Análisis de viabilidad de un proyecto de recuperación del patrimonio cultural urbano

  1. Andrea Báez
  2. Luis Cesar Herrero
  3. Ana Bedate
  4. Angel Sanz
Journal:
Gestión turística

ISSN: 0717-1811

Year of publication: 2012

Issue: 17

Pages: 97-119

Type: Article

DOI: 10.4206/GEST.TUR.2012.N17-06 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

More publications in: Gestión turística

Sustainable development goals

Abstract

The use of methodologies and empirical testing around the valuation of historical and cultural heritage allow the estimation of the preferences of individuals and society, they can also serve as input for the evaluation of policies and projects relating to cultural heritage. The goal of this work is to perform a cost-benefit analysis of a historical heritage restoration project in Valdivia, Chile. The estimation of the expected benefits are calculated through the implementation of a contingent evaluation method, specifically to assess the value assigned by citizens and tourists to the cultural heritage of this city. Such applications can be interesting, given the urgency to recover many of the assets and the opportunity to turn them factors of economic development, or at least as tourist attractions

Bibliographic References

  • An, M.Y. y Ayala, R.A. (1996): “A simple Algorithm for Nonparametric Estimation of Distribution Functions with Arbitrarily Grouped Data”, Working Paper 9602, Department of Economics, Duke University, Durham.
  • Báez, A. (2007): “Aplicación de Técnicas de Valoración Contingente para la Evaluación del Patrimonio Histórico Urbano. El caso del Conjunto Histórico de la Ciudad de Valdivia (Chile)”, Tesis Doctoral, Departamento de Economía Aplicada, Universidad de Valladolid, Valladolid.
  • Banco Central de Chile. (2009): Base de datos económicos. www.bcentral.cl.
  • Bateman, I.J. y Willis, K.G. (1999): “Valuing Environmental Preferences. Theory and Practice of the Contingent Valuation in the US, EU and Developing Countrie”. Oxford University Press, New York.
  • Bedate, A., Herrero, L.C. & Sanz, A. (2006): “Ex Ante and Ex Post Valuations of a Cultural Good: The Case of a Museum of Contemporary Art”. 14th International Conference of the ACEI, Viena. Austria.
  • Bedate, A., Herrero, L.C. & Sanz, A. (2009): “Economic valuation of a contemporary art museum: correction of hypothetical bias using a certainty question”, Journal of Cultural Economics. Vol 27, nº1. pp.159-176.
  • Bishop, R.C. y Heberlein, T.A. (1979): “Measuring Values of Extra-Market Goods: Are Indirect Measures Biased?”. American Journal of Agricultural Economics. pp.926-930.
  • Boardman, A., Greenberg, D., Vining, A., y Weimer, D. (2001): Cost-Benefit Analysis. Concepts and Practic. Segunda Edición, Prentice Hall, New Jersey.
  • Consejo de Monumentos Nacionales. (2008): Monumentos Nacionales de la Región de los Ríos. www.monumentos.cl.
  • Cameron, T.A. y James, M.D. (1987): “Efficient Estimation Methods for Use with „Closed-Ended‟ Contingent Valuation Survey Data”. Review of Economics and Statistcs, nº69, pp. 269-276.
  • Cameron, T.A. y Quiggin J. (1994): “Estimation using contingent valuation data from a dichotomous choice with follow-up Questionnaire”. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, nº27, pp. 218-234.
  • Carson, R.T., Mitchell, R.C., Conaway, M.C., Navrud, S. (1997): “Non-Moroccan Values for Rehabilitating the Fés Medina”, World Bank Report, Washington.
  • CEPAL. (2005): Metodología general de identificación, preparación y evaluación de proyectos de inversión pública. Instituto Latinoamericano y del Caribe de Planificación Económica y Social, Área de Proyectos y Programación de Inversiones. Santiago de Chile.
  • Chafla, P.R. (2001): Valor económico del patrimonio histórico arquitectónico del centro histórico de la ciudad de Quito. Tesis Doctoral, Departamento de Fundamentos de Economía e Historia Económica. Universidad de Alcalá. Madrid.
  • Comisión Europea (1997): Guide of costs-benefit analysis or investment projects. Evaluation Unit DG Regional Policy, European Commission.
  • Comisión Europea (2003): Guía del análisis costes-beneficios de los proyectos de inversión, Unidad de Evaluación DG Política Regional.
  • Cuccia, T. (2003): “Contingent Valuation” in TOWSE, R. (ed.) (2003). A Handbook of cultural economics, Chapter 14, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, pp.119-131.
  • Cuccia, T. y Signorello, G. (2002): “A Contingent Valuation Study of willingness to Pay for Heritage Visits: Case Study of Noto”. in I. RIZZO y R. TOWSE (eds.), The Economics of Heritage: a Study in the Political Economy of Culture in Sicily, Capítulo 10, Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, pp.147-163.
  • Greene, W. (1998): Análisis econométrico. Tercera Edición, Prentice Hall. Madrid.
  • Guarda, G. (1990): Flandes Indiano. Las fortificaciones del Reino de Chile 1541-1826, Ediciones Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago.
  • Guarda, G. (2001): Nueva Historia de Valdivia. Ediciones Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago.
  • Hanemann, W.M. (1984): “Welfare Evaluations in Contingent Valuation Experiments with Discrete Responses”. American Journal of Agricultural Economic. nº66, pp. 332-341.
  • Hanemann, W., Loomis, J. y Kaninnen, B. (1991): Statistical Efficiency of DoubleBounded Dichotomous Choice Contingent Valuation, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, nº73, pp.1255-1263.
  • Harrison, G. W. (2006): “Experimental evidence on alternative environmental valuation methods”. Environmental and Resource Economics, vol 34 nº1, pp. 125– 162.
  • Harrison, G. W., y Rutström, E. E. (2005): “Experimental evidence on the existence of hypothetical bias in value elicitation methods”. In C. R. Plott & V. L. Smith (Eds.), Handbook of experimental economics results. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
  • Herrero, L.C. (2001): “Economía del patrimonio histórico”. Información Comercial Española. nº792, pp.15-168.
  • Hutter, M. y Rizzo, I. (eds.), (1997): Economics Perspectives on Cultural Heritage. MacMillan Press Ltd., Basingstoke.
  • INE. (2009): Índice de Precios al Consumidor (IPC). www.ine.cl.
  • Mishan, E.J. (1971): Cost-Benefit Analysis.George Allen and Unwin. London.
  • Mitchell R.C. y Carson R. (1989): Using Surveys to Value Public Goods: The Contingent Valuation Method, Resources for the Future. Washington.
  • National Oceanographic Atmospheric Administration. (1994): Proposed rules for valuing environmental damages. Federal Register, vol 59, nº5, pp.1062– 1191
  • Navrud, S. y Ready, R.C. (eds.) (2002): Valuing Cultural Heritage: Applying Environmental Valuation Techniques to Historic Buildings, Monuments and Artifacts. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham.
  • ONUDI. (1993): Guidelines for project evaluation. in www.unido.org.
  • Pagiola, S. (1999): Valuing the Benefits of Investments in Cultural Heritage: The Historic Core of Split. Environmental Department, World Bank. Washington, D.C.
  • Peacock, A. (ed.). (1998): Does the Past have a Future?. The Political Economy of Heritage. Institute of Economic Affairs, London.
  • Pearce, D. y Nash, C. (1981): The social appraisal of Projects: A text in Cost – Benefit Analysis. MacMillan, London.
  • Rus del G. (2004): Análisis Coste-Beneficio. Evaluación económica de políticas y proyectos de inversión, Ariel, Barcelona.
  • Santagata, W. y Signorello, G. (2000): “Contingent valuation of a cultural public good and policy design: The Case Napoli Musei Aperti”. Journal of Cultural Economics. nº24, pp.181-204.
  • Sanz J.A., Herrero, L.C. y Bedate, A. (2003): Contingent Valuation and Semiparametric Methods: A Case Study of the National Museum of Sculpture in Valladolid, Spain. Journal of Cultural Economics, vol 27, nº3-4, pp. 241-257.
  • Saz, S. Del y Montagud, J. (2005): “Valuing cultural heritage: the social benefits of Restoring an old Arab Tower”. Journal of Cultural Heritage. nº6, pp. 69- 77.
  • Sen, A. (2000): “The Discipline of Cost-Benefit Analysis”. The Journal of Legal Studies, vol. 29, nº2, pp. 931-952.
  • Throsby, D. (2001): “Cultural Capital”. Journal of Cultural Economics, nº23, pp. 3-12.
  • Tuan, T.H. y Navrud, S. (2007): “Valuing cultural heritage in developing countries: comparing and pooling contingent valuation and choice modelling estimates”. Environmental and Resource Economics, vol 38, nº1, pp. 51- 69.
Data source: Dialnet