Entornos comunicativos de aprendizajeCoordenadas para comprender los procesos de aprendizaje y el CSCL

Erreferentzia bibliografikoak

• Alterman, R., & Ari, J. (2013). Participation and common knowledge in a case study of student co-blogging. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 8(2), 6-15.
• Andriessen, J. (2006). Collaboration in computer conferencing. En A. M. O´Donnell, C. E. Hmelo-Silver & G. Erkens (Eds.), Collaborative learning, reasoning and technology (pp. 197-230). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
• Apple, M., & Beane, J. A. (2007). Democratic Schools. Lessons in powerful Education. Chicago: Heinemann.
• Aubert, A., & Soler, M. (2008). Dialogism. The dialogic turn of the social sciences. En A. Joe, L. Kincheloe & Raymond A. Horn Editor (Eds.). The Praeger Hanbook of Education and Psychology (pp. 521-529). Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
• Aubert, A., Flecha, A., García, C., Flecha, R., & Racionero, S. (2008). Aprendizaje dialógico en la sociedad de la información. Barcelona: Hipatia.
• Barbera, E., Badía, A., Coll, C., Espasa, A., Gispert, I., Lafuente, M., & Mayordomo, R. (2002). Pautas para el análisis de la intervención en entornos de aprendizaje virtual: dimensiones relevantes e instrumentos de evaluación. Barcelona: EDUS (UOC)-GRINETE.
• Bereiter, C. (2002). Education and mind in the knowledge age. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
• Bronfenfrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
• Brown, A. L., & Campione, J. C. (1996). Innovation in learning: New environments for education, EnA. L. Schauble & R. Glaser (Eds.), Psychological learning theory and the design of innovative learning environments: On procedures, principles, and systems (pp. 289-325). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
• Bruner, J. (1996a). The culture of education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
• Bruner, J. (1996b) Frames for thinking. Ways of Making Meaning. En D. R. Olson & T. Torrance (Eds.), Modes of Thought. Explorations in Culture and Cognition (pp. 93-105). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Bruner, J. (2012). What Psychology Should Study. International Journal of Educational Psychology, 1(1), 5-13. doi: 10.4471/ijep.2012.01
• Buffe, K. (1993). Collaborative learning. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
• Coll, C., & Martí, E. (2001). La educación escolar ante las nuevas tecnologías de la información y de la comunicación. En C. Coll, J. Palacios y A. Marchesi (Eds.), Desarrollo psicológico y educación 2. Psicología de la educación escolar (pp. 623-651). Madrid: Alianza.
• Crook, C. (1994). Computers and the collaborative experience of learning. London: Routledge.
• Delpit, L. (1988). The silenced dialogue: Power and pedagogy in educating other people children. Harvard Educational Review, 58(3), 280-298.
• Edwards, A. (2011). Building common knowledge at the boundaries between professional practices: Relational agency and relational expertise in systems of distributed expertise. International Journal of Educationl Research, 50, 33-39.
• Elboj, C., Rodríguez, M. A., & Welikala, T. (2013). The technologies of information and communication in the rural isolation output. The case of Arino. Scripta NovaRevista Electrónica de Geografía y Ciencias Sociales, 17(427), 11-21.
• Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding: An activity-theorical approach to developmental research. Helsinki: Orienta-Konsultit.
• Engle, A., & Onrubia, J. (2013). Estrategias discursivas para la construcción colaborativa del conocimiento en entornos virtuales de aprendizaje. Cultura y educación, 25(1), 77-94.
• Flecha, R. (1997). Compartiendo palabras. Teoría y práctica del aprendizaje dialógico. Barcelona: Paidós.
• Forguson, L., & Gopnik, A. (1988). The ontogeny of common sense. En J. W. Astington, P. L. Harris & D. R. Olson (Eds.), Depeloping Theories of Mind (pp. 226-243). New York: Cambridge University Press.
• Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2001). Critical thinking, cognitive presence, and computer conferencing in distance education. American Journal of Distance Education, 15(1), 7-23.
• Gatt, S., & Sordé, T. (2012). ICT Alone Is Not Enough, The Whole Village Is Needed. A Community-based and Dialogic Approach to Technology in Schools. International Journal of Educational Psychology, 1(2), 153-174.
• Gatt, S., Ojala, M., & Soler, M. (2011). Promoting social inclusion counting with everyone: Learning communities and INCLUD-ED. International Studies in Sociology of Education, 21(1), 33- 47.
• Giddens, A. (1995). La constitución de la sociedad. Bases para la teoría de la estructuración. Madrid: Amorrortu.
• Gómez, J., & Elboj, E. (2001). El giro dialógico en las ciencias sociales: hacia la comprensión de una metodología dialógica. Acciones e investigaciones sociales, 12, 77-94.
• González Calvo, G., & Barba Martín, J. (2014). Formación permanente y desarrollo de la identidad reflexiva del profesorado desde las perspectivas grupal e individual. Profesorado, Revista de Currículum y Formación del Profesorado, 18(1), 397- 412.
• Gunawardena, L. Lowe, C., & Anderson, T. (1997). Interaction analysis of a global online debate and the development of a constructivist interaction analysis model for computer conferencing. Journal of educational Computing Research, 17(4), 395-429.
• Hanks, W. (1992). The indexical ground of deictic reference. En A. Duranti & C. Goodwin (Eds.), Rethinking context: Language as an interactive phenomenon (pp. 43–76). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
• Harris, A. L. (2011). Media and technology in adolescent sexual education and safety. Journal of Obstetric Gynecologic and Neonatal Nursing, 40(2), 235-242.
• Hartup, W. (1992). Having Friends, Making Friends, and Keeping Friends: Relationships as educational Contexts. ERICDigest (online). Recuperado de http://ericeece.org/pubs/digests/1992/hartup92.html].
• Hernández-Sellés, N., González-Sanmamed, M., & Muñoz-Carril, P. C. (2015). El rol docente en las ecologías de aprendizaje: análisis de una experiencia de aprendizaje colaborativo en entornos virtuales. Profesorado, Revista de Currículum y Formación del Profesorado, 19(2), 147-163.
• Howe, C. J., Tolmie, A., Duchak-Tanner, V., & Rattray, C. (2000) Hypothesis testing in science: group consensus and the acquisition of conceptual and procedural knowledge. Learning and Instruction, 10, 361-391.
• Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the wild. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. INCLUD-ED. Strategies for inclusion and social cohesion in Europe from education (2006- 2011). 6th Framework Programme European Commission. Barcelona: CREA, Universidad de Barcelona.
• Ingold, T. (2004). Beyond biology and culture. The meaning of evolution in a relational world. Social Anthropology, 12(2), 209-221.
• Jarvela, S., & Hakkinen, P. (2000). Levels of web-based discussion: Theory of perspective-taking as a tool for analyzing interaction. En B. Fishman & S. O’Connor-Divelbiss (Eds.), Fourth international conference of the learning sciences (pp. 22-26). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
• Kanuka, H, & Anderson, T. (1998). Online social interchange, Discord, and Knowledge Construction. Journal of Distance Education, 13(1), 57-74.
• Kolodner, J., & Guzdial, M. (1996). Effects with and of CSCL: tracking learning in a new paradigm. En T. D. Koschmann (Ed.), CSCL, theory and practice of an emerging paradigm (pp. 307–320). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
• Kyriakides, L., & Valls, R. (en prensa). The power of Interactive Groups: How parental participation in classroom groups can promote inclusion and success for children of vulnerable minority ethnic populations. Cambridge Journal of Education.
• Ladson-Billings, G. (1994). The dreamkeepers: Successful teachers of African American children. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
• Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning. Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
• Liu Coward, F., Crooks, S. F., Flores, R., & Dao, D. (2012). Examining the Effects of Gender and Presentation Mode on Learning from a Multimedia Presentation. Géneros, 1(1), 48-69.
• Mcloughlin, C., & Luca, J. (2000). Cognitive engagement and higher order thinking through computer conferencing: We know why but do we know how? En A. Herrmann & M. M. Kulski (Eds.), Flexible Futures in Tertiary Teaching. Proceedins of the 9 Annual Teaching Learning Forum, 2-4 February 2000. Perth: Curtin University of Technology. [http.77otl.curtin.edu.au/tlf/tlf2000/mcloughlin.html] [acceso el 13 de agosto de 2014].
• Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, self & society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
• Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, self & society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
• Mercer, N. (2000). Words and Minds: how we use language to think together. London: Routledge.
• Moll, L., Amanti, C., Neff, D., & González, N. (1992). Funds of knowledge for teaching: Using a qualitative approach to connect homes and classrooms. Theory into Practice, 31(2), 132-141.
• Newman, D., Griffin, P., & Cole, M. (1989). The construction zone: Working for cognitive change in schools. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
• Racionero, S., & Padrós, M. (2010). The Dialogic Turn in Educational Psychology. Revista de Psicodidáctica, 15(2), 143-162.
• Radziszewka, B. ., & Rogoff, B. (1991). Children´s guided participation in planning imaginary errands with skilled adult or peer partners. Developmental Psychology, 27(3), 381-389.
• Resta, P., & Laferrière, T. (2007). Technology in Support of Collaborative Learning. Educational Psychology Review, 19, 65–83.
• Ribeiro Pessoa, M. T., Hernández Serrano, M. J., & Muñoz Rodríguez, J. M. (2015). Aprendizaje informal, alfabetización mediática e inclusión social. Descripción de una experiencia. Profesorado, Revista de Currículum y Formación del Profesorado, 19(2), 75-91.
• Rogoff, R, Goodman, C., & Barlett, L. (2001). Learning together: Children and adults in a school community. New York: Oxford University Press.
• Roschelle, J., & Teasley, S. (1995). The construction of shared knowledge in collaborative problem solving. En C. O'Malley (Ed.), Computer-supported collaborative learning (pp. 69–197). Berlin: Springer Verlag.
• Rubia, B., Jorrín, I., & Dimitriadis, Y. (Julio, 2005). La naturaleza de la educación y su influencia en la creación de espacios CSCL. Proceedings of the 4ª Conferencia Iberoamericana en Sistemas, Cibernética e Informática. 2º Simposio Iberoamericano de Educación, Cibernética e Informática, SIECI-CISCI, Florida.
• Rubia, B., Ruiz, I., Jorrín, I., & Anguita, R. (2011). La investigación en innovación educativa desde una pequeña perspectiva colaborativa. El marco CSCL y la cultura de la innovación. En R. Roig y C. Laneve (Coords.), La práctica educativa en la sociedad de la información: Innovación a través de la investigación (pp. 357-368). Alcoy: Marfil.
• Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1994). Computer support for knowledge-building communities. The Journal of he Learning Sciences, 3(3), 265-283.
• Schellens, T., & Valcke, M. (2005). Collaborative learning inasynchronous discussion gropus: What about the impact on cognitive processing? Computers in Human Behavior, 21, 957-975.
• Schrire, S. (2006). Knowledge building in asynchrounous discussion gropus: Going beyond quantitative analysis. Computer and Education, 46(1), 49-70.
• Segarra-Arnau, T., Traver-Martí, J. A., & Lozano-Estivalis, M. (2015). Saberes nómadas, convivencia intercultural y transformación social: las misiones interculturales, un estudio de caso. Profesorado, Revista de Currículum y Formación del Profesorado, 19(2), 165-183.
• Stahl, G. (2006). Group cognition. Computer support for Building Collaborative Knowledge. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
• Stahl, G. (2013). Transactive discourse in CSCL. International Journal of ComputerSupported Collaborative Learning. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 8(2), (2-5).
• Stahl, G., & Hesse, F. W. (2009). Paradigms of shared knowledge. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 4(4), 365-369.
• Stahl, G., & Hesse, F. W. (2010). Beyond folk theories of CSCL. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 5(4), 355-358.
• Stahl, G., Koschmann, T., & Suthers, D. (2006). Computer-supported collaborative learning: An historical perspective. En R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 409-426). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
• Suthers, D. (2006). Technology affordances for intersubjective meaning making: A research agenda for CSCL. International Journal of Computer-supported collaborative Learning, 1(3), 315-337.
• Tharp, R., & Gallimore, R. (1988). Rousing Minds to Life: Teaching, Learning, and Schooling in Social Context. New York: Cambridge University.
• Tomasello, M. (1999). The Cultural Origins of Human Cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
• Tomasello, M., Carpenter, M., Call, J., Behne, T., & Moll, H. (2005). Understanding and sharing intentions: The origins of cultural cognition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 28, 675-735.
• Valls, R. y Kyriakides, L. (2013). The power of Interactive Groups: how diversity of adults volunteering in classroom groups can promote inclusion and success for children of vulnerable minority ethnic populations. Cambridge Journal of Education, 43(1), 17-33.
• Valls, R., Soler, M., & Flecha, R. (2008). Lectura dialógica: interacciones que mejoran y aceleran la lectura. Revista Ibero-Americana de educación, 46, 71-87.
• Vygostky, L. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Vygotsky, L. (1962). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: M.I.T. Press.
• Wegerif, R., Perez, J., Rojas-Drummond, S., Mercer, N., & Velez, M. (2005). Thinking Together in the UK and Mexico: Transfer o an educational innovation. Journal of Classroom Interaction, 40(1), 40-48.
• Weinberger, A., & Fisher, F. (2006). A framework to analyze argumentative knowledge construction in computer-supported collaborative learning. Computers & Education, 46, 71-95.
• Wells, G. (2001). Indagación dialógica: hacia una teoría y una práctica socioculturales de la educación. Barcelona: Paidós.
• Wells, G., & Mejía Arauz, R. (2006). Dialogue in the classroom. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15(3), 379-428.