Validación del Instrumento de Evaluación de la Conciencia Morfológica Oral (IECMO)

  1. González-Sánchez, Lorena 1
  2. García, Trinidad 2
  3. Areces, Débora 2
  4. Fernández, Estrella 2
  5. Arias-Gundin, Olga 1
  6. Rodríguez, Celestino 2
  1. 1 Universidad de León
    info

    Universidad de León

    León, España

    ROR https://ror.org/02tzt0b78

  2. 2 Universidad de Oviedo
    info

    Universidad de Oviedo

    Oviedo, España

    ROR https://ror.org/006gksa02

Revista:
European journal of education and psychology

ISSN: 1888-8992,  1989-2209

Año de publicación: 2018

Volumen: 11

Número: 2

Páginas: 107-122

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.30552/EJEP.V11I2.225 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

Otras publicaciones en: European journal of education and psychology

Objetivos de desarrollo sostenible

Resumen

Morphological awareness can play an important role in the process of literacy refers. It presents an experimental validation study with a sample of students pre-readers in kindergarten and first students of Primary Education on Instrumento de Evaluación de la Conciencia Morfológica Oral (IECMO) designed for study Spanish and focuses on the evaluation of the three dimensions of morphological awareness: a) the morphology inflexional, b) derivacional morphology, and c) compound words. This study involved a total of fifty students belonging to the last year of kindergarten and first grade education. Their ages ranged from 5 to 7 years. In conjunction with experimental validation study presented the initial results of reliability testing for internal consistency, item analysis and stable test-retest analysis and the validity of the proof, or apparent conflict of content and construct or theoretical. The results obtained in the analysis of the psychometric properties of the instrument to verify verify both the validity of content and construct, as the reliability of IECMO. This tool can be very useful, since teachers should take into account the role of morphological awareness in learning and mastering different metalinguistic skills.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Aguilar, M., Aragón, E., Navarro, J.I., Delgado, C., y Marchena, E. (2017). Análisis del efecto san Mateo en un studio longitudinal sobre el desarrollo lector durante la educación primaria (1º a 5º). European Journal of Education and Psychology 10, 23-32.
  • Arnbak, E., y Elbro, C. (2000). The effects of morphological awareness training on the reading and spelling skills of young dyslexics. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 44(3), 229-251.
  • Carlisle, J.F. (1995). Morphological awareness and early ready achievement. En L.B. Feldman (Ed.), Morphological aspects of language processing (pp.189-209). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Carlisle, J.F. (2003). Morphology matters in learning to read: A commentary. Reading Psychology, 24, 291-322.
  • Cassalis, S., Colé, P., y Sopo, D. (2004). Morphological Awareness in Developmental Dyslexia. Annals of Dislexia, 54(1), 114-138.
  • Cassalis, S., y Louis-Alexandre, M.F. (2000). Morphological analysis, phonological analysis and learning to read French: a longitudinal study. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 12, 303-335.
  • Clin, E., Wade-Woolley, L., y Heggie, L. (2009). Prosodic sensitivity and morphological awareness in children reading. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 104, 197-213.
  • Deacon, H., y Bryant, P. (2006). This turnip´s not for turning: Children´s use of root morphemes in spelling. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 24, 567-575.
  • Duncan, L., Cassalis, S., y Colé, P. (2009). Early metalinguistic awareness of derivational morphology: Observations from a comparison of English and French. Applied Psycholinguistics, 30, 405-440.
  • García, J.N., y González, L. (2006). Diferencias en la conciencia morfológica, la escritura y el lenguaje en función del desarrollo y el nivel educativo del niño. Psicothema, 18(2), 171- 179.
  • González, L., Rodríguez, C., Gázquez, J.J., González-Castro, P., y Álvarez, D. (2011). La conciencia morfológica: tendencias de desarrollo y patrón evolutivo en Educación Infantil y Primaria. Psicothema. 23(2), 239-244.
  • Green, L., McCutchen, D., Shwiebert, C., Quinlan, T., Eva-Wood, A., y Juelis, J. (2003). Morphological Development in Children´s Writing. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(4), 752-761.
  • Jiménez, J.E., y del Cristo, S. (2017). Análisis factorial confirmatorio del Indicadores de Progreso de Aprendizaje en Matemáticas (IPAM) en escalas de primer curso de Primaria. European Journal of Invesstigation in Health, Psychology and Education, 7(1), 31-45.
  • Mahony, D., Singson, M., y Mann, V. (2000). Reading ability and sensitivity to morphological relations. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 12, 191-218.
  • McBride-Chang, C., Cho, J., Liu, H., Wagner, R., Shu, H., Zhou, A., Cheuk, C., y Muse, A. (2005). Changing models across cultures: associations of phonological awareness and morphological structure awareness with vocabulary and word recognition in second graders from Beijing, Hong Kong, Korea, and the United States. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 92, 140-160.
  • Moats, L. (2000). Speech to print: Language essentials for teachers. Baltimore: Brookes.
  • Morais, J. (1991). Constraints on the development of phonemic awareness. En S. Brady y D. Shankweiler (Eds.), Phonological processes in literacy. A tribute to Isabelle Liberman (pp. 5-27). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum
  • Nunes, T., Bryant, P., y Olson, J.M. (2003): Learning morphological and phonological spelling rules: an intervention study. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 63, 141-170.
  • Nunes, T., y Bryant, P. (2004). Morphological awareness improves spelling and vocabulary. Literacy Today, 11, 1-19.
  • Rodrigo, M., Jiménez, J.E., García, E., Díaz, A., Ortiz, M.R., Guzmán, R., Hernández-Valle, I., Estévez, A., y Hernández, S. (2004). Valoración del procesamiento ortográfico en niños españoles con dislexia: El papel de las unidades léxicas y subléxicas. Revista Electrónica de Investigación Psicoeducativa y Psicopedagógica, 2(2), 105-126.
  • Seymour, P.H.K. (1997). Foundations of orthographic development. En Perfetti, C. A.; Rieben, L. y Fayol (Eds). Learning to spell: Research, theory, and practice across languages (pp. 319-337). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet