Learning objects recommendation systemissues and approaches for retrieving, indexing and recomend learning objects

  1. AZAMBUJA SILVEIRA, Ricardo 1
  2. LUNARDI COMARELLA, Rafaela 1
  3. LIMA ROCHA CAMPOS, Ronaldo 2
  4. VIAN, Jonas 1
  5. DE LA PRIETA, Fernando 3
  1. 1 University of Santa Catarina
  2. 2 Instituto Federal Catarinense
    info

    Instituto Federal Catarinense

    Blumenau, Brasil

    ROR https://ror.org/02f8h1m78

  3. 3 Universidad de Salamanca
    info

    Universidad de Salamanca

    Salamanca, España

    ROR https://ror.org/02f40zc51

Mostrar afiliaciones +
Revista:
ADCAIJ: Advances in Distributed Computing and Artificial Intelligence Journal

ISSN: 2255-2863

Año de publicación: 2015

Volumen: 4

Número: 4

Páginas: 69-82

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.14201/ADCAIJ2015446982 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: ADCAIJ: Advances in Distributed Computing and Artificial Intelligence Journal

Objetivos de desarrollo sostenible

Resumen

This paper discusses some important issues regarding the the management of Learning objects covering searching over repositories and different approaches of recommendation systems and presents a multiagent system based application model for indexing, retrieving and recommending learning objects stored in different and heterogeneous repositories. The objects within these repositories are described by filled fields using different metadata (data about data) standards. The searching mechanism covers several different learning object repositories and the same object can be described in these repositories by the use of different types of fields. Aiming to improve accuracy and coverage in terms of recovering a learning object and improve the relevance of the results we propose an information retrieval model based on a multiagent system approach and an ontological model to describe the covered knowledge domain.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • ADL, 2016. Advanced Distributed Learning. doi:http://www.adlnet.gov.AICC, 2016.
  • Aviation Industry CBT Committee. doi:http://www.aicc.org/dev/.
  • ARIADNE, 2016. The Ariadne Foundation. doi:http://www.ariadne-eu.org.
  • Bargmeyer, B. E. and Gillman, D. W., 2016. Metadata Standards and Metadata Registries: An Overview.doi:http://stats.bls.gov/ore/pdf/st000010.pdf.BIOE, 2016.
  • Banco Internacional de Objetos Educacionais. doi:http://objetoseducacionais2.mec.gov.br/.
  • Campos, J., Comarella, R., and Silveira, R. A., 2013. Multiagent Based Recommendation System Modelfor Indexing and Retrieving Learning Objects. InHighlights in Practical Applications of Agents andMultiagent Systems International Workshops of PAAMS 2013, Salamanca, Spain, May 22-24, 2013.Proceedings, volume 365, pages 328–339.
  • CESTA, 2016. CESTA - Coletânea de Entidades de Suporte ao uso de Tecnologia na Aprendizagem.doi:http://www.cinted.ufrgs.br/CESTA/.
  • CORDRA(ContentObjectRepositoryDiscoveryandRegistration/ResolutionArchitecture).doi:http://lab.usgin.org/standards/cordra-content-object-repository-discovery-and-registrationresolution-architecture.
  • DCMI, 2016. The Dublin Core Metadata Initiative. doi:http://dublincore.org/.
  • Downes, S., 2001. Learning Objects: Resources for distance education worldwide.The International Reviewof Research in Open and Distance Learning, 2(1).
  • Fabre, M. C. J. M., Tarouco, L. M. R., and Tamusiunas, F. R., 2003. Reusabilidade de objetos educacionais.RENOTE - Revista Novas Tecnologias na Educação, 1(1).
  • FEB, 2016. Federation of Educa Brazil. doi:http://feb.ufrgs.br/.
  • FIPA, 2016. Foundation for Intelligent Physical Agents. doi:http://www.fipa.org/.FROAC, 2016. Repository Federation of Learning Ob-jects Colombia -
  • FROAC. doi:http:/froac.manizales.unal.edu.co/froac/.
  • Gil, A. B., Rodríguez, S., De la Prieta, F., and Corchado, J. M., 2013. Learning object retrieval inheterogeneous environments.Int. J. Web Engineering and Technology, 8(2).IEEE-LTSC, 2016. Draft Standard for Learning Object Metadata
  • IEEE Learning Technology StandardsCommittee. doi:http://ltsc.ieee.org/wg12/files/LOM_1484_12_1_v1_Final_Draft.pdf.IMS, 2016.
  • IMS Global Learning Consortium.
  • ISO, 2011. ISO/IEC 19788-1:2011. Information technology – Learning, education and training – Metadatafor learning resources – Part 1: Framework. doi:http://www.iso.org/iso/home/search.htm?qt=19788&published=on&active_tab=standards.
  • JADE, 2016. Jade: Java Agent Development Framework.
  • Li, S., Yang, Z., Liu, Q., and Huang, T., 2008. Research of web information retrieval based on metadata andOAI, Granular Computing. InGranular Computing, 2008. GrC 2008. IEEE International Conferenceon, pages 383–386. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/GRC.2008.4664693.
  • LUME, 2016. Repository of the Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul. doi:http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/.
  • Manning, C. D., Raghavan, P., and Schutz, H., 2008.Introduction to Information Retrieval. CambridgeUniversity Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511809071
  • McGreal, R., 2004.Online Education Using Learning Objects. Routledge.
  • MERLOT, 2016. Multimedia Educational Resources for Learning and Online Teaching. doi:http://www.merlot.org/merlot/index.htm.
  • Nash, S. S., 2005. Learning Objects, Learning Object Repositories, and Learning Theory: Preliminary BestPractices for Online Courses.Interdisciplinary Journal of Knowledge and Learning Objects, 1.
  • OAI-PMH, 2015. The Open Archives Initiative Protocol for Metadata Harvesting. doi:http://www.openarchives.org/pmh/.
  • OBAA, 2016.Portal obaa.doi:http://www.portalobaa.org/obaac/padrao-obaa/relatorios-tecnicos/RT-OBAA-01.pdf/view.
  • RIVED, 2016. Interactive Virtual Education Network. doi:http://rived.mec.gov.br/site_objeto_lis.php.
  • Simon, B., Massart, F. T. S., D.and Van Assche, and Duval, E., 2005. Information Retrieval (Z39.50):Application Service Definition and Protocol Specification. doi:ftp://ftp.cenorm.be/PUBLIC/CWAs/e-Europe/WS-LT/CWA15454-00-2005-Nov.pdf.
  • SRU, 2013. Search/Retrieve via URL, Draft SRU 2.0. doi:http://www.loc.gov/standards/sru/.
  • Ternier, D. T. M. K. J., S.and Massart and Duval, E., 2010. The simple publishing interface.D-Lib Magazine,Regular IssueVol 3 n.3 doi:http://www.dlib.org/dlib/september10/ternier/09ternier.html.
  • Vian, J. and Silveira, R. A., 2011. Multiagent System for Indexing and Retrieving Learning Objects. InHighlights in Practical Applications of Agents and Multiagent Systems: 9th International Conference onPractical Applications of Agents and Multiagent Systems, volume 89, pages 53–60. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-19917-2_7
  • Wiley, D. A., 2002. Connecting learning objects to instructional design theory: A definition, a metaphor, and a taxonomy. InThe instructional use of learning objects. Association for Instructional Technology.doi:http://reusability.org/read/chapters/wiley.doc.
  • Wooldridge, M., 2002.An Introduction to Multiagent Systems. John Wiley & Sons.
  • Z39.50, 2003. Information Retrieval (Z39.50): Application Service Definition and Protocol Specification.doi:http://www.loc.gov/z3950/agency/Z39-50-2003.p
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet