Institucionesreglas y procesos

  1. María Teresa López de la Vieja de la Torre 1
  1. 1 Universidad de Salamanca
    info

    Universidad de Salamanca

    Salamanca, España

    ROR https://ror.org/02f40zc51

Journal:
Bajo palabra. Revista de filosofía

ISSN: 1576-3935,  1887-505X

Year of publication: 2019

Season: 2

Issue: 20

Pages: 51-64

Type: Article

DOI: 10.15366/BP2019.20.003 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

More publications in: Bajo palabra. Revista de filosofía

Abstract

Institutions are a manifestation of power. According to H. Arendt, a second aspect has to be considered; institutions could decay and even petrify when the living power, the people´s power, doesn’t uphold them. The recent crisis in the national and the international political sphere, could derive from insufficient backing of power in institutional systems. However, their erosion would depend on several factors, not only of the “living power”, as H. Arendt stated. Deinstitutionalization processes are complex phenomena and, consequently, they require several levels of analysis: (1) institutions perform integration functions, articulating reciprocal expectations of agents, (2) as systems of rules, institutions define rights and duties (3) the role of “constitutive rules”. In general, the normativity or deontic power of public systems of rules has to be taken into account

Bibliographic References

  • ARENDT, H., On Violence, Orlando, Harcourt Brace Jovanovich Publishers, 1969
  • BACHRACH, L., Deinstitutionalization: An Analytical Review and Sociological Perspective, Rockville, National Institute of Mental Health, U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare (DHEW), 1976
  • BERGER, P., LUCKMANN, TH., The Social Construction of Reality, London, Penguin, 1991
  • CALHOUN, C., «Occupy Wall Street in Perspective», British Journal of Sociology, 64, 2013, pp. 26-38
  • DACIN,T., GOODSTEIN, J., SCOTT, R., «Institutional Theory and Institutional Change: Introduction to the Social Research Forum», The Academy of Management Journal, 45, 2002, pp. 45-56
  • DÉCIEUX, F., NACHTWEY, O., « Occupy: Protest in der Postdemokratie », Forschungsjournal Soziale Bewegungen, 27, 2014, pp. 75-88
  • DELLA PORTA, D., Social Movements in Times of Austerity, Cambridge, Polity Press, 2015
  • GREENWOOD, R., OLIVER, CH., SUDDABY, R., SAHLIN, K., Organizational Institutionalism, London, Sage, 2008
  • HABERMAS, J., Im Sog der Tecnokratie, Frankfurt, Suhrkamp, 2013
  • HABERMAS, J., Ach, Europa, Frankfurt, Suhrkamp, 2008
  • HAJER, M., «Policy without Polity? Policy Analysis and the Institutional Void», Policy Sciences, 36, 2003, pp. 175-195
  • HANISH, C., «The Personal is Political», Notes form the Second Year. Women´s Liberation Movement, 1970, pp. 76-78
  • HESSEL, S., Indignez-vous!, Montpellier, Indigène Éditions, 2010
  • Huntington, S., Political Order in Changing Societies, New Haven, Yale University Press, 1968
  • Laeken Declaration on the Future of the European Union, 2001
  • Ley Orgánica 1/2004, de 28 de diciembre, de Medidas de Protección Integral contra la Violencia de Género.
  • Ley Orgánica 3/2007, de 22 de marzo, para la igualdad efectiva de mujeres y hombres
  • MARCH, J., OLSEN, J., Rediscovering Institutions, New York, The Free Press, 1989
  • OLIVER, CH., «Strategic Responses to Institutional Processes», The Academy of Management Review, 4, 16, 1991, pp. 145-179
  • PARSONS, T., On Institutions and Social Evolution, Chicago. The University of Chicago Press, 1982
  • PETERS, G., Institutional Theory in Political Science, London, Pinter, 1999
  • RADAELLI, C., Featherstone, K., “Introduction”. En: Featherstone, K., Radaelli, C.: The Politics of Europeanization, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2003, pp. 27-56
  • RAWLS, J., A Theory of Justice, Cambridge, The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1999
  • Regulation (EU) No 604/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013
  • SCOTT, J., «Gender: A Useful Category of Historical Analysis», American Historical Review, 54, 1986, pp. 1053-1075
  • SCOTT, R., Institutions and Organizations, London, Sage, 1995
  • SCOTT, R., «The Adolescence of Institutional Theory», Administrative Science Quarterly, 1987, pp. 493-511
  • SEARLE, J., «What Is An Institution?», Journal of Institutional Economics, 1, 2005, pp. 1-22
  • SEARLE, J., «How to Derive “Ought” From “Is”», The Philosophical Review, 73, 1964, pp. 43-58
Data source: Dialnet