El dilema nuclear desde una perspectiva hispano-sueca

  1. Pablo García-García 1
  1. 1 Universidad de Valladolid
    info

    Universidad de Valladolid

    Valladolid, España

    ROR https://ror.org/01fvbaw18

Aldizkaria:
RIPS: Revista de investigaciones políticas y sociológicas

ISSN: 1577-239X

Argitalpen urtea: 2018

Alea: 17

Zenbakia: 2

Orrialdeak: 49-70

Mota: Artikulua

DOI: 10.15304/RIPS.17.2.5270 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openSarbide irekia editor

Beste argitalpen batzuk: RIPS: Revista de investigaciones políticas y sociológicas

Garapen Iraunkorreko Helburuak

Laburpena

La energía nuclear es considerada una fuente energética útil y problemática al mismo tiempo. Su utilización ofrece ventajas e inconvenientes que deben ser analizados para comprender el dilema económico, político y social al que se enfrenta una sociedad cuando toma la decisión de configurar su perfil energético. El análisis se plantea desde una perspectiva hispano-sueca, en tanto que España y Suecia son dos ejemplos de las respuestas que una sociedad puede dar ante el mencionado dilema nuclear.

Erreferentzia bibliografikoak

  • ALLEN, T., BUSBY, J., MEYER, M., PETTI, D. (2010) Materials challenges for nuclear systems. Materials Today, 13, 14–23.
  • APERGIS, N., PAYNE, J. E. (2010) A panel study of nuclear energy consumption and economic growth. Energy Economics, 32, 545–549.
  • BALDWIN, D. A. (1997) The concept of security. Review of International Studies, 23(1), 5–26. Cambridge University Press.
  • BALTA-OZKAN, N., LE GALLO, J. (2018) Spatial variation in energy attitudes and perceptions: Evidence from Europe. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 81, 2160–2180.
  • CARVALHO, F. P., MADRUGA, M. J., REIS, M. C., ALVES, J. G., OLIVEIRA, J. M., GOUVEIA, J., SILVA, L. (2007) Radioactivity in the environment around past radium and uranium mining sites of Portugal. Journal of Environmental Radioactivity, 96(1–3), 39–46.
  • CHERP, A., JEWELL, J. (2014) The concept of energy security: Beyond the four As. Energy Policy, 75, 415–421.
  • DAVIS, L., HAUSMAN, C. (2016) Market impacts of a nuclear power plant closure. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 8(2), 92–122.
  • ESPEJO MARÍN, C. (2002) La producción de electricidad de origen nuclear en España. Boletín de La Asociación de Geógrafos Españoles, (33), 65–77.
  • FAWCETT, A. A., IYER, G. C., CLARKE, L. E., EDMONDS, J. A., HULTMAN, N. E., MCJEON, H. C., SHI, W. (2015) Can Paris pledges avert severe climate change? Science, 350(6265), 1168–1169.
  • FJAESTAD, M. (2013) The geopolitics of uranium : Swedish energy dependencies from a transnational perspective. En 24th International Congress of History of Science, Technology and Medicine. Manchester: Kungliga Tekniska Högskolan.
  • GRANDIN, K., JAGERS, P., KULLANDER, S. (2010) Nuclear Energy. AMBIO, 39(1), 26–30.
  • HEJAZI, R. (2017) Nuclear energy: Sense or nonsense for environmental challenges. International Journal of Sustainable Built Environment, 6(2), 693–700.
  • HÖGBERG, L. (2013) Root Causes and Impacts of Severe Accidents at Large Nuclear Power Plants. AMBIO, 42(3), 267–284.
  • HOLMBERG, S., HEDBERG, P. (2011) Party Influence on Nuclear Power Opinion in Sweden. Swedish National Election Studies Program, (5). Göteborgs Universitet.
  • HUHTALA, A., REMES, P. (2017) Quantifying the social costs of nuclear energy: Perceived risk of accident at nuclear power plants. Energy Policy, 105, 320–331.
  • JENKINS, J. D., ZHOU, Z., PONCIROLI, R., VILIM, R. B., GANDA, F., DE SISTERNES, F., BOTTERUD, A. (2018) The benefits of nuclear flexibility in power system operations with renewable energy. Applied Energy, 222, 872–884.
  • KABERGER, T. (2007) History of nuclear power in Sweden. Estudos Avançados, 21(59), 225–242.
  • KOSAI, S., UNESAKI, H. (2017) Quantitative analysis on the impact of nuclear energy supply disruption on electricity supply security. Applied Energy, 208, 1198–1207.
  • LARSSON, C. (1985) Historien om en svensk atombomb. Ny Teknik, (17–20). LEE, C., CHIU, Y. (2011) Oil prices, nuclear energy consumption, and economic growth: New evidence using a heterogeneous panel analysis. Energy Policy, 39, 2111–2120.
  • LEIJONHUFVUD, S. (1994) Parentes?: en historia om svensk kärnkraft. Västerås: ABB Atom.
  • LENZEN, M. (2008) Life cycle energy and greenhouse gas emissions of nuclear energy: A review. Energy Conversion and Management, 49(8), 2178–2199.
  • LYMAN, E. S. (2011) Nuclear Energy and Human Health. In Encyclopedia of Environmental Health (pp. 185–192). Elsevier.
  • MARTÍNEZ-ALEGRÍA, R., SANZ, G., OLIVEIRA, S., MONTEQUI, I., CAMPOS, F. (2014) Spanish Nuclear Industry Future perspectives and reserves’ analysis. International Workshop “Uranium, Environment and Public Health,” 8, 81–85.
  • MIR, M. C. (1999) Evaluación de los planes energéticos nacionales en España. Revista de Historia Industrial, (15), 161–178.
  • MUDD, G. M., DIESENDORF, M. (2008) Sustainability of Uranium Mining and Milling: Toward Quantifying Resources and Eco-Efficiency. Environmental Science & Technology, 42(7), 2624–2630.
  • PEARCE, J. M. (2012) Limitations of nuclear power as a sustainable energy source. Sustainability, 4(6), 1173–1187.
  • QVIST, S. A., BROOK, B. W. (2015) Environmental and health impacts of a policy to phase out nuclear power in Sweden. Energy Policy, 84, 1–10.
  • RUBIO-VARAS, M. M., DE LA TORRE, J. (2017) The Economic History of Nuclear Energy in Spain: Governance, Business and Finance. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
  • SAN MARTÍN, E., MUÑOZ, B., LORCA, A. (2014) Vulnerabilidad energética. En J. M. Blanco & L. de la Corte (Eds.), Seguridad Nacional, amenazas y respuestas. Madrid: LID Editorial.
  • SANTOS-FRANCÉS, F., GIL PACHECO, E., MARTÍNEZ-GRAÑA, A., ALONSO ROJO, P., ÁVILA ZARZA, C., GARCÍA SÁNCHEZ, A. (2018) Concentration of uranium in the soils of the west of Spain. Environmental Pollution, 236, 1–11.
  • SKALA, B. (2008) Sweden’s nuclear fuel cycle policy. In Technical Meeting on “Country Nuclear Fuel Cycle Profiles.” Fukui.
  • STEINHAUSER, G., BRANDL, A., JOHNSON, T. E. (2014) Comparison of the Chernobyl and Fukushima nuclear accidents: A review of the environmental impacts. Science of The Total Environment, 470–471, 800–817.
  • SUMAN, S. (2018) Hybrid nuclear-renewable energy systems: A review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 181, 166–177.
  • TENGSTRÖM, E. (1990) Energin, makten och framtiden: samhällsvetenskapliga perspektiv på teknisk förändring. Estocolmo: Allmänna FoÌrl.
  • TERÄVÄINEN, T., LEHTONEN, M., MARTISKAINEN, M. (2011) Climate change, energy security, and risk—debating nuclear new build in Finland, France and the UK. Energy Policy, 39, 3434–3442.
  • WITTNEBEN, B. (2012) The impact of the Fukushima nuclear accident on European energy policy. Environmental Science & Policy, 15(1), 1–3.
  • ZOELLNER, T. (2009) Uranium : war, energy, and the rock that shaped the world. Londres: Viking, Penguin.
  • AGENCIA DE SUMINISTRO EURATOM (2016) Annual Report 2016. http://ec.europa.eu/euratom/ar/last.pdf
  • ALFSEN, K., ESKELAND, G. (2007) A broader palette: The role of technology in climate policy. Estocolmo. Regeringskansliet.
  • APERC (2007) A Quest for Energy Security in the 21st Century: Resources and Constraints (No. # 207-RE-01.2). Tokyo. http://aperc.ieej.or.jp/file/2010/9/26/
  • AURA ENERGY (2012) Updated scoping study further supports Häggån project viability. Melbourne. http://www.auraenergy.com.au/assets/
  • BERTEL, E. (2005) Nuclear energy and the security of energy supply. NEA News, 23(2), 4–7. https://www.oecd-nea.org/pub/newsletter/2005/23-2-securitysupply.pdf
  • CONSEJO DE LA UE. Directivas 2011/70/Euratom, 2009/71/Euratom y 2013/59/ Euratom. Diario Oficial de la Unión Europea.
  • CSN (2015) La energía nuclear. Madrid. https://www.csn.es/documents/ de las Heras Abás, A. (2016) Informe de situación de las emisiones de CO2 en el mundo. Barcelona. Fundación Empresa y Clima.
  • ENRESA (2017). Informe Anual. Madrid. http://www.enresa.es/documentos/informe_anual_2016.pdf
  • EURATOM (2012). Diario Oficial de la Unión Europea. EUROBARÓMETRO (2008). Attitudes towards radioactive waste. (2010) Europeans and Nuclear Safety. http://ec.europa.eu/commfrontoffice/publicopinion/ archives/ebs/
  • EUROSTAT (2018). Energy Database. http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/energy/data
  • FORATOM (2017). What People Really Think about Nuclear Energy. Atw International Journal for Energy Power, 62(3). https://www.kernenergie.de/
  • FORO DE LA INDUSTRIA NUCLEAR ESPAÑOLA (2016). Comentario de informes. https://www.foronuclear.org/es/
  • IEA (2018) World energy statistics. París. https://www.iea.org/statistics
  • INSTITUTE FOR ECONOMICS AND PEACE (2017). Global Peace Index. Sydney. http://visionofhumanity.org/app/uploads/2017/06/GPI17-Report.pdf
  • MINISTERIO DE ENERGÍA, TURISMO Y AGENDA DIGITAL DE ESPAÑA (2018) Energía nuclear. http://www.minetad.gob.es/energia/nuclear/
  • MUÑOZ MANSILLA, M. (2015) Contribución de la Energía Nuclear al Cambio Climático. Madrid.https://www.sne.es/images/stories/recursos/actividades/
  • NEA, IEA, OECD (2015) Technology Roadmap: Nuclear Energy. París. https://www. oecd-nea.org/pub/techroadmap/techroadmap-2015.pdf
  • NEA (2010) Public Attitudes to Nuclear Power. https://www.oecd-nea.org/ndd/pubs/
  • Observatorio Nuclear Europeo. (2018). Prices. http://ec.europa.eu/euratom/observatory_price.html
  • SEGOVIANO MONTERRUBIO, S. (2011) España ante el reto de la seguridad energética (No. 56/2011). Fundación Alternativas.
  • SKB (2016) The Swedish System. http://www.skb.com/our-operations
  • SNE (2018) Origen del uranio. https://www.sne.es/es/
  • TEULE, R. (2011) ¿Por qué Greenpeace le dice NO a la energía nuclear? Greenpeace Internacional. http://www.greenpeace.org/
  • WNA (2018) Country profiles. http://www.world-nuclear.org/
  • WWF (2009) Climate Scorecard Sweden. http://www.wwf.se/
Datuen iturria: Dialnet