La revolución de Internet. Los usos beneficiosos y avanzados de Internet como la nueva frontera de la desigualdad digital

  1. Stefano de Marco 1
  1. 1 Universidad de Salamanca (España)
Revista:
Panorama social

ISSN: 1699-6852

Any de publicació: 2017

Títol de l'exemplar: Las desigualdades digitales. Los límites de la Sociedad Red

Número: 25

Pàgines: 99-116

Tipus: Article

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAccés obert editor

Altres publicacions en: Panorama social

Resum

En este trabajo se analiza el fenómeno de la desigualdad digital en España; esto es, las diferencias entre internautas en cuanto a la adopción de los usos beneficiosos de Internet. Para ello, se observa y analiza la evolución de la difusión de dichos usos en función de los perfiles socioeconómicos de los internautas. Se aprecia cómo los usos de Internet dirigidos al entretenimiento personal presentan patrones de difusión parecidos en todos los segmentos poblacionales. Sin embargo, los usos beneficiosos se han ido difundiendo con mayor intensidad entre los españoles más jóvenes y con mayor nivel educativo.

Referències bibliogràfiques

  • ATTEWELL, P. (2001), “The first and second digital divides”, Sociology of Education, 74(3): 252-­259.
  • BONFADELLI, H. (2002), “The Internet and knowledge gaps”, European Journal of Communication, 17(1): 65-­84.
  • BUHTZ, K. (2016), Mechanisms driving technology use in the context of digital inequality: A series of essays on the role of social influence, socio­cognitive processes, and socio­ economic determinants. Tesis doctoral, Faculty of Business Administration and Economics of the University of Passau.
  • DE MARCO, S.; ROBLES, J. M., y M. ANTINO (2014), “Digital skills as a conditioning factor for digital political participation”, Communications, 39(1): 43-­65.
  • DIMAGGIO, P., y E. HARGITTAI (2001), “From the ‘Digital Divide’ to ‘Digital Inequality’: Studying Internet use as penetration increases”, Working Paper Series (15), Center for Arts and Cultural Policy Studies, Woodrow Wilson School, Princeton University.
  • DIMAGGIO, P.; HARGITTAI, E.; CELESTE, C., y S. SHAFER (2004), “From unequal access to differentiated use: A literature review and agenda for research on digital inequality”, en K. M. NECKERMAN (Ed.), Social inequality, New York, Russell Sage Fundation: 355­-400.
  • DIMAGGIO, P.; HARGITTAI, E.; NEUMAN, R. W., y J. P. ROBINSON (2001), “Social implications of the Internet”, Annual Review of Sociology, 27: 307­-336.
  • DUNHAM, R. S. (1999), “Across America, a troubling ‘Digital Divide’”, Business Week, 2 de agosto de 1999: 36-40(2).
  • GURSTEIN, M. (2003), “Effective use: A community informatics strategy beyond the Digital Divide”, First Monday, 1 de diciembre: 8(12) (http://firstmonday.org/article/ view/1107/1027).
  • HAIGHT, M.; QUAN-HAASE, A., y B. A. CORBETT (2014), “Revisiting the Digital Divide in Canada: The impact of demographic factors on access to the internet, level of online activity, and social networking site usage”, Information, Communication & Society, 17(4): 503­-519.
  • HARGITTAI, E. (2010), “Digital na(t)ives? Variation in internet skills and uses among Members of the ‘Net Generation’”, Sociological Inquiry, 80(1): 92­-113.
  • HARGITTAI, E., y A. HINNANT (2008), “Digital inequality: Differences in young adults’ use of the Internet”, Communication Research, 35(5): 602-­621.
  • HARGITTAI, E., y A. SHAW (2015), “Mind the skills gap: The role of Internet know­how and gender in differentiated contributions to Wikipedia”, Information, Communication & Society, 18(4): 424-­442.
  • HARGITTAI, E., y G. WALEJKO (2008), “The participation divide: Content creation and sharing in the digital age”, Information, Communication & Society., 11(2): 239­-256.
  • HYVÖNEN, E.; VILJANEN, K.; TUOMINEN, J., y K. SEPPÄLÄ (2008), “Building a national semantic web ontology and ontology service infrastructure–the FinnONTO approach”, en AROYO, L. (ed.), The semantic Web: Research and applications, Berlín, Springer: 95­-109.
  • LIVINGSTONE, S., y E. HELSPER (2010), “Balancing opportunities and risks in teenagers’ use of the Internet: The role of online skills and internet self­efficacy”, New Media & Society, 12(2): 309-­329.
  • MOSSBERGER, K.; TOLBERT, C. J., y M. STANSBURY (2003), Virtual inequality: Beyond the Digital Divide, Georgetown: Georgetown University Press.
  • NETER, E., y E. BRAININ (2012), “eHealth literacy: Extending the Digital Divide to the realm of health information”, Journal of Medical Internet Research, 14(1): 19­-20.
  • PETER, J., y P. M. VALKENBURG (2006), “Adolescents’ internet use: Testing the ‘disappearing digital divide’ versus the ‘emerging digital differentiation’ approach”, Poetics, 34(4­ 5): 293­-305.
  • ROBINSON, J. P.; DIMAGGIO, P., y E. HARGITTAI (2003), “New social survey perspectives on the digital divide”, IT y Society, 1(5): 1-­22.
  • ROBLES, J. M.; MOLINA, O., y S. DE MARCO (2010), “La e­administración como modelo de democracia digital débil”, Revista Española de Sociología, 14: 67-­84.
  • ROBLES, J. M.; TORRES-ALBERO, C.; ANTINO, M., y S. DE MARCO (2015), “The use of digital social networks from an analytical sociology perspective: The case of Spain”, Rationality & Society, 27(4): 492-­512.
  • STAFFORD, T. F.; STAFFORD R. M., y L. L. SCHKADE (2004), “Determining uses and gratifications for the Internet”, Decision Sciences, 35: 259-­288.
  • STERN, M. J.; ADAMS, A. E., y S. ELSASSER (2009), “Digital inequality and place: The effects of technological siffusion on Internet proficiency and usage across rural, suburban, and urban counties”, Sociological Inquiry, 79(4): 391­-417.
  • VAN DEURSEN, A. G. M.; HELSPER, E.; EYNON, R., y J. A. G. M. VAN DIJK (2017), “The compoundness and sequentiality of digital inequality”, International Journal of Communication, 11: 452­-473
  • VAN DIJK, JAN A. G. M.(2005), The deepening divide: Inequality in the information society, Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
  • VAN DIJK, JAN A. G. M. (2006), “Digital divide research, achievements and shortcomings”, Poetics, 34(4­5): 221-­235.
  • VAN DIJK, JAN A.G.M., y K. HACKER (2003), “The Digital Divide as a complex and dynamic phenomenon”, The information Society, 19(4): 315-­326.
  • WARSCHAUER, M. (2004), Technology and social inclusion: Rethinking the digital divide, Cambridge, MIT press.
  • ZHONG, Z. J. (2011), “From access to usage: The divide of self­reported digital skills among adolescents”, Computers & Education, 56(3): 736-­746.
  • ZILLIEN, N., y E. HARGITTAI (2009), “Digital distinction: Status­specific types of Internet usage”, Social Science Quarterly, 90(2): 274­-291.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet