Una aproximación semiótica al estudio de los emojis

  1. Vela Delfa, Cristina 1
  1. 1 Universidad de Valladolid
    info

    Universidad de Valladolid

    Valladolid, España

    ROR https://ror.org/01fvbaw18

Zeitschrift:
Círculo de lingüística aplicada a la comunicación

ISSN: 1576-4737

Datum der Publikation: 2020

Titel der Ausgabe: Monográfico: Multilingüismo en las universidades chinas

Nummer: 84

Seiten: 153-165

Art: Artikel

DOI: 10.5209/CLAC.69723 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openOpen Access editor

Andere Publikationen in: Círculo de lingüística aplicada a la comunicación

Ziele für nachhaltige Entwicklung

Zusammenfassung

Emojis are graphic signs that are frequently used in written digital interactions. Although they have become increasingly popular since they were incorporated into the Apple keyboard in 2011 and instant messaging applications such as WhatsApp, their origin can be traced back to the 1990’s. In recent years, emojis have emerged as one of the central topics in digital communication studies and have been approached from different fields and theories. In this work, we present a semiotic characterization of emojis. We ask ourselves about the place that these elements occupy in the classification of signs (index, icon, symbol), how their interpretation is constructed and what relationships these communicative units establish between each other.

Bibliographische Referenzen

  • Albert, Georg. 2015. Semiotik und Syntax von Emoticons. Zeitschrift für angewandte Linguistik, 62.1, 3-23
  • Albert, Georg. 2020. Beyond the binary: Emoji as a challenge to the image-word distinction. En Crispin Thurlow, Christa Dürscheid y Federica Diémoz, eds, Visualizing Digital Discourse, Berlin, De Gruyter, 65-80.
  • Al Rashdi, Fathiya. 2018. Functions of emojis in WhatsApp interaction among Omanis. Discourse, context y media, 26, 117-126.
  • Bai, Qiyu, et al. 2019. A Systematic Review of Emoji: Current Research and Future Perspectives. Frontiers in psychology, 10, 2221.
  • Cantamutto y Vela. 2019. Emojis frecuentes en las interacciones por WhatsApp. Círculo De Lingüística Aplicada a La Comunicación, 77, 171-186.
  • Calero Vaquera, María Luisa. 2014. El discurso del WhatsApp: entre el messenger y el SMS, Oralia: Análisis del discurso oral. 17, 87-116
  • Bourlai, Elli, Herring, Susan y Mo Abdul-Magee. 2016. Distinguishing functional types of hashtags: A structural approach. In 3rd International Conference of the American pragmatics Association (AMPRA 2016), Bloomington, IN.
  • Damasio, Antonio. 2003. Feelings of emotion and the self. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 1001.1, 253-261.
  • Danesi, Marcel. 2016. The semiotics of emoji: The rise of visual language in the age of the internet. London, Bloomsbury Publishing.
  • Derks, Daantje, Arjan er Bos y Jasper Von Grumbkow. 2008. Emoticons in computer-mediated communication: Social motives and social context. Cyberpsychology & behavior, 1, 99-101.
  • Dresner, Eli, and Susan C. Herring. 2010. Functions of the nonverbal in CMC: Emoticons and illocutionary force. Communication theory, 20.3, 249-268.
  • Dunlap, Joanna C., et al. 2016. What sunshine is to flowers: A literature review on the use of emoticons to support online learning. Emotions, technology, design, and learning. Academic Press, 163-182.
  • Eco, Umberto. 1979. A theory of semiotics. Indiana, Indiana University Press.
  • Entman, Robert. 1991. Framing US coverage of international news: Contrasts in narratives of the KAL and Iran Air incidents. Journal of communication, 41.4, 6-27.
  • Entman, Robert. 1993. Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm, Journal of communication, 43.4, 51-58.
  • Entman, Robert. 2008. Media framing biases and political power: Explaining slant in news of Campaign, Journalism 11.4, 389-408.
  • Evans, Vyvyan. 2017. The emoji code: How smiley faces, love hearts and thumbs up are changing the way we communicate, London, Michael O'Mara Books.
  • Halté, Pierre. 2018. Les émoticônes et les interjections dans le chat, Paris, Éditions Lambert Lucas.
  • Herring, Susan y Dainas, Ashley. 2017. “Nice Picture Comment!” Graphicons in Facebook Comment Threads. Proceedings of the 50th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2185–2194.
  • Kelly, Ryan, y Leon Watts. 2015. Characterising the inventive appropriation of emoji as relationally meaningful in mediated close personal relationships. Experiences of technology appropriation: unanticipated users, usage, circumstances, and design, 20.
  • Koch, Peter y Wulf Oesterreicher. 2007. Lengua hablada en la Romania: español, francés, italiano, Madrid, Gredos.
  • Lucas, Gavin. 2016. The story of emoji, Prestel Verlag.
  • Mancera, Ana y Ana Pano. 2013. El español coloquial en las redes sociales, Colección Cuadernos de Lengua Española, Madrid, Arco/Libros.
  • Maiz-Arevalo, Carmen 2014. A pragmatic and multimodal analysis of emoticons and gender in social networks.En Antonia Sánchez Macarro Ana Belén Cabrejas Peñuelas eds., New insights into gendered discursive practices: language, gender and identity construction, Valencia, Publicaciones Universidad de Valencia, 175-197
  • Mayans, Joan. 2002. Género chat. O cómo la etnografía puso un pie en el ciberespacio, Barcelona, Gedisa.
  • McCulloch, Grechell. 2019. Because internet, London, Riverhead books.
  • Miller, H., J. Thebault-Spieker, S. Chang, I. Johnson, L. Terveen y B. Hecht. 2016. Blissfully Happy” or Ready to Fight: Varying Interpretations of Emoji. Proceeding of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, Cologne, 259–268.
  • Morris, Charles. 1971. Fundamentos de la teoría de los signos, Barcelona, Paidós.
  • Pappert, Steffen. 2017. Zu kommunikativen Funktionen von Emojis in der WhatsApp-Kommunikation, Empirische Erforschung internetbasierter Kommunikation, 175-211.
  • Panckhurst, Rachel, Cédric Lopez, Frontini, Francesca. 2020. Evolving interactional practices of emoji in text message. En Crispin Thurlow, Christa Dürscheid y Federica Diémoz, eds, Visualizing Digital Discourse, Berlin, De Gruyter, 81-103.
  • Peirce, Charles Sanders. 1903. A syllabus of certain topics of logic.
  • Provine, Robert R., Robert J. Spencer, y Darcy L. Mandell. 2007. Emotional expression online: Emoticons punctuate website text messages. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 26.3, 299-307.
  • Sampietro, Agnese. 2019. Emoji and rapport management in Spanish WhatsApp chats. Journal of Pragmatics, 143, 109-120.
  • Sampietro, Agnese. 2016. Emoticonos y emojis: análisis de su historia, difusión y uso en la comunicación digital actual. Tesis doctoral, Universidad de Valencia, Valencia.
  • Thurlow, Crispin. 2017. Forget about the words”? Tracking the language, media and semiotic ideologies of digital discourse: The case of sexting. Discourse, context & media, 20, 10-19.
  • Thurlow, Crispin, and Vanessa Jaroski. 2020. Emoji invasion”: The semiotic, En Crispin Thurlow, Christa Dürscheid y Federica Diémoz, eds, Visualizing Digital Discourse: Interactional, Institutional and Ideological Perspectives, Berlin, De Gruyter, 45-64
  • Seargeant, Philip. 2019. The Emoji Revolution: How technology is shaping the future of communication, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
  • Skovholt, Karianne, Anette Grønning, y Anne Kankaanranta. 2014. The communicative functions of emoticons in workplace e-mails. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 19.4, 780-797.
  • Veszelszki, Ágnes. 2017. Digilect: the impact of infocommunication technology on language. Berlin, Walter de Gruyter.
  • Watzlawick, Paul. 1978. La réalité de la réalité: confusion, désinformation, communication. París, Éditions du Seuil.
  • Yus, Francisco. 2010. Ciberpragmática 2.0. Nuevos usos del lenguaje en Internet, Barcelona, Ariel.
  • Yus, Francisco. 2014. Not all emoticons are created equal. Linguagem em (Dis) curso (special issue on relevance theory), 14(3), 511–529.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet