La interferencia entre el estatus familiar y las características individuales en el nacimiento del primer hijo tras la emigración a España

  1. del Rey Poveda, Alberto 1
  2. Cebrián-Villar, Mar 1
  3. Grande Martín, Rafael 1
  4. Antón Pérez, José Ignacio 2
  5. Fernández-Macías, Enrique 3
  1. 1 Universidad de Salamanca
    info

    Universidad de Salamanca

    Salamanca, España

    ROR https://ror.org/02f40zc51

  2. 2 Johannes Kepler University of Linz
    info

    Johannes Kepler University of Linz

    Linz, Austria

    ROR https://ror.org/052r2xn60

  3. 3 Eurofoud
Mostra les afiliacions +
Revista:
Revista internacional de sociología

ISSN: 0034-9712

Any de publicació: 2015

Volum: 73

Número: 2

Tipus: Article

DOI: 10.3989/RIS.2013.10.14 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAccés obert editor

Altres publicacions en: Revista internacional de sociología

Objectius de Desenvolupament Sostenible

Resum

The aim of this paper is to analyze the factors that affect the birth of the first child after migration. In particular, we focus on family conditions and socio-demographic characteristics of migrant women at the moment of arriving in Spain. The general hypothesis is that reproductive behavior after migrating is closely related to the situation on arrival. At the same time, we consider that different family situations interact with individual characteristics generating different effects on the probability of having the first child. In the analysis discrete time survival models were estimated using data from National Immigrant Survey 2007. Results show the importance of marital status and number of previous children on fertility after migration, although there is some interference between family background and personal characteristics of the migrant.

Referències bibliogràfiques

  • Abbasi-Shavazi, M. y P. McDonald. 2000. «Fertility and Multiculturalism: Immigrant Fertility in Australia, 1977-1991». International Migration Review 34:215-242. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2676018
  • Abbasi-Shavazi, M. y P. McDonald. 2002. «A comparison of fertility patterns of European immigrants in Australia with those in the countries of origin». Genus 58:53-76.
  • Alders, M. 2000. «Cohort fertility of migrant women in the Netherlands: Developments in fertility of women born in Turkey, Morocco, Suriname, and the Netherlands Antilles and Aruba», paper presented at the BSPS-NVD-URU Conference on New Paths in Exploring and Analysing Demographic Data, Utrecht. PMCid:PMC1378011
  • Andersson, G. 2004. «Childbearing after migration: Fertility patterns of foreignborn women in Sweden». International Migration Review 38:747-774. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-7379.2004.tb00216.x
  • Baizán, P., A. Aassve y F. Billari. 2003. «Cohabitation, Marriage, and First Birth: The Interrelationship of Family Formation Events in Spain». European Journal of Population 19:147-169. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1023343001627
  • Bledsoe, C. H., R. Houle y P. Sow. 2007. «High fertility Gambians in low fertility Spain: The dynamics of child accumulation cross transnational space». Demographic Research 16:375-411. http://dx.doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2007.16.12
  • Blossfeld, H.-P. y U. Jaeninchen. 1992. «Educational expansion and changes in women's entry into marriage and motherhood in the Federal Republic of Germany». Journal of Marriage and the Family 54:302-315. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/353062
  • Bonngarts, J. 2003. «Completing the fertility transition in the developing world: The role of educational differences and fertility preferences». Population Studies 57:321-335. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0032472032000137835 PMid:14602532
  • Carter, M. 2000. «Fertility of Mexican immigrant women in the U.S: A closer look». Social Science Quarterly 81:1073-1086.
  • Castro-Martín, T. y L. Rosero-Bixbi. 2011. «Maternidad y fronteras. La fecundidad de las mujeres inmigrantes en Espa-a». Revista Internacional de Sociología 69:105-137. http://dx.doi.org/10.3989/ris.2011.iM1.388
  • Castro-Martín, T., M. Domínguez-Folgueras y T. Martín-García. 2008. «Not truly partnerless: Non-residential partnerships and retreat from marriage in Spain». Demographic Research 18:443-468. http://dx.doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2008.18.16
  • Cerrutti, M. y D. S. Massey. 2001. «On the Auspices of Female Migration from Mexico to the United States». Demography 38:187-200. http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/dem.2001.0013 PMid:11392907
  • Coleman, D. A. 1994. «Trends in fertility and intermarriage among immigrant populations in Western Europe as measure of integration». Journal of Biosocial Science 26:107-136. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0021932000021106 PMid:8200876
  • Cortina Trilla, C., X. Bueno García y T. Castro Martín. 2010. «¿Modelos familiares de aquí o de allá? Cohabitación y fecundidad fuera del matrimonio entre los latinoamericanos en Espa-a». América Latina Hoy 55:61-84.
  • Curran, S. R. y A. C. Saguy. 2001. «Migration and Cultural Change: A Role for Gender and Social Networks». Journal of International Women's Studies 2:54-77.
  • Curran, S. R. y E. Rivero-Fuentes. 2003. «Engendering migrant networks: the case of Mexican migration». Demography 40:289-307. http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/dem.2003.0011 PMid:12846133
  • DeJong, F. D., B. D. Root y R. G. Abad. 1986. «Family Reunification and Philippine Migration to the United States: The Immigrants' Perspective». International Migration Review 20:598-611. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2545706 PMid:12268140
  • Domínguez-Folgueras, M. y T. Castro-Martín. 2008. «Women's changing socioeconomic position and union formation in Spain and Portugal». Demographic Research 19:1513-1550. http://dx.doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2008.19.41
  • Feliciano, C. 2005. «Educational selectivity in U.S. immigration». Demography 42:131-152. http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/dem.2005.0001 PMid:15782899
  • Ford, K. 1990. «Duration of Residence in the United States and the Fertility of U.S. Immigrants». International Migration Review 24:34-68. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2546671 PMid:12316218
  • Frejka, T. y J.-P. Sardon. 2007. «Cohort birth order, parity progression ratio and parity distribution trends in developed countries». Demographic Research 16:315-374. http://dx.doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2007.16.11
  • Goldstein, S. 1973. «Interrelations Between Migration and Fertility in Thailand». Demography 10:225-241. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2060815 http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2060815
  • Hoem, J. M. 1986. «The impact of education on modern family-union initiation». European Journal of Population 2:113-133. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01796886
  • Instituto Nacional de Estadística (INE). 2007. «Metodología General». Pp. 12-13 en Encuesta Nacional de Inmigrantes 2007. Consultado en Marzo de 2013 (www.ine.es/ fenómenos demográficos/Encuesta Nacional de Inmigrantes 2007).
  • Kahn, J. R. 1988. «Immigrant Selectivity and Fertility Adaptation in the United States». Social Forces 67:108-128. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/sf/67.1.108
  • Kahn, J. R. 1994. «Immigrant and Native Fertility during the 1980s: Adaptation and Expectations for the Future». International Migration Review 28:501-519. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2546818 PMid:12345792
  • Kiernan, K. 1999. «Chilbering outside marriage in Western Europe». Population Trends 98:11-20. PMid:10658241
  • Kofman, E. 1999. «Female 'Birds of Passage' a Decade Later: Gender and Immigration in the European Union». International Migration Review 33:269-299. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2547698 PMid:12319733
  • Kulu, H. 2005. «Migration and fertility: Competing hypotheses re-examined». European Journal of Population 21:51-87. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10680-005-3581-8
  • Lindstrom, D. P. y S. Giorguli. 2007. «The interrelationship between fertility, family maintenance, and Mexico-U.S. migration». Demographic Research 17:821-858. http://dx.doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2007.17.28
  • Massey, D. S. 1990. «Social Structure, Household Strategies, and the Cumulative Causation of Migration». Population Index 56:3-26. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3644186 PMid:12316385
  • Massey, D. S., R. Alarcon, J. Durand y H. Gonzalez. 1987. Return to Azatlán: The Social Process of International Migration from Western Mexico. Berkeley: University of California.
  • Milewski, N. 2007. «First child of immigrant workers and their descendants in West Germany: Interrelation of events, disruption, or adaptation?». Demographic Research 17:859-896. http://dx.doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2007.17.29
  • Mulder, C. H. y M. Wagner. 1993. «Migration and marriage in the life course: A method for studying synchronized events». European Journal of Population 9:55-76. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01267901 PMid:12344903
  • Mussino, E. y S. Strozza. 2012. «The fertility of immigrants after arrival: The Italian case». Demographic Research 26:99-130. http://dx.doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2012.26.4
  • Myrskyla, M., H.-P. Kohler y F. C. Billari. 2009. «Advances in development reverse fertility declines». Nature 460:441-443. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature08230 PMid:19661915
  • Parrado, E. A. y C.A. Flippen. 2005. «Migration and Gender among Mexican women». American Sociological Review 70:606-632. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/000312240507000404
  • Parrado, E. A. y S. P. Morgan. 2008. «Intergenerational fertility among Hispanic women: new evidence of immigrant assimilation». Demography 45:651-71. http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/dem.0.0023 PMid:18939666 PMCid:PMC2782440
  • Parrado, E. A. 2011. «How High is Hispanic/Mexican Fertility in the U.S.? Immigration and Tempo Considerations». Demography 48:1059-1080. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13524-011-0045-0 PMid:21695573
  • Population Reference Bureau. 2007. 2007 World Population Data Sheet. Washington, D. C.: PRB.
  • Reher, D. y M. Requena. 2009. «The National Immigrant Survey of Spain. A new data source for migration studies in Europe». Demographic Research 20:253-278. http://dx.doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2009.20.12
  • Reher D-S. y M. Requena. 2009. Las múltiples caras de la inmigración en Espa-a. Madrid: Alianza Editorial. PMCid:PMC2812977
  • Reher, D., M. Requena y M. Sánchez-Domínguez. 2013. «How level is the Playing Field? Divided Families Among Latin American Immigrants in Spain». The History of the Family 18:26-43. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1081602X.2012.755931
  • Requena, M. y M. Sánchez-Domínguez. 2011. «Las familias inmigrantes en Espa-a». Revista Internacional de Sociología 69:79-104. http://dx.doi.org/10.3989/ris.2011.iM1.387
  • (Del) Rey, A. y D. Vono. 2014. «Marrying after arriving: the role of individuals' networks for immigrant choice of partner's origin». Advances in Life Course Research 19:28-39. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.alcr.2013.10.003 PMid:24796876
  • (Del) Rey, A. y M. Cebrián. 2010. «Population Replacement and Migration in Two Spanish Regions during the Twentieth century». Population 65:481-498. http://dx.doi.org/10.3917/pope.1003.0481
  • Rindfuss, R. R., S. P. Morgan y G. Swicegood. 1988. First Birth in America: Change in the Timing of Parenthood. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  • Roig-Vila, M. y T. Castro-Martín. 2007. «Childbearing patterns of foreign women in a new immigration country: the case of Spain». Population-E 62:351-380. http://dx.doi.org/10.3917/pope.703.0351
  • Sánchez-Domínguez, M., H. de Valk y D. Reher. 2011. «Marriage strategies among immigrants in Spain». Revista Internacional de Sociología 69:139-166. http://dx.doi.org/10.3989/ris.2011.iM1.389
  • Sobotka, T. 2008. «The rising importance of migrants for childbearing in Europe». Demographic Research 19:225-248. http://dx.doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2008.19.9
  • Stanek, M. 2009. «Patterns of Romanian and Bulgarian migration to Spain». Europe Asia Studies 61:1627-1644. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09668130903209160
  • Stephen, E. H. y E D. Bean. 1992. «Assimilation, Disruption and the Fertility of Mexican-Origin Women in the United States». International Migration Review 6:67-88. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2546937
  • Toulemon, L. 2004. «Fertility among immigrant women: new data, a new approach». Population and Societies 400:1-4.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet