Los modelos familiares en Españareflexionando sobre la ambivalencia familiar desde una aproximación teórica

  1. Almudena Moreno Mínguez 1
  2. Marta Ortega Gaspar 2
  3. Carlos Gamero-Burón 2
  1. 1 Universidad de Valladolid
    info

    Universidad de Valladolid

    Valladolid, España

    ROR https://ror.org/01fvbaw18

  2. 2 Universidad de Málaga
    info

    Universidad de Málaga

    Málaga, España

    ROR https://ror.org/036b2ww28

Revista:
RES. Revista Española de Sociología

ISSN: 2445-0367 1578-2824

Año de publicación: 2017

Volumen: 26

Número: 2

Páginas: 149-167

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.22325/FES/RES.2016.5 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

Otras publicaciones en: RES. Revista Española de Sociología

Resumen

Los cambios familiares acontecidos en España en las últimas décadas han propiciado un fructífero debate teórico y empírico sobre las nuevas formas familiares. En base a los hallazgos de los estudios internacionales sobre actitudes y valores familiares, el principal objetivo del presente trabajo es realizar una exhaustiva revisión de la literatura científica sobre los modelos familiares en España, con el fin de ofrecer una propuesta de modelos teóricos que puedan contribuir al futuro análisis empírico. El debate planteado se sustenta en la reflexión crítica sobre los fundamentos normativos que explican la coexistencia ambivalente de dos modelos familiares, por una parte, el modelo de cuidado tradicional y, por otra, el modelo de dos sustentadores (ambos trabajan y cooperan en las responsabilidades de cuidado). Dicha coexistencia se produce en un contexto social de escaso apoyo institucional al modelo más igualitario de cuidado.

Información de financiación

Este artículo se ha redactado en el contexto del proyecto de I+D+I “La implicación paterna y el bienestar infantil en España’’ (CSO2015-69439-R) financiado por (MINECO/FEDER), Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad (2016-2018), dirigido por la profesora Almudena Moreno Mínguez.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Aboim, S. (2010). Labour and Love: the gender division of labour and caring in across-national perspective. En S. Aboim (Ed.), Plural Masculinities. Aldershot: Ashgate, 83-109.
  • Abril, P.; Amigot, P.; Botía, C.; Domínguez-Folgueras, M.; González, M. J.; Jurado-Guerrero, T.; Lapuerta, I.; Martín-García, T.; Monferrer, J. y Seiz, M. (2015). Ideales igualitarios y planes tradicionales: análisis de parejas primerizas en España. Revista Española de Investigaciones Sociológicas, 150, 3-22.
  • Akerlof, G. y R. Kranton (2000). Economics and Identity. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 115 (3), 715-753.
  • Alberdi, I. (1995) Aspectos sociodemográficos de la familia. Infancia y Sociedad: Revista de estudios, 29, 5-26.
  • Alberdi, I. (2004) Cambios en los roles familiares y domésticos. Arbor: Ciencia, pensamiento y cultura, 702, 231-262.
  • Avellar, S., Smock, P. J. (2005). The economic consequences of the dissolution of cohabiting unions. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67 (2), 315-327.
  • Beck, U., Beck-Gernsheim, E. (2003) La individualización. El individualismo institucionalizado y sus consecuencias sociales y políticas. Barcelona: Paidós.
  • Becker, G. S. (1965). A Theory of the Allocation of Time. Economic Journal, 75 (299), 493-517.
  • Bettio, Fr., Plantenga, J. (2004). Comparing Care Regimes in Europe. Feminist Economics, 10 (1), 85-113.
  • Bianchi, S. M., Milkie, M. A., Sayer, L. C., Robinson, J. P. (2000). Social Forces, 69 (1), 191-228.
  • Bittman, M., England, P., Sayer, L., Folbre, N., Matheson, G. (2003). When Does Gender Trump Money? Bargaining and Time in Household Work. American Journal of Sociology, 109 (1), 186-214.
  • Blair-Loy, M. (2003). Competing devotions: Career and family among women executives. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.
  • Blossfeld, H.-P., Drobnic , S. (Eds.). (2001). Careers of Couples in Contemporary Societies: From Male Breadwinner to Dual-Earner Families. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Bloosfeld, H.-P., Hofmeister, H. (Editors) (2006). Globalization, Uncertainty and Women’s Carrers. Abingdon: Routledge.
  • Bourdieu, P. (1989). Prólogo: Estructuras sociales y estructuras mentales en: Bourdieu, Pierre. La nobleza de Estado. Grandes ecoles y espíritu de cuerpo, Paris: Minuit, s/n.
  • Breen, R., Cooke, L. P. (2005). The Persistence of Gender Division of Domestic Labour. European Sociological Review, 21 (1), 43-57.
  • Clarkberg, M., Stolzenberg, R. M., Waite, L. J. (1995). Attitudes, values, and entrance into cohabitational versus marital unions. Social forces, 74 (2), 609-632.
  • Cloïn, M. (2010). Het werken waard. Den Haag: SCP.
  • Cooke, L. P. (2010). En Treas, Judith y Drobnic, S. (Eds.) Dividing the Domestic. Standford: Standford University Press.
  • Crompton, R. (2006). Employment and the Family. The Reconfiguration of Work and Family Life in Contemporary Societies. Cambridge University Press.
  • Crompton, R., Lyonette, C. l. (2005). The new gender essentialism domestic and family ‘choices’ and their relation to attitudes. British Journal of Sociology, 56 (4), 601-24.
  • Crompton, R., Lewis, S. y Lyonette, C. (Eds.) (2007). Women, Men, Work and Family in Europe, London: Palgrave.
  • Daly, M. (2011). What adult worker model? A critical look at recent social policy reform in Europe from a gender and family perspective. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State and Society, 18 (1), 1-23.
  • Daly, M., Scheiwe, K. (2010). Individualisation and personal obligations Social policy, family policy and law reform in Germany and the UK. International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family, 24 (2), 177-197.
  • Del Campo, S. (1991). La Nueva Familia Española. Madrid: EUDEMA Universidad.
  • Duncan, S., Carling, A., Edwards, R. (2002). Analysing Families: Morality and Rationality in Policy and Practice. Londres: Routledge.
  • Escot, L., Fernández-Cornejo, J. A. y Poza, C. (2013). “Fathers’ Use of Childbirth Leave in Spain. The Effects of the 13-Day Paternity Leave”. Population Research and Policy Review, 1-35.
  • Engster , D. y Stensöta, H. (2011). “Do family policy regimes matter for children’s well-being?”, Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society , 18 (1), 82-124.
  • Esping Andersen, G. (2002). Why we need a new welfare state?, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Flaquer, Ll. y Soler, J. (1990). Permanencia y cambio en la familia española. Madrid: Centro de Investigaciones Sociológicas.
  • Flaquer, Ll., Escobedo A., Navarro, L. (2012). ‘The Social Politics of Fatherhood in Spain and France: A Comparative Analysis of Parental Leave and Shared Residence’ in: Ethnologie Française, XLII (1), 125-134.
  • Flaquer, Ll. y Escobedo, A (2014). Licencias parentales y política social de la paternidad en España. Cuadernos de Relaciones Laborales, 32 (1), 69-99.
  • Flaquer, Ll., Moreno Mínguez, A., Cano, T. (2015). Changing family models: Emerging new opportunities for fathers in Catalonia Spain in Crespi I. (Ed.), Fatherhood and family work balance. Palgrave: Macmillan.
  • Gershuny, J., Bittman, M., Brice, J. (2005). Exit, Voice, and Suffering: Do Couples Adapt to Changing Employment Patterns? Journal of Marriage and Family 67 (3), 656-665.
  • Gerson, K. (1985). Hard choices: How women decide about work, career, and motherhood. Berkeley, Calif: University of California Press.
  • Goldscheider, F., Bernhardt, E., Lappegård, T. (2014). Studies of Men’s Involvement in the Family. Journal of Family Issues 35 (7), 879-890.
  • González, M. J.; Jurado-Guerrero, T. y Naldini, M. (2009). What Made Him Change? An Individual and National Analysis of Men’s Participation in Housework in 26 Countries. DemoSoc Working Paper, paper number 2009-30. Disponible en http://sociodemo.upf.edu/papers/DEMOSOC30.pdf.
  • González, M. J., Miret, P., Treviño, R. (2010). “Just living together”: implications of cohabitation for fathers’ participation in child care in Western Europe. Demographic Research, 23 (816), 445-478.
  • Hakim, C. (1996). The Sexual Division of Labour and Women’s Heterogeneity. The British Journal of Sociology, 47 (1), 178-188.
  • Hakim, C. (2000). Work-lifestyle choices in the 21st Century: Preference theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Hakim, C. (2002). Do Lifestyle preferences explain the pay gap? Paper presented to the Gender Research Forum Conference on the Gender Pay and Productivity Gap, London: Women and Equality Unit, DTI.
  • Hakim, C. (2005). Modelos de familia en las sociedades modernas. Madrid: Centro de Investigaciones Sociológicas.
  • Hochschild, A. (1997). The Time Bind. When work becomes home and home becomes work. New York: Henry Holt and Company.
  • Hook, J. (2015). Incorporating “class” into workfamily arrangements: Insights from and for the Three Worlds. Journal of European Social Policy, 25 (1), 14-31.
  • Iglesias de Ussel, J. (dir.) (1994). “Familia”, en: Juárez, M. (Dir.), V Informe sociológico sobre la situación social en España. Sociedad para todos en el año 2000. Madrid: FOESSA.
  • Iglesias de Ussel, J. (1998). La familia y el cambio político en España. Madrid: Tecnos. International Social Survey Programme (ISSP): 2002 y 2012.
  • Janus, A. L. (2013a). The Gap between Mothers’ Work-Family Orientations and Employment Trajectories in 18 OECD Countries. European Sociological Review, 29 (4), 752-766.
  • Janus, A. L. (2013b). The implications of family policy regimes for mothers’ autonomy. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 34, 96-110.
  • Johnstone, M., Lee, C. (2009). Young Australian women’s aspirations for work and family: Individual and socio-cultural differences. Sex Roles, 61, 204-220.
  • Kalmijn, M., Loeve, A., Manting, D. (2007). Income dynamics in couples and the dissolution of marriage and cohabitation. Demography, 44 (1), 159-179.
  • Kangas O., Rostgaard, T. (2007). Preferences or institutions? Work family life opportunities in seven European countries. Journal of European Social Policy, 17 (3), 240-256.
  • Kaufman, G. (2000). Do gender role attitudes matter? Family formation and dissolution among traditional and egalitarian men and women. Journal of Family Issues, 21 (1), 128-144.
  • Kaufman, G., White, D. (2016). For the Good of Our Family: Men’s Attitudes toward Their Wives’ Employment. Journal of Family Issues, 37 (11), 1624-1650.
  • Kremer M. (2007). How Welfare States Care: Culture, Gender, and Parenting in Europe, Amsterdam: University Press.
  • Lapuerta, I., Bazán, P., González, J. (2010). Individual and Institutional Constraints: An Analysis of Parental Leave Use and Duration in Spain. Popul Res Policy, 30, 185-210.
  • Laughlin, L., Farrie, D., Fagan, J. (2009). Father involvement with children following marital and non-marital separations. Fathering: A Journal of Theory, Research, and Practice about Men as Fathers, 7 (3), 226-248.
  • Lewis, J. (1992). Gender and the Development of Welfare Regimes. Journal of European Social Policy, 2 (3), 159-173.
  • Lewis y Daly (2000) The concept of social care and the analysis of contemporary welfare states en British Journal of Sociology Vol. No. 51 Issue No. 2 pp. 281-298.
  • Lye, D. N., Waldron, I. (1997). Attitudes toward cohabitation, family, and gender roles: Relationships to values and political ideology. Sociological Perspectives, 40 (2), 199-225.
  • Mandel, H. (2009). Configurations of gender ine quality: the consequences of ideology and public policy. British Journal of Sociology, 60 (4), 693-718.
  • Marks, J. L., Lam, C. B., McHale, S. M. (2009). Family patterns of Gender roles attitudes. Sex Roles, 61, 221-234.
  • McMahon, M. (1995). Engendering motherhood: Identity and self-transformation in women’s lives. New York: The Guilford Press.
  • McRae, S. (2003). Constraints and Choices in Mothers’ Employment careers: a Consideration of Hakim’s Preference Theory. The British Journal of Sociology, 54 (3), 317-338.
  • Meil, G. (1995). Presente y futuro de la política familiar en España. Revista Española de Investigaciones Sociológicas, 70, 67-90.
  • Meil, G. (2011). Individualización y solidaridad familiar. Barcelona: Fundación La Caixa.
  • Meil, G. (2013). European Men’s Use of Parental Leave and Their Involvement in Child Care and Housework. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 24 (5), 557-570.
  • Meil, G., Iglesias de Ussel, J. (2001). La política familiar en España. Barcelona: Ariel.
  • Moreno Mínguez, A. (2010). Family and Gender Roles in Spain from a Comparative Perspective. European Societies, 12 (1), 85-111.
  • Moreno Mínguez, A. (2015). La ambivalencia ante la corresponsabilidad parental en España: Una cuestión de género. Revista la Ventana, 42, 46-98.
  • Naldini, M. (2003). The Family in the Mediterranean Welfare States. London & Portland, Or.: Frank Cass.
  • Naldini, M. y Jurado-Guerrero, T. (2013). Family and Welfare State Reorientation in Spain and Inertia in Italy from a European Perspective, Population Review, 52, 43-61.
  • Navarro Ardoy, L. (2006). Modelos ideales de familia en la sociedad española. Revista Internacional de Sociología (RIS), LXIV (43), 119-138.
  • O’Brien, M. (2013). Fitting fathers into work-family policies: International challenges in turbulent times. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 33 (9/10), 542-564.
  • O’Neal, W. C., Futris, T. G. (2011). Cohabiting couples’ gender role attitudes, communication and relationship well-being. Family Science Review, 16 (1), 42-56.
  • Ortega, M. (2011). Los cuidados de los hijos y el género. Pamplona: Civitas, Thomson Reuters.
  • Ortega, M. (2013). The Modernization process through the perceptions of Work-family balance in Spain and Great Britain, European Societies, 15 (5), 707-728.
  • Pfau-Effinger, B. (2004). Development of Culture, Welfare States and Women’s Employment in Europe. Aldershot: Ashgate.
  • Pfau-Effinger, B. (2005). Welfare State Policies and the Development of Care Arrangements. European Societies, 7 (2), 321-347.
  • Pfau-Effinger, B., Flaquer, Ll., Jensen, P. H. (Eds.) (2009). Formal an Informal Work. The Hidden Work Regime in Europe. London: Routledge.
  • Pfau-Effinger, B. (2014). Nuevas políticas para cuidados en el hogar en los Estados de bienestar europeos (New policies for caring family members in European welfare states), Cuadernos de Relaciones Laborales, 32 (1), 33-48.
  • Pleck J. H., Masciadrelli, B. P. (2004). Paternal involvement by U.S. residential fathers: Levels, sources, and consequences. In: Lamb M., editor. The role of the father in child development. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Raley, S. B., Mattingly, M. J. y Bianchi, S. M. (2006). How Dual Are Dual-Income Couples? Documenting Change from 1970 to 2001. Journal of Marriage and Family, 68 (1), 11-28.
  • Reher, D. S. (1998). Family Ties in Western Europe: Persistent Contrasts. Population and Development Review, 24 (2), 203-234.
  • Requena, M. (2004). Tamaño y composición de los hogares y familias en España. En J. Leal, coord., Informe sobre la situación demográfica en España, Madrid: Fundación Fernando Abril Martorell, 135-159.
  • Requena, M. (2012). Cambios demográficos y familias tardías en España. En N. Konvalinka, (Ed.) Modos y maneras de hacer familia. Las familias tardías, una modalidad emergente. Madrid: Biblioteca Nueva, 67-82.
  • Romero-Balsas, P. (2012). Fathers Taking Paternity Leave in Spain: Which Characteristics Foster and which Hamper the use of Paternity Leave? Sociologia e Politiche Sociali, 15, 105-130.
  • Shelton, B. A., John, D. (1993). Does marital status make a difference? Housework among married and cohabiting men and women. Journal of Family Issues, 14, 401-420.
  • Solsona, M., Treviño, R. (1990). Estructuras familiares en España. Madrid: Ministerio de Asuntos Sociales. Instituto de la Mujer.
  • Steiber, N., Haas, B. (2009). Ideals or Compromises? The Attitude-Behaviour Relationship in Mothers’ Employment’. Socio-Economic Review, 7 (4), 639-668.
  • Stensöta Olofsdotter H., Engster, D., 2011. Do Family Policies Matter for Children Well Being? Social Politics, 18 (1), 82-124.
  • Stier, H., Lewin-Epstein, N., Braun, M. (2012). Workfamily conflict in comparative perspective: The role of social policies, Research. Social Stratification and Mobility, 30 (3), 265-279.
  • Tavora, I. (2012). The southern European social model: familialism and the high rates of female employment in Portugal. Journal of European Social Policy, 22 (1), 63-76.
  • Tobío, C. (2005). Madres que trabajan. Madrid: Ediciones Cátedra.
  • Tobío, C. (2012). Cuidado e identidad de género. De las madres que trabajan a los hombres que cuidan. Revista Internacional de Sociología, 70 (2), 399-422.
  • Treas, J., Widmer, E. (2000). Married women’s employment over the life course: attitudes in cross-national perspective. Social forces, 78 (4), 1409-1436.
  • Valiente, C. (1997). Políticas públicas de género en perspectiva comparada: la mujer trabajadora en Italia y España (1900-1996). Madrid: Universidad Autónoma de Madrid.
  • Valiente, C. (2010). The erosion of “familism” in the Spanish Welfare State: childcare police since 1975, en Ajzenstadt, M. y Gal, J. (Eds.), Children, gender and families in Mediterranean Welfare States. London: Springer.
  • Van Wel, F., Knijn, T. (2007). Single mothers’ motivation to work and their participation in the labour market in the Netherlands. International Journal of Sociology of the Family, 33 (1), 183-196.
  • Wall, K. (2007). Main patterns in Attitudes to the Articulation between Work and Family Life: a Cross-National Analysis, en Crompton, R. Lewis, S., Lyonnette, Cl. (Eds.) Women, Men, Work and Family in Europe, Palgrave Macmillan, 86-115.
  • Wiesmann, S., Boeije, H., Doorne-Huiskes, A., van, Den Dulk, L. (2008). Not worth mentioning: The implicit and explicit nature of decision-making about the division of paid and domestic work. Community, Work & Family, 11 (4), 341-363.