Environmental performance concerns in Latin AmericaDeterminant factors and multivariate analysis

  1. Isabel Gallego-Álvarez 1
  2. Raquel García-Rubio 1
  3. Jennifer Martínez-Ferrero 1
  1. 1 Universidad de Salamanca
    info

    Universidad de Salamanca

    Salamanca, España

    ROR https://ror.org/02f40zc51

Revista:
Revista de contabilidad = Spanish accounting review: [RC-SAR]

ISSN: 1138-4891

Año de publicación: 2018

Volumen: 21

Número: 2

Páginas: 206-221

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.1016/J.RCSAR.2018.05.003 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

Otras publicaciones en: Revista de contabilidad = Spanish accounting review: [RC-SAR]

Resumen

There is now a great concern for environmental problems and countries around the world are trying to take steps to foster economic growth without compromising future generations. In this research, we use indicators proposed in the Environmental Performance Index (EPI) based on two essential issues related to sustainable development: (i) environmental stresses on human health; (ii) protecting ecosystems and natural resources. The objective of this research focuses on analysing the EPI and the variables that can influence it. This is important because of the potential repercussions at the macroeconomic level, for example the influence it may have on the valuation of certain agents in assessing the policies of a certain country, as well as at the microeconomic level due to its relationship with other types of indexes that can be related directly to the company’s valuation and the effect on investment. We conducted multivariate analysis using the HJ-Biplot method to contextualize the countries grouped by geographic area and the variables related to the environmental indicators included in the EPI. The sample comprised 24 countries in Latin America. The findings obtained from the empirical analysis point to socioeconomic factors, such as education, determining factors of environmental performance in the countries analyzed. In addition, political ideology influences environmental performance when analysing the environmental health of the countries. Size also positively influences the EPI. From the biplot analysis, we also find that the variables for environmental health are more closely related to the countries located in the geographic area of the Caribbean (Cuba, the Dominican Republic, Haiti, Jamaica and Trinidad and Tobago). Other variables associated with ecosystem vitality, such as air pollution (effects on nature), are more closely related to Mesoamerica (Costa Rica, Honduras and Panama, among other countries). Countries in South America, however, are shown to be more concerned about climate change; these countries include Argentina, Chile and Brazi.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Aerni, P., What is sustainable agriculture? Empirical evidence of diverging views in Switzerland and New Zealand. Ecological Economics 68 (2009), 1872–1882.
  • Aide, M., Grau, R., Globalization, migration, and Latin American ecosystems. Science 305 (2004), 1915–1916.
  • Al-Tuwaijri, S., Christensen, T., Hughes, K.E., The relations among environmental disclosure, environmental performance, and economic performance: A simultaneous equations approach. Accounting, Organization and Society 29:5/6 (2004), 447–471.
  • Bachero, J., Esteban, J., Ivars, A., Aplicación del Biplot al análisis comparativo de las economías de las comunidades autónomas: el caso de Asturias. Anales de Economía Aplicada, XIV Reunión Asepelt, Spain, 22 and 23 June, 2000.
  • Bell, S., Morse, S., Measuring sustainability: Learning by doing earthscan, London. 2003.
  • Blasius, J., Eilers, P., Gower, J., Better biplots. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis 5 (2009), 3145–3158.
  • Böhringer, C., Löschel, A., Computable general equilibrium models for sustainability impact assessment: Status quo and prospects. Ecological Economics 60 (2006), 49–64.
  • Bustamante, E., Monge, J., Gonzalez, M.I., Air pollution in a tropical city: The relationship between wind direction and lichen bio-indicators in San José Costa Rica. International Journal of Tropical Biology and Conservation 59:2 (2011), 899–905.
  • Clarkson, P., Li, Y., Richardson, G., Vasvari, F., Revising the relation between environmental performance and environmental disclosure: An empirical analysis. Accounting, Organization and Society 33 (2008), 303–327.
  • Corbera, E., Kosoyc, N., Martínez, M., Equity implications of marketing ecosystem services in protected areas and rural communities: Case studies from Meso-America. Global Environmental Change 17 (2007), 365–380.
  • Correa-Ruiz, C., Moneva-Abadía, J.M., Social responsibility accounting and reporting in times of sustainability downturn/crisis. Spanish Accounting Review 14:Suppl. 1 (2011), 187–211.
  • Cracolici, M.F., Cuffaro, M., Nijkamp, P., The measurement of economic, social and environmental performance of countries: A novel approach. Social Indicators Research 95 (2010), 339–356.
  • Curran, M.M., Moran, D., Impact of the FTSE4Good index on firm price: An event study. Journal of Environmental Management 82:4 (2007), 529–537.
  • D‘Onofrio, P.A., Las teorías de la contabilidad social y su relación con la responsabilidad social empresarial. 2006 http:/www.econ.uba.ar/www/servicios/Biblioteca/bibliotecadigital/institutos/cics/a1n1/cap2.pdf.
  • De Sherbinin, A., Levy, M., Adamo, S., MacManus, K., Yetman, G., Mara, V., Pistolesi, L., Migration and risk: net migration in marginal ecosystems and hazardous areas. Environmental Research Letters, 7(4), 2012, 045602.
  • Duit, A., Understanding environmental performance of States: An institution centered approach and some difficulties. Working paper serie, Vol. 7, 2005, Göteborg University.
  • Emerson, J.W., Hsu, A., Levy, M.A., de Sherbinin, A., Mara, V., Esty, D.C., et al. Environmental Performance Index and pilot trend Environmental Performance Index. 2012, Yale Center for Environmental Law and Policy, New Haven http://epi.yale.edu.
  • Epstein, M.J., Measuring corporate environmental performance. 1996, IMA/McGraw Hill, San Francisco.
  • Esty, D., Levy, M.A., Kim, C.H., de Sherbinin, A., Srebotnjak, T., Mara, V., Environmental performance index. 2008, Yale Center for Environmental Law and Policy, New Haven.
  • Esty, D., Porter, M., National environmental performance: An empirical analysis of policy results and determinants. Environment and Development Economics 10 (2005), 391–434.
  • Farzin, Y.H., Bond, C.A., Democracy and environmental quality. Journal of Development Economic 81 (2006), 213–235.
  • Fiorino, D.J., Explaining national environmental performance: Approaches, evidence, and implications. Political Sciences 44 (2011), 367–389.
  • Frías-Aceituno, J.V., Marques, M.C., Rodríguez-Ariza, L., Divulgación de información sostenible: ¿se adapta a las expectativas de la sociedad?. Spanish Accounting Review 16:2 (2013), 147–158.
  • Gabriel, K.R., The Biplot graphic display of matrices with applications to principal components analysis. Biometrika 58 (1971), 453–467.
  • Gabriel, K.R., Odoroff, C.L., Biplot in biomedical research. Statistic in Medicine 9 (1990), 469–485.
  • Galindo, M.P., Una alternativa de representación simultánea: HJ Biplot. Qüestiió 10:1 (1986), 13–23.
  • Galindo, M.P., Contribución a la representación simultanea de datos multidimensionales. (Doctoral Thesis), 1985, University of Salamanca.
  • Gallego-Álvarez, I., Ortas, E., Vicente-Villardón, J.L., Álvarez Etxeberria, I., Institutional constraints, stakeholder pressure and corporate environmental reporting policies. Business Strategy and the Environment 26 (2017), 807–825.
  • Grafton, R., Knowles, S., Social capital and national environmental performance: A cross-sectional analysis. Journal of Environment and Development 13 (2004), 336–370.
  • Gower, J.C., Hand, D.J., Biplots. 1996, Chapman and Hall, London.
  • Hossein, M.H., Kaneko, S., Dynamic sustainability assessment of countries at the macro level: A principal component. Ecological Indicators 11 (2011), 811–823.
  • InfoStat, InfoStat versión 2004. Software Estadístico. 2004, Grupo InfoStat, FCA, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Argentina.
  • International Monetary Fund, World Economic Outlook. 2013, International Monetary Fund, United States.
  • Jahn, D., Environmental performance and policy regimes: Explaining variations in 18 OECD-countries. Policy sciences 31:2 (1998), 107–131.
  • Jain, A.K., Dubes, R.C., Algorithms for clustering data. 1988, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
  • Katz, R., Del Favero, G., Bases conceptuales y marco de referencia para la elaboración de políticas ambientales en América Latina. 1995, Centro de Estudios Públicos, Chile.
  • Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A., Mastruzzi, M., Governance matters VI: Governance indicators. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 94280. 2008 Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=999979.
  • Link, B., The struggle for a common interim reporting frequency regime in Europe. Accounting in Europe 9 (2012), 191–226.
  • Lober, D., Evaluating the environmental performance of corporations. The Journal of Management Issues 8 (1996), 184–205.
  • Malul, L., Hadad, Y., Ben-Yair, S., Measuring and raking of economic, environmental and social efficiency of countries. International Journal of Social Economics 36 (2009), 832–843.
  • McGillivary, M., Measuring non-economic well-being achievement. Review of Income and Wealth 51 (2005), 337–364.
  • Mitra, A.K., Rodríguez-Fernández, G., Latin America and the Caribbean: Assessment of the advances in public health for the achievement of the Millennium Development Goals. International Journal Environmental Research Public Health 7:5 (2010), 2238–2255.
  • Mol, A., Sonnenfeld, D., Ecological modernization around the world: An introduction. Environmental Politicals 9 (2000), 3–16.
  • Morse, S., Bottom rail on top: The shifting sands of sustainable development indicators as tools to assess progress. Sustainability 5 (2013), 2421–2441.
  • Navarro, A., Alcaraz, F.J., Ortiz, D., La Divulgación de Información Sobre Responsabilidad Corporativa en Administraciones Públicas: Un Estudio Empírico en Gobiernos Locales. Spanish Accounting Review 13:2 (2010), 285–314.
  • Neumayer, E., Are left-wing party strength and corporatism good for the environment? Evidence from panel analysis of air pollution in OCDE countries. Ecological Economics 45 (2003), 203–220.
  • Neumayer, E., Do international human rights treaties improve respect for human rights?. Journal of Conflict Resolution 49:6 (2005), 925–953.
  • Ortas, E., Moneva, J.M., Sustainability stock exchange indexes and investor expectations: Multivariate evidence from DJSI-Stoxx. Revista Española De Financiación y Contabilidad 40:151 (2011), 395–416.
  • Pintér, L., Hardi, P., Martinuzzi, A., Halla, J., Bellagio STAMP: Principles for sustainability assessment and measurement. Ecological Indictors 17 (2012), 20–28.
  • Rapport, D., Friend, A., Towards a comprehensive framework for environmental statistics: A stress–response approach, Statistics Canada Catalogue, 11-510. 1979, Minister of Supply and Services, Ottawa, Canada.
  • Rohlf, F.J., NTSYS pc: Numerical taxonomy system, Version 2. 1. 2002, Exeter Publishing, Setauket, NY.
  • Scruggs, L., Is there really a link between neo-corporative and environmental performance? Updated evidence and new data for the 1980s and 1990s. British Journal of Political Science 31 (2001), 686–692.
  • Scruggs, L., Sustaining abundance: Environmental performance in industrial democracies. 2003, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  • Seo, S., A microeconometric analysis of adapting portfolios to climate change: Adoption of agricultural systems in Latin America. Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy 32:3 (2010), 489–514.
  • Swamy, A.V., Fikkert, B., Estimating the contributions of capital and labor to GDP: An instrumental variable approach. Economic Development and Cultural Change 50 (2000), 693–708.
  • Vicente-Villardón, J.L., Biplot 2010. Un programa para la interpretación de Biplots. 2010, Department of Statistics, University of Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain.
  • Wälti, S., How multilevel structures affect environmental policy in industrialized countries. European Journal of Political Research 43 (2004), 599–634.
  • Welsch, H., Corruption, growth, and the environment: A cross-country analysis. Environment and Development Economics 9 (2004), 663–693.
  • World Bank, The World Bank data. 2013 http://www.worldbank.org/.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet