Influencia de la longitud axial en el resultado refractivo tras cirugía de catarata

  1. V. de Juan
  2. R. Martín
  3. I. Pérez
  4. J. M. Herreras
Revista:
Archivos de la Sociedad Española de Oftalmologia

ISSN: 0365-6691

Ano de publicación: 2010

Volume: 85

Número: 4

Páxinas: 144-148

Tipo: Artigo

DOI: 10.1016/S0365-6691(10)70038-1 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso aberto editor

Outras publicacións en: Archivos de la Sociedad Española de Oftalmologia

Resumo

Purpose: To analyse the influence of axial length (AL) and age on refractive outcome after cataract surgery in terms of uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and subjective refraction. Methods: A retrospective review of 171 consecutive cases of uncomplicated cataract surgery was done. The refractive outcome was analysed (UCVA, BCVA and postoperative retraction) according AL before surgery (AL < 22 mm, between 22 and 25 mm and AL > 25 mm) and age (< 40, between 40-60 years and > 60 years). Results: After surgery mean UCVA was 0.6 ± 0.33 Diopters (D) and mean BCVA was 0,93 ± 0,23 D. Mean refractive outcome was 0.89 ± 0.78 D. There were no significant differences in post-operative UCVA, BCVA and refraction between the three age groups. There were statistically significant differences (p = 0.004) in UCVA between the three AL groups. The group with AL between 22 and 25 mm had better UCVA. Mean refractive outcome was -0.95 ± 1.91 D in the group with AL < 22 mm, -0.36 ± 0.88 D in the group with AL between 22 and 25 mm and 0.23 ± 1.15 D in the group with AL > 25 mm. Conclusions: AL influences refractive outcome and UCVA after cataract surgery. Eyes with AL < 22 mm have a worse refractive outcome.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Acosta, R, Hoffmeister, L, Roman, R, Comas, M, Castilla, M, Castells, X. (2006). Revisión sistemática de estudios poblacionales de prevalencia de catarata. Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol.. 81. 509
  • Narváez, J, Zimmerman, G, Doyle, R, Chang, DH. (2006). Accuracy of intraocular lens power prediction using the Hoffer Q, Holladay 1, Holladay 2, and SRK/T formulas. J Cataract Refract Surg.. 32. 2050
  • Acebal, M, Lledo, C. (2006). Comparación clínica entre la biometría de inmersión, óptica y de contacto. Soc Esp Enfermería Oftalmol.. 1. 20
  • Verhulst, E, Vrijghem, JC. (2001). Accuracy of intraocular lens power calculations using the Zeiss IOL Master: A prospective study. Bull Soc Belge Ophthalmol.. 281. 61
  • Maclaren, RE, Natkunarajah, M, Riaz, Y, Bourne, RR, Restori, M, Allan, B. (2007). Biometry and formula accuracy with intraocular lenses used for cataract surgery in extreme hyperopia. Am J Ophthalmol.. 143. 920
  • Koranyi, G, Lydahl, E, Norrby, S, Taube, M. (2002). Anterior chamber depth measurement: A-scan versus optical methods. J Cataract Refract Surg.. 28. 243
  • Németh, J, Fekete, O, Pesztenlehrer, N. (2003). Optical and ultrasound measurement of axial length and anterior chamber depth for intraocular lens power calculation. J Cataract Refract Surg.. 29. 85
  • Rajan, MS, Keilhorn, I, Bell, JA. (2002). Partial coherence laser interferometry vs conventional ultrasound biometry in intraocular lens power calculations. Eye. 16. 552
  • Eleftheriadis, H. (2003). IOLMaster biometry: refractive results of 100 consecutive cases. Br J Ophthalmol.. 87. 960
  • Siahmed, K, Muraine, M, Brasseur, G. (2001). La biometrie optique dans le calcul d´implant de la chirurgie de la cataracte: Comparison aux methods usuelles. J Fr Ophtalmol.. 24. 922
Fonte de datos: Dialnet