Diversification decisions among family firmsthe role of family involvement and generational stage

Referencias bibliográficas

• Anderson, R.C., Reeb, D.M., Founding-family ownership, corporate diversification, and firm leverage. J. Law Econ. 46 (2003), 653–684.
• Anglin, A.H., Reid, S.W., Short, J.C., Zachary, M.A., Rutherford, M.W., An archival approach to measuring family influence: an organizational identity perspective. Fam. Bus. Rev. 30 (2017), 19–36.
• Basco, R., Where do you want to take your family firm? A theoretical and empirical exploratory study of family business goals. Bus. Res. Q. 20 (2017), 28–44.
• Basco, R., Calabró, A., Who should sit there? Effects of family-oriented objectives on board composition. Int. J. Entrep. Ventur. 9:1 (2017), 81–99.
• Berrone, P., Cruz, C., Gomez-Mejia, L.R., Larraza-Kintana, M., Socioemotional wealth and corporate responses to institutional pressures: do family-controlled firms pollute less?. Adm. Sci. Q. 55 (2010), 82–113.
• Berrone, P., Cruz, C., Gomez-Mejia, L.R., Socioemotional wealth in family firms: theoretical dimensions, assessment approaches, and agenda for future research. Fam. Bus. Rev. 25 (2012), 258–279.
• Bercovitz, J., Mitchell, W., When is more better? The impact of business scale and scope on long-term business survival, while controlling for profitability. Strateg. Manage. J. 28 (2007), 61–79.
• Bertrand, M., Mehta, P., Mullainathan, S., Ferreting out tunneling: an application to Indian business groups. Q. J. Econ. 117 (2002), 121–148.
• Boellis, A., Mariotti, S., Minichilli, A., Piscitello, L., Family involvement and firms’ establishment mode choice in foreign markets. J. Int. Bus. Stud. 47 (2016), 929–950.
• Björnberg, A., Nicholson, N., Emotional ownership: the next generation's relationship with the family firm. Fam. Bus. Rev. 25 (2012), 374–390.
• Borghesi, R., Houston, J., Naranjo, A., Value, survival, and the evolution of firm organizational structure. Financ. Manage. 36 (2007), 5–31.
• Bureau van Dijk, Osiris Data Guide. 2007 Available online at: www.bvdep.com.
• Carney, M., van Essen, M., Gedajlovic, E.R., Heugens, P.P.M.A.R., What do we know about private family firms? A meta-analytical review. Entrep. Theory Pract. 39 (2015), 513–544.
• Carney, M., Duran, P., van Essen, M., Shapiro, D., Family firms, internationalization, and national competitiveness: does family firm prevalence matter?. J. Fam. Bus. Strategy 6 (2017), 123–136.
• Cennamo, C., Berrone, P., Cruz, C., Gomez-Mejia, L.R., Socioemotional wealth and proactive stakeholder engagement: why family-controlled firms care more about their stakeholders. Entrep. Theory Pract. 36 (2012), 1153–1173.
• Chang, Y., Thomas, H., The impact of diversification strategy on risk-return performance. Strateg. Manage. J. 10 (1989), 271–284.
• Chang, S., Shim, J., When does transitioning from family to professional management improve firm performance?. Strateg. Manage. J. 36 (2015), 1297–1316.
• Chen, H.-L., Hsu, W.-T., Family ownership, board independence, and R&D investment. Fam. Bus. Rev. 22 (2009), 347–362.
• Chrisman, J.J., Chua, J.H., Pearson, A.W., Barnett, T., Family involvement, family influence, and family-centered non-economic goals in small firms. Entrep. Theory Pract. 36 (2012), 267–293.
• Chrisman, C.C., Patel, P.C., Variations in R&D investment of family and non-family firms: behavioral agency and myopic loss aversion perspectives. Acad. Manage. J. 55 (2012), 976–997.
• Chua, J.H., Chrisman, J.J., Sharma, P., Defining the family business by behavior. Entrep. Theory Pract., 23, 1999, 19.
• Chua, J.H., Chrisman, J.J., Steier, L.P., Rau, S.B., Sources of heterogeneity in family firms: an introduction. Entrep. Theory Pract. 36 (2012), 1103–1113.
• Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S.G., Aiken, L.S., Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. 3rd ed., 2003, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
• Cruz, C., Nordqvist, M., Entrepreneurial orientation in family firms: a generational perspective. Small Bus. Econ. 38 (2012), 33–49.
• Daily, C.M., Dollinger, M.J., Alternative methodologies for identifying family- versus non-family-managed businesses. J. Small Bus. Manage. 31 (1993), 79–90.
• Davis, P.S., Harveston, P.D., In the founder's shadow: conflict in the family firm. Fam. Bus. Rev. 12 (1999), 311–323.
• Davis, P.S., Harveston, P.D., The phenomenon of substantive conflict in the family firm: a cross-generational study. J. Small Bus. Manage. 39 (2001), 14–30.
• Defrancq, C., Huyghebaert, N., Luypaert, M., Influence of family ownership on the industry-diversifying nature of a firm's M&A strategy: empirical evidence from Continental Europe. J. Fam. Bus. Strategy 7 (2016), 210–226.
• Denis, D.K., McConnell, J.J., International corporate governance. J. Financ. Quant. Anal. 38 (2003), 1–36.
• Ducassy, I., Prevot, F., The effects of family dynamics on diversification strategy: empirical evidence from French companies. J. Fam. Bus. Strategy 1 (2010), 224–235.
• Duller, C., Corporate governance of family firms in subsequent generations. Int. Bus. Econ. Res. J. 12 (2013), 345–354.
• Essen, M. van, Carney, M., Gedajlovic, E., Heugens, P.P.M.A.R., Do US publicly listed family firms differ? Does it matter? A meta-analysis. Best Paper Proceedings of the 71st Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, 2011, 1–6.
• Feldman, E.R., Amit, R.R., Villalonga, B., Corporate divestitures and family control. Strat. Manag. J. 37:3 (2016), 429–446.
• Fernandez, Z., Nieto, M.J., International strategy of Small and Medium-Sized family businesses: some influential factors. Fam. Bus. Rev. 31 (2005), 597–621.
• Fiss, P.C., Zajac, E.J., The diffusion of ideas over contested terrain: the (non)adoption of a shareholder value orientation among German firms. Adm. Sci. Q. 49 (2004), 501–534.
• Gallo, M.A., Tapies, J., Cappuyns, K., Comparison of family and nonfamily business: financial logic and personal preferences. Fam. Bus. Rev. 17 (2004), 303–318.
• Gersick, K., Davis, J.A., Hampton, M.M., Lansberg, I., Generation to Generation: Life Cycles of the Family Business. 1997, Harvard Business School Press, Boston.
• Gomez-Mejia, L.R., Larraza-Kintana, M., Makri, M., The determinants of executive compensation in family-controlled public corporations. Acad. Manage. J. 46 (2003), 226–237.
• Gomez-Mejia, L.R., Haynes, K.T., Núñez-Nickel, M., Jacobson, J.L.K., Moyano-Fuentes, J., Socioemotional wealth and business risks in family-controlled firms: evidence from Spanish Olive Oil Mills. Adm. Sci. Q. 52 (2007), 106–137.
• Gomez-Mejia, L.R., Makri, M., Larraza-Kintana, M., Diversification decisions in family controlled firms. J. Manage. Stud. 47 (2010), 223–252.
• Gomez-Mejia, L.R., Cruz, C., Berrone, P., De Castro, J., The bind that ties: socioemotional wealth preservation in family firms. Acad. Manage. Ann. 5 (2011), 653–707.
• Handler, W.C., Methodological issues and considerations in studying family businesses. Fam. Bus. Rev. 2 (1989), 257–276.
• Hatum, A., Pettigrew, A., Adaptation under environment turmoil: organizational flexibility in family-owned firms. Fam. Bus. Rev. 17 (2004), 237–258.
• Hautz, J., Mayer, M.C.J., Stadler, C., Ownership identity and concentration: a study of their joint impact on corporate diversification. Br. J. Manage. 24 (2013), 102–126.
• Hernandez-Trasobares, A., Galve-Gorriz, C., The influence of family control on decisions regarding the specialization and diversification of business groups. Bus. Res. Q. 19 (2016), 73–89.
• Herrero, I., Agency costs, family ties, and firm efficiency. J. Manage. 37 (2011), 887–904.
• Hoskisson, R., Hitt, M., Antecedents and performance outcomes of diversification: a review and critique of theoretical perspectives. J. Manage. 16:2 (1990), 461–509.
• Jaskiewicz, P., Dyer, W.D., Addressing the elephant in the room: disentangling family heterogeneity to advance family business research. Fam. Bus. Rev. 20 (2017), 111–118.
• Jones, C.D., Makri, M., Gomez-Mejia, L.R., Affiliate directors and perceived risk bearing in publicly traded, family-controlled firms: the case of diversification. Entrep. Theory Pract. 32 (2008), 1007–1026.
• Johnson, S., La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., Tunneling. Am. Econ. Rev. 90 (2000), 22–27.
• Kabbach de Castro, L.R., Aguilera, R.V., Crespi-Cladera, R., Family firms and compliance: reconciling the conflicting predictions within the socioemotional wealth perspective. Fam. Bus. Rev. 30 (2017), 137–159.
• Kellermanns, F.W., Eddleston, K.A., Barnett, T., Pearson, A., An exploratory study of family member characteristics and involvement: effects on entrepreneurial behavior in the family firm. Fam. Bus. Rev. 21 (2008), 1–14.
• Kotlar, J., De Massis, A., Fang, H., Frattini, F., Strategic reference points in family firms. Small Bus. Econ. 43 (2014), 597–619.
• Le Breton-Miller, I., Miller, D., Lester, R.H., Stewardship or agency? A social embeddedness reconciliation of conduct and performance in public family businesses. Organ. Sci. 22 (2011), 704–721.
• Lim, E.N.K., Lubatkin, M.H., Wiseman, R.M., A family firm variant of the behavioral agency theory. Strateg. Entrep. J. 4 (2010), 197–211.
• Lins, K., Servaes, H., Is corporate diversification beneficial in emerging markets?. Financ. Manage. 31 (2002), 5–32.
• Luo, X.R., Chung, C.N., Filling or abusing the institutional void? Ownership and management control of public family businesses in an emerging market. Organ. Sci. 24 (2013), 591–613.
• Martinez, J.I., Stöhr, B.S., Quiroga, B.F., Family ownership and firm performance: evidence from public companies in Chile. Fam. Bus. Rev. 20 (2007), 83–94.
• Maury, B., Family ownership and firm performance: empirical evidence from Western European corporations. J. Corpor. Finance 12 (2006), 321–341.
• Miller, D., Le Breton-Miller, I., Lester, R.H., Cannella, A., Are family firms really superior performers?. J. Corpor. Finance 13 (2007), 829–858.
• Miller, D., Le Breton-Miller, I., Lester, R.H., Family ownership and acquisition behavior in publicly-traded companies. Strateg. Manage. J. 31 (2010), 201–223.
• Minichilli, A., Nordqvist, M., Corbetta, G., Amore, M.A., CEO succession mechanisms, organizational context, and performance: a Socioemotional-Wealth perspective of family-controlled firms. J. Manage. Stud. 51 (2014), 1153–1179.
• Muñoz-Bullón, F., Sanchez-Bueno, M.J., The impact of family involvement on the R&D intensity of publicly traded firms. Fam. Bus. Rev. 24:1 (2011), 62–70.
• Mustakallio, M.A., Autio, E., Zahra, S.A., Relational and contractual governance in family firms: effects on strategic decision making. Fam. Bus. Rev. 15 (2002), 205–222.
• Naldi, L., Nordqvist, M., Sjöberg, K., Wiklund, J., Entrepreneurial orientation, risk taking, and performance in family firms. Fam. Bus. Rev. 20 (2007), 33–47.
• Nordqvist, M., Sharma, P., Chirico, F., Family firm heterogeneity and governance: a configuration approach. J. Small Bus. Manage. 52 (2014), 192–209.
• Peng, M.W., Jiang, Y., Institutions behind family ownership and control in large firms. J. Manage. Stud. 47 (2010), 253–273.
• Pindado, J., Requejo, I., de la Torre, C., Does family control shape corporate capital structure? An empirical analysis of Eurozone firms. J. Bus. Finance Account. 42 (2015), 965–1006.
• Sacristan-Navarro, M., Gomez-Anson, S., Cabeza-Garcia, L., Family ownership and control, the presence of other large shareholders, and firm performance: further evidence. Fam. Bus. Rev. 24 (2011), 71–93.
• Schmid, T., Ampenberger, M., Kaserer, C., Achleitner, A.K., Family firms, agency costs and risk aversion – empirical evidence from diversification and hedging decisions. Working Paper Series, Center for Entrepreneurial and Financial Studies, 2008, 2008–2013.
• Schmid, T., Ampenberger, M., Kaserer, C., Achleitner, A.K., Family firm heterogeneity and corporate policy, evidence from diversification decisions. Corpor. Gov.: Int. Rev. 23 (2015), 285–302.
• Schulze, W.S., Lubatkin, M.H., Dino, R.N., Buchholtz, A.K., Agency relationships in family firms: theory and evidence. Organ. Sci. 12:2 (2001), 99–116.
• Schulze, W.S., Lubatkin, M.H., Dino, R.N., Toward a theory of agency and altruism in family firms. J. Bus. Ventur. 18 (2003), 473–490.
• Sciascia, S., Mazzola, P., Chirico, F., Generational involvement in the top management team of family firms: exploring non-linear effects of entrepreneurial orientation. Entrep. Theory Pract. 37 (2013), 69–85.
• Sciascia, S., Mazzola, P., Kellermanns, F.W., Family management and profitability in private family-owned firms: introducing generational stage and the socioemotional wealth perspective. J. Fam. Bus. Strategy 5 (2014), 131–137.
• Sonfield, M.C., Lussier, R.N., First, second-, and third-generation family firms: a comparison. Fam. Bus. Rev. 17 (2004), 189–201.
• Stockmans, A., Lybaert, N., Voordeckers, W., Socioemotional wealth and earnings management in private family firms. Fam. Bus. Rev. 23 (2010), 280–294.
• Strike, V.M., Berrone, P., Sapp, S.G., Congiu, L., A socioemotional wealth approach to CEO career horizons in family firms. J. Manage. Stud. 52 (2015), 555–583.
• Thomsen, S., Pedersen, T., Ownership structure and economics performance in the largest European companies. Strateg. Manage. J. 21 (2000), 689–705.
• Vandemaele, S., Vancauteren, M., Nonfinancial goals, governance, and dividend payout in private family firms. J. Small Bus. Manage. 53 (2015), 166–182.
• Vardaman, J.M., Gondo, M.B., Socioemotional wealth conflict in family firms. Entrep. Theory Pract. 38 (2014), 1317–1322.
• Zahra, S.A., International expansion of U.S. manufacturing family business: the effect of ownership and involvement. J. Bus. Ventur. 18 (2003), 495–512.
• Zahra, S.A., Hayton, J.C., Salvato, C., Entrepreneurship in family vs. non-family firms: a resource-based analysis of the effect of organizational culture. Entrep. Theory Pract. 28 (2004), 363–381.