Formación y actividad clínica de los retinólogos en Españaun primer acercamiento: Proyecto retina 2. Análisis descriptivo

  1. J.C. Pastor
  2. I. Fernández
  3. S. Barragán
  4. R. Coco
  5. M.R. Sanabria
  6. E. Rodríguez-de-la-Rúa
  7. J. Rojas
  8. D. Sánchez
  9. R. Fernández
Revista:
Archivos de la Sociedad Española de Oftalmologia

ISSN: 0365-6691

Año de publicación: 2009

Volumen: 84

Número: 2

Páginas: 75-84

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.4321/S0365-66912009000200005 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: Archivos de la Sociedad Española de Oftalmologia

Objetivos de desarrollo sostenible

Resumen

Purpose: To create a database of Spanish ophthalmologists mainly dedicated to retinal pathology care, describing their training period characteristics and their daily activity (clinical and surgical). Methods: A postal questionnaire was sent to 504 possible retinologists identified through the information supplied by the Spanish Ophthalmological Society and the Spanish Vitreous-Retina Society, with a minimum of 3 retinologists per Autonomous Region. Results: 267 (52.9% of the sample population) responses were collected and processed. Most of the respondents had started their residency after 1980 (82.4%). Ninety-four percent had received specific training in retinal pathology, mostly during the residency period (82.1%) and from more experienced colleagues (62.9%). Official fellowships were held in a minority of cases (around 12%). Twelve percent of retinologists performed retinal surgery only, 14.6% performed anterior segment surgery, and 60.7% performed both types of surgery. Conclusions: Despite not having taken into consideration non-response bias, this study provides the first reported data on the professional profile of Spanish retinologists.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Spivey, BE. (1991). An ophthalmologist’s definition of ophthalmology. Ophthalmology. 98. 1877-1881
  • Lee, PP, Hoskins, HD Jr, Parke, DW 3rd. (2007). Access to care: eye care provider workforce considerations in 2020. Arch Ophthalmol. 125. 406-410
  • Gedde, SJ, Budenz, DL, Haft, P, Lee, Y, Quigley, HA. (2007). Factors affecting the decision to pursue glaucoma fellowship training. J Glaucoma. 16. 81-87
  • Riad, SF, Dart, JK, Cooling, RJ. (2003). Primary care and ophthalmology in the United Kingdom. Br J Ophthalmol. 87. 493-499
  • (1996). he repair of rhegmatogenous retinal detachments. Ophthalmology. 103. 1313-1324
  • Frimpong-Ansah, K, Kirkby, GR. (2002). Arrangements for the management of urgent retinal detachments in the United Kingdom and Eire in the year 2000: results of a survey. Eye. 16. 754-760
  • Comer, MB, Newman, DK, George, ND, Martin, KR, Tom, BD, Moore, AT. (2000). Who should manage primary retinal detachments?. Eye. 14. 572-578
  • Thompson, JA, Snead, MP, Billington, BM, Barrie, T, Thompson, JR, Sparrow, JM. (2002). National audit of the outcome of primary surgery for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment: II. Clinical outcomes. Eye. 16. 771-777
  • Thompson, JA, Snead, MP, Billington, BM, Barrie, T, Thompson, JR, Sparrow, JM. (2002). National audit of the outcome of primary surgery for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment: I. Sample and methods. Eye. 16. 766-770
  • Fernández, I, Rojas, I, Pastor, JC, Gómez Ulla, F, Piñero, A. (2006). Encuesta nacional sobre la cirugía vitreo-retiniana y la atención de los desprendimientos de retina regmatógenos en España: Proyecto Retina 2. Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol. 81. 635-640
  • Rojas, J, Fernandez, I, Pastor, JC, Gómez-Ulla, F, Piñero, A. (2007). Manejo de los desprendimientos de retina regmatógenos urgentes en el sistema nacional de Salud de España: Proyecto Retina 2. Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol. 82. 279-284
  • Gedde, SJ, Budenz, DL, Haft, P, Tielsch, JM, Lee, Y, Quigley, HA. (2005). Factors influencing career choices among graduating ophthalmology residents. Ophthalmology. 112. 1247-1254