Correlación entre presión intraocular, paquimetría y queratometría en una población normal

  1. H. Sánchez-Tocino
  2. R. Bringas-Calvo
  3. D. Iglesias-Cortiñas
Aldizkaria:
Archivos de la Sociedad Española de Oftalmologia

ISSN: 0365-6691

Argitalpen urtea: 2007

Alea: 82

Zenbakia: 5

Orrialdeak: 267-272

Mota: Artikulua

DOI: 10.4321/S0365-66912007000500004 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openSarbide irekia editor

Beste argitalpen batzuk: Archivos de la Sociedad Española de Oftalmologia

Laburpena

Purpose: To study the intraocular pressure (IOP), the corneal thickness and the corneal curvature distribution in a normal population. To investigate the relation between these variables, and to determine if the IOP and the paquimetry will be modified by the refractive error and age. Methods: A population of 273 subjects, 545 eyes, without ocular pathology was selected. The refractive error, the corneal curvature, the corneal thickness and the IOP [with a non-contact tonometer (NCT) and with a Goldmann tonometer (GT)] were evaluated. Results: The average age of the population was 49.34 (SD 7.23) years (27-68). The average corneal thickness was 544.3 (SD 33) mm in females and 543.1 (SD 29) mm in males. An inverse correlation was found between corneal thickness and age but this was not significant statistically. A mildly statistically significant correlation was found between corneal thickness and intraocular pressure with both methods of measurement of IOP: r = 0.316 (p < 0,001) and r = 0.264 (p < 0,001), with NCT and GT respectively. No correlation was found between corneal thickness and refractive error, or with mean corneal curvature. In the regression model, corneal thickness and mean corneal curvature were significant in the IOP prediction: R = 0.341 (p < 0.001). Conclusion: Mean corneal thickness was very similar to that reported in other studies of a latin population. A statistically significant inferior corneal thickness has been found in people older than 54 years. The relationship between the corneal thickness and the corneal curvature with the IOP has been calculated by linear regression analyses.

Erreferentzia bibliografikoak

  • Doughty, MJ, Zaman, ML. (2000). Human corneal thickness and its impact on intraocular pressure measures: a review and meta-analysis approach. Surv Ophthalmol. 44. 367-408
  • Singh, RP, Goldberg, I, Graham, SL, Sharma, A, Mohsin, M. (2001). Central corneal thickness, tonometry and, ocular dimensions in glaucoma and ocular hypertension. J Glaucoma. 10. 206-210
  • Tonnu, PA, Ho, T, Newson, T, El Sheikh, A, Sharma, K, White, E. (2005). The influence of central corneal thickness and age on intraocular pressure measured b pneumotonometry, non-contact tonometry, the Tono-Pen XL, and Goldmann applanation tonometry. Br J Ophthalmol. 89. 851-854
  • Kohlhaas, M, Boehm, AG, Spoerl, E, Pursten, A, Grein, HJ, Pillunat, LE. (2006). Effect of central corneal thickness, corneal curvature, and axial length on applanation tonometry. Arch Ophthalmol. 124. 471-476
  • Nemesure, B, Wu, SY, Hennis, A, Leske, ML. (2003). Corneal thickness and intraocular pressure in the Barbados eye studies. Arch Ophthalmol. 121. 240-244
  • Shimmyo, M, Ross, AJ, Moy, A, Mostafavi, R. (2003). Intraocular pressure, Goldmann applanation tension, corneal thickness, and corneal curvature in Caucasians, Asians, Hispanics, and African Americans. Am J Ophthalmol. 136. 603-613
  • Eysteinsson, T, Jonasson, F, Sasaki, H, Arnarsson, A, Sverrisson, T, Sasaki, K, et, al. (2002). Central corneal thickness, radius of corneal curvature and intraocular pressure in normal subjects using non-contact techniques: Reykjavik Eye Study. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 80. 11-15
  • Shields, MB. (1980). The non-contact tonometer. Its value and limitations. Surv Ophthalmol. 24. 211-219
  • Hahn, S, Azen, S, Ying-Lai, M, Varma, R. (2003). Central corneal thickness in Latinos. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 44. 1508-1512
  • La Rosa, FA, Gross, RL, Orengo-Nania, S. (2001). Central corneal thickness of Caucasians and African Americans in glaucomatous and nonglaucomatous populations. Arch Ophthalmol. 119. 23-27
  • Foster, PJ, Baasanhu, J, Alsbirk, PH, Munkhbayar, D, Uranchimeg, D, Johnson, GJ. (1998). Central corneal thickness and intraocular pressure in a Mongolian population. Ophthalmology. 105. 969-973
  • Nissen, J, Hjortdal, JO, Ehlers, N, Frost-Larsen, K, Sorensen, T. (1991). A clinical comparison of optical and ultrasonic pachometry. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh). 69. 659-663
  • Wolfs, RC, Klaver, CC, Vingerling, JR, Grobbee, DE, Hofman, A, de Jong, PT. (1997). Distribution of central corneal thickness and its association with intraocular pressure: The Rotterdam Study. Am J Ophthalmol. 123. 767-772
  • Cho, P, Lui, T. (1997). Comparison of the performance of the Nidek NT-2000 noncontact tonometer with the Keeler Pulsair 2000 and the Goldman applanation tonometer. Optom Vis Sci. 74. 51-58
  • Sánchez-Tocino, H, Bringas-Calvo, R, Iglesias-Cortinas, D. (2005). Estudio comparativo entre el neumotonómetro de no contacto Canon TX-10 y el tonómetro de Goldmann. Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol. 80. 643-649
  • Ehlers, N, Bramsen, T, Sperling, S. (1975). Applanation tonometry and central corneal thickness. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh). 53. 34-43
  • Shah, S, Chatterjee, A, Mathai, M, Kelly, SP, Kwartz, J, Henson, D. (1999). Relationship between corneal thickness and measured intraocular pressure in a general ophthalmology clinic. Ophthalmology. 106. 2154-2160
  • Copt, RP, Thomas, R, Mermoud, A. (1999). Corneal thickness in ocular hypertension, primary open-angle glaucoma, and normal tension glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol. 117. 14-16
  • Bron, AM, Creuzot-Garcher, C, Goudeau-Boutillon, S, d'Athis, P. (1999). Falsely elevated intraocular pressure due to increased central corneal thickness. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 237. 220-224