El control judicial de la política exteriorhacia la normalización de la PESC en el ordenamiento jurídico de la Unión Europea (a propósito del asunto "Bank Refah Kargaran")
-
1
Universidad de Salamanca
info
ISSN: 1138-4026
Year of publication: 2021
Year: 25
Issue: 68
Pages: 159-184
Type: Article
More publications in: Revista de Derecho Comunitario Europeo
Sustainable development goals
Abstract
La sentencia del TJUE en el asunto Bank Refah Kargaran va a contribuir significativamente a reforzar la protección jurídica de los particulares en relación con las medidas restrictivas adoptadas por la UE. Por primera vez, el TJUE se ha declarado competente para conocer de los recursos que tienen por objeto obtener una indemnización por los perjuicios sufridos como consecuencia de la adopción de medidas restrictivas en el ámbito de la PESC. La sentencia Bank Refah Kargaran tiene profundas implicaciones constitucionales para el ordenamiento jurídico de la UE, ya que viene a confirmar que el rol del TJUE en la PESC no es tan limitado como aparentan los Tratados. Los actos jurídicos de la PESC no pueden ser considerados como instrumentos de naturaleza netamente intergubernamental que se mantienen al margen del control judicial. Los actos de la PESC han de ser interpretados en el marco de la estructura general de los Tratados, incluyendo el sistema general de recursos de la UE.
Bibliographic References
- Andrés Sáenz de Santamaría, P. (2017). Mejorando la lex imperfecta: tutela judicial efectiva y cuestión prejudicial en la PESC. Revista de Derecho Comunitario Europeo, 58, 871-903. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.18042/cepc/ rdce.58.02.
- Butler, G. (2020). Non-contractual liability and actions for damages regarding restrictive measures through CFSP Decisions: Jurisdiction of the CJEU confirmed. EU Law Live.
- Butler, G. y Wessel, R. A. (2021). Jurisdiction of the Court for non-contractual liability and actions for damages claims within the CFSP: Bank Refah Kargaran. En G. Butler y R. Wessel (eds.). EU External Relations Law: The Cases in Context. Oxford: Hart Publishing.
- Cardwell, P. J. (2015). On ‘Ring-Fencing’ the Common Foreign and Security Policy in the Legal Order of the European Union. Northern Ireland Legal Quarterly, 64, 443-463.
- De Baere, G. y Koutrakos, P. (2012). The Interactions between the Legislature and the Judiciary in EU External Relations. En P. Syrpis (ed.). The Judiciary, the Legislature and the EU Internal Market (pp. 243-273). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511845680.014.
- Denza, E. (2002). The Intergovernmental Pillars of the European Union. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198299356.001.0001.
- Eckes, C. (2020). Constitutionalising the EU Foreign and Security Policy: The ECJ accepts jurisdiction over claims for damages under the Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP). Verfassungsblog on matters constitutional [blog], 18-10- 2020. Disponible en: https://bit.ly/3aTvSlI.
- Griller, S. (2013). The Court of Justice and the Common Foreign and Security Policy. En A. Rosas et al. (eds.). Court of Justice of the European Union - Cour de Justice de l’Union Européenne, The Court of Justice and the Construction of Europe: Analyses and Perspectives on Sixty Years of Case-law - La Cour de Justice et la Construction de l’Europe: Analyses et Perspectives de Soixante Ans de Jurisprudence (pp. 675-692). The Hague: T.M.C. Asser Press. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-6704-897-2_36.
- Hillion, C. (2014). A Powerless Court? The European Court of Justice and the Common Foreign and Security Policy. En C. Cremona y A. Thies (eds). The European Court of Justice and External Relations Law. Oxford: Hart Publishing. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2388165.
- Hinarejos, A. (2009). Judicial Control in the European Union – Reforming Jurisdiction in the Intergovernmental Pillars. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199569960.001.0001.
- Koutrakos, P. (2018). Judicial Review in the EU’s Common Foreing and Security Policy. International Comparative Law Quartely, 67, 1-35. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020589317000380.
- Santos Vara, J. (2021). The ‘Normalisation’ of CFSP International Agreements in the EU Legal Order: Mauritius and Tanzania. En G. Butler y R. Wessel (eds.). EU External Relations Law: The Cases in Context. Oxford: Hart Publishing.
- Santos Vara, J. (2019). The European Parliament in the Conclusion of International Agreements Post-Lisbon: Entrenched Between Values and Prerogatives. En J. Santos Vara y S. R. Sánchez-Tabernero (eds.). The Democratization of EU International Relations Through EU Law. Routledge. Disponible en: https://doi. org/10.4324/9781315178721-4.
- Santos Vara, J. (2011). The Consequences of Kadi: Where the Divergence of Opinion between EU and International Lawyers Lies? European Law Journal, 17 (2), 252-274. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0386.2010.00547.x.
- Santos Vara, J. (2009). Judicial control over the sanctions against Al-Qaeda and the Taliban in the European Union: a challenge to the powers of the Security Council?. Revista de Derecho Comunitario Europeo, 32, 91-120.
- Santos Vara, J. (2008). El control judicial de la ejecución de las sanciones del Consejo de Seguridad en la Unión Europea. Revista Electrónica de Estudios Internacionales, 15, 1-23.
- Van Elsuwege, P. y De Coninck J. (2020). Action for damages in relation to CFSP decisiones pertaining to restrictive measures: A revolutionary move by the Court of Justice in Bank Refah Kargaran? EU Law Analysis, 9-10-2020. Disponible en: http://hdl.handle.net/1854/LU-8677757.
- Wessel, R. A. (2019). Legal aspects of parliamentary oversight in EU foreign and security policy. En J. Santos Vara and S. R. Sánchez-Tabernero, (eds.), The democratization of EU international relations through EU law. London: Routledge. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315178721-4.
- Wessel, R. A. (2018). The Good, the Bad and the Ugly: Three Levels of Judicial Control over the CFSP. En S. Blockmans y P. Koutrakos (eds.). Research Handbook in EU Common Foreign and Security Policy (pp. 65-87). Cheltenham; Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.4 337/9781785364082.00011.
- Wessel, R. A. (2016). Lex Imperfecta: Law and Integration in European Foreign and Security Policy. European Papers: A Journal on Law and Integration, 1 (2), 439-468.