Effectiveness of diathermy in patients with low back and pelvic pain referred to lower limba pilot study

  1. Rodríguez Sanz, David
  2. Martinez Pascual, Beatriz
  3. Fernandez Martinez, Silvia
  4. De la Cueva Reguera, Monica
  5. Diaz Vega, Ignacio
  6. Calvo Lobo, Cesar
Revista:
EJPOD: European Journal of Podiatry = Revista europea de podología

ISSN: 2445-1835

Ano de publicación: 2017

Volume: 3

Número: 2

Páxinas: 41-45

Tipo: Artigo

DOI: 10.17979/EJPOD.2017.3.2.1947 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso aberto editor

Outras publicacións en: EJPOD: European Journal of Podiatry = Revista europea de podología

Resumo

Objetivos: El dolor lumbar y pélvico son problemas de salud prevalentes y la mayor causa de discapacidad y de gasto sanitario. Evaluar la efectividad de la diatermia para el dolor lumbopelvico. Método: Se seleccionan 20 multifidus en sujetos con dolor lumbopelvico previo. Se desarrolla un estudio ciego con dos grupos aleatorizados , grupo A diatermia, grupo B diatermia placebo para comprobar la eficacia. Resultados: El grupo tratado con diatermia no mostró diferencias significativas con el grupo placebo de manera aislada. Esta técnica rara vez se usa de manera aislada y se asocia frecuentemente a técnicas de propiocepcion o a fisioterapia. El grupo de diatermia mostró mejores valores en las correlaciones tensomiográficas. Conclusiones: Se necesitan más estudios para incrementar el conocimiento de los efectos físicos de la diatermia en poblaciones con enfermedades prevalente como la lumbalgia.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Andersson GB. Epidemiological features of chronic low back pain. Lancet. 1999; 354: 581–85.
  • Luo X, Pietrobon R, Sun SX, Liu GG, and L. Hey L.“Estimates and patterns of direct health care expenditures among individuals with back pain in the United States,” Spine. 2004; 29 (1): 9–86.
  • Dagenais S, Caro J, Haldeman S. “A systematic review of low back pain cost of illness studies in the United States and internationally,” Spine Journal. 2008; 8(1): 8–20.
  • Ricci JA, Stewart RB, Chee E, Leotta C, Foley K, aM. Hochber C. “Back pain exacerbations and lost productive time costs in United States workers,” Spine. 2006; 31, (26): 3052–60.
  • Stewart WF, Ricci JA,Chee E,Morganstein D, and R. Lipton, “Lost productive time and cost due to common pain conditions in the US workforce,” Journal of the American Medical Association. 2003; 290(18): 2443–54.
  • Strine TW, Hootman JW. “US national prevalence and correlates of low back and neck pain among adults,” Arthritis and Rheumatism. 2007; 57 (4): 656–65.
  • Heidari P, Farahbakhsh F, Rostami M, Noormohammadpour P, Kordi R. The role of ultrasound in diagnosis of the causes of low back pain: a review of the literature. Asian J Sports Med. 2015 Mar;6(1):238-43.
  • Whittaker JL, Warner MB, Stokes M. Comparison of the sonographic features of the abdominal wall muscles and connective tissues in individuals with and without lumbopelvic pain. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2013;43(1):11-9.
  • Kiesel KB, Underwood FB, Mattacola CG, Nitz AJ, Malone TR. A comparison of select trunk muscle thickness change between subjects with low back pain classified in the treatment-based classification system and asymptomatic controls. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2007;37(10):596-607.
  • Pillastrini P, Ferrari S, Rattin S, Cupello A, Villafañe JH, Vanti C. Exercise and tropism of the multifidus muscle in low back pain: a short review. J Phys Ther Sci. 2015;27(3):943-5.
  • Teyhen DS, Gill NW, Whittaker JL, Henry SM, Hides JA, Hodges P. Rehabilitative ultrasound imaging of the abdominal muscles. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2007;37(8):450-66.
  • Whittaker JL, Warner MB, Stokes M. Comparison of the sonographic features of the abdominal wall muscles and connective tissues in individuals with and without lumbopelvic pain. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2013;43(1):11-9.
  • Kiesel KB, Underwood FB, Mattacola CG, Nitz AJ, Malone TR. A comparison of select trunk muscle thickness change between subjects with low back pain classified in the treatment-based classification system and asymptomatic controls. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2007;37(10):596-607.
  • Pillastrini P, Ferrari S, Rattin S, Cupello A, Villafañe JH, Vanti C. Exercise and tropism of the multifidus muscle in low back pain: a short review. J Phys Ther Sci. 2015;27(3):943-5.
  • Teyhen DS, Gill NW, Whittaker JL, Henry SM, Hides JA, Hodges P. Rehabilitative ultrasound imaging of the abdominal muscles. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2007;37(8):450-66.
  • Kiesel KB, Underwood FB, Mattacola CG, Nitz AJ, Malone TR. A comparison of select trunk muscle thickness change between subjects with low back pain classified in the treatment-based classification system and asymptomatic controls. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2007;37(10):596-607.
  • De Paula Simola RÁ, Harms N, Raeder C, Kellmann M, Meyer T, Pfeiffer, M, Ferrauti A. Assessment of neuromuscular function after different strength training protocols using tensiomyography. J Strength Cond Res. 2015;29(5):1339-48.
  • Tous-Fajardo J, Moras G, Rodríguez-Jiménez S, Usach R, Doutres DM, Maffiuletti NA. Inter-rater reliability of muscle contractile property measurements using non-invasive tensiomyography. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2010 Aug;20(4):761-6.
  • Koo TK, Guo J, Brown CM. Test-retest reliability, repeatability, and sensitivity of an automated deformation-controlled indentation on pressure pain threshold measurement. J Man Manip Ther. 2013; 36(2): 84-90.
  • Williamson A, Hoggart B. Pain: a review of three commonly used pain rating scales. J Clin Nurs. 2005; 14(7): 798-804.
Fonte de datos: Dialnet