Connecting blog, Twitter and Facebook use with gaps in knowledge and participation

Références bibliographiques

• Bonfadelli, H. (2002). The Internet and knowledge gaps. European Journal of Communication, 17(1), 65-84.
• Boulianne, S. (2009). Does Internet use affect engagement? A meta-analysis of research. Political Communication, 26(2), 193-211.
• Brundidge, J., Rice, R. E. (2009). Political engagement online: Do the information rich get richer and the like-minded more similar. In A. Chadwick (Ed.), Routledge handbook of Internet politics (pp.144-156). London, New York: Routledge.
• Chadwick, A. (2012). Recent shifts in the relationship between the Internet and democratic engagement in Britain and the United States: granularity, informational exuberance and political learning. In Anduiza, E., Jensen, M. & Jorba, L. (Eds.), Digital media and political engagement worldwide: a comparative study (pp.39-52). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Cho, J., Gil de Zúñiga, H., Rojas, H. & Shah, D. V. (2003). Beyond access: The digital divide and Internet uses and gratifications. IT & Society, 1(4), 46-72.
• Cho, J., Shah, D. V., McLeod, J. M., McLeod, D. M., Scholl, R. M. & Gotlieb, M. R. (2009). Campaigns, reflection, and deliberation: Advancing an O-S-R-O-R model of communication effects. Communication Theory, 19(1), 66-88.
• Converse, P. E. (1964). The nature of belief systems in mass politics. Critical Review, 18(1-3), 1-74.
• Delli Carpini, M., Keeter, S. (1997). What Americans know about politics and why it matters. New Haven: Yale University Press.
• Downes, E. J., McMillan, S. J. (2000). Defining interactivity. New Media & Society, 2(2), 157.
• Eveland, W. P., Scheufele, D. A. (2000). Connecting news media use with gaps in knowledge and participation. Political Communication, 17(3), 215-237.
• Eveland, W. P. (2001). The cognitive mediation model of learning from the news: Evidence from nonelection, off-year election, and presidential election contexts. Communication Research, 28(5), 571-601.
• Eveland, W.P., Dylko, I. (2007). Reading political blogs during the 2004 election campaign: Correlates and political consequences. In M. Tremayne (Ed.) Blogging, citizenship, and the future of media (pp. 105-126). London, New York: Routledge.
• Farrell, H. (2012). The consequences of the Internet for politics. Political Science, 15(1), 35-52.
• Gaines, B. J., Mondak, J. J. (2009). Typing together? Clustering of ideological types in online social networks. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 6(3-4), 216-231.
• Genova, B. K. L., Greenberg, B. S. (1979). Interests in news and the knowledge gap. Public Opinion Quarterly, 43(1), 79-91.
• Gil de Zúñiga, H. Internet inherentemente personal: Cómo su uso influencia nuestras vidas, Binaria 3, 2002, 1-45.
• Gil de Zúñiga, H., Puig-i-abril, E. & Rojas, H. (2009). Weblogs, traditional sources online and political participation: An assessment of how the internet is changing the political environment, New Media & Society, 11(4), 2009, 553-574.
• Gil de Zúñiga, H., & Rojas, H. (2009). Análisis de los efectos de los blogs en la sociedad de la información. Comunicación y Ciudadanía. 2(3), 60-71.
• Gil de Zúñiga, H., Bachmann, I., Hsu, S. & Brundidge, J. (2013). Expressive vs. consumptive blog use: Implications for interpersonal discussion and political participation, International Journal of Communication 7, 1538-1559.
• Gil de Zúñiga, H., & Hinsley, A. (2013). The press versus the public: What is "good journalism? Journalism Studies 14(6) 926-942. doi:10.1080/1461670X.2012.744551
• Gil de Zúñiga, H., Molyneux, L. & Zheng, P. (2014). Social media, political expression and political participation: Panel analysis of lagged and concurrent relationships. Journal of Communication. 64(4) 612-634.
• Grabe, M. E., Kamhawi, R., & Yegiyan, N. (2009). Informing citizens: How people with different levels of education process television, Newspaper, and Web News. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 53(1), 90-111.
• Habermas, J. (1985). The theory of communicative action: Volume 1: Reasoning and the rationalization of society (translated by T. McCarthy). London: Heinemann.
• Heeter, C. (1989). Implications of new interactive technologies for conceptualizing communication. In Slvaggio, J.L. & Bryant, J. (Eds.), Media use in the information age emerging patterns of adoption and consumer use (pp.217-235). Hilldale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
• Hindman, M. (2009). The myth of digital democracy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
• Huberman, B., Romero, D. & Wu, F. (2009). Social networks that matter: Twitter under the microscope. Available at SSRN 1313405.
• Iyengar, S., Hahn, K. S. (2009). Red media, blue media: Evidence of ideological selectivity in media use. Journal of Communication, 59(1), 19-39.
• Jerit, J., Barabas, J. & Bolsen, T. (2006). Citizens, knowledge, and the information environment. American Journal of Political Science, 50(2), 266-282.
• Kenski, K., Stroud, N. J. (2006). Connections between Internet use and political efficacy, knowledge, and participation. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 50(2), 173-192.
• Kim, S. H. (2008). Testing the knowledge gap hypothesis in South Korea: Traditional news media, the Internet, and political learning. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 20(2), 193-210.
• Kiousis, S. (2001). Public trust or mistrust? Perceptions of media credibility in the information age. MassCommunication & Society, 4, 381-403.
• Kiousis, S. (2002). Interactivity: a concept explication. New Media & Society, 4(3), 355-383.
• Krueger, B. S. (2002). Assessing the potential of Internet political participation in the United States: A resource approach. American Politics Research, 30(5), 476-498.
• Kwak, H. Lee, C. Park, H. & Moon, S. (2010). What is twitter, a social network or a news media? Paper presented at the 19th International Conference on World Wide Web.
• Kwak, N. (1999). Revisiting the knowledge gap hypothesis. Communication Research, 26(4), 385-413.
• Leary, T. (1990). The interpersonal, interactive, interdimensional interface. In B. Laurel (Ed.) The Art of Human-Computer Interface Design (pp. 229-234). Menlo Park, CA: Addison- Wesley.
• Lemert, J. B. (1992). Effective public opinion. Public opinion, the press, and public policy, 41-61.
• McLeod, J. M., Scheufele, D. A. & Moy, P. (1999). Community, communication, and participation: The role of mass media and interpersonal discussion in local political participation. Political Communication, 16(3), 315-336.
• Mutz, D. C. (2006). Hearing the other side: Deliberative versus participatory democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Nam, T., Stromer-Galley, J. (2012). The Democratic Divide in the 2008 US Presidential Election. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 9(2), 133-149.
• Papacharissi, Z. (2009). The virtual sphere 2.0: The Internet, the public sphere, and beyond. In A. Chadwick (Ed.), Routledge handbook of Internet politics (pp. 230-245). London, New York: Routledge.
• Pew Research Center (2010). Parsing election day media: How the midterms message varied by platform, retrieved from http://pewresearch.org/pubs/1794/parsing-election-daymediamessages- varied-by-platform
• Prior, M. (2005). News vs. entertainment: How increasing media choice widens gaps in political knowledge and turnout. American Journal of Political Science, 577-592.
• Prior, M. (2007). Post-broadcast democracy: How media choice increases inequality in political involvement and polarizes elections. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Touchstone.
• Rafaeli, S. (1988). Interactivity: From new media to communication. Advancing communication science: Merging mass and interpersonal processes, 16, 110-134.
• Rojas, H., Pérez I. & Gil de Zúñiga, H. (2010). Comunicación y Comunidad. Universidad Externado de Colombia Press: Bogotá Colombia.
• Shah, D. V., Cho, J., Eveland, W. P., & Kwak, N. (2005). Information and expression in a digital age. Communication research, 32(5), 531.
• Shah, D. V., Cho, J., Nah, S., Gotlieb, M. R., Hwang, H. & Lee, N. J. (2007). Campaign ads, online messaging, and participation: Extending the communication mediation model. Journal of communication, 57(4), 676-703.
• Sunstein, C. R. (2009). Republic. com 2.0. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
• Swigger, N. (2012). The online citizen: Is social media changing citizens' beliefs about democratic values? Political Behavior, 1-15.
• Tichenor, P. J., Donohue, G. A. & Olien, C. N. (1970). Mass media flow and differential growth in knowledge. Public opinion quarterly, 34(2), 159.
• Tremayne, M. (2008). Manipulating interactivity with thematically hyperlinked news texts: a media learning experiment. New Media & Society, 10(5), 703-727.
• Tsfati, Y. (2003). Does audience skepticism of the media matters in agenda setting? Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 47, 157-176.
• Verba, S., Schlozman, K. L. & Brady, H. E. (1995). Voice and equality: Civic voluntarism in American politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Vitak, J., Zube, P., Smock, A., Carr, C. T., Ellison, N. & Lampe, C. (2010). It's complicated: Facebook users' political participation in the 2008 election. Cyber-Psychology, behavior, and social networking, 14(3), 107-114.
• Wojcieszak, M. E., Mutz, D. C. (2009). Online groups and political discourse: do online discussion spaces facilitate exposure to political disagreement? Journal of Communication, 59(1), 40-56.
• Zaller, J. (1992). The nature and origins of mass opinion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.