On the Validity of Systemic Functional Approaches as a Tool for Selecting Materials in CLIL Contextsa case of study

  1. Filardo Llamas, Laura
  2. González-Cascos Jiménez, Elena
  3. Riesco Canduela, Laura
Aldizkaria:
Porta Linguarum: revista internacional de didáctica de las lenguas extranjeras

ISSN: 1697-7467

Argitalpen urtea: 2011

Zenbakia: 16

Orrialdeak: 65-74

Mota: Artikulua

DOI: 10.30827/DIGIBUG.32008 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

Beste argitalpen batzuk: Porta Linguarum: revista internacional de didáctica de las lenguas extranjeras

Laburpena

The aim of this paper is to propose the validity of functional approaches within discourse analysis as a tool for selecting classroom material. By taking into account the linguistic realization of the three main contextual variables, namely field, tenor, and mode, and their impact on the function of language within each particular context of communication, we believe that the task of selecting and devising materials for CLIL setting shall be eased. This hypothesis becomes the point of departure for this article, where we present an analysis of six texts used for teaching Science using L2 English as the means of instruction. Conclusions are obtained about the importance of considering that any type of language used in a text has a function which depends on the context where it is used, an aspect which is frequently forgotten in L2 classrooms

Erreferentzia bibliografikoak

  • BBC (2010). «The Earth», in BBC-KS2. Bitesize: Earth, Sun and Moon, available from: http:// www.bbc.co.uk/schools/ks2bitesize/science/physical_processes/earth_sun_moon/read2.shtml, accessed 01/09/2010.
  • The Nemours Foundation (1995-2010). «Your Lungs and Respiratory System», Kidshealth for Kids, available from: http://kidshealth.org/kid/htbw/lungs.html, accessed 01/09/2010.
  • Santillana (2006). Essential Science 3. Inglés, educación primaria. Madrid: Santillana/Richmond Publishing
  • Santillana (2008). Essential Science 4. Inglés, educación primaria. Madrid: Santillana/Richmond Publishing
  • Santillana (2008). Conocimiento del medio 3. Proyecto «La casa del Saber». Madrid: Santillana/ Richmond Publishing.
  • Santillana (2008). Conocimiento del medio 4. Proyecto «La casa del Saber». Madrid: Santillana/ Richmond Publishing.
  • Bradshaw, C. (2006). «Taboo or not taboo?», in English Teaching Professional, 46: 22-24.
  • Brown, G. & G. Yule. (1983). Discourse Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Coffin, C., J. Donohue, & S. North. (2009). Exploring English Grammar. From Formal to Functional. London: Routledge.
  • Halliday, M. A. K. (1999). The Notion of «Context» in Language Education. In M. Ghadessy (ed)., Text and Context in Functional Linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins: 1-24.
  • Halliday, M.A.K. & J.R. Martin. (1993). Writing Science. Literacy and Discursive Power. London: Routledge.
  • Halliday, M.A.K. (2004). An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Hodder education.
  • Langacker, R.W. (2008). Cognitive Grammar. A Basic Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • McCarthy, M. & R. Carter. (1994). Language as Discourse. Perspectives for Language Teaching. Essex: Pearson
  • Moss, M.G. (2000). «The language of school textbooks and the ideology of science», Zona Próxima. Revista del Instituto de Estudios en Educación Universidad del Norte 1: 44-55.
  • Wray, D. & M. Lewis. (1997). Extending Literacy. Children Reading and Writing Non-Fiction. London: Routledge.
Datuen iturria: Dialnet