Nivel formativo, ocio complementario y participación laboral de las parejas de mayor edad en España

  1. Carlos Pérez Domínguez 1
  2. Ángel Martín-Román 1
  3. Alfonso Moral de Blas 1
  1. 1 Universidad de Valladolid
    info

    Universidad de Valladolid

    Valladolid, España

    ROR https://ror.org/01fvbaw18

Revue:
Revista del Ministerio de Empleo y Seguridad Social: Revista del Ministerio de Trabajo, Migraciones y Seguridad Social

ISSN: 2254-3295

Année de publication: 2016

Número: 126

Pages: 15-30

Type: Article

D'autres publications dans: Revista del Ministerio de Empleo y Seguridad Social: Revista del Ministerio de Trabajo, Migraciones y Seguridad Social

Résumé

After a lengthy period during which participation rates of older males (55-64 year-old males) in most OECD countries (including Spain) were showing a negative trend, there has been a signifícant increase in labour market participation since the mid-late nineties. Moreover, some previous research works have provided evidence of the importance of the so-called ‘complementarity’ or ‘shared leisure’ effect, on the one hand, and of formal education, on the other, to explain this phenomenon. Specifically, it has been estimated that the likelihood of a Spanish older man participating in the labour market increases, ceteris paribus, by between 11 and 17 percentage points if their spouse is active rather than inactive. In addition to this effect, male academic attainment proves to be the most important feature vis-á-vis impacting participation likelihood. Indeed, compared to having no qualifications, holding a university degree increases said probability by 23 percentage points and by over 30 percentage points in the case of a postgraduate qualification. Thus, the main objective of this research is to analyze some possible interactions between the two previously mentioned phenomena, studying how different educational attainment of the members of the couple may affect the intensity of the shared leisure effect. The interaction between the educational level of the members of the couple and their retirement joint decisions is an issue that has not received much attention in the economic literature and, to even a lesser extent, in the case of older couples.

Références bibliographiques

  • Álvarez, S.; J. Prieto y D. Romero (2002). Estado de salud y participación laboral de las personas mayores, Cuadernos aragoneses de economía, 12(2), pp. 271-292.
  • Blau, D.M. (1998). Labor force dynamics of older married couples, Journal of Labor Economics, 16(3), pp. 595–629.
  • Blau, D.M. y R.M. Goodstein (2010). Can Soc ial Secur it y Explain Trends in Labor Force Participation of Older Men in the United States?, Journal of Human Resources, 45(2), pp. 328-363.
  • Blundel, R. y Macurdy, T. (1999). Labor supply: a review of alternative approaches, en Ashenfelter, O. y Card, D. (eds.), Handbook of Labor Economics, vol. 3A, cap. 27, Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.
  • Chalmers, L. y A. Milan (2005). Marital satisfaction during the retirement years, Canadian Social Trends, 76 (Statistics Canada Catalogue no. 11-008), pp. 14–17.
  • Coile, C. (2004a). Health shocks and couples’ labor supply decisions, NBER Working Paper, no. 10810, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.
  • Coile, C. (2004b). Retirement incentives and couples’ retirement decisions, Topics in Economic Analysis and Policy, 4(1), pp. 1–28.
  • Goldin, C. y l.F. Katz (2007). Long-Run Changes in the Wage Structure: Narrowing, Widening, Polarizing, Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 2, pp. 135-167.
  • Gustman, A. y T.L. Steinmeier (2000). Retirement in dual career families: A structural model, Journal of Labor Economics, 18(3), pp. 503–45.
  • Gustman, A. y T.L. Steinmeier (2009). «How Changes in Social Security Affect Recent Retirement Trends». Research on Aging 31(2): 261-290.
  • Hanel, B. y R.T. Riphahn (2012). The timing of retirement. New evidence from Swiss female workers, Labour Economics, 19, pp. 718–728.
  • Honoré, B. y A. de Paula (2013). Int erdependent durations in joint retirement, CEMMAP Working Paper CWP05/13.
  • Hospido, L. y G. Zamarro (2013). Retirement patterns of couples in Europe, Documentos de Trabajo, N.º 1317, Banco de España.
  • Kaya, E. (2014). Heterogeneous couples, household interactions and labor supply elasticities of married women, Working paper, Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona
  • Kuhn, P. y F. Lozano (2008). The expanding wor kweek? Understanding trends in long work hours among U.S. men, 1979–2004, Journal of Labor Economics, 26(2), pp. 39–57.
  • Maestas, N. (2001). Labor, Love & Leisure: Complementarity and the Timing of Retirement by Working Couples, UC Berkeley, Department of Economics, Mimeo.
  • Maestas, N. y J. Zissimopoulos (2010). How Longer Work Lives Ease the Crunch of Population Aging, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 24(1), pp. 139-60.
  • Michaud, P.c. y F. Vermeulen (2011). A collective labor supply model with complementarities in leisure: Identification and estimation by means of panel data, Labour Economics, 18, pp. 159–67.
  • Peracchi, F.; M. Boldrin y S. Jiménez-Martín (2002). Micro-Modelling of retirement behavior in Spain, Papeles de trabajo del Instituto de Estudios Fiscales, Serie economía, no 14, pp. 7-86.
  • Pérez, C. y U. Carrascal. (2010). Determinantes de la participación laboral de los hombres mayores en Castilla y León, III Congreso Nacional sobre Mercado de Trabajo y Relaciones Laborales, Palencia,Mimeo.
  • Pérez, C.; a. Martín-Román y A. Moral (2015). The impact of leisure complementarity on the labour force participation of older males in Spain,Applied Economics Letters, 22(3), pp. 214217.
  • Schirle, T. (2007). Health, pensions, and the retirement decision: Evidence from Canada, Working Paper no. 2007-02 EC, Department of Economics, Wilfrid Laurier University.
  • Schirle, T. (2008). Why Have the Labor Force Participation Rates of Older Men Increased since the Mid1990s?, Journal of Labor Economics, 26(4), pp. 549-594.
  • Stancanelli, E. y A. Van Soest (2012). Ret irement and Home Production: A Regression Discontinuity Approach, American Economic Review, 102(3), pp. 600-605.