El enfoque de capacidades dinámicas y la empresa familiar. Un análisis en las empresas familiares españolas

  1. Ismael Barros Contreras 1
  2. Juan Hernangómez Barahona 2
  3. Natalia Martín Cruz 2
  1. 1 Universidad Austral de Chile
    info

    Universidad Austral de Chile

    Valdivia, Chile

    ROR https://ror.org/029ycp228

  2. 2 Universidad de Valladolid
    info

    Universidad de Valladolid

    Valladolid, España

    ROR https://ror.org/01fvbaw18

Journal:
Economía industrial

ISSN: 0422-2784

Year of publication: 2016

Issue Title: Dinámica empresarial

Issue: 399

Pages: 121-130

Type: Article

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openOpen access editor

More publications in: Economía industrial

Abstract

The relationship and interaction of the family, family members and the firm is a source of resources and distinctive capabilities of family firms that affect their behavior. The literature recognizes that knowledge and its management are the basis for dynamic capabilities generation within organizations. In this paper, we focus on this goal by using a sample of Spanish firms to evaluate our research model. The results indicate that family involvement promotes the generation of organizational routines, and therefore, the generation of dynamic capabilities in the family firm

Bibliographic References

  • ALLEN, N.J. y MEYER, J.P. (1990). «The measurement and antece dents of affective, continuance and normative commitment to the organization». Journal of Occupational Psychology, vol. 63, nº 1, pp. 1-18.
  • ARREGLE, J.L.; HITT, M.A.; SIRMON, D.G. y VERY, P. (2007). «The development of organizational social capital: Attributes of family firms». Journal of Management Studies, vol. 44, nº 1, pp. 73-95.
  • ASTRACHAN, J.H. (2010). «Strategy in family business: Toward a multidimensional research agenda». Journal of Family Bunisess Stra tegy, vol. 1, nº 1, pp. 6-14.
  • ASTRACHAN, J.H.; KLEIN, S. B. y SMYRNIOS, K.X. (2002). «The F-PEC scale of family influence: A proposal for solving the family business definition problem». Family Business Review, nº 15, nº 1, pp. 45-58.
  • ASTRACHAN, J.H. y PIEPER, T.M. (2010). «Introduction to volume 1. Journal of Family Business Strategy, vol. 1, nº 1, pp. 1-5.
  • BARCLAY, D.; HIGGINS, C. y THOMPSON, R. (1995). «The partial least squares (PLS) approach to causal modeling: personal computer adoption and use as an illustration». Technology studies, vol. 2, nº 2, 285-309.
  • BASCO, R. y PÉREZ RODRÍGUEZ, M.J. (2011). «Ideal types of family business management: Horizontal fit between family and business decisions and the relationship with family business performance». Jour nal of Family Business Strategy, vol. 2, nº 3, pp. 151-165.
  • BERRONE, P.; CRUZ, C. y GÓMEZ-MEJÍA, L.R. (2012). «Socio emotional wealth in family firms: Theoretical dimensions, assessment approaches, and agenda for future research». Family Business Review, vol. 25, nº 3, pp. 258-279.
  • BOWMAN, C. y AMBROSINI, V. (2003). «How the resource-based and the dynamic capability views of the firm inform corporate-level strategy». British Journal of Management, vol. 14, nº 4, pp. 289-303.
  • CABRERA-SUÁREZ, M.K., DÉNIZ-DÉNIZ, M.D.L.C. y MARTÍN-SANTANA, J.D. (2014). «The setting of non-financial goals in the family firm: The influence of family climate and identification». Journal of Family Business Strategy, vol. 5, nº 3, pp. 289-299.
  • CEPEDA, G. y ROLDÁN, J.L. (2004). Aplicando en la práctica la técnica PLS en la administración de empresas. Conocimiento y Competitividad. XIV Congreso Nacional ACEDE. Murcia, España.
  • COLOMBO, G.; KOIRANEN, M. y CHIRICO, F. (2006). Understanding family businesses as value creation systems through system dynamics. Family firms as arenas for trans-generational value creation. A qualitative and computational approach, University of Jyväskylä.
  • CYERT, R.M. y MARCH, J. G. (1963). A behavioral theory of the firm. Blackwell, Malden, MA, USA.
  • CHIN, W.W. (1998). The partial least squares approach for structural equation modeling, en M. GA (dir), Modern methods for business research Lawrence Erlbaun Associates, Mahwah, NJ, USA.
  • CHIRICO, F. (2006). Knowledge, dynamic capabilities and family inertia in family firms: A computational approach. Family firms as arenas for trans-generational value creation. A qualitative and computational approach, University of Jyväskylä.
  • CHIRICO, F. (2007). «The accumulation process of knowledge in family firms». Electronic Journal of Family Business Studies, vol. 1, nº 1, pp. 62-90.
  • CHIRICO, F. (2008). «Knowledge accumulation in family firms: Evidence from four case studies». International Small Business Journal, vol. 26, nº 4, pp. 433-462.
  • CHIRICO, F. y NORDQVIST, M. (2010). «Dynamic capabilities and trans-generational value creation in family firms: The role of organizational culture». International Small Business Journal, vol. 28, n1 5, pp. 487-504.
  • CHIRICO, F.; NORDQVIST, M.; COLOMBO, G. y MOLLONA, E. (2012). «Simulating dynamic capabilities and value creation in family firms: Is paternalism an “asset” or “liability”?». Family Business Review, vol. 25, nº 3, pp. 318-338.
  • CHIRICO, F. y SALVATO, C. (2008). «Knowledge integration and dynamic organizational adaptation in family firms». Family Business Review, vol. 21, nº 2, pp. 169-181.
  • CHIRICO, F. y SALVATO, C. (2016). «Knowledge internalization and product development in family firms: When relational and affective factors matter». Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, en prensa, DOI 10.1111/etap.12114.
  • CHRISMAN, J.J.; CHUA, J.H. y LITZ, R. A. (2004). «Comparing the agency costs of family and non-family firms: Conceptual issues and exploratory evidence». Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, vol. 28, nº 4, pp. 335-354.
  • CHRISMAN, J.J.; CHUA, J.H.; Pearson, A.W. y BARNETT, T. (2012). «Family involvement, family influence, and family-centered non-economic goals in small firms». Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, vol. 36, nº 2, pp. 267-293.
  • CHRISMAN, J.J.; CHUA, J.H. y SHARMA, P. (2005). «Trends and directions in the development of a strategic management theory of the family firm». Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, vol. 29, nº 5, pp. 555-576.
  • CHUA, J.H.; CHRISMAN, J.J. y SHARMA, P. (1999). «Defining the family business by behavior». Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, vol. 23, nº 4, pp. 19-39.
  • DE MASSIS, A.; CHIRICO, F.; KOTLAR, J. y NALDI, L. (2014). «The temporal evolution of proactiveness in family firms: The horizontal S-Curve hypothesis». Family Business Review, en prensa, DOI 10.1177/ 0894486513506114 27.
  • EDDLESTON, K.A.; KELLERMANNS, F.W. y SARATHY, R. (2008). «Resource configuration in family firms: Linking resources, strategic planning and technological opportunities to performance». Journal of Management Studies, vol. 45, nº 1, pp. 26-50.
  • EISENHARDT, K.M. y MARTIN, J. A. (2000). «Dynamic capabilities: What are they?». Strategic Management Journal, nº 21(10-11), pp. 1105-1121.
  • FORNELL, C. y BOOKSTEIN, F.L. (1982). «Two structural equation models: LISREL and PLS applied to consumer exit-voice theory». Journal of Marketing Research, vol. 19, nº 4, pp. 440-452.
  • GERSICK, K.E.; Davis, J.A.; MCCOLLOM, M. y LANSBERG, I. (1997). Generation to generation life cycles of the family business. Harvard Business School Press, Boston MA, USA.
  • GOLD, A.H.; MALHOTRA, A. y SEGARS, A.H. (2001). «Knowledge management: An organizational capabilities perspective». Journal of Management Information Systems, vol. 18, nº 1, pp. 185-214.
  • GÓMEZ-MEJÍA, L.R.; CRUZ, C.; BERRONE, P. y DE CASTRO, J. (2011). «The bind that ties: Socioemotional wealth preservation in family firms». The Academy of Management Annals, vol. 5, nº 1, pp. 653-707.
  • GÓMEZ-MEJÍA, L.R.; HAYNES, K.T.; NÚÑEZ-NICKEL, M.; JACOBSON, K.J.L. y MOYANO-FUENTES, J. (2007). «Socioemotional wealth and business risks in family-controlled firms: Evidence from Spanish olive oil mills». Administrative Science Quarterly, vol. 52, nº 1, pp. 106-137.
  • GRANT, R.M. (1996). «Prospering in dynamically-competitive environments: Organizational capability as knowledge integration». Organization Science, vol. 7, nº 4, pp. 375-387.
  • HABBERSHON, T.G. y WILLIAMS, M.L. (1999). «A resource-based framework for assessing the strategic advantages of family firms». Family Business Review, vol. 12, nº 1, pp. 1-25.
  • HELFAT, C.E.; FINKELSTEIN, S.; MITCHELL, W.; PETERAF, M. A.; SING, H.; TEECE, D.J. y WINTER, S.G. (2007). Dynamic capabilities: Un ders tanding strategic change in organizations. Blackwell Oxford, UK.
  • HENSELER, J.; RINGLE, C. y SINKOVICS, R. (2009). «The use of partial least squares path modeling in international marketing». Advances in International Marketing (AIM), nº 20, pp. 277-320.
  • HOLT, D.T.; RUTHERFORD, M.W. y KURATKO, D.F. (2010). «Advancing the field of family business research: Further testing the measurement properties of the F-PEC». Family Business Review, vol. 23, nº 1, pp. 76-88.
  • JEHN, K.A. (1995). «A multimethod examination of the benefits and detriments of intragroup conflict. Administrative Science Quarterly, vol. 40, nº 2, pp. 256-282.
  • KLEIN, S.B.; ASTRACHAN, J.H. y SMYRNIOS, K.X. (2005). «The F-PEC scale of family influence: Construction, validation, and further implication for theory». Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, vol. 29, nº 3, pp. 321-339.
  • KLEIN, S.B. y KELLERMANNS, F.W. (2008). «Editor’s Notes». Family Business Review, vol. 21, nº 2, pp. 121-125.
  • KYU KIM, K.; YUL RYOO, S. y DUG JUNG, M. (2011). «Inter-organizational information systems visibility in buyer–supplier relationships: The case of telecommunication equipment component manufacturing industry». Omega, vol. 39, nº 6, pp. 667-676.
  • LEANA, C.R. y PIL, F. K. (2006). «Social capital and organizational performance: Evidence from urban public schools». Organization Science, nº 3, pp. 353-366.
  • LINDOW, C.M.; STUBNER, S. Y WULF, T. (2010). «Strategic fit within family firms: The role of family influence and the effect on performance«. Journal of Family Business Strategy, vol. 1, nº 3, pp. 167-178.
  • MILLER, D.; LE BRETON-MILLER, I.; LESTER, R. H. y CANNELLA Jr, A.A. (2007). «Are family firms really superior performers?». Journal of Corporate Finance, vol. 13, nº 5, pp. 829-858.
  • NAHAPIET, J. y GHOSHAL, S. (1998). «Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage». Academy Management Review, vol. 23, nº 2, pp. 242-266.
  • NONAKA, I. y TAKEUCHI, H. (1995). The knowledge-creating company: How Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. Oxford University Press, USA.
  • RINGLE, C.M.; WENDE, S. y Will, S. (2005). SmartPLS 2.0 (M3). University of Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.
  • SALVATO, C. y MELIN, L. (2008). «Creating value across generations in family-controlled businesses: The role of family social capital». Family Business Review, vol. 21, nº 3, pp. 259-276.
  • SARSTEDT, M.; RINGLE, C.M.; SMITH, D.; REAMS, R. y HAIR Jr, J.F. (2014). «Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM): A useful tool for family business researchers. Journal of Family Business Strategy, vol. 5, nº 1, pp. 105-115.
  • SATTLER, H.; VÖLCKNER, F.; RIEDIGER, C. y RINGLE, C. M. (2010). «The impact of brand extension success drivers on brand extension price premiums». International Journal of Research in Marketing, vol. 27, nº 4, pp. 319-328.
  • SHARMA, P. y CARNEY, M. (2012). «Value creation and performance in private family firms: Measurement and methodological issues». Family Business Review, vol. 25, nº 3, pp. 233-242.
  • SIRMON, D.G. y HITT, M.A. (2009). «Contingencies within dynamic managerial capabilities: Interdependent effects of resource investment and deployment on firm performance». Strategic Mana ge ment Journal, vol. 30, nº 13, pp. 1375-1394.
  • SORENSON, R.L.; GOODPASTER, K.E.; HEDBERG, P.R. y YU, A. (2009). «The family point of view, family social capital, and firm performance». Family Business Review, vol. 22, nº 3, pp. 239-253.
  • TEECE, D.J. (2007). «Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance». Strategic Management Journal, vol. 28, nº 13, pp. 1319-1350.
  • TEECE, D. J. (2014). «The foundations of enterprise performance: Dynamic and ordinary capabilities in an (economic) theory of firms». The Academy of Management Perspectives, vol. 28, nº 4, pp. 328-352.
  • TEECE, D.J.; PISANO, G. y SHUEN, A. (1997). «Dynamic capabilities and strategic management». Strategic Management Journal, vol. 18, nº 7, pp. 509-533.
  • TIWANA, A. y MCLEAN, E. (2005). «Expertise integration and creativity in information systems development». Journal of Management Information Systems, vol. 22, nº 1, pp. 13-43.
  • VALLEJO, M.C. (2009). «Analytical model of leadership in family firms under transformational theoretical approach». Family Business Review, vol. 22, nº 2, pp. 136-150.
  • WARD, J.L. (1987). Keeping the family business healthy: How to plan for continuing growth, profitability, and family leadership. Jossey Bass Inc.; San Francisco, California, USA.
  • WOLD, H. (1982). Systems under indirect observation using PLS, en F. C. (dir), A second generation of multivariate analysis, Vol. I Method. Praeger, New York, USA.
  • ZAHRA, S.A.; NEUBAUM, D.O. y LARRAÑETA, B. (2007). «Knowledge sharing and technological capabilities: The moderating role of family involvement». Journal of Business Research, vol. 60, nº 10, pp. 10701079.
  • ZELLWEGER, T.M.; NASON, R.S.; NORDQVIST, M. y BRUSH, C.G. (2013). «Why do family firms strive for nonfinancial goals? An organizational identity perspective». Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, vol. 37, nº 2, pp. 229-248.
  • ZHENG, W.; YANG, B. y MCLEAN, G.N. (2010). «Linking organizational culture, structure, strategy, and organizational effectiveness: Mediating role of knowledge management». Journal of Business Research, vol. 63, nº 7, pp. 763-771.
  • ZOLLO, M. y WINTER, S.G. (2002). «Deliberate learning and the evolution of dynamic capabilities». Organization Science, vol. 13, nº 3, pp. 339-351.
Data source: Dialnet