Regulación, política agro-energética y la evolución del mercado de carburantes renovables en Brasil

  1. Rodríguez Morales, Jorge Ernesto 1
  2. Rodríguez López, Fernando 2
  1. 1 Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
    info

    Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú

    Lima, Perú

    ROR https://ror.org/00013q465

  2. 2 Universidad de Salamanca
    info

    Universidad de Salamanca

    Salamanca, España

    ROR https://ror.org/02f40zc51

Revista:
Derecho PUCP: Revista de la Facultad de Derecho

ISSN: 0251-3420,  2305-2546

Any de publicació: 2015

Número: 75

Pàgines: 355-384

Tipus: Article

DOI: 10.18800/DERECHOPUCP.201502.016 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

Altres publicacions en: Derecho PUCP: Revista de la Facultad de Derecho

Resum

Los costes de la dependencia del petróleo, los costes externos medioambientales de los combustibles fósiles, o la promoción del desarrollo agrícola, han justificado una serie de medidas de intervención estatal para expandir el mercado interno de los biocarburantes, en el supuesto de que la intervención del Estado es condición necesaria y suficiente para lograr este objetivo. Después de analizar en perspectiva histórica los elementos políticos y económicos en el sector del etanol de Brasil, en este artículo se argumenta que la expansión o contracción del mercado no debe entenderse como el efecto de unas políticas determinadas por el Estado regulador. En este sentido, sostenemos que las tendencias en el desarrollo del mercado reflejan los efectos de una relación subyacente anterior, que está determinada por la convergencia o divergencia en el tiempo de los costos de oportunidad del gobierno y de la agroindustria. Nuestro análisis muestra que la eficacia de una política de diversificación energética como la promoción de los biocombustibles depende de los beneficios económicos y de las rentas políticas generadas por la expansión del uso de etanol. Estas restricciones se pueden extrapolar como parte del análisis de costo-efectividad de las políticas públicas relacionadas con el sector en otros países.

Referències bibliogràfiques

  • Ajanovic, Amela & Reinhard Haas (2010). Economics Challenges for Future Relevance of Biofuels in Transport in EU Countries. Energy, 35, 3340-3348.
  • ANFAVEA (2013). Anuário da Industria Automobilística Brasileira ANFAVEA. Recuperado de http://www.anfavea.com.br/.
  • ANP (2013). Evolução do mercado de combustíveis e derivados: 2000-2012. Agência Nacional do Petróleo, Gás Natural e Biocombustíveis-Superintendência de Pesquisa e Desenvolvimento Tecnológico.
  • Baccarin, José Giacomo (2005). A desregulamentação e o desempenho do complexo sucroalcooleiro no Brasil. Tesis de Doctorado. São Carlos: Universidade Federal de São Carlos.
  • Baker Institute (2010). Fundamentals of a Sustainable US Biofuels Policy. Houston: James A. Baker III Institute for Public Policy of Rice University.
  • Barzelay, Michael (1986). The Politicized Market Economy: Alcohol in Brazil’s Energy Strategy. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  • Borges, Júlio Maria Martins (1992). Custos, preços e competitividade do álcool combustível. Revista Brasileira de Energia, 2(2), 163-175.
  • Box, George E.P. & George C. Tiao (1975). Intevention Analysis with Aplications to Economic and Environmental Problems. Journal for the American Statistical Association, 70 (349), 70-92.
  • Crosbie, John (1993). Interrupted Time-Series Analysis with Brief Single-Subject Data. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 61(6), 966-974.BP. Outlook in Brief. Recuperado de http://www.bp.com/en/global/corporate/about-bp/energy-economics/statistical-review-of-world-energy/statistical-review-downloads.html
  • Da Costa, Mário Luiz Oliveira (2003). Setor Sucroalcooleiro. Da rígida intervenção ao livre mercado. São Paulo: Editora Método.
  • Da Rocha Sampaio, Rômulo Silveira (2010). Leadership Challenges: Biofuels and the 2009 Brazilian National Climate Change Policy Act. Renewable Energy Law and Policy Review, 2, 189-196.
  • De Castro Santos, Maria Helena (1979). The Politics of Energy Crises in Brazil: An Overview. Ponencia presentada en VIII Annual Meeting of the Latin-American Studies Association. Pittsburg.
  • De Castro Santos, Maria Helena (1985). Alcohol as Fuel in Brazil: An Alternative Energy Policy and Politics. Tesis doctoral. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
  • De Freitas, Luciano Charlita & Shinji Kaneko (2011). Ethanol Demand under the Flex-Fuel Technology Regime in Brazil. Energy Economics, 33, 1146-1154.
  • Demirbas, Ayhan (2009). Progress and Recent Trends in Biodiesel Fuel. Energy Conversion and Management, 50, 14-34.
  • Duffield, James A. & otros (2008). Ethanol Policy: Past, Present, and Future. South Dakota Law Review, 53(3), 425-453.
  • Earley, Jane (2009). US Trade Policies on Biofuels and Sustainable development. ICTSD Programme on Agricultural Trade and Sustainable Development/
  • ICTSD Global Platform on Climate Change, Trade Policies and Sustainable Energy. Issue Paper 18.
  • European Commission (2007). Impact Assessment Renewable Energy Roadmap March 2007. The impact of a minimum 10% obligation for biofuels use in the EU-27 in 2020 on agricultural markets. Directorate-General for Agriculture and Rural development.
  • FAO (2008). Bioenergy Policy, Markets and Trade And Food Security. Technical background document from the expert consultation held on 18 to 20 February 2008. Roma.
  • Giesecke, James A. & otros (2009). The Downside of Domestic Substitution of Oil with Biofuels: Will Brazil Catch the Dutch Disease? Studies in Regional Science. Brazilian Regional Structural Adjustment to Rapid Growth in Global Ethanol Demand, 39 (1), 189-207.
  • Goldemberg, Jose & Isaias C. Macedo (1994). Brazilian Alcohol Program: An Overview. Energy for Sustainable Development, 1(1), 17-22.
  • Goldemberg, Jose & otros (2013). The Rationality of Biofuels. Energy Policy, 61, 595-598.
  • Goldemberg, Jose & otros (2014). Oil and Natural Gas Prospects in South America: Can the Petroleum Industry Pave the Way for Renewables in Brazil? Energy Policy, 64, 58-70.
  • Goldemberg, Jose & otros (2008). The Sustainability of Ethanol Production from Sugarcane. Energy Policy, 36, 2086-2097.
  • Goldemberg, Jose & otros (2004). Ethanol Learning Curve. The Brazilian Experience. Biomass and Bioenergy, 26, 301-304.
  • Halff, Antoine (2008). Energy Nationalism, Consumer Style: How the Quest for «Energy Independence» Undermine U.S Ethanol Policy and Energy Security. Stanford Law & Policy Review, 19, 402-425.
  • Hathaway, Dale E. (1997). Agriculture and the GATT: Rewriting the Rules. Policy Analysis in International Economics. Washington DC: Institute for International Economics.
  • Hill, Jason & otros (2006). Environmental, Economic, and Energetic Costs and Benefits of Biodiesel and Ethanol Biofuels. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America (PNAS), 103 (30), 11206-11210.
  • Howse, Robert & otros (2006). WTO Disciplines and Biofuels: Opportunities and Constrains in the Creation of a Global Marketplace. Washington DC: International Food and Agricultural Trade Policy Council.
  • IEA Bionergy (2009). Bioenergy. A Sustainable and Reliable Energy Source. A Review of Status and Prospects. París: OECD/IEA.
  • IPEA (2013). Sitio web: http://www.ipeadata.gov.br/
  • Johnson, Ronald N. & Gary D. Libecap (2001). Information Distortion and Competitive Remedies in Government Transfer Programs: The Case of Ethanol. Economics of Governance, 2, 101-134.
  • Klok, Jacob (2002). Negotiating EU CO2/Energy Taxation: Political Economic Forces and Barriers. Copenhague: AKF Forlaget.
  • Kojima, Masami & otros (2007). Renewable Energy. Considering Trade Policies for Biofuels. Washington DC: Energy Sector Management Assistance Program (ESMAP)/ World Bank.
  • Koplow, Doug (2009). State and Federal Subsidies to Biofuels: Magnitude and Options for Redirection. International Journal of Biotechnology, 11(1-2), 92-126.
  • La Rovere, Emilio Lèbre (1981). Les impacts sociaux et écologiques du plan alcool brésilien. Économie et Humanisme, 260, 36–47.
  • La Rovere, Emilio Lèbre (2011) Biofuels and Sustainable Development in Brazil. World development, 39(6), 1026-1036.
  • Lazzari, Salvatore (2005). Energy Tax Policy: An Economic Analysis. US CRS Report for Congress.
  • Leher, Nadine (2010). U.S. Farm Bills and Policy Reforms: Ideological Conflicts over World Trade, Renewable Energy, and Sustainable Agriculture. Nueva York: Cambria Press.
  • Luque, Rafael & otros (eds.) (2011). Handbook of Biofuels Production. Processes and Technologies. Cambridge: Woodhead Publishing.
  • Macêdo, Fernando dos Santos (2011). A reestructuração do sector sucroenergético no Brasil: uma análise do período entre 2005 e 2011. São Paulo: Fundação Getúlio Vargas.
  • Malça, João & Fausto Freire (2006). Renewability and Life-Cycle Energy Efficiency of Bioethanol and Bio-Ethyl Tertiary Butyl Ether (bioETBE): Assessing the Implications of Allocation. Energy, 31(15), 3362-3380.
  • Maniatis, Kyriakos & Stefan Tostman (2010). EU Technology Strategy on Bioenergy: From Blue-Sky Research to Targeted Technology Development. Renewable Energy Law and Policy Review, 2, 169-179.
  • McCleary, Richard & Richard A. Hay (1980). Applied Time Series Analysis for the Social Sciences. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.
  • McDowall, David & otros (1980). Interrupted Time Series Analysis. Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
  • Meira, Roberta (2007). Bangüês, engenhos centrais e usinas: o desenvolvimento da economia açucareira em São Paulo e a sua correlação com as políticas estatais (1875-1941). Tesis de Maestría. São Paulo: Universidade de São Paulo.
  • Moraes, Márcia (2000). A desregulamentação do setor sucroalcooleiro e as novas formas de atuação do Estado. Revista de Economia e Sociologia Rural,38(2), 101-122.
  • Nastari, Plinio (1983). The Role of Sugar Cane in Brazil’s History and Economy.Tesis de Doctorado. Iowa: Iowa State University.
  • Neustrom, Michael W. & William M. Norton (1993). The Impact of Drunk Driving Legislation in Louisiana. Journal of Safety Research, 24(2), 107-121.
  • Numberg, Barbara (1978). State Intervention in the Sugar Sector in Brazil: A Study of the Institute of Sugar and Alcohol. Tesis de Doctorado. Standford, CA: Standford University.
  • Oliveria, Marcelo & otros (2005). Ethanol as Fuel: Energy, Carbon Dioxide Balances, and Ecological Footprint. Bioscience, 55 (7), 593–602.
  • Pinheiro, J. (2000). A política nacional do álcool combustível. En: Instituto da Cidadanía. Álcool: o Cobustível do novo milênio? Cadernos Cidadania1 (pp. 47-50).
  • Puerto Rico, Julieta (2007). Programa de Biocombustíveis no Brasil e na Colômbia: Uma Análise da Implantação, Resultados e Perspectivas. São Paulo: Universidade de São Paulo/PIPGE.
  • Puerto Rico, Julieta & otros (2010). Genesis and Consolidation of the Brazilian Bioethanol: A Review of Policies and Incentive Mechanisms. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 14 (7), 1874–1887.
  • Santos, Magda (1997). O Álcool-motor no Brasil e sua relaçao com a produçao açucareira(1903-1954). Tesis de Maestría. São Paulo: Universidade de São Paulo.Schnepf, Randy (2011). Renewable Energy Programs and the Farm Bill: Status and Issues. Congressional Research Program. US CRS Report for the Congress.
  • Semineiro, Frank A. (2008). A Tale of Two Subsidies: How Federal Support Programs for Ethanol and Biodiesel Can be Created in Order to Circumvent Fair Trade Challenges under World Trade Organization Ruling. Penn State International Law Review, 26 (4), 963-996.
  • Sheales, Terry & otros (1999). Sugar: International Policies Affecting Market Expansion. ABARE Research Report 99.14. Canberra: Australian Bureau of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
  • Shikida, Pery (2002). The Economics of Etanol Production in Brazil: A Path Dependance Approach. En Márcia Moraes & Pery Shikida, Agroindustria canavieira no Brasil: evolução, desenvolvimiento e desafíos. São Paulo: Atlas.
  • Stattman, Sarah L. & otros (2013). Governing Biodiesel in Brazil: A Comparison of Bioethanol and Biodiesel Policies. Energy Policy, 61, 22-30.
  • Szmerecsányi, Tamás (1979). O planejamento da agroindústria canavieira do Brasil (1930-75). São Paulo: Hucitec/Unicamp.
  • Szmrecsányi, Tamás (1988). Crescimento e crise da agroindústria açucareira do Brasil, 1914-1939. Revista Brasileira de Ciências Sociais , 7(5).
  • Szmrecsányi, Tamás & Eduardo Moreira (1991). O desenvolvimento da agroindústria canavieira do Brasil desde a Segunda Guerra Mundial. Estudos Avançados , 11(5), 57–79.
  • UNEP (2009). Towards Sustainable Production and Use of Resources: Assessing Biofuels. Nairobi: UNEP.
  • Teixeira, Suani & otros (2006). Brazilian Sugarcane Ethanol: Lessons Learned. Energy for Sustainable Development, 10(2), 26-39.
  • Vietor, Richard H.K. (1987). Energy Policy in America since 1945: A Study of Business-Government Relations. Nueva York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Wustehagen, Rolf & Tarja Teppo (2006). Do Venture Capitalists Really Invest in Good Industries? Risk-Return Perceptions and Path Dependence in the Emerging European Energy VC Market. International Journal of Technology Management, 34 (1/2), 63-87.
  • Yacobucci, Brent D. (2010). Intermediate–Levels Blends of Ethanol in Gasoline, and the Blend Wall. US CRS Report for the Congress.
  • Yacobucci, Brent D. & Kelsi Bracmort (2010). Calculation of Lifcycle Greenhouse Gas Emissions for the Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS). US CRS Report for the Congress.
  • Zarrilli, Simonetta (2008). Making Certification Work for Sustainable Development: The Case of Biofuels. UNCTAD.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet