Evaluación Auténtica y Evaluación Orientada al Aprendizaje en Educación Superior. Una Revisión en Bases de Datos Internacionales

  1. Barrientos-Hernán, Emilio José
  2. López-Pastor, Víctor M.
  3. Pérez-Brunicardi, Dario
Revista:
Revista Iberoamericana de Evaluación Educativa

ISSN: 1989-0397

Ano de publicación: 2020

Volume: 13

Número: 2

Páxinas: 67-83

Tipo: Artigo

DOI: 10.15366/RIEE2020.13.2.004 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

Outras publicacións en: Revista Iberoamericana de Evaluación Educativa

Resumo

This paper analyses a review of the international literature on “Learning Oriented Assessment” (LOA) and “Authentic Assessment” (AA) in Higher Education (HE). The European Higher Education Area (EHEA) implies new challenges on Formative Assessmet (FA) and the approaches related to it. A literature review has been carried out using three international databases: WOS, ERIC and Google Scholar. A content analysis has been carried out establishing two categories: LOA and AA. The main results on LOA are: (1) Assessment tasks should be designed to stimulate sound learning practices amongst students; (2) Assessment should involve students actively in engaging with criteria, quality, their own and/or peers’ performance; (3) Feedback should be timely and forward-looking so as to support current and future student learning. Most of the experiences show positive aspects using LOA-HE. The results on AA-HE show the main criteria to define it as: (1) do authentic tasks in the classroom with the same or similar characteristics to real life work-tasks; (2) use mimetic or similar contexts to real-work spaces. Most of the experiences show that students assessed very positively this type of assessment due to their connection with real life and/or future world contexts.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Archbald, D. A. (1991). Authentic assessment: principles, practices, and issues. School Psychology Quarterly, 6(4), 279-293. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0088821
  • Archbald, D. A. y Newmann, F. M. (1988). Assessing authentic academic achievement in the secondary school. NASSP.
  • Ashford-Rowe, K., Herrington, J. y Brown, C. (2014). Establishing the critical elements that determine authentic assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 39(2), 205-222. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2013.819566
  • Barrientos, E. (2013). La evaluación formativa y evaluación orientada al aprendizaje en educación superior: una revisión internacional. Universidad de Valladolid.
  • Biddle, J. (2014). A needs analysis for K-12 school improvement projects and their use as the dissertation in practice for the professional practice education doctorate program at the University of Central Florida. University of Central Florida.
  • Black, P. y Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5(1), 7-74. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969595980050102
  • Bohemia, E. y Davison, G. (2012). Authentic learning: the gift project. Design and Technology Education: an International Journal, 17(2), 49-61.
  • Bosco, A. M. y Ferns, S. (2014). Embedding of authentic assessment in work-integrated learning curriculum. Asia-Pacific Journal of Cooperative Education, 15(4), 281-290.
  • Boud, D. y Falchikov, N. (2006). Aligning assessment with long‐term learning. Assessment y Evaluation in Higher Education, 25(3), 279-291. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930600679050
  • Bretones, A. (2008). Participación del alumnado de Educación Superior en su evaluación. Revista de Educación, 347, 181‐202.
  • Canabal, C. y Margalef, L. (2017). The feedback: a key to learning-oriented assessment. Profesorado. Revista de Curriculum y Formación de Profesorado, 21(2), 149-170.
  • Carless, D. (2007). Learning‐oriented assessment: conceptual bases and practical implications. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 44(1), 57-66. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703290601081332
  • Carless, D. (2009a). Learning-oriented assessment: principles, practice and a project. En L. H. Meyer, S. Davidson, H. Anderson, R. Fletcher, P. M. Johnston y M. Rees (Eds.), Tertiary assessment y higher education student outcomes: Police, practice & research learning-oriented assessment (pp. 79-90). Ako Aotearoa.
  • Carless, D. (2009b). Trust, distrust and their impact on assessment reform. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 34(1), 79-89. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930801895786
  • Carless, D. (2015a). Excellence in university assessment: learning from award-winning practice. Routledge.
  • Carless, D. (2015b). Exploring learning-oriented assessment processes. Higher Education, 69(6), 963-976. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-014-9816-z
  • Carless, D., Joughin, G. y Mok, M. (2006). Learning-oriented assessment: principles and practice. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 31(4), 395-398. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930600679043
  • Carmona, M. y Flores, J. (2008). Learning-oriented assessment in higher education: conditions and strategies for its application to university teaching. Revista Española de Pedagogía, 241, 467-486.
  • Cumming, J. y Maxwell, G. S. (1999). Contextualising authentic assessment. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 6(2), 177-194. https://doi.org/10.1080/09695949992865
  • Dochy, F., Segers, M. y Dierick, S. (2002). Nuevas vías de aprendizaje y enseñanza y sus consecuencias: una nueva era de evaluación. Revista de Docencia Universitaria, 2(2), 13-29.
  • Eddy, P. L. y Lawrence, A. (2013). Wikis as platforms for authentic assessment. Innovative Higher Education, 38(4), 253-265. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-012-9239-7.
  • Febriana, B. y Arlianty, W. (2017) The application of authentic assessment in chemistry curriculum. En B. Budi, L. Kim, Y. Isao e I. Khan (Eds.), Proceedings of the 3rd international xonference on education and training (pp. 99-105). International Institute of Knowledge Management. https://doi.org/10.17501/icedu.2017.3111
  • Gauntlett, N. (2007). Literature review on formative assessment in higher education. Middlesex University.
  • Gessa Perera, A. (2011). La coevaluación como metodología complementaria de la evaluación del aprendizaje. Análisis y reflexión en las aulas universitarias. Revista de Educación, 354, 749-764.
  • Ghosh, S., Bowles, M., Ranmuthugala, D. y Brooks, B. (2017). Improving the validity and reliability of authentic assessment in seafarer education and training: a conceptual and practical framework to enhance resulting assessment outcomes. WMU Journal of Maritime Affairs, 16(3), 455-472. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13437-017-0129-9
  • Gonzalez-DeHass, A. R. y Willems, P. P. (2015). Case-study instruction in educational psychology: implications for Ttacher preparation. En M. Li y Y. Zhao (Ed.), Exploring learning & teaching in higher education (pp. 99-122). Springer.
  • Gulikers, J. M., Bastiaens, T. J. y Kirshner, P. A. (2004). A five-dimensional framework for authentic assessment. Educational Technology Research and Development, 52(3), 67–87. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02504676
  • Gulikers, J. T., Kester, L., Kirschner, P. A. y Bastiaens, T. J. (2008). The effect of practical experience on perceptions of assessment authenticity, study approach, and learning outcomes. Learning and Instruction, 18(2), 172-186. https://doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.02.012
  • Hassanpour, B., Utaberta, N., Abdullah, N. y Tahir, M. (2011). Authentic assessments or standardized assessment new attitude to architecture assessment. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, 3590-3595. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.04.340
  • Heinzen, T. E., Landrum, R. E., Gurung, R. A. y Dunn, D. S. (2015). Game-based assessment: the mash-up we’ve been waiting for. En T. Reiners y L. Wood (Eds.), Gamification in education and business (pp. 201-217). Springer.
  • Ibarra, M. S., Rodríguez, G. y Gómez, M. A. (2012). La evaluación entre iguales: beneficios y estrategias para su práctica en la universidad. Revista de Educación, 359, 206-231. https://doi.org/10-4438/1988-592X-RE-2010-359-092
  • James, L. T. y Casidy, R. (2018). Authentic assessment in business education: its effects on student satisfaction and promoting behaviour. Studies in Higher Education, 43(3), 401-415. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2016.1165659
  • Kaider, F., Hains-Wesson, R. y Young, K. (2017). Practical typology of authentic work-integrated learning activities and assessments. Asia-Pacific Journal of Cooperative Education, 18(2), 153-165.
  • Kearney, S., Perkins, T. y Kennedy-Clark, S. (2016). Using self-and peer-assessments for summative purposes: analysing the relative validity of the AASL (Authentic Assessment for Sustainable Learning) model. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 41(6), 840-853. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2015.1039484
  • Keppell, M. y Carless, D. (2006). Learning‐oriented assessment: a technology‐based case study. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 13(2), 179-191. https://doi.org/10.1080/09695940600703944
  • Keyser, S. y Howell, S. L. (2008). The state of authentic assessment. Columbus.
  • Latorre, M. A. y Varela, J. L. M. (2015). La contribución de las rúbricas a la práctica de la evaluación auténtica. Observar, 9, 5-17.
  • Lombard, B. (2008). Modelling critical thinking through learning-oriented assessment. South African Journal of Higher Education, 22(5), 1029-1043. https://doi.org/10.4314/sajhe.v22i5.42923
  • López-Pastor, V. M. (2008). Implementing a formative and shared assessment system in higher education teaching. European Journal of Teacher Education, 31(3), 293-311. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619760802208452
  • López-Pastor, V. M., D. Kirk, E. Lorente-Catalán, MacPhail, A. y Macdonald, D. (2013). Alternative assessment in physical education: a review of international literature. Sport, Education & Society, 18(1), 57-76. https://doi.org/10.1080/13573322.2012.713860
  • López-Pastor, V. y Sicilia-Camacho, A. (2017). Formative and shared assessment in higher education. Lessons learned and challenges for the future. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 42(1), 77-97. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2015.1083535
  • Lorente, E. y Kirk, D. (2013). Alternative democratic assessment in PETE: an action-research study exploring risks, challenges and solutions. Sport, Education and Society, 18(1), 77-96. https://doi.org/10.1080/13573322.2012.713859
  • McDermott, M. Z. R., Daniels, M., Nylén, A., Pears, A., Isomöttönen, V. y Caspersen, M. (2017). The authenticity of ‘authentic’assessment some faculty perceptions. En M. E. Van Valkenburg (Ed.), Proceedings of IEEE frontiers in education conference (pp. 1-9). IEEE.
  • Murphy, V., Fox, J., Freeman, S. y Hughes, N. (2017). “Keeping it Real”: A review of the benefits, challenges and steps towards implementing authentic assessment. AISHE-J: The All Ireland Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 9(3).
  • Nguyen, H. (2017). Authentic assessment in pedagogy-related modules in teacher education: Vietnamese student teachers’ perspective. University of East Anglia.
  • Palacios, A. y López-Pastor, V. M. (2013). Haz lo que yo digo pero no lo que yo hago: sistemas de evaluación del alumnado en la formación inicial del profesorado. Revista de Educación, 361, 279-305. https://doi.org/10.4438/1988-592X-RE-2011-361-143.
  • Pérez, A., Tabernero B., López Pastor, V. M., Ureña, N., Ruiz Lara, E., Caplloch, M., González Fernández, N. y Castejón, F. J. (2008). Evaluación formativa y compartida en la docencia universitaria y el Espacio Europeo de Educación Superior: cuestiones clave para su puesta en práctica. Revista de Educación, 347, 435‐451.
  • Prieto, J. P. A., Llácer, C. V. H. y Escobar, A. H. (2017). The effect of portfolios on higher Education students learning. En L. Gómez Chova, A. López Martínez, I. Candel Torres (Eds.), Proceedings of 11th international technology, education and development conference (pp. 6478-6480). IATED Academy.
  • Quesada, V., Rodríguez, G. e Ibarra, M. S. (2013). ActEval: un instrumento para el análisis y la reflexión sobre la actividad evaluadora del profesorado universitario. Revista de Educación, 362, 69-104. https://doi.org/10.4438/1988-592X-RE-2011-362-153
  • Rodríguez, G., Quesada, V. e Ibarra, M. (2016). Learning-oriented e-assessment: the effects of a training and guidance programme on lecturers’ perceptions. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 41(1), 35-52. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2014.979132
  • Rule, A. C. (2006). The components of authentic learning. The Journal of Authentic Learning, 3(1), 1-10.
  • Santos, J. M. (2017). Design, implementation and evaluation of an authentic assessment experience in a pharmacy course: are students getting it? En J. Domenech, M. C. Vincent Vela, E. Poza Plaza y M. D. Blázquez Soriano (Eds), Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on higher education advances (pp. 574-583). Universitat Politécnica de Valencia. https://doi.org/10.4995/HEAd17.2017.5294
  • Sullivan, D. F. y McConnell, K. D. (2017). Big progress in authentic assessment, but by itself not enough. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 49(1),14-25. https://doi.org/10.4995/HEAD17.2017.5294
  • Vu, T. T. (2011). Investigating authentic assessment for student learning in higher education. University of Queensland.
  • Zabalza, M. Á. (2003). Competencias docentes del profesorado universitario. Calidad y desarrollo profesional. Narcea.
Fonte de datos: Dialnet