzano, A., Ferrés, J. & García, A. (2010). La educación mediática en la escuela 2.0. UNED, 7-8. Recuperado de: http://ntic.educacion.es/w3/web_20/informes/educacion_mediatica_e20_julio20010.pdf.
  • Area, M. & Pessoa, T. (2012). De lo sólido a lo líquido: Las nuevas alfabetizaciones ante los csmbios culturales de la Web 2.0. Comunicar, 38 (XIX), 13-20. DOI: 10.3916/C38-2011-02-01
  • Barab, S. A., & Duffy, T. (2000). From practice fields to communities of practice. Theoretical foundations of learning environments, 1(1), 25-55.
  • Bauman, Z. (2007). Los retos de la educación en la modernidad líquida. Barcelona: Gedisa.
  • Boud, D., Cohen, R., y Sampson, J. (1999). Peer learning and assessment. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 24(4), 413-126.
  • Braun, I. & Joerges, B. (1992) Techniques du quotidien et macrosystèmes techniques, en Gras, J. Sociologie des techniques de la vie quotidienne. Paris: Harmattan.
  • Brown, J. S., Collins, A. & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated Cognition and the Culture of Learning. Educational Researcher, Vol. 18 (1), 32-42.
  • Bruce. B. (2003). Literacy in the information age. Newark: International Reading Association.
  • Burbules, N. (2014) El aprendizaje ubicuo: nuevos contextos, nuevos procesos. Entramados: Educación y sociedad, 1, 131-136.
  • Capstick, S. (2004). Benefits and Shortcomings of Peer Assisted Learning (PAL) in Higher Education: an appraisal by students. In Peer Assisted Learning Conference.
  • Comisión Europea (2006). Recommendation 2006/962/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2006 on key competences for lifelong learning [Official Journal L 394 of 30.12.2006].
  • Crick, R. D. (2007). Learning how to learn: The dynamic assessment of learning power. The Curriculum Journal, 18(2), 135-153.
  • Cross, J. (2006). Informal learning. San Francisco: Wiley. http://www.ascilite.org.au/conf96/21.html
  • Dalgarno, B. (1996). Constructivist computer assisted learning: Theory and techniques. Making New Connections. Proceedings of ASCILITE '96, University of Adelaide, pp 127-148. Recuperado de http://www.ascilite.org.au/conf96/21.html
  • DeSchryver, M., & Spiro, R. (2009). New forms of deep learning on the Web: Meeting the challenge of cognitive load in conditions of unfettered exploration in online multimedia environments. In R. Zheng (Ed.), Cognitive effects of multimedia learning (pp. 134–152). New York: Information Science Reference
  • DeSchryver, M. (2015). Higher-Order Thinking in an Online World: Toward a Theory of Web-Mediated Knowledge Synthesis. Teachers College Record,117(3). Recuperado de http://www.tcrecord.or/ContentId=17692
  • Dickens, L., Couldry, N. & Fotopoulou, A. (2015). News in the community?: investigating the new spaces of news production/consumption. Journalism Studies, 16 (1), 97-114.
  • Dillenbourg, P. (1999). What do you mean by collaborative learning? In P. Dillenbourg (Ed.), Collaborative-learning: Cognitive and Computational Approaches. (pp.1-19). Oxford: Elsevier.
  • Drucker, P. F. (2011). The age of discontinuity: Guidelines to our changing society. London: Transaction Publishers.
  • Duffy, T. M. & Jonassen, D. (1992). Constructivism and The Technology of Instruction: a conversation. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Ferrés, J. & Piscitelli, A. (2012). La competencia mediática: propuesta articulada de dimensiones e indicadores. Comunicar, 38, (XIX), 75-82. DOI: 10.3916/C 38-2012-02-08
  • Giddens, A., Beck, U. & Lash, S. (2001). Modernización reflexiva. Madrid: Alianza Editorial.
  • Gozálvez, V. (2013). Ciudadanía mediática. Una mirada. Madrid: Dykinson.
  • Gozálvez, V. & Contreras, P. (2014). Empoderar a la ciudadanía mediática desde la educomunicación. Comunicar, 21(42), 129-136. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3916/C42-2014-12
  • Hanna, R., Rohm, A. & Crittenden, V. L. (2011). We’re all connected: The power of the social media ecosystem. Business Horizons, 54(3), 265-273.
  • Hwang, G. J. (2014) Definition, framework and research issues of smart learning environments - a context-aware ubiquitous learning perspective. Smart Learning Environments, 1 (4). Recuperado de: http://www.slejournal.com/content/1/1/4.
  • Jenkins, H. (2009). Confronting the Challenges of Participatory Culture. Media Education for the 21st Century. Massachusetts: The MIT Press.
  • Jones, G. & Sallis, E. (2013). Knowledge management in education: Enhancing learning & education. London: Routledge.
  • Kalantzis, M. & Cope, B. (2012). Literacies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Kolesinsky, M; Nelson-Weaver, E. & Diamond, D. (2014) Digital Solidarity in Education. New York: Routledge.
  • Lave, J. (1991). Situating Learning in Communities of Practice. In L. Resnick, J. Levine & S. Teasley (Eds.), Perspectives on Socially Shared Cognition (pp. 63- 82). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
  • Lee, C. (2008). The Centrality of Culture to the Scientific Study of Learning and Development: How an Ecological Framework in Education Research Facilitates Civic Responsibility. Educational Researcher, 37 (5) 267–279.
  • Liceras Ruiz, Á. (2014). La educación informal de los medios de comunicación y la protección de los menores de la violencia en televisión: historia de un fracaso. Profesorado: Revista de curriculum y formación del profesorado, 18(2), 353-365.
  • McMahon, M. (1997). Social constructivism and the World Wide Web-A paradigm for learning. In ASCILITE Conference. Perth, Australia.
  • Merchant, G. (2012). Unravelling the social network: theory and research. Learning, Media and Technology, 37(1), 4-19.
  • Mesa, W. (2012). Las TIC como herramientas potenciadoras de equidad, pertinencia e inclusión educativa. Revista Trilogía, 7, 61-77.
  • Siemens, G. (2005). Connectivism: A learning theory for the digital age. International journal of instructional technology and distance learning, 2(1), 3-10.
  • Sloman, M. (2003). Training in the Age of the Learner. London: Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development.
  • Spiro, R. J. (2006a). The “New Gutenberg Revolution”: Radical new learning, thinking, teaching, and training with technology. Bringing the future near. Educational Technology, 46(1), 3–4.
  • Spiro, R. J. (2006b). The post-Gutenberg world of the mind: The shape of the new learning. Educational Technology, 46(2), 3–4.
  • Spiro, R. J. (2006c). Old ways die hard. Educational Technology, 46(3), 3–4.
  • Spiro, R. J. (2006d). Approaching the post-Gutenberg mind: The revolution is in progress. Educational Technology, 46(4), 3–4.
  • Spiro, R. J. (2006e). The “New Gutenberg Revolution”: Radical new learning, thinking, teaching, and training with technology. Bringing the future near. Educational Technology, 46(6), 3–5.
  • Spiro, R. J. & Jehng, J. C. (1990). Cognitive Flexibility and Hypertext: Theory and Technology for the Nonlinear and Multidimensional Traversal of Complex Subject Matter. In D. Nix & R. J. Spiro (Eds), Cognition, Education, and Multimedia: Exploring Ideas in High Technology (pp. 163-205). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Spiro, R. J., Collins, B. P. & Ramchandran, A. R. (2006). Modes of openness and flexibility in “cognitive flexibility hypertext” learning environments. In B. Khan (Ed.), Flexible learning in an information society (pp. 18–25). Hershey, PA: Information Science Publishing.
  • Spiro, R. J., Feltovich, P. J., Coulson, R. L. & Anderson, D. K. (1989). Multiple analogies for complex concepts: antidotes for analogy – induced misconceptions in advanced knowledge acquisition. In S. Vosniadou & A. Ortony (Eds), Similarity and Analogical Reasoning (pp. 498-531). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Spiro, R. J., Feltovich, P. J., Jacobson, M. J. & Coulson, R. L. (1991). Cognitive Flexibility, Constructivism, and Hypertext: Random Access Instruction for advanced knowledge acquisition in Ill-Structured Domains. Educational Technology, 31(5), 24-33.
  • Swaffield, S. (2004) Critical friends: supporting leadership, improving learning. Improving Schools, 7 (3) 267-278.
  • Tirado, R., Boza, A. & Aguaded, J. I. (2009). Comunidades de práctica en la Red: indicadores y condiciones para su desarrollo. Tendencias Pedagógicas, 14, 303-324.
  • UNESCO (2014). Declaration on Media and Information Literacy in the Digital Era [online] Recuperado de http://www.unesco.org/new/fileadmin/MULTIMEDIA/HQ/CI/CI/pdf/news/paris_mil_declaratio n.pdf
  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1979). El desarrollo de los procesos psicológicos superiores. Barcelona: Crítica.
  • Waldeck, J. H. & Dougherty, K. (2012). Collaborative communication technologies and learning in college courses: which are used, for what purposes, and to what ends? Learning, Media and Technology, 37(4), 355-378.
  • Watton, E. (2009). The contribution of social media to community empowerment and regeneration: an investigation of Peoples Voice Media’s community reporters programme’, A report for PVM, University of Salford.
  • Wenger E, (1998). Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity. Cambridge: University Press.
  • Wresh, W. (1996). Disconnected. Haves and have-nots in the information age. New Brunswick, Nueva Jersey: Rutgers University Press.
Fonte de datos: Dialnet