Análisis teórico de un posible futuro en la sociedad ciborgrobotización, estrés y epigenética

  1. Juan Coca 2
  2. Isabel Castro Piedras 3
  3. Jesús Alberto Valero-Matas 2
  4. Rui Pedro Lopes 1
  1. 1 Instituto Politécnico de Bragança
    info

    Instituto Politécnico de Bragança

    Bragança, Portugal

    ROR https://ror.org/00prsav78

  2. 2 Universidad de Valladolid
    info

    Universidad de Valladolid

    Valladolid, España

    ROR https://ror.org/01fvbaw18

  3. 3 Texas Tech University
    info

    Texas Tech University

    Lubbock, Estados Unidos

    ROR https://ror.org/0405mnx93

Show affiliations +
Journal:
Cultura de los cuidados: Revista de Enfermería y Humanidades

ISSN: 1699-6003

Year of publication: 2020

Issue: 56

Pages: 271-288

Type: Article

DOI: 10.14198/CUID.2020.56.19 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openRUA editor

More publications in: Cultura de los cuidados: Revista de Enfermería y Humanidades

Abstract

Robotics has generated, over time, an enormous number of social imaginaries presents in plentiful cultural expressions. In the present work a preliminary analysis of these one is done to better understand the new social reality to which we can be subjected. Through a theoretical social analysis, we seek to investigate credible elements that we can find in a relatively close future. Specifically, we will focus on data offered by epigenetics and analyze possible future realities (consequences) based on this information.

Bibliographic References

  • Alonso, A., Arzoz, I. (2003). Carta al homo ciberneticus. Madrid: Edaf
  • Aaltonen, M. (1997). The return to Multi-Causality. Journal of Futures Studies, 12(1): 81-86.
  • Ayyagari, R., Grover, V. y Purvis, R. (2011). Technostress: Technological Antecedents and Implications. MIS Quarterly, 35(4), 831-858.
  • Bannister, A.J. y Kouzarides, T. (2011). Regulation of chromatin by histone modifications. Cell Research, 21(3), 381-395. Recuperado de: https://doi.org/10.1038/cr.2011.22
  • Bauman, Z. (2004). Modernidad líquida. Buenos Aires: FCE.
  • Beriain, J. (2005). Modernidades en disputa. Barcelona: Anthropos.
  • Bury, J. (2009). La idea del progreso. Madrid: Alianza.
  • Cao-Lei, L., de Rooij, S.R., King, S., Matthews, S.G., Metz, G.A.S., Roseboom, T.J. y Szyf, M. (2017). Prenatal stress and epigenetics. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, (In Press). Recuperado de: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2017.05.016.
  • Chung, E., Cromby, J., Papadopoulos, D. y Tufarelli, C. (2016). Social Epigenetics: A Science of Social Science?. The Sociological Review, 64(1), suppl, 168–185. Recuperado de: https://doi.org/10.1111/2059-7932.12019
  • Coca, J.R. (2011). Comprensión social de la biotecnología. Análisis de los imaginarios sociales desde una perspectiva de análisis integracionista. Saarbrücken: Editorial Académica Española.
  • Coca, J.R. y Barrientos-Rastrojo, J. (2014). Aplicación de la verosimilitud analógica al progreso científico. Utopía y Praxis Latinoamericana, 19(65), 65-74.
  • Coeckelbergh, M. (2016). Technology and the good society: A polemical essay on social ontology, political principles, and responsibility for technology. Technology in Society, 52, 4-9. Recuperado de: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2016.12.002.
  • Decker, M. (2017). Too Early or Too Late? The Assessment of Emerging Technology. In: Heil, R.; Seitz, S.B.; König, H. & Robienski, J. (Eds.) Epigenetics. Ethical, Legal and Social Aspects (pp. 31-40). Wiesbaden (Germany): Springer VS.
  • Domínguez-Alcon, C. 2017. Ética del cuidado y robots. Cultura de los cuidados, año XXI, nº 47, pp. 9-13. Recuperado de: https://doi.org/10.14198/cuid.2017.47.01
  • Dreher, A; Gaston, N y Martens, P (2010). Measuring Globalisation. Gauging its Consequences. New York: Springer.
  • Emirbayer, M. (1997). Manifesto for a Relational Sociology. American Journal of Sociology, 103(2), 281-317.
  • Endreß, M. (2016). On the Very Idea of Social Construction: Deconstructing Searle’s and Hacking’s Critical Reflections. Human Studies, 39, 127-146.
  • Feng, S., Cokus, S. J., Zhang, X., Chen, P. Y., Bostick, M., Goll, M. G., Hetzel, J., Jain, J., Strauss, S.H., Halpern, M.E., Ukomadu, C., Sadler, K.C., Pradhan, S., Pellegrini, M. y Jacobsen, S. E. (2010). Conservation and divergence of methylation patterning in plants and animals. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science of the USA, 107(19), 8689-8694. Recuperado de: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1002720107
  • Goldberg, A. D., Allis, C. D., & Bernstein, E. (2007). Epigenetics: a landscape takes shape. Cell, 128(4), 635-638. Recuperado de: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2007.02.006
  • Goll, M. G. y Bestor, T. H. (2005). Eukaryotic cytosine methyltransferases. Annual Review of Biochemistry, 74, 481-514. Recuperado de: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.biochem.74.010904.153721
  • Hubbard, R. y Wald, E. (1999). El mito del gen. Madrid: Alianza.
  • Lee, R.S. (1970). Social attitudes and computer revolution. Public Opinion Quarterly, 34, 53-59.
  • Malaska, P (2001). A futures research outline of a post-modern idea of progress. Futures, 33, 225-243. Recuperado de: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-3287(00)00069-0
  • Meloni, M. (2014). How biology became social, and what it means for social theory. The Sociological Review, 62, 593-614. Recuperado de: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-954X.12151
  • Navajas, S. (2016). El hombre tecnológico y el síndrome Blade Runner. En la era del biorobot. Córdoba, Benerice.
  • Niiniluoto, I (1984). Is Science Progressive?. Dordrecht: Riedel.
  • Nimrod, G. (2018). Technostress: measuring a new threat to well-being in later life. Aging & Mental Health, 22(8), 1080-1087. Recuperado de: https://doi.org/10.1080/13607863.2017.1334037
  • Norma, D.A. (2010). El diseño de los objetos del futuro. La interacción entre el hombre y la máquina. Madrid: Paidós.
  • Peschansky, V. J. y Wahlestedt, C. (2014). Non-coding RNAs as direct and indirect modulators of epigenetic regulation. Epigenetics, 9(1), 3-12. Recuperado de: https://doi.org/10.4161/epi.27473
  • Pohl, C. (2011). What is progress in transdisciplinary research?. Futures, 43, 618-626. Recuperado de: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2011.03.001
  • Rescher, N. (1999). Razón y valores en la Era científico-tecnológica. Barcelona: Paidós-ICE/UAB.
  • Salanova, M. (2003). Trabajando con tecnologías y afrontando el tecnoestrés: el rol de las creencias de eficacia. Revista de Psicología del Trabajo y de las Organizaciones, 19(3), 225-246.
  • Sardar, Z. y Sweeny, J.A. (2016). The Three Tomorrows of Postnormal Times. Futures, 75, 1-13. Recuperado de: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2015.10.004
  • Smith, R. J., Arnaud, P. y Kelsey, G. (2004). Identification and properties of imprinted genes and their control elements. Cytogenetics and Genome Research, 105(2-4), 335-345. Recuperado de: https://doi.org/10.1159/000078206
  • Stankiewicz, A.M.; Swiergiel, A.H. y Lisowski, P. (2013). Epigenetics of stress adaptations in the brain. Brain Research Bulletin, 98, 76-92. Recuperado de: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainresbull.2013.07.003.
  • Strait, D., Grine FE. y Fleagle, JG. (2015). Analyzing hominin phylogeny: Cladistic approach. In: Enke, W. & Tattersall, I. (Eds.) Handbook of Paleoanthropology (pp. 1989-2014). Verlag/Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer.
  • Tarafdar, M., Tu, Q., Ragu-Nathan, B.S., y Ragu-Nathan, T.S. (2007). The Impact of Technostress on Role Stress and Productivity. Journal of Management Information Systems, 24(1), 301-328. Recuperado de: https://doi.org/10.2753/MIS0742-1222240109
  • Tarafdar, M., Pullins E.B. y Ragu-Nathan. T. S. (2015). Technostress: negative effect on performance and possible mitigations. Information Systems Journal, 25, 103–132. Recuperado de: https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12042
  • Verona, R. I., Mann, M. R. y Bartolomei, M. S. (2003). Genomic imprinting: intricacies of epigenetic regulation in clusters. Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology, 19, 237-259. Recuperado de: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.cellbio.19.111401.092717
  • Walter, J. y Hümpel, A. (2017). Introduction to Epigenetics. In: Heil, R.; Seitz, S.B.; König, H. y Robienski, J. (Eds.) Epigenetics. Ethical, Legal and Social Aspects (pp. 11-30). Wiesbaden (Germany): Springer.
  • Weinberger, N.; Decker, M.; Fleischer, T. y Schippl, J. (2013). A new monitoring process of future topics for innovation and technological analysis: informing Germanys' innovation policy. European Journal of Futures Research 1: 15-23. Recuperado de: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40309-013-0023-4
  • Weiss, A.; Igelsböck, J.; Wurhofer, D. y Tscheligi, M. (2011). Looking Forward to a “Robotic Society”?. International Journal of Social Robotics, 3 (2), 111-123. Recuperado de: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-010-0076-5
  • Zemach, A., McDaniel, I. E., Silva, P. y Zilberman, D. (2010). Genome-wide evolutionary analysis of eukaryotic DNA methylation. Science, 328(5980), 916-919. Recuperado de: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1186366
Data source: Dialnet