The timely expression of coherence helps cause the right impression

  1. Fernando Gordillo
  2. José M. Arana
  3. Juan José G. Meilán
  4. Lilia Mestas
  5. Miguel Angel Pérez
Revista:
Anales de psicología

ISSN: 0212-9728,  1695-2294

Año de publicación: 2017

Volumen: 33

Número: 2

Páginas: 211-217

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.6018/ANALESPS.33.2.261471 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR

Otras publicaciones en: Anales de psicología

Objetivos de desarrollo sostenible

Resumen

An analysis was conducted on the modulating role that the emotional coherence between verbal and non-verbal information plays on the formation of impressions. The study involved 301 subjects who made inferences on a woman’s personality based on verbal information on her life (positive, negative), the emotional coherence between verbal and nonverbal information (coherent, neutral, incoherent), and the type of coding, referring to the moment when the verbal and non-verbal information was presented to them (simultaneously, separately). The results showed that when the information is positive, coherent and the coding has been made separately, the person is perceived to be more stable, pleasant and sociable. The results are discussed, along with their implications for the adaptive processes present in natural contexts.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Albright, L., Kenny, D., & Malloy, T. (1988). Consensus in personality judgments at zero acquaintance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55(3), 387-395. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.55.3.387
  • Ambady, N., Bernieri, F. J., & Richeson, J. A. (2000). Toward a histology of social behavior: Judgmental accuracy from thin slices of the behavioral stream. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 32, 201-271. doi: 10.1016/s0065-2601(00)80006-4.
  • Argyle, M., Alkema, F., & Gilmour, R. (1971). The communication of friendly and hostile attitudes by verbal and nonverbal signals. European Journal of Social Psychology, 1, 385–402. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.2420010307
  • Aviezer, H., Hassin, R., Ryan, J., Grady, C., Susskind, J., Anderson, A., Moscovitch, M., & Bentin, S. (2008). Angry, disgusted or afraid? Studies on the malleability of emotion perception. Psychological Science, 19, 724–732. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02148.x
  • Bargh, J. A. (2006). What have we been priming all these years? On the development, mechanisms, and ecology of nonconscious social behavior. European Journal of Social Psychology, 36, 147-168. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.336.
  • Battles, M. B., & Berman, J. S (2012). The impact of conversational acknowledgers on perceptions of psychotherapists. Psychotherapy Research, 22(6), 648-655. doi: 10.1080/10503307.2012.699476
  • Berry, D. S. (1990). Taking people at face value: Evidence for the kernel of truth hypothesis. Social Cognition, 8, 343-361. doi: 10.1521/soco.1990.8.4.343
  • Bond, C., Berry, D., & Omar, A. (1994). The kernel of truth in judgments of deceptiveness. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 15, 523-534. doi: 10.1207/s15324834basp1504_8
  • Bruner, J. S., & Tagiuri, R. (1954). The perception of people. In G. Lindsay (Ed.), Handbook of social psychology (Vol. 2). Cambridge, MA: Addison-Wesley.
  • Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1985). The NEO Personality lnventory Manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
  • Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
  • Estrada, C., Oyarzún, M., & Yzerbyt, V (2007). Teorías implícitas y esencialismo psicológico: Herramientas conceptuales para el estudio de las relaciones entre y dentro de los grupos. Psykhe, 16(1), 111-121.
  • Fenske, M. J., & Eastwood, J. D. (2003). Modulation of focused attention by faces expressing emotion: Evidence from flanker tasks. Emotion, 3, 327–341. doi: 10.1037/1528-3542.3.4.327
  • Ferreira, M. B., García-Marqués, L., Hamilton, D., & Ramos, T. (2012). On the relation between spontaneous trait inferences and intentional inferences: An inference monitoring hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 1-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2011.06.013.
  • Fox, E., Russo, R., Bowles, R. J., & Dutton, K. (2001). Do threatening stimuli draw or hold visual attention in sub-clinical anxiety? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130(4), 681–700. doi : 10.1037/0096-3445.130.4.681
  • Gulotta, B., Sadia, G., & Sussman, E. (2013). Emotional processing modulates attentional capture of irrelevant sound input in adolescents. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 88(1), 40-46. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2013.01.003
  • Hareli, S., & Weiner, B. (2002). Social emotion and personality inferences: A scaffold for a new direction in the study of achievement motivation. Educational Psychologist, 37(3), 183-193. doi: 10.1207/S15326985EP37034
  • Hehman, E., Leitner, J. B., Deegan, M. P., & Gaertner, S. L. (2013). Facial structure is indicative of explicit support for prejudicial beliefs. Psychological Science, 24(3), 289-296. doi: 10.1177/0956797612451467
  • Heinrich, C. U., & Borkenau, P. (1998). Deception and deception detection: The role of cross-modal inconsistency. Journal of Personality, 66, 687–712. doi: 10.1111/1467-6494.00029
  • Hodsoll, S., Viding, E., & Lavie, N. (2011). Attentional Capture by Irrelevant Emotional Distractor Faces. Emotion, 11(2), 346-353.
  • Krys, K., Hansen, K., Xing, C., Szarota, P., & Yang, M. (2013). Do only fools smile at strangers? Cultural differences in social perception of intelligence of smiling individuals. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 45(2), 314-321. doi: 10.1177/0022022113513922
  • Kulik, C. T., Olekalns, M., & Swain, E. T. (2014). Does consistency pay? The effects of information sequence and content on women´s negotiation outcomes. ACAD MANAGE PROC, 11675. doi: 10.5465/AMBPP.2014.97
  • LaBar, K. S., & Cabeza, R. (2006). Cognitive neuroscience of emotional memory. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 7, 54-64. doi:10.1038/nrn1825
  • Lamy, D., Amunts, L., & Bar-Haim, Y. (2008). Emotional priming of pop-out in visual search. Emotion, 8, 151–161. doi: 10.1037/1528-3542.8.2.151
  • Lerner, J. S., Li, Y., Valdesolo, P., & Kassam, K. S. (2015). Emotion and decision making. Annual Review of Psychology, 66, 33.1-33.25. doi: 0.1146/annurev-psych-010213-115043
  • Lieberman, M. D., Jarcho, J. M., & Obayashi, J. (2005). Attributional inference across cultures: Similar automatic attributions and different controlled corrections. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31(10), 1-14. doi: 10.1177/0146167204274094
  • Matsumoto, D., & Hwang, H (2010). Judging faces in context. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 3, 1-10. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-9004.2010.00271.x
  • Mogg, K., & Bradley, B. P. (1999). Orienting of attention to threatening facial expressions presented under conditions of restricted awareness. Cognition & Emotion, 13, 713–740. doi: 10.1080/026999399379050
  • Niedenthal, P. M., & Setterlund, M. B. (1994). Emotion congruence in perception. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20(4), 401-410. doi: 10.1177/0146167294204007
  • Ohman, A., Lundqvist, D., & Esteves, F. (2001). The face in the crowd revisited: A threat advantage with schematic stimuli. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 381-396. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.80.3.381
  • Ramos, T., García-Marqués, L., Hamilton, Ferreira, D. L., & Van Acker, K. V. (2012). What I infer depends on who you are: The influence of stereotypes on trait and situational spontaneous inferences. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2012.05.009.
  • Redondo, J., Fraga, I., Comesaña, M., & Perea, M. (2005). Estudio normativo de 478 palabras españolas. Psicológica, 26, 317-326.
  • Reeck, C. (2015). Interactions between attention and emotion. Brain Mapping, 3, 269-274. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2012.00139
  • Sandal, G. M., Bye, H.H., & Pallesen, S. (2012). Personality trait inferences of Turkish immigrant and neutral targets: an experimental study. Scand J Psychol, 53(6), 528-33. doi: 10.1111/sjop.12016.
  • Scherer, K. R., Scherer, U., Hall, J. A., & Rosenthal, R. (1977). Differential attribution of personality based on multichannel presentation of verbal and nonverbal cues. Psycho. Res., 39, 221-247. doi: 10.1007/BF00309288.
  • Schneider, D. J., Hastorf, A. H., & Ellsworth, P. C. (1979). Person perception. Reading, MA: Addison–Wesley.
  • Stecher, K., & Counts, S. (2008). Spontaneous Inference of Personality Traits and Effects on Memory for Online Profiles. En: Proc. Int. AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media (ICWSM).
  • Stein, T., Zwickel, J., Ritter, J., Kitzmantel, M., & Schneider, W. X. (2009). The effect of fearful faces on the attentional blink is task dependent. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16(1), 104 –109. doi: 10.3758/PBR.16.1.104
  • Tottenham, N., Tanaka, J. W., Leon, A. C., McCarry, T., Nurse, M., Hare, T. A., Marcus, D. J., Westerlund, A., Casey, B. J., & Nelson, C. (2009). The NimStim set of facial expressions: judgments from untrained research participants. Psychiatry Research, 168, 242-249. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2008.05.006
  • Van den Stock, J., Grezes, J., & de Gelder, B. (2008). Human and animal sounds influence recognition of body language. Brain Research, 1242, 185-190. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2008.05.040
  • Walker-Andrews, A. S. (2008). Intermodal emotional processes in infancy. In M. Lewis, J. M. Haviland-Jones, & L. F. Barrett (Eds.), Handbook of emotions (pp. 364–375). New York: Guilford
  • Weisbuch, M., Ambady, N., Clarke, A. L., & Achor, S. (2010). On being consistent: The role of verbal-Nonverbal consistency in first impressions. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 32. 261-268. doi: 10.1080/01973533.2010.495659
  • Wieser, M. J., & Brosch, T. (2012). Faces in context: a review and systematization of contextual influences on affective face processing. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 471. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00471
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet