Variables explicativas y predictivas de la capacidad de emprendimiento e innovaciónevidencia en las empresas familiares

  1. Alfredo Martínez Bobillo 1
  2. Juan Antonio Rodríguez Sanz 1
  3. Fernando Tejerina Gaite 1
  1. 1 Universidad de Valladolid
    info

    Universidad de Valladolid

    Valladolid, España

    ROR https://ror.org/01fvbaw18

Revista:
Management Letters / Cuadernos de Gestión

ISSN: 1131-6837

Año de publicación: 2021

Volumen: 21

Número: 2

Páginas: 63-76

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.5295/CDG.201329AM DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: Management Letters / Cuadernos de Gestión

Resumen

El presente trabajo pretende analizar las variables explicativas de la orientación emprendedora y la capacidad de innovación de la empresa familiar (EO-IC) en un estudio comparativo de las empresas familiares españolas y latinoamericanas. A este respecto, se constata un cambio de paradigma en la literatura sobre innovación en el que las capacidades dinámicas derivadas del gobierno corporativo y de la productividad han ido cobrando progresiva importancia en la conformación de la (EO-IC) y en la consecución de una ventaja competitiva sostenible. Esta problemática cobra especial interés en el caso de la empresa familiar, donde las implicaciones socioemocionales y la aversión al riesgo, características de este tipo de empresa, ponen habitualmente en tela de juicio su capacidad para innovar y emprender. Construimos un panel con 182 grandes empresas familiares (1.820 observaciones) pertenecientes a Argentina, Brasil, Chile, Colombia, México, Perú, Uruguay y España, utilizando las bases de datos Thomson Onebanker y ORBIS para el período 2008-2018. Los resultados obtenidos evidencian la aparición de nuevas variables explicativas en la configuración de la (EO-IC) de la empresa familiar, basadas en la productividad y fundamentalmente en el gobierno corporativo. De la misma manera, en la empresa familiar latinoamericana, se constata cómo el entorno institucional (legal, regulatorio, laboral y educativo) frena la utilización de variables de eficiencia (productividad), en favor de otras variables más tradicionales como tamaño y concentración de la propiedad en el diseño y fortalecimiento de a OE CI. En el caso español, sin embargo, se evidencia la transición de variables tradicionales hacia factores relacionados con la eficiencia y productividad empresarial.

€ Ver financiación

Información de financiación

The authors are grateful to Editor and two anonymous referees for suggestions and comments on previous version of the paper. This work was supported by the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness [grant number ECO2017-84864-P].

Financiadores

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Aiello, F., Mannarino, L. and Pupo, V., 2020. Innovation and productivity in family firms: evidence from a sample of European firms. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 29(4), 394-416.
  • Anderson, R.C., Duru, A. and Reeb, D.M., 2012. Investment policy in family controlled firms. Journal of Banking and Financing 36(6), 1744-1758.
  • Andres, C., 2008. Large shareholders and firm performance-An empirical examination of founding-family ownership. Journal of Corporate Finance, 14(4), 431-445.
  • Aparicio, G., Iturralde, T. and Sánchez-Famoso, V., 2019. Innovation in family firms: a holistic bibliometric overview of the research field. European Journal of Family Business, 9(2), 71-84.
  • Arellano, M., and Bond, S., 1991. Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. Review of Economic Studies, 58, 277-297.
  • Arzubiaga, U., 2019. Gobernanza corporativa y orientación emprendedora de las pymes familiares: un análisis de la influencia de la implicación familiar a distintos niveles. Cuadernos de Gestión, 19(1), 119-146.
  • Arzubiaga, U., Kotlar, J., De Massis, A., Maseda, A. and Iturralde, T., 2018. Entrepreneurial orientation and innovation in family SMEs: Unveiling the (actual) impact of the Board of Directors. Journal of Business Venturing, 33(4), 455-469.
  • Bacci, S., Cirillo, A., Mussolino, D. and Terzani, S., 2018. The influence of family ownership dispersion on debt level in privately held firms. Small Business Economics, 51(3), 557-576.
  • Barney, J., 1991. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management 17(1), 99-120.
  • Basco, R., 2015. Family business and regional development: A theoretical model of regional familiness. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 6, 259-271.
  • Basco, R., and Calabrò, A., 2016. Open innovation search strategies in family and non-family SMEs. Academia Revista Latinoamericana de Administración, 29(3), 279-302.
  • Battilana, J., Leca, B. and Boxenbaum, E., 2009. How actors change institutions: Towards a theory of institutional entrepreneurship. Academy of Management Annals, 3, 65-107.
  • Beckert, J. and Dewey, M., 2017. The architecture of illegal markets: Towards an economic sociology of illegality in the economy. Oxford University Press.
  • Beinhocker, E., Davis, I. and Mendonca, L., 2009. The 10 trends you have to watch. Harvard Business Review, 87, 55-60.
  • Benfratello, L., Schiantarelli, F. and Sembenelli, A., 2008. Banks and innovation: Microeconometric evidence on Italian firms. Journal of Financial Economics, 90(2), 197-217.
  • Bianchini, S., Krafft, J., Quatraro, F. y Ravix, J., 2015. Corporate governance, innovation and firm age: insights and new evidence. GREDEG Working Papers Series, 68(275).
  • Block, J., 2010. Family management, family ownership, and downsizing: Evidence from S&P 500 firms. Family Business Review, 23(2), 109-130.
  • Block, J.H. y Spiegel, F., 2013. Family firm density and regional innovation output: An exploratory analysis. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 4(4), 270-280.
  • Blundell, R. y Bond, S., 1998. Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models. Journal of Econometrics, 87(1), 115-143.
  • Brunninge, O. y Nordqvist, M., 2004. Ownership structure, board composition and entrepreneurship. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 10(1-2), 85-105.
  • Cabrera-Suárez, K.C., y Santana-Martín, D.J., 2004. Governance in Spanish family business. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 10(1-2), 141-163.
  • Calabrò, A., Torchia, M., Jimenez, D.G. and Kraus, S., 2020. The role of human capital on family firm innovativeness: the strategic leadership role of family board members. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 1-27. Retrieved from: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11365-020-00657-y#article-info. [Access: 13th December 2020]
  • Carney, M., 2007. Minority family business in emerging markets: Organization forms and competitive advantage. Family Business Review, 20(4), 289-300.
  • Casillas, J.C. and Moreno, A.M., 2010. The relationship between entrepreneurial orientation and growth: The moderating role of family involvement. Entrepreneurship & regional development, 22(3-4), 265-291.
  • Casillas, J.C., Moreno, A.M. and Barbero, J.L., 2011. Entrepreneurial orientation of family firms: Family and environmental dimensions. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 2(2), 90-100.
  • Cirillo, A., Pennacchio, L., Carillo, M.R. and Romano, M., 2019. The antecedents of entrepreneurial risk-taking in private family firms: CEO seasons and contingency factors. Small Business Economics, 1-20. Retrieved from: https://link.springer.com/arti- cle/10.1007%2Fs11187-019-00279-x. [Access: 13th December 2020].
  • Chatzoglou, P. and Chatzoudes. D., 2018. The role of innovation in building competitive advantages: an empirical investigation. European Journal of Innovation Management, 41, 46-73.
  • Cho, H.-J. and Pucik, V., 2005. Relationship between innovativeness, quality, growth, profitability, and market value. Strategic Management Journal, 26 (6), 555-575.
  • Chrisman, J.J., Chua, J.H. and Sharma, P., 2005. Trends and directions in the development of a strategic management theory of the family firm. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29(5), 555-575.
  • Chrisman, J. J. and Patel, P.J., 2012. Variations in R&D investments of family and non-family firms: Behavioral agency and myopic loss aversion perspectives. Academy of Management Journal, 55(4), 976-997.
  • Chrisman, J.J., Chua, J.H., De Massis, A., Frattini, F. and Wright, M., 2015. The ability and willingness paradox in family firm innovation. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 32(3), 310-318.
  • Chua, J.H., Chrisman, J.J., Steier, L.P. and Rau, S.B., 2012. Sources of heterogeneity in family firms: An introduction. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 36(6), 1103-1113.
  • Classen, N., Carree, M., Van Gils, A., and Peters, B., 2014. Innovation in family and non-family SMEs: an exploratory analysis. Small Business Economics, 42(3), 595-609.
  • Crafts, N.F.R., 2000. Globalization and Growth in the Twentieth Century. No. 00/44. International Monetary Fund.
  • Croci, E., Doukas, J.A. and Gonenc, H., 2011. Family control and financing decisions. European Financial Management, 17(5), 860-897.
  • Cruz, C., Justo, R., and De Castro, J.O., 2012. Does family employment enhance MSEs performance?: Integrating socioemotional wealth and family embeddedness perspectives. Journal of business venturing, 27(1), 62-76.
  • Davidson, R. and MacKinnon, J.G., 1993. Estimation and Inference in Econometrics. Oxford University Press, New York.
  • De Massis, A., Di Minin, A. and Frattini, F., 2015. Family-Driven Innovation. California Management Review, 58(1), 5-19.
  • Decker, C., and Günther, C., 2017. The impact of family ownership on innovation: evidence from the German machine tool industry. Small Business Economics, 48(1) 199-212.
  • Deming, D., 2017. The growing importance of social skills in the labour market. NBER Working Paper, nº 2147.
  • Dreux, D.R., 1990. Financing family business: Alternatives to selling out or going public. Family Business Review, 3, 225-243.
  • Dunn, B., 1996. Family enterprises in the UK: A special sector? Family Business Review, 9(2), 139-155
  • Duran, P., Kammerlander, N., Van Essen, M. and Zellweger, T., 2016. Doing more with less: Innovation input and output in family firms. Academy of Management Journal, 59(4), 1224-1264.
  • Dyer, W.G., 2003. The family: The missing variable in organizational research. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 27(4), 401-416.
  • Eddleston, K.A., Kellermanns, F.W. and Sarathy, R., 2008. Resource configuration in family firms: Linking resources, strategic planning and technological opportunities to performance. Journal of Management Studies, 45(1), 26-50.
  • Faccio, M. and Lang, L.H., 2002. The ultimate ownership of Western European corporations. Journal of Financial Economics, 65(3), 365-395.
  • Garcés-Galdeano, L., Larraza-Kintana, M., García-Olaverri, C. and Makri, M., 2016. Entrepreneurial orientation in family firms: the moderating role of technological intensity and performance. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 12(1), 27-45.
  • Gómez-Mejía, L.R., Makri, M., and Kintana, M.L., 2010. Diversification decisions in family-controlled firms. Journal of Management Studies, 47(2), 223-252.
  • Gómez-Mejía, L.R., Cruz, C., Berrone, P. and De Castro, J., 2011. The bind that ties: Socioemotional wealth preservation in family firms. Academy of Management Annals, 5(1), 653-707.
  • Gómez–Mejía, L.R., Campbell, J.T., Martin, G., Hoskisson, R. E., Makri, M. and Sirmon, D.G., 2014. Socioemotional wealth as a mixed gamble: Revisiting family firm R&D investments with the behavioral agency model. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 38(6), 1351-1374.
  • Gras, D. and Mendoza-Abarca, K.I., 2014. Risky business? The survival implications of exploiting commercial opportunities by nonprofits. Journal of Business Venturing, 29(3), 392-404.
  • Habbershon, T.G. and Williams, M.L., 1999. A resource-based framework for assessing the strategic advantages of family firms. Family Business Review, 12(1), 1-25.
  • Habbershon, T.G., Williams, M., Macmillan and Ian C., 2003. A unified systems perspective of family firm performance. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(4), p. 451-465.
  • Habbershon, T. G. and Pistrui, J., 2002. Enterprising families domain: Family‐influenced ownership groups in pursuit of transgeneration-al wealth. Family Business Review, 15(3), 223-237.
  • Heirman, A. and Clarysse, B., 2007. Which tangible and intangible as-sets matter for innovation speed in start‐ups? Journal of Product Innovation Management, 24(4), 303-315.
  • Hernández-Linares, R., and López-Fernández, M.C., 2018. Entrepreneurial orientation and the family firm: Mapping the field and tracing a path for future research. Family Business Review 31(3), 318-351.
  • Hernández-Perlines, F., and Cisneros, M.A.I., 2017. Analysis of the moderating effect of entrepreneurial orientation on the influence of social responsibility on the performance of Mexican family companies. Cogent Business & Management, 4(1), 1408209.
  • Huergo, E. and Jaumandreu, J., 2004. How does probability of innovation change with firm age? Small Business Economics, 22(3-4), 193-207.
  • Huselid, M.A., 1995. The impact of human resource management practices on turnover, productivity, and corporate financial performance. Academy of Management Journal, 38(3), 635-672.
  • Hutchinson, R.W., 1995. The capital structure and investment decision of the small owner–managed firm: Some exploratory issues. Small Business Economics, 7(3), 231-239.
  • Kammerlander, N. and Ganter, M., 2015. An attention‐based view of family firm adaptation to discontinuous technological change: Exploring the role of family CEOs’ noneconomic goals. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 32(3), 361-383.
  • Kellerman, B., 2008. How followers are creating change and changing leaders. Boston, MA: Harvard School Press.
  • Khan, U, Xuele, Z., Atlas, F. and Khan, F., 2019. The impact of dominant logic and competitive intensity on SMEs performance: A case from China. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 4, 1-11.
  • Kupp, M., Schmitz, B. and Habel, J., 2019. When do family firms consider issuing external equity? Understanding the contingent role of families’ need for control. Journal of Family Business Management, 9(3), 271-296.
  • Kotlar, J., De Massis, A., Fang, H. and Frattini, F., 2014. Strategic reference points in family firms. Small Business Economics, 43(3), 597-619.
  • Kotlar, J., Signori, A., De Massis, A., and Vismara, S., 2018. Financial wealth, socioemotional wealth, and IPO underpricing in family firms: A two-stage gamble model. Academy of Management Journal, 61(3), 1073-1099.
  • La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., and Shleifer, A., 1999. Corporate ownership around the world. Journal of Finance, 54(2), 471-517.
  • Lansberg, I. and Perrow, E., 1991. Understanding and working with leading family businesses in Latin America. Family Business Review, 4(2), 127-147.
  • Le Breton-Miller, I., Miller, D. and Lester, R.H., 2011. Stewardship or agency? A social embeddedness reconciliation of conduct and performance in public family businesses. Organization Science, 22(3), 704-721.
  • Lee, T. and Chu, W., 2017. The relationship between entrepreneurial orientation and firm performance: Influence of family governance. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 8(4), 213-223.
  • Litz, R.A., 2008. Two sides of a one-sided phenomenon: Conceptualizing the family business and business family as a Möbius strip. Family Business Review, 21, 217-236.
  • López-Fernández, M.C., Serrano Bedia, A. and Palama-Ruiz, M., 2016. What hampers innovation in Mexican familia firms? Academia Revista Latinoamericana de Administración, 29(3), 255-278.
  • Lumpkin, G.T. and Lichtenstein, B.B., 2005. The role of organizational learning in the opportunity–recognition process. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29(4), 451-472.
  • Malaver Rodríguez, F. and Vargas Pérez, M., 2004. Los procesos de innovación en la industria colombiana: Resultados de un estudio de casos. Academia Revista Latinoamericana de Administración, 33(2) 5-33.
  • Michiels, A. and Molly, V., 2017. Financing decisions in family businesses: a review and suggestions for developing the field. Family Business Review, 30(4), 369-399.
  • Miller, D., Wright, M., Breton-Miller, I.L. and Scholes, L., 2015. Resources and innovation in family businesses: The Janus-face of socioemotional preferences. California Management Review, 58(1), 20-40.
  • Monteferrante, P. and Piñango, R., 2011. Governance structures and entrepreneurial performance in family firms: an exploratory study of Latin American family firms. En M. Nordqvist et.al. (Eds.), Understanding Entrepreneurial Family Businesses in Uncertain Environments. Edward Elgar Publishing.
  • Morck, R. and Yeung, B., 2003. Agency problems in large family business groups. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 27(4), 367-383.
  • Munari, F., Oriani, R. and Sobrero, M., 2010. The effects of owner identity and external governance systems on R&D investments: A study of Western European firms. Research Policy, 39(8), 1093-1104.
  • Muñoz-Bullón, F. and Sánchez-Bueno, M., 2011. The impact of family involvement on the R&D intensity of publicly traded firms. Family Business Review, 24(1), 62-70.
  • Murphy, L. and Lambrechts, F., 2015. Investigating the actual career decisions of the next generation: The impact of family business involvement. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 6(1), 33-44.
  • Naldi, L., Nordqvist, M., Sjöberg, K. and Wiklund, J., 2007. Entrepreneurial orientation, risk taking, and performance in family firms. Family Business Review, 20(1), 33-47
  • Nicholson, E., 2011. Discovering Latin America and its family business. Tharawhat Magazine. www.thara-whatmagazine.com.
  • Nieto, M.J., Santamaria, L. and Fernández, Z., 2015. Understanding the innovation behavior of family firms. Journal of Small Business Management, 53(2), 382-399.
  • Nordqvist, M., Habbershon, T. G., and Melin, L., 2008. Transgenerational entrepreneurship: Exploring entrepreneurial orientation in family firms. Entrepreneurship, sustainable growth and performance: Frontiers in European entrepreneurship research, 93.
  • Nordqvist, M., Marzano, G., Brenes, E. R., Jiménez, G. and Fonseca-Parades, M., 2011. Understanding entrepreneurial family businesses in uncertain environments: The case of Latin America. In Under- standing Entrepreneurial Family Businesses in Uncertain Environments. Edward Elgar Publishing.
  • Olavarrieta, S. and Villena, M.G., 2014. Innovation and business research in Latin America: An overview. Journal of Business Research, 67(4), 489-497.
  • Orlitzky, M, Schmidt, F.L Rynes and Reynes, S., 2003. Corporate social and financial performance: A meta-analysis. Organization Studies, 24 (3), 403-441.
  • Ostrom, E., 2005. Undestanding instituional diversity . Princenton University Press.
  • Pavitt, K., 2005. Innovation process, En Fagerberg, et al (eds.), The Oxford handbook of innovation, 86-114, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Pérez, P. F. and Lluch, A. (Eds.), 2016. Evolution of family business: Continuity and change in Latin America and Spain. Edward Elgar Publishing.
  • Pindado, J., Requejo, I. and de la Torre, C., 2011. Family control and investment–cash flow sensitivity: Empirical evidence from the Euro zone. Journal of Corporate Finance, 17(5), 1389-1409.
  • Pindado, J. and Requejo, I., 2014. Panel data: a methodology for model specification and testing. Wiky Enciclopedia of Manager, Cooper, C.L. (ed.). Ed John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
  • Poza, E.J., 1995. Global competition and the family‐owned business in Latin America. Family Business Review, 8(4), 301-311.
  • Querbach, S., Bird, M., Kraft, P.S. and Kammerlander, 2020. When the former CEO stays on board: The role of the predecessor’s board retention for product innovation in family firms. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 37(2), 184-207.
  • Ridder, A-K., 2012. External dynamics capabilities: Creating competitive advantages in Innovation via external resources renewal, WP- 2012. School of Business Economics, Maastrich University.
  • Roberts, P.W. and Dowling, G.R., 2002. Corporate reputation and sustained superior financial performance. Strategic Management Journal, 23(12), 1077-1093.
  • Robles, T.F., Carroll, J.E., Bai, S., Reynolds, B.M., Esquivel, S. and Repetti, R. L., 2016. Emotions and family interactions in childhood: Associations with leukocyte telomere length. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 63, 343-350.
  • Rua, O.L., 2018. From intangible resources to export performance. Review of International Business and Strategy, 28(1), 224-242.
  • Sapra, H., Subramanian, A. and Subramanian, K., 2014. Corporate governance and Innovation: Theory and evidence, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 49(4), 957-1003.
  • Sciascia, S., Mazzola, P. and Chirico, F., 2013. Generational involvemen in the top management team of family firms: Exploring nonlinear effects on entrepreneurial orientation. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 37(1), 69-85.
  • Schneider, B.R., 2009. Hierarchical market economies and varieties of capitalism in Latin America. Journal of Latin American Studies, 41(3), 553-575.
  • Schoorman, F.D., Mayer, R.C. and Tagi, J.H., 2007. An Integrative model of organizational trust: Past, present, and future. Academy of Management Review, 32(2), 344- 354.
  • Schumpeter, J.A., 1934. The theory of economic development, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Schumpeter, J.A., 1942. Capitalism, socialism and democracy. New York: Harper and Row.
  • Sharma, P. and Chua, J.H., 2013. Asian family enterprises and family business research. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 30, 641-656.
  • Shrivastava, P. and Grant, J.H., 1985. Empirically derived models of strategic decision‐making processes. Strategic Management Journal, 6(2), 97-113.
  • Steir, L., 2003. Variants of agency contracts in family financed ventures as a continuum of familial altruistic and market rationalities. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(5), 597-618.
  • Stoney, C. and Winstanley, D., 2001. Stakeholding: confusion or utopia? Mapping the conceptual terrain. Journal of Management Studies, 38(5), 602-626.
  • Surroca, J., Tribó, J.A. and Waddock, S., 2010. Corporate responsibility and financial performance: The role of intangible resources. Strategic Management Journal, 31(5), 463-490.
  • Thornton, P.H. and Ocasio, W., 2008. Institutional logics. En R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, y R. Suddaby (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 99-128.
  • Talke, K., Salomo, S. and Rost, K., 2010. How top management team diversity affects innovativeness and performance via the strategic choice to focus on innovation fields. Research Policy, 39(7), 907-918.
  • Teece, D.J., 2007. Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28(13), 1319-1350.
  • Trott, P., 2008. Innovation management and new Product development. Harlow, UK: Financial Times/Prentice Hall.
  • Ughetto, E., 2010. Assessing the contribution to innovation of private equity investors: a study on European buyout. Research Policy, 39(1), 126-140.
  • Van der Wijst D., 1989. Small Business Characteristics. In: Financial Structure in Small Business. Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, vol 320. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. 11-26.
  • Van Doorn, S., Jansen, J.J., Van den Bosch, F.A. and Volberda, H.W., 2013. Entrepreneurial orientation and firm performance: Drawing attention to the senior team. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 30(5), 821-836.
  • White, H., 1980. A heteroscedastic-consistent covariance matrix estimator and a direct test for heteroscedasticity. Econometrica, 48, 817-838.
  • Wu, L.Y., 2010. Applicability of the resource-based and dynamic-capability views under environmental volatility. Journal of Business Research, 63(1), 27-31.
  • Zahra, S.A., 2005. Entrepreneurial risk taking in family firm. Family Business Review, 18(1), 23-40,
  • Zahra, S.A., Hayton, J.C., Neubaum, D.O., Dibrell, C. and Craig. J., 2008. Culture of family commitment and strategic flexibility: The moderating effect of stewardship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 32(6), 1035-1054.
  • Zattoni, A., Gnan, L. and Huse, M., 2015. Does family involvement influence firm performance? Exploring the mediating effects of board processes and tasks. Journal of Management, 41(4), 1214-1243.
  • Zellweger, T., 2007. Time horizon, costs of equity capital, and generic investment strategies of firms. Family business review, 20(1), 1-15.
  • Zellweger, M., Eddleston, K.A., and Kellermans, F.W., 2010. Exploring the concept of familiness: Introducing family firm identity. Journal of family Business Strategy, 1(1), 54-63
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet