Ayudar a comprender y enseñar a comprenderdos planteamientos instruccionales para los estudiantes de educación primaria

Referencias bibliográficas

• Anmarkrud, Ø., McCrudden, M. T., Bråten, I. & Strømsø, H. I. (2013). Task-oriented reading of multiple documents: Online comprehension processes and offline products. Instructional Science, 41(5), 873–894. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-013-9263-8
• Best, R. M., Floyd, R. G. & McNamara, D. S. (2008). Differential competencies contributing to children’s comprehension of narrative and expository texts. Reading Psychology, 29(2), 137–164. https://doi.org/10.1080/02702710801963951
• Braasch, J. L. G., Bråten, I. & McCrudden, M. T. (2018). Introduction to research on multiple source use. En J. L. G. Braasch, I. Bråten, & M. T. McCrudden (Eds.), Handbook of multiple source use (pp. 1-13). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315627496-1
• Britt, M. A., Rouet, J. F. & Durik, A. (2018). Literacy beyond text comprehension: a theory of purposeful reading. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315682860
• Britton, B. K. & Gülgöz, S. (1991). Using Kintsch’s model to improve instructional text: Effects of inference calls on recall and cognitive structures. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 329–345. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.83.3.329
• Brooks, L. W., Spurlin, J. E., Dansereau, D. F. & Holley, C. D. (1983). Effects of headings on text-processing. Journal of Educational Psychology, 75(2), 292–302. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.75.2.292
• Calvo, N. (2021). Estudio de los precursores y de las habilidades nucleares de la comprensión de textos académicos (Tesis doctoral en preparación). Universidad de Salamanca, España.
• Caravolas, M., Lervåg, A., Mousikou, P., Efrim, C., Litavsky, M., Onochie-Quintanilla, E., ... Hulme, C. (2012). Common patterns of prediction of literacy development in different alphabetic orthographies. Psychological Science, 23(6), 678–686. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611434536
• Chall, J. S., Jacobs, V. A. & Baldwin, L. E. (1990). The reading crisis: why poor children fall behind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
• Chi, M. T. H. (2008). Three types of conceptual change: Belief revision, mental model transformation, and categorical shift. En S. Vosniadou (Ed.), Handbook of research on conceptual change (pp. 61–82). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
• Compton, D. L. & Pearson, P. D. (2016). Identifying robust variations associated with reading comprehension skill: The search for pressure points. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 9(2), 223–231. https://doi.org/10.1080/19345747.2016.1149007
• Cuetos, F., Ramos, J. L. & Ruano, E. (2002). PROESC: evaluación de los procesos de escritura. España: TEA.
• Cuetos, F., Rodríguez, B., Ruano, E. & Arribas, D. (2007). PROLEC-R. Batería de Evaluación de los Procesos Lectores, Revisada. España, TEA.
• Degand, L. & Sanders, T. J. M. (2002). The impact of relational markers on expository text comprehension in L1 and L2. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 15(7–8), 739–757. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020932715838
• Duke, N. K. (2000). 3.6 minutes per day: the scarcity of informational texts in first grade. Reading Research Quarterly, 35(2), 202–224. https://doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.35.2.1
• Duke, N. K. & Roberts, K. L. (2010). The genre-specific nature of reading comprehension and the case of informational text. En D. Wyse, R. Andrews, & J. Hoffman (Eds.), The international handbook of English language and literacy teaching (pp. 74–86). Routledge.
• Eason, S. H., Goldberg, L. F., Young, K. M., Geist, M. C. & Cutting, L. E. (2012). Reader – text interactions: How differential text and question types influence cognitive skills needed for reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(3), 515–528. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027182
• Ericsson, K. A. & Lehmann, A. C. (1996). Expert and exceptional performance: Evidence of Maximal Adaptation to Task Constraints. Annual Review of Psychology, 47, 273–305. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.47.1.273
• Ferreira, A. C. (2018). La comprensión lectora: el papel de la competencia retórica (Tesis doctoral, Universidad de Salamanca). Recuperado de http://hdl.handle.net/10366/139503
• Florit, E., Cain, K. & Mason, L. (2020). Going beyond children’s single‐text comprehension: The role of fundamental and higher‐level skills in 4th graders’ multiple‐document comprehension. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 9(2), 449-472. bjep.12288. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12288
• García, J. R., Bustos, A. & Sánchez, E. (2015). The contribution of knowledge about anaphors, organisational signals and refutations to reading comprehension. Journal of Research in Reading, 38(4), 405–427. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9817.12021
• García, J. R. & Cain, K. (2014). Decoding and reading comprehension: A meta-analysis to identify which reader and assessment characteristics influence the strength of the relationship in English. Review of Educational Research, 84(1), 74–111. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654313499616
• García, J. R., Montanero, M., Lucero, M., Cañedo, I. & Sánchez, E. (2018). Comparing rhetorical devices in History textbooks and teachers’ lessons: Implications for the development of academic language skills. Linguistics and Education, 47, 16–26. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2018.07.004
• García, J. R., Sánchez, E., Cain, K. & Montoya, J. M. (2019). Cross-sectional study of the contribution of rhetorical competence to children’s expository texts comprehension between third- and sixth-grade. Learning and Individual Differences, 71, 31–42. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2019.03.005
• Gersten, R., Fuchs, L. S., Williams, J. P. & Baker, S. (2001). Teaching reading comprehension strategies to students with learning disabilities: A review of research. Review of Educational Research, 71(2), 279–320. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543071002279
• Givón, T. (1992). The grammar of referential coherence as mental processing instructions. Linguistics, 30(1), 5–55. https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.1992.30.1.5
• Goldman, S. R. (2015). Reading and the Web: Broadening the need for complex comprehension. En R. J. Spirom, M. DeSchryver, M. S. Hagerman, P. Morsink, & P. Thompson (Eds.), Reading at a crossroads? Disjunctures and continuities in current conceptions and practices (pp. 89-103). Routledge.
• Goldman, S. R., Lawless, K. & Manning, F. (2013). Research and development of multiple source comprehension assessment. En M. A. Britt, S. R. Goldman, & J.-F. Rouet (Eds.), Reading from words to multiple texts (pp. 160–179). Routledge.
• Gough, P. B., Hoover, W. A. & Peterson, C. L. (1996). Some observations on a simple view of reading. En C. Cornoldi & J. Oakhill (Eds.), Reading comprehension difficulties (pp. 1– 13). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
• Gough, P. B. & Tunmer, W. E. (1986). Decoding, reading, and reading disability. Peer Reviewed Journal, 7(1), 6–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/074193258600700104
• Graesser, A. (2007). An introduction to strategic reading comprehension. En D. S. McNamara (Ed.), Reading comprehension strategies. Theories, interventions, and technologies (pp. 3–26). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
• Hall, K. M., Sabey, B. L. & McClellan, M. (2005). Expository text comprehension: helping primary-grade teachers use expository texts to full advantage. Reading Psychology, 26(3), 211–234. https://doi.org/10.1080/02702710590962550
• Hebert, M., Bohaty, J. J. Nelson, J. R. & Brown, J. (2016). The effects of text structure instruction on expository reading comprehension: A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 108(5), 609–629. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000082
• Hoover, W. A. & Gough, P. B. (1990). The simple view of reading. Reading and Writing, 2(2), 127–160. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00401799
• Jiménez, J. E. & Ortiz, M. del R. (2000). Metalinguistic awareness and reading acquisition in the Spanish language. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 3(1), 37–46. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1138741600005527
• Karmiloff-Smith, A. (1992). Más allá de la modularidad. España: Alianza Editorial.
• Kiili, C., Bråten, I., Kullberg, N. & Leppänen, P. H. T. (2020). Investigating elementary school students’ text-based argumentation with multiple online information resources. Computers & Education, 147, 103785. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103785
• Kintsch, W. & Yarbrough, J. C. (1982). Role of rhetorical structure in text comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 74(6), 828–834. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.74.6.828
• Lemarié, J., Lorch, R. F., Eyrolle, H. & Virbel, J. (2008). SARA: A text-based and reader- based theory of signaling. Educational Psychologist, 43(1), 27–48. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520701756321
• Mayer, R., & Alexander, P. (2016). Handbook of research on learning and instruction. Routledge.
• Mayer, R. E. (2010). Aprendizaje e instrucción. España: Alianza Editorial.
• McCrudden, M. T. (2018). Text relevance and multiple source use. En J. L. G. Braasch, I. Bråten, & M. T. McCrudden (Eds.) Handbook of multiple source use (pp. 168-183). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315627496-10
• McCrudden, M. T. & Schraw, G. (2007). Relevance and goal-focusing in text processing. Educational Psychology Review, 19(2), 113–139. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-006-9010-7
• McCrudden, M. T. & Schraw, G. (2010). The effects of relevance instructions and verbal ability on text processing. Journal of Experimental Education, 78(1), 96–117. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220970903224529
• McCrudden, M. T., Magliano, J. P. & Schraw, G. (2010). Exploring how relevance instructions affect personal reading intentions, reading goals, and text processing: A mixed methods study. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 35(4), 229-241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2009.12.001
• McCrudden, M. T., Magliano, J. P. & Schraw, G. (2011). Relevance in text comprehension. En M. T. McCrudden, J. P. Magliano, & G. Schraw (Eds.), Text relevance and learning from text (pp. 1-17). Information Age Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1428-6_354
• McNamara, D. S. (2007). Reading comprehension strategies: Theories, interventions, and technologies. Lawrence Erlbaum.
• McNamara, D. S., Kintsch, E., Songer, N. B. & Kintsch, W. (1996). Are good texts always better? Interactions of text coherence, background knowledge, and levels of understanding in learning from text. Cognition and Instruction, 14(1), 1–43. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci1401_1
• Meneses, A., Uccelli, P., Santelices, M. V., Ruiz, M., Acevedo, D. & Figueroa, J. (2018). Academic language as a predictor of reading comprehension in monolingual Spanish-speaking readers: evidence from Chilean early adolescents. Reading Research Quarterly, 53(2), 223–247. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.192
• Meyer, B. J. F. (1975). The organization of prose and its effects on memory. Elsevier Science Publishing Co Inc.
• Meyer, B. J. F., Brandt, D. M. & Bluth, G. J. (1980). Use of top-level structure in text: key for reading comprehension of 9th-grade students. Reading Research Quarterly, 16(1), 72–103. https://doi.org/10.2307/747349
• Oakhill, J., Cain, K. & Bryant, P. E. (2003). The dissociation of word reading and text comprehension: evidence from component skills. Language and Cognitive Processes, 18(4), 443–468. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960344000008
• Paul, J., Cerdán, R., Rouet, J.-F. & Stadtler, M. (2018). Exploring fourth graders’ sourcing skills. Infancia y Aprendizaje, 41(3), 536–580. https://doi.org/10.1080/02103702.2018.1480458
• Pekrun, R., Frenzel, A. C., Goetz, T. & Perry, R. P. (2007). The control-value theory of achievement emotions: an integrative approach to emotions in education. En P. A. Schutz & R. Pekrun (Eds.), Emotion in education (pp. 13–36). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1002/path.1711270305
• Perfetti, C. & Adlof, S. M. (2012). Reading comprehension: A conceptual framework from word meaning to text meaning. En J. Sabatini, E. Albro & T. O’Reilly (Eds). Measuring up: Advances in how to assess reading ability. (pp. 3-20). Rowman & Littlefield Education.
• Reutzel, D. R., Smith, J. A. & Fawson, P. C. (2005). An evaluation of two approaches for teaching reading comprehension strategies in the primary years using science information texts. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 20(3), 276–305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2005.07.002
• Rojas, S. P., Meneses, A. & Sánchez, E. (2019). Teachers’ scaffolding science reading comprehension in low-income schools: how to improve achievement in science. International Journal of Science Education, 41(13), 1827–1847. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2019.1641855
• Saenz, L. M. & Fuchs, L. S. (2002). Examining the reading difficulty of secondary students with learning disabilities: Expository versus narrative text. Remedial and Special Education, 23, 31–41. https://doi.org/10.1177/074193250202300105
• Sánchez, E., García-Rodicio, H. & García, J. R. (2021). Task-oriented reading in elementary school. Students’ evaluation and selection of relevant content from multiple texts. Manuscrito en preparación.
• Sánchez, E. & García, J. R. (2009). The relation of knowledge of textual integration devices to expository text comprehension under different assessment conditions. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 22(9), 1081–1108. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-008-9145-7
• Sánchez, E. & García, J. R. (2015). Understanding teachers as learners in reading comprehension mentoring: Considering teachers’ possibilities of change as a way of bridging the distance between teachers’ practice and research-based instructional design programs. En H. Tillema, G. J. van der Westhuizen, & K. Smith (Eds.), Mentoring for Learning: Climbing the Mountain. (pp. 227-255). Sense Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-058-1_11
• Sánchez, E., García, J. R. & Bustos, A. (2017). Does rhetorical competence moderate the effect of rhetorical devices on the comprehension of expository texts beyond general comprehension skills? Reading and Writing, 30(3), 439–462. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-016-9684-2
• Sánchez, E., García, J. R. & Bustos, A. (2020). Written versus oral cues: The role of rhetorical competence in learning from texts. Reading Research Quarterly, rrq.368. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.368
• Sánchez, E., García, J. R. & Rosales, J. (2010). La lectura en el aula: qué se hace, qué se debe hacer y qué se puede hacer. Barcelona, España: Graó.
• Sánchez, E., Gonzalez, A. J. & García, R. (2002). Competencia retórica. Una propuesta para interpretar las dificultades de comprensión. Psicothema, 14(1), 77–85.
• Sanders, T. J. M. & Noordman, L. G. M. (2000). The role of coherence relations and their linguistic markers in text processing. Discourse Processes, 29(1), 37–60. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326950dp2901_3
• Snow, C. (2002). Reading for understanding: Toward an R&D program in reading comprehension. RAND.
• Snow, C. E. & Uccelli, P. (2009). The challenge of academic language. En D. R. Olson & N. Torrance (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Literacy (pp. 112–133). Cambridge, Reino Unido: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511609664.008
• Stanovich, K. E. (1986). Matthew effects in reading: some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 21(4), 360–406. https://doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.21.4.1
• Uccelli, P., Barr, C. D., Dobbs, C. L., Galloway, E. P., Meneses, A. & Sánchez, E. (2015). Core academic language skills (CALS): An expanded operational construct and a novel instrument to chart school-relevant language proficiency in pre- and adolescent learners. Applied Psycholinguistics, 36(5), 1077–1109. https://doi.org/10.1017/S014271641400006X
• van den Broek, P. & Kendeou, P. (2008). Cognitive processes in comprehension of science texts: the role of co-activation in confronting misconceptions. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 22(3), 335–351. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1418
• van Dijk, T. A. (1980). Macrostructures. Mouton.
• van Dijk, T. A. & Kintsch, W. (1983). Strategies of discourse comprehension. Academic Press.
• Vygotsky, L. (1995). Pensamiento y lenguaje. España: Paidós.
• Williams, J. P. (2018). Text structure instruction: the research is moving forward. Reading and Writing, 31(9), 1923–1935. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-018-9909-7
• Williams, J. P. & Pao, L. S. (2011). Teaching narrative and expository text structure to improve comprehension. En R. E. O’Connor & P. F. Vadasy (Eds.), Handbook of reading interventions (pp. 254–278). Guilford Press.