Towards an egalitarian societyFamily gender values in the young people of Germany, Norway and Spain

  1. Moreno Mínguez, Almudena 1
  1. 1 Universidad de Valladolid, España
Revista:
Revista internacional de sociología

ISSN: 0034-9712

Año de publicación: 2021

Volumen: 79

Número: 3

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.3989/RIS.2021.79.3.19.70 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: Revista internacional de sociología

Resumen

El objetivo de este artículo es analizar cómo inciden las variables socio-demográficas en los valores familiares y laborales entre los jóvenes de 18 a 35 años en Alemania, Noruega y España, países con diferentes modelos familiares, Estados de bienestar y roles de género. El artículo trata, por tanto, de cubrir el vacío existente en la literatura sobre los valores familiares y de género entre los jóvenes, tratando de ir más allá de la perspectiva dualista existente en estos estudios. El análisis está basado en los datos procedentes de la Encuesta Social Europea correspondiente a 2010, la cual contiene preguntas relativas a los valores familiares y la conciliación laboral y familiar. Se ha aplicado un análisis de regresión logística para estimar el efecto de variables socio-demográficas como el género, la educación o la situación laboral en los valores familiares de los jóvenes desde una perspectiva comparada. Los resultados evidencian que los valores familiares tradicionales están más enraizados entre los jóvenes en los países del sur de Europa que en el norte de Europa. También se ha observado un efecto significativo de la educación en aquellos países donde la familia tradicional está más arraigada, mientras que el desempleo tiene un efecto inverso en los valores tradicionales. Estos hallazgos aportan progresos innovadores a los estudios de juventud y familia desde una perspectiva comparada, además de ser útiles para orientar el diseño de políticas familiares destinadas a favorecer la transición actitudinal hacia modelos de familia igualitarios con potenciales efectos positivos en la fecundidad y la igualdad de género.

€ Ver financiación

Información de financiación

Financiadores

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Aboim, S. 2010. Labour and Love: the gender division of labour and caring in across-national perspective. Inn S. Aboim Ed. , Plural Masculinities. Aldershot: Ashgate, 83-109.
  • Akerlof, G. and Kranton R. 2000. “Economics and Identity”. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 115 (3): 715-753.
  • Alvarez, B. and Miles, D. 2003. “Gender effect of housework allocation: Evidence from Spanish two-earner couples”. Journal of Population Economics 16 (3): 227-242.
  • Auspurg, K., and Gundert, S. 2015. “Precarious employment and bargaining power: Results of a factorial survey analysis”. Zeitschrift für Soziologie, 44 (2): 99-117.
  • Baker M.J. and Jacobsen, J.P. 2007. “Marriage, Specialization, and the Gender Division of Labor”. Journal of Labor Economics, 25 4: 763-793.
  • Beck, Ulrich 1986: Risikogesellschaft. Auf dem Weg in eine andere Moderne. Frankfurt/Main: Suhrkamp.
  • Beck, U.; Beck-Gernsheim, E. 1993. Nicht Autonomie, sondern Bastelbiographie: Anmerkungen zur Individualisierungsdiskussion am Beispiel des Aufsatzes von Günter Burkart. Zeitschrift für Soziologie, 22, 3: 178-187.
  • Bernhardt E. 2004. “Is the Second Demographic Transition a useful concept for demography?” Vienna yearbook of population research 25-28.
  • Liefbroer, A.C and Billari, F. (2009). “Bringing Norms Back In: A Theoretical and Empirical Discussion of Their Importance for Understanding Demographic Behaviour”. Popul. Space Place16: 287-305
  • Brines J. 1994. “Economic dependency, gender, and the division of labor at home”. American Journal of Sociology, 100, 652-688.
  • Braun, M. and Scott, J. 2009. “Gender-role egalitarianism: Is the trend reversal real?” International Journal of Public Opinion Research 21(3): 362-367.
  • Brines, J., and Joyner, K. 1999. “The ties that bind: Principles of cohesion in cohabitation and marriage”. American Sociological Review, 64: 333-355.
  • Bryan, M. L., and Sevilla-Sanz, A. 2011. “Does housework lower wages? Evidence for Britain”. Oxford Economic Papers, 63 (1): 187-210.
  • Calzada, I and Brooks, C. 2013. “The Myth of Mediterranean Familism”, European Societies, 15 (4): 514-534.
  • Cliquet RL. 1991. The second demographic transition: fact or fiction? Strasbourg: Council of Europe.
  • Coleman D. 2004. Why we don’t have to believe without doubting in the” Second Demographic Transition”-some agnostic comments. Vienna yearbook of population research. 2004:11-24
  • Crompton R., Lewis S. and Lyonette C. 2007. “Introduction: The Unravelling of the ‘Male breadwinner’ Model - and Some of its Consequences”. In: Crompton R., Lewis S., Lyonette C. eds Women, Men, Work and Family in Europe.London: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Crompton, R. and Lyonette, C. 2000. “The new Gender essentialism - domestic and family ‘choices’ and their relation to attitudes”. British Journal of Sociology, 56 (4): 601-24.
  • Daly, M. and Scheiwe, K. 2010. “Individualisation and personal obligations Social policy, family policy and law reform in Germany and the UK”. International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family, 24 (2): 177-197.
  • Davis, S. N., Greenstein, T. N., and Gerteisen Marks, J. P. 2007. “Effects of union type on division of household labor: Do cohabiting men really perform more housework?”. Journal of Family Issues, 28: 1246-1272.
  • DeBacker, T. K., Crowson, H. M., Beesley, A. D., Thoma, S. J., and Hestevold, N. L. 2008. 2The challenge of measuring epistemic beliefs: An analysis of three self-report instruments”. The Journal of Experimental Education, 76 (3): 281-312.
  • Domínguez Folgueras, M. 2012. “La división del trabajo doméstico en las parejas españolas. Un análisis del uso del tiempo”. Revista Internacional de Sociología, 70 (1): 153-179.
  • Duncan, S. 2005. “Mothering, Class and Rationality”. Sociological Review, 53 (2): 50-76.
  • Engster. D. and Stensöta, H. O. 2011. “Do Family Policy Regimes Matter for Children’s Well-Being”. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State and Society, 18 (1): 82-124.
  • Esping-Andersen, G. and Billari, C. 2015. “Re-theorizing Family Demographics”, Population and Development Review 41 (1):, 1-31.
  • Fagan, C. 2002. “How many hours? Work-time regimes and preferences in European countries”. In G. Crow and S. Heath Eds. , Social conceptions of time: Structure and process in work and everyday life pp. 69-77 . Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Ferrera, M. 1998. “The Four ‘Social Europes: Between Universalism and Selectivity”. In: Rhodes M., Mény Y. eds The Future of European Welfare. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Ferrera, M. 1996. “The Southern model of welfare in Social Europe. Journal of European Social Policy, 6 (1): 17-37.
  • Flaquer, L. 2000. La articulación entre familia y Estado de bienestar en los países de la Europa del sur, Paper. 73: 27-58.
  • Flaquer, Ll. Moreno Mínguez, A., and Cano, T. 2017. “Changing family models: Emerging new opportunities for fathers in Catalonia Spain ?”. In I. Crespi and E. Ruspini Eds. . Balancing Work and Family in a Changing Society. The Fathers’ Perspective, London: Palgrave.
  • Fuwa, M. 2004. “Macro-level gender inequality and the division of household labor in 22 countries”. American Sociological Review, 69: 751-767.
  • Goldscheider, F.; Bernhardt, E. and Lappegård, T. 2015. “The Gender Revolution: A Framework for Understanding Changing Family and Demographic Behavior”, 41 2 : 207-239.
  • González, M. J., Miret, P. and Treviño, R. 2010. “Just living together: implications of cohabitation for fathers, participation in child care in Western Europe”. Demographic Research, 23 (16) : 445-478.
  • Greenstein T. 2000. “Economic dependence, gender, and the division of labor in the home: A replication and extension2. Journal of Marriage and the Family: 62,322-335.
  • Hagqvist, E. (2016). The juggle and struggle of everyday life Gender, division of work, work-family perceptions and well-being in different policy contexts, Doctoral tesis
  • Hakim, C. 2000. Work-lifestyle choices in the 21st century: Preference theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Karu, M., and Kasearu, K. 2011. “Slow Steps Towards Dual Earner/ Dual Carer Family Model: Why Fathers do not Take Parental Leave”. Studies of Transition States and Societies, 3 (1): 24-38.
  • Kasearu, K. 2009. “The Effect of Union Type on Work-Life Conflict in Five European Countries”, Soc Indic Res 93:549-567.
  • Killewald A, Gough M. 2010. “Money isn’t everything: Wives’ earnings and housework time”. Social Science Research, 39:987-1003.
  • Lesthaeghe, R. 2010. “The unfolding story of the second demographic transition,” Population and Development Review 36: 211-251.
  • León, M. and Migliavacca, M. 2013. “Italy and Spain: Still the Case of Familistic Welfare Models?”. Population Review 52 (1): 25-42.
  • Leon, M. and Pavolini, E. 2015. Social Investment’ or Back to ‘Familism’: The Impact of the Economic Crisis on Family and Care Policies in Italy and Spain, Volume 19 (3).
  • Lewis, J. and Daly 2000. “The concept of social care and the analysis of contemporary welfare states”. British Journal of Sociology, 51 (2): 281-298.
  • Leibfried, S. 1992. “Towards a European welfare state?”, in C. Pierson and F. G. Castles eds., The Welfare State Reader, Cambridge: PolityPress, pp. 190207. Lipsmeyer, C. S. and Nordstrom
  • Luck, D. (2014). “Family values and family norms: What impact does culture have on familial and generative bejaviour”, Comparative Population Studies, 39 (3): 451-464.
  • Lye, D., and Waldron, I. 1997. “Attitudes toward cohabitation, family, and gender roles: relationships to values and political ideology”. Sociological Perspectives, 40: 199-225.
  • Matějů, P.Michael L. Smith, Weidnerová, S.Petra Anýžová, P. 2017. “The role of basic values and education on women’s work and family preferences in Europe”. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy 37 (9/10): 494-514.
  • Meil G., Romero-Balsas, P. and Castrillo Bustamante, C. 2019. The effectiveness of corporate gender equality plans in improving leave provisions for fathers in Spain. Comunity, Work and Family, 22 (1), 96-110.
  • Moreno Mínguez, A. 2015. “La ambivalencia ante la corresponsabilidad parental en España: Una cuestión de género”. Revista la Ventana, 42: 46-98.
  • Moreno Mínguez, A. and Crespi I. 2016. “Gender equality and family changes in the work-family culture in Southern Europe”. International Review of Sociology, 27 (3): 394-420.
  • Moreno Mínguez, A., Ortega Gaspar, M. and Gamero, C. 2017. “Los modelos familiares en España: reflexionando sobre la ambivalencia familiar desde una aproximación teórica”. Revista Española de Sociología, 26 (2): 149-167.
  • Naldini, M. 2003. The Family in the Mediterranean Welfare State. London and Portland: Frank Cass.
  • Naldini, M. and Jurado, T. 2013. “Family and welfare state reorientation in Spain and inertia in Italy from a European perspective”. Population Review, 52 (1): 43-61.
  • Perelli-Harris, Brienna et al. 2012. “Changes in union status during the transition to parent-hood: An examination of 11 European countries”, Population Studies: A Journal of Demography 66 (2): 167-182
  • Pfau-Effinger, B. 2004. “Socio-historical paths of the male breadwinner model - an explanation of cross-national differences”. The British Journal of Sociology 55 (3):377-399.
  • Pfau-Effinger, B., Flaquer, L. and Jensen, Per H. Eds. 2009. Formal and Informal Work in Europe. The Hidden Work Regime. New York: Routledge.
  • Saraceno, C. 2004. ‘The Italian family from the 1960 to the present’. Modern Italy 9 (1) : 4757.
  • Saraceno, Ch. And Keck, W. 2010. Can we identify intergenerational policy regimes in Europe?. European Societies 12(5):675-696.
  • Scott, J. 2006. Families and gender roles: How attitudes are changing” Arxius15: 143-154.
  • Sjöberg, O. 2010. “Ambivalent Attitudes, Contradictory Institutions: Ambivalence in Gender-Role Attitudes in Comparative Perspective”. International Journal of Comparative Sociology, 51 (1-2) : 33-57.
  • Sobotka T. 2008. Overview chapter 6: The diverse faces of the second demographic transition in Europe. Demographic research. 8;19:171-224.
  • Solsona M. 1998 The second demographic transition from a gender perspective. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research. 11:211-25.
  • Sullivan, O. 2006 . Changing gender relations, changing families: Tracing the pace of change. New York: Roman and Littlefiled.
  • Sullivan, O. Gershuny, J. and Robinson, P. 2018. “Stalled or Uneven Gender Revolution? A Long-Term Processual Framework for Understanding Why Change Is Slow: Stalled or Uneven Gender Revolution?”. Journal of Family Theory and Review 10 2: 263-279.
  • Thornton, A., Axinn, W. G., and Xie, Y. 2007. Marriage and cohabitation. London: University of Chigaco Press.
  • Tur-Prats, A. 2017 Unemployment and Intimate-Partner Violence: A Gender-Identity Approach, Barcelona GSE Working Paper Series, Working Paper nº 963
  • Tyrell, F. A., Wheeler, L. A., Gonzales, N. A., Dumka, L., & Millsap, R. (2016), Family influences on Mexican American adolescents’ romantic relationships: Moderation by gender and culture. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 26, 142-158.
  • Van De Kaa, D. 2004. Is the Second Demographic Transition a Useful Research Concept: Questions and Answers, Vienna Yearbook of Population Research 2(2004):4-10.
  • Van Wel, F. and Knijn, T. 2007. “Single mothers’ motivation to work and their participation in the labour market in the Netherlands”. International Journal of Sociology of the Family, 33 (1): 183-196.
  • Washbrook, E. 2007. Explaining the Gender Division of Labour: the role of the gender wage gap. University of Bristol, Centre for Market and Public Organisation, Working paper, N0. 07/174.
  • West, C., and Zimmerman, D. H. 1987 . “Doing gender.Gender and Society”, 1: 125-151
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet