Construção de um teste de visualização a partir da psicologia cognitiva

  1. Gerardo Prieto Adánez
  2. Angela Dias Velasco
Zeitschrift:
Avaliaçao Psicologica: Interamerican Journal of Psychological Assessment

ISSN: 2175-3431,  1677-0471

Datum der Publikation: 2002

Ausgabe: 1

Nummer: 1

Seiten: 39-47

Art: Artikel

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

Andere Publikationen in: Avaliaçao Psicologica: Interamerican Journal of Psychological Assessment

Zusammenfassung

In this work we describe the theoretical criteria that guided the process of the construction of a Visualization test, whose items were generated from a Surfaces Development task. This test was applied to samples of first-year Engineering students of the Polytechnic School of the University of Sao Paulo and the Paulista State University (Guaratinguetá Campus). The item difficulty was estimated using the Rasch model. We observed that the item difficulty is associated to a task condition involved in the ability of mentally transforming the objects and of maintaining active the spatial information during the transforming process. Also we verify the usefulness of this test in diagnosing the students performance in the Technical Drawing discipline.

Bibliographische Referenzen

  • Adams, R.J., Khoo, S.. (1996). Quest: The interactive Test Analysis System. ACER. Victoria.
  • Baddeley, A.D.. (1986). Working memory. Clarendon Press. Oxford.
  • Bejar, I.I.. (1993). Test Theory for a new generation of tests. LEA. Hillsdale^eN.J. N.J.. 323-358
  • Bennet, G., Seashore, H., Wesman, A.. (1947). Diferential aptitude test. Psychological Corporation. New York.
  • Bond, T.G., Fox, C.M.. (2001). Applying the Rasch Model. LEA. Mahwah^eNJ NJ.
  • Carroll, J.B.. (1993). Human cognitive abilities: A survey of factor?analytic studies. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge.
  • Cronbach, L.J., Snow, R.E.. (1981). Aptitudes and instructional methods: A Handbook for research on interactions. Irvington P. New York.
  • Embretson, S.E.. (1992). Technical manual for The Spatial Learning Ability Test. Department of Psychology, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas. Lawrence^eKS KS.
  • Embretson, S. E.. (1993). Test Theory for a new generation of tests. LEA. Hillsdale^eN.J. N.J.. 125-150
  • Embretson, S.E.. (1996). Cognitive Design Principles and the Successful Performer: A Study on Spatial Ability. Journal of Educational Measurement. 33. 29-39
  • Embretson, S.E., Reise, S.P.. (2000). Item Response Theory for Psychologists. LEA. Mahwah^eNJ NJ.
  • Hsi, S., Linn, M.C., Bell, J.E.. (1997). The Role of Spatial Reasoning in Engineering and Design of Spatial Instruction. Journal of Engineering Education. 151-158
  • Irvine, S.H., Kyllonen, P.. Item generation for test development. LEA. Mahwah^eNJ NJ.
  • Karabatsos, G.. (2000). A Critique of Rasch Residual Fit Statistics. Journal of Applied Measurement. 1. 152-176
  • Logie, R.H.. (1995). Visuo-Spatial Working Memory. LEA. Hove.
  • Lohman, D.F.. (1979). Spatial ability: a review and reanalysis of the correlational literature. Stanford University Press. Stanford^eCA CA.
  • Lohman, D.F.. (1988). Advances in the psychology of human inteligence. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Hillsdale^eNJ NJ. 4.
  • Lohman, D.F.. (2000). Handbook of Intelligence. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge^eUK UK. 285-340
  • (1997). MetaCard users Guide, Boulder. ^eCO CO.
  • Miyake, A., Shah, P.. (1999). Models of working memory: Mechanisms of active mainenance and executive control. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge^eUK UK. 442-481
  • Prieto, G., Carro, J., Orgaz, B., Pulido, R.F.. (1993). Análisis cognitivo de un test informatizado de Visualización Espacial. Psicothema. 5. 293-301
  • Prieto, G., Carro, J., Pulido, R.F., Orgaz, B., Delgado, A.R., Loro, P.. (1996). Medición de la Visualización Espacial mediante tests informatizados. Estudios de Psicología. 55. 41-59
  • Rasch, G.. (1960). Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests. The Danish Institute for Educational Research. Copenhague.
  • Rasch, G.. (1977). The Danish Yearbook of Philosophy. Munksgarrd. Copenhagen. 59-94
  • Saito, T., Suzuki, K., Jingu, T.. (1998). Relations between Spatial Ability evaluated by a Mental Cutting Test and Engineering Graphics Education. Austin^eTexas Texas. 231-235
  • Shepard, R.N., Feng, C.. (1972). A chronometric study of mental paper folding. Cognitive Psychology. 3. 228-243
  • Suzuki, K., Shiina, K., Makino, K., Saito, T., Jingu, T., Tsutsumi, N., Kashima, S., Shibata, M., Maki, H., Tsutsumi, E., Isoda, H.. (1992). Evaluation os Student's Spatial Abilities by a Mental Cutting Test. 5th ASEE International Conference ECDGD. Melbourne.
  • Thurstone, T.G., Thurstone, L.L.. (1949). Mechanical Aptitude II; Description of Group Tests. Univ.of Chicago, Psychometric Laboratory. Chicago.
  • van der Linden, W.J., Hambleton, R.K.. (1997). Handbook of Modern Item Response Theory. Springer. New York.
  • Wright, B.D., Masters, G.N.. (1982). Rating scale analysis. MESA Press. Chicago.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet