Data envelopment analysis efficiency of public servicesbootstrap simultaneous confidence region

  1. Jesús A. Tapia 1
  2. Bonifacio Salvador 1
  3. Jesús M. Rodríguez 2
  1. 1 Universidad de Valladolid
    info

    Universidad de Valladolid

    Valladolid, España

    ROR https://ror.org/01fvbaw18

  2. 2 Junta de Castilla y León
    info

    Junta de Castilla y León

    Valladolid, España

    ROR https://ror.org/02s8dab97

Aldizkaria:
Sort: Statistics and Operations Research Transactions

ISSN: 1696-2281

Argitalpen urtea: 2019

Alea: 43

Zenbakia: 2

Orrialdeak: 337-354

Mota: Artikulua

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openSarbide irekia editor

Beste argitalpen batzuk: Sort: Statistics and Operations Research Transactions

Laburpena

Public services, such as higher education, medical services, libraries or public administration offices, provide services to their customers. To obtain opinion-satisfaction indices of customers, it would be necessary to survey all the customers of the service (census), which is impossible. What is possible is to estimate the indices by surveying a random customer sample. The efficiency obtained with the classic data envelopment analysis models, considering the opinion indices of the customers of the public service as output data estimated with a user sample, will be an estimation of the obtained efficiency if the census is available. This paper proposes a bootstrap methodology to build a confidence region to simultaneously estimate the population data envelopment analysis efficiency score vector of a set of public service-producing units, with a fixed confidence level and using deterministic input data and estimated customer opinion indices as output data. The usefulness of the result is illustrated by describing a case study comparing the efficiency of libraries.

Erreferentzia bibliografikoak

  • Alexander, W.R.J., Haug, A.A. and Jaforullah, M. (2010). A two-stage double-bootstrap data envelopment analysis of efficiency differences of New Zealand secondary schools. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 34, 99–110.
  • Assaf, A. (2010). Bootstrapped scale efficiency measures of UK airports. Journal of Air Transport Management, 16, 42–44.
  • Assaf, A.G. and Agbola, F.W. (2011). Modelling the performance of Australian hotels: A DEA double bootstrap approach. Tourism Economics, 17, 73–89.
  • Banker, R.D. (1993). Maximum likelihood, consistency and data envelopment analysis: a statistical foundation. Management Science, 39, 1265–1273.
  • Barra, C. and Zotti, R. (2016). Measuring efficiency in higher education: An empirical study using a bootstrapped data envelopment analysis. International Advances in Economic Research, 22, 11–33.
  • Bayraktar, E., Tatoglu, E., Turkyilmaz, A., Delen, D. and Zaim, S. (2012). Measuring the efficiency of customer satisfaction and loyalty for mobile phone brands with DEA. Expert Systems with Applications, 39, 99–106.
  • Benito, B., Solana, J. and Moreno, M.R. (2014). Explaining efficiency in municipal services providers. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 42, 225–239.
  • Casu, B. and Molyneux, P. (2003). A comparative study of efficiency in European banking. Applied Economics, 35, 1865–1876.
  • Ceyhan, M.E. and Benneyan, J.C. (2014). Handling estimated proportions in public sector data envelopment analysis. Annals of Operations Research, 221, 107–132.
  • Charles, V. and Kumar, M. (2014). Satisficing data envelopment analysis: An application to servqual efficiency. Measurement, 51, 71–80.
  • Charnes, A. and Cooper, W.W. (1959). Chance-constrained programming. Management Science, 6, 73–79.
  • Charnes, A. and Cooper, W.W. (1963). Deterministic equivalents for optimizing and satisficing under chance constraints. Operations Research, 11, 18–39.
  • Charnes, A., Cooper, W.W. and Rhodes, E. (1978). Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research, 2, 429–444.
  • Chowdhury, H. and Zelenyuk, V. (2016). Performance of hospital services in Ontario: DEA with truncated regression approach. Omega, 63, 111–122.
  • Cooper, W., Huang, Z. and Li, S.X. (1996). Satisficing DEA models under chance constraints. Annals of Operations Research, 66, 279–295.
  • Cooper, W.W., Deng, H., Huang, Z., Li, S.X. et al. (2002). Chance constrained programming approaches to technical efficiencies and inefficiencies in stochastic data envelopment analysis. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 53, 1347–1356.
  • Cooper, W.W., Seiford, L.M. and Tone, K. (2006). Introduction to data envelopment analysis and its uses: with DEA-solver software and references. Springer Science & Business Media. New York, NY 10013, USA.
  • Cooper, W.W., Seiford, L.M. and Zhu, J. (2011). Handbook on data envelopment analysis, volume 164. Springer Science & Business Media. New York, NY 10013, USA.
  • Essid, H., Ouellette, P. and Vigeant, S. (2014). Productivity, efficiency and technical change of Tunisian schools: a bootstrapped Malmquist approach with quasi-fixed inputs. Omega, 42, 88–97.
  • Førsund, F.R. (2017). Measuring effectiveness of production in the public sector. Omega, https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.omega.2016.12.007.
  • Gil Ropero, A., Turias Dominguez, I. and Cerbán Jiménez, M.M. (2019). Bootstrapped operating efficiency in container ports: a case study in Spain and Portugal. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 119, 924–948.
  • Huang, Z. and Li, S.X. (2001). Stochastic DEA models with different types of input-output disturbances. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 15, 95–113.
  • Khodabakhshi, M. (2010). An output oriented super-efficiency measure in stochastic data envelopment analysis: Considering iranian electricity distribution companies. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 58, 663–671.
  • Khodabakhshi, M. and Asgharian, M. (2009). An input relaxation measure of efficiency in stochastic data envelopment analysis. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 33, 2010–2023.
  • Kneip, A., Park, B.U. and Simar, L. (1998). A note on the convergence of nonparametric DEA estimators for production efficiency scores. Econometric Theory, 14, 783–793.
  • Kneip, A., Simar, L. and Wilson, P.W. (2008). Asymptotics and consistent bootstraps for DEA estimators in nonparametric frontier models. Econometric Theory, 24, 1663–1697.
  • Kneip, A., Simar, L. and Wilson, P.W. (2011). A computationally efficient, consistent bootstrap for inference with non-parametric DEA estimators. Computational Economics, 38, 483–515.
  • Land, K.C., Lovell, C. and Thore, S. (1993). Chance-constrained data envelopment analysis. Managerial and Decision Economics, 14, 541–554.
  • Lee, H. and Kim, C. (2014). Benchmarking of service quality with data envelopment analysis. Expert Systems with Applications, 41, 3761–3768.
  • Liu, S.T. and Chuang, M. (2009). Fuzzy efficiency measures in fuzzy DEA/AR with application to university libraries. Expert Systems with Applications, 36, 1105–1113.
  • Mayston, D.J. (2015). Analysing the effectiveness of public service producers with endogenous resourcing. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 44, 115-126.
  • Mayston, D.J. (2017). Data envelopment analysis, endogeneity and the quality frontier for public services. Annals of Operations Research, 250, 185–203.
  • Olesen, O.B. and Petersen, N. (1995). Chance constrained efficiency evaluation. Management Science, 41, 442–457.
  • Parasuraman, A., Berry, L.L. and Zeithaml, V.A. (1993). More on improving service quality measurement. Journal of Retailing, 69, 140–147.
  • Salo, A. and Punkka, A. (2011). Ranking intervals and dominance relations for ratio-based efficiency analysis. Management Science, 57, 200–214.
  • Santı́n, D. and Sicilia, G. (2017). Dealing with endogeneity in data envelopment analysis applications. Expert Systems with Applications, 68, 173–184.
  • Särndal, C.-E., Swensson, B. and Wretman, J. (2003). Model assisted survey sampling. Springer Science & Business Media. New York, NY 10010, USA.
  • Silverman, B.W. (1986). Density estimation for statistics and data analysis. Chapman and Hall. London; New York.
  • Simar, L. and Wilson, P.W. (1998). Sensitivity analysis of efficiency scores: How to bootstrap in nonparametric frontier models. Management Science, 44, 49–61.
  • Simar, L. and Wilson, P.W. (2000). A general methodology for bootstrapping in non-parametric frontier models. Journal of Applied Statistics, 27, 779–802.
  • Simar, L. and Wilson, P.W. (2007). Estimation and inference in two-stage, semi-parametric models of production processes. Journal of Econometrics, 136, 31–64.
  • Simar, L. and Wilson, P.W. (2011). Inference by the m out of n bootstrap in nonparametric frontier models. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 36, 33–53.
  • Simar, L. and Wilson, P.W. (2013). Estimation and inference in nonparametric frontier models: Recent developments and perspectives. Foundations and Trends in Econometrics, 5, 183–337.
  • Simar, L. and Wilson, P.W. (2015). Statistical approaches for non-parametric frontier models: a guided tour. International Statistical Review, 83, 77–110.
  • Simar, L. and Zelenyuk, V. (2006). On testing equality of distributions of technical efficiency scores. Econometric Reviews, 25, 497–522.
  • Smith, P. and Mayston, D. (1987). Measuring efficiency in the public sector. Omega, 15, 181–189.
  • Tapia, J.A., Salvador, B. and RodrÃguez, J.M. (2018). Data envelopment analysis in satisfaction survey research: sample size problem. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 69, 1096-1104.
  • Tavana, M., Shiraz, R.K. and Hatami-Marbini, A. (2014). A new chance-constrained DEA model with birandom input and output data. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 65, 1824–1839.
  • Tsekouras, K., Papathanassopoulos, F., Kounetas, K. and Pappous, G. (2010). Does the adoption of new technology boost productive efficiency in the public sector? the case of ICUs system. International Journal of Production Economics, 128, 427–433.
  • Witte, K.D. and Geys, B. (2013). Citizen coproduction and efficient public good provision: Theory and evidence from local public libraries. European Journal of Operational Research, 224, 592–602.
  • Wu, D. and Olson, D.L. (2008). A comparison of stochastic dominance and stochastic DEA for vendor evaluationand. International Journal of Production Research, 46, 2313–2327.
  • Wu, D.D. (2010). A systematic stochastic efficiency analysis model and application to international supplier performance evaluation. Expert Systems with Applications, 37, 6257–6264.
  • Wu, D.D. and Lee, C.-G. (2010). Stochastic DEA with ordinal data applied to a multi-attribute pricing problem. European Journal of Operational Research, 207, 1679–1688.
Datuen iturria: Dialnet