El efecto de la estructura de las redes sociales sobre la confianza. Un análisis de simulaciones computarizadas y evaluación de la tesis de Coleman

Referencias bibliográficas

• Alesina, Alberto y La Ferrara, Eliana (2002). «Who Trusts Others?». Journal of Public Economics, 85, 207-234. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0047-2727(01)00084-6
• Allison, Paul (1978). «Measures of Inequality». American Sociological Review, 43, 865-880. https://doi.org/10.2307/2094626
• Axelrod, Robert (1984). The Evolution of Cooperation. Nueva York: Basic Books. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-90400-9_7
• Axelrod, Robert (1997). «Advancing the Art of Simulation in the Social Science». En: Conte, Rosaria; Hegselmann, Rainer y Terna, Pietro (eds.). Simulation Social Phenomena. Berlín: Springer-Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-03366-1_2
• Back, István y Flache, Andreas (2006). «The Viability of Cooperation Based on Interpersonal Commitment». Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 9(1). Recuperado el 21 de mayo de 2017, de http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/9/1/12.html .
• Barabási, Albert‐László (2002). Linked: The New Science of Networks. Cambridge, MA: Perseus. https://doi.org/10.2307/20033300
• Boccaletti, Stefano et al. (2006). «Complex networks: Structure and dynamics». Physics Reports, 424, 175-308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2005.10.009
• Bourdieu, Pierre (1986). «The forms of Capital». En: Richardson, J.G. (ed.). Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education. Nueva York: Greenwood. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470755679.ch15
• Burt, Ronald S. (2004). «Structural holes and good ideas». American Journal of Sociology, 110, 349-399. https://doi.org/10.1086/421787
• Burt, Ronald S. (2005). Brokerage and Closure. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-21742-6_23
• Burt, Ronald S.; Bian, Yanjie y Opper, Sonja (2018). «More or less guanxi: Trust is 60% network context, 10% individual difference». Social Networks, 54, 12-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2017.12.001
• Buskens, Vincent W. (1998). «The social Structure of Trust». Social Networks, 20, 265-289. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0378-8733(98)00005-7
• Buskens, Vincent W. (2002). Social networks and trust. Boston, Dordrecht y Londres: Kluwer Academic Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/b109038
• Carrington, Peter J.; Scott, John y Wasserman, Stan (2005). Models and Methods in Social Network Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511811395
• Chow, Wing S. y Chan, Lai S. (2008). «Social network, social trust and shared goals in organizational knowledge sharing». Information & Management, 45(7), 458-465. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2008.06.007
• Coleman, James S. (1988). «Social Capital in the Create of Human Capital». American Journal of Sociology, 94, 95-120. https://doi.org/10.1086/228943
• Coleman, James S. (1990). Foundations of Social Theory. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
• Coleman, James S.; Menzel, Herbert y Katz, Elihu (1957). «The diffusion of an innovation among physicians». Sociometry, 20, 253-270. https://doi.org/10.2307/2785979
• Cook, Karen S. y Gerbasi, Alexandra (2009). «Trust». En: Hedström, Peter y Bearman, Peter (eds.). The Oxford Handbook of Analytical Sociology. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199215362.013.10
• Cruz Gómez, Irene y Verd, Joan M. (2013). «The strength of ties: A theoretical and empirical exploration of its multiple meanings». Empiria: Revista de Metodología de Ciencias Sociales, 26, 149-174. https://doi.org/10.5944/empiria.26.2013.7156
• Diestel, Reinhard (2000). Graph Theory. Nueva York.
• Dunn, John (1993). «Trust». En: Goodin, Robert E. y Pettit, Philip (eds.). A Companion to Contemporary Political Philosophy. Oxford: Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1111/b.9780631199519.1995.x
• Epstein, Joshua M. (2006). Generative Social Science: Studies in Agent-Based Computational Modelling. Princeton: Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400842872
• Fukuyama, Francis (1995). Trust: The Social Virtues and the Creation of Prosperity. Nueva York: Free Press.
• García-Valdecasas, José Ignacio (2011a). «La simulación basada en agentes: Una nueva forma de explorar los fenómenos sociales». Revista Española de Investigaciones Sociológicas (REIS), 136, 91-110. https://doi.org/10.5477/cis/reis.136.91
• García-Valdecasas, José Ignacio (2011b). «Una definición estructural de capital social». Redes: Revista Hispana para el Análisis de Redes Sociales, 20(1). https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/redes.411
• García-Valdecasas, José Ignacio (2013). «Grupos moderados y tolerantes en la polarización política de las redes sociales». Revista Española de Investigaciones Sociológicas (REIS), 136, 25-44. https://doi.org/10.5477/cis/reis.142.25
• García-Valdecasas, José Ignacio (2014a). «El impacto de la estructura de las redes sociales sobre el acceso de los individuos al mercado laboral». Revista Internacional de Sociología (RIS), 72(2), 303-321. https://doi.org/10.3989/ris.2012.09.13
• García-Valdecasas, José Ignacio (2014b). «Explicación, mecanismo y simulación: Otra forma de hacer sociología». Empiria: Revista de Metodología de Ciencias Sociales, 28, 35-58. https://doi.org/10.5944/empiria.28.2014.12120
• García-Valdecasas, José Ignacio (2015). «La estructura compleja de las redes sociales». Revista Española de Sociología (RES), 24, 65-84.
• García-Valdecasas, José Ignacio (2016). Simulación basada en agentes: Una introducción a NetLogo. Madrid: Centro de Investigaciones Sociológicas. Cuadernos Metodológicos, 53.
• García-Valdecasas, José Ignacio y López, Iván (2017). «Un modelo basado en agentes para el análisis de la segregación étnica espacial urbana». Revista de Geografía Norte Grande, 67, 145-165. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-34022017000200008
• García Vázquez, J.C. y Sancho Caparrini, F. (2016). NetLogo: Una herramienta de Modelado. Payhip.
• Gasalla, Jose María y Navarro, Leila (2008). Confianza: La clave para el éxito personal y empresarial. Madrid: Empresa Activa.
• Ghavipour, Mina y Meybodi, Mohammad R. (2018). «A dynamic algorithm for stochastic trust propagation in online social networks: Learning automata approach». Computer Communications, 123, 11-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comcom.2018.04.004
• Gilbert, Nigel (2008). Agent-Based Models: Quantitative applications in the social science 153. Londres: Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412983259
• Gilbert, Nigel y Abbott, Andrew (2005). «Social Science Computation». American Journal of Sociology, 110, 859-863. https://doi.org/10.1086/430413
• Gilbert, Nigel y Troitzsch, Klaus G. (2005). Simulation for the Social Scientist. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
• González-Bailón, Sandra (2004). «¿Sociedades artificiales?: Una introducción a la simulación social». Revista Internacional de Sociología, 39, 199-222. https://doi.org/10.3989/ris.2004.i39.268
• González-Bailón, Sandra (2006). «The Role of Dynamic Network in Social Capital: A Simulation Experiment». Papers: Revista de Sociología, 80, 171-194. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/papers/v80n0.1774
• Granovetter, Mark (1973). «The strength of weak ties». American Journal of Sociology, 76, 1360-1380. https://doi.org/10.1086/225469
• Granovetter, Mark (1974). Getting a Job: A Study of Contacts and Careers. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
• Hanneman, Robert A. y Riddle, Mark (2005). Introduction to social network methods. Riverside, CA: University of California, Riverside.
• Hardin, Russell (2006). Trust. Cambridge: Polity.
• Hedström, Peter (2005). Dissecting the Social: On the Principles of Analytical Sociology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511488801
• Hedström, Peter y Bearman, Peter (eds.) (2009). The Oxford Handbook of Analytical Sociology. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199215362.001.0001
• Herreros, Francisco (2002). ¿Por qué confiar?: El problema de la creación de capital social. Madrid: CEACS.
• Herreros, Francisco (2003). «Las fuentes de la confianza social». Revista Internacional de Sociología, 35, 151-175. https://doi.org/10.2307/3541411
• Herreros, Francisco (2004). The Problem of Forming Social Capital: Why Trust? Nueva York y Londres: Palgrave. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403978806
• Lewin, Kurt (1936). Principles of Topological Psychology. Nueva York, NY: Harper & Row.
• Lewin, Kurt (1951). Field Theory in the Social Sciences. Nueva York, NY: Harper.
• Lin, Nan (2001). Social Capital: A Theory of Social Structure and Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511815447
• Lucas, Antonio (ed.) (2013). Sociología de las organizaciones. Madrid: Fragua.
• Macy, Michael W. y Flache, Andreas (2009). «Social Dynamics from the Bottom Up: Agent-Based Model of Social Interaction». En: Hedström, Peter y Bearman, Peter (eds.). The Oxford Handbook of Analytical Sociology. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199215362.013.11
• Macy, Michael W. y Miller, Robert (2002). «From Factors to Actors: Computational Sociology and Agent-Based Modelling». Annual Review of Sociology, 28, 143-66. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.28.110601.141117
• Milgram, Stanley (1967). «The Small World Problem». Psychology Today, 2, 60-67. https://doi.org/10.1037/e400002009-005
• Molina, José Luis (2001). El análisis de las redes sociales: Una introducción. Barcelona: Bellaterra.
• Montero, José; Zmerli, Sonja y Newton, Ken (2008). «Confianza social, confianza política y satisfacción con la democracia». Revista Española de Investigaciones Sociológicas, 138, 11-54. https://doi.org/10.2307/40184879
• Moreno, Jacob L. (1934). Who shall survive?: A new approach to the problem of human interrelations. Nueva York, NY: Beacon Press.
• Newman, Mark E.J. (2003). «The Structure and Function of Complex Networks». SIAM Review, 45, 167-256. https://doi.org/10.1137/S003614450342480
• Newman, Mark E.J.; Barabási, Albert‐László y Watts, Duncan J. (2003). The Structure and Dynamics of Networks. Princeton: Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/springerreference_60528
• Paramio, Ludolfo (1999). «Estrategias partidarias y desconfianza política». Revista Internacional de Sociología, 22, 183-201.
• Pareto, Vilfredo (1906). Manual of political economy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.
• Putnam, Robert D. (1993). «The Prosperous Community: Social Capital and Public Life». The American Prospect, 13, 35-42.
• Putnam, Robert D. (1995). «Bowling Alone: America’s Declining Social Capital». Journal of Democracy, 6, 65-78. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.1995.0002
• Putnam, Robert D. (2000). Bowling Alone: The collapse and revival of American community. Nueva York: Simon and Schuster. https://doi.org/10.1145/358916.361990
• Ramírez, Jorge y Hernández, Eduardo (2012). «¿Tenía razón Coleman?: Acerca de la relación entre capital social y logro educativo». Sinéctica: Revista Electrónica de Educación, 39, 1-14.
• Requena, Félix (1989). «El concepto de red social». Revista Española de Investigaciones Sociológicas, 48, 137-152. https://doi.org/10.2307/40183465
• Rodríguez, Josep A. (1995). Análisis estructural y de redes. Madrid: Centro de Investigaciones Sociológicas.
• Rousseau, Denise M.; Sitkin, Sim B.; Burt, Ronald S. y Camerer, Colin (1998). «Not so different after all: A cross-discipline view of trust». Academy of Management Review, 23(3), 393-404. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1998.926617
• Schelling, Thomas C. (1978). Micromotives and Macrobehavior. Nueva York: W.W. Norton.
• Siegel, David A. (2009). «Social Networks and Collective Action». American Journal of Political Science, 53, 122-138. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2008.00361.x
• Snijders, Chris (1996). Trust and Commitments. Amsterdam: Thesis Publishers.
• Squazzoni, Flaminio (2012). Agent-Based Computational Sociology. Singapur: Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119954200
• Steglich, Christian; Snijders, Tom A.B. y Pearson, Michael (2010). «Dynamic Networks and Behavior: Separating Selection from Influence». Sociological Methodology, 40(1), 329-393. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9531.2010.01225.x
• Sztompka, Piotr (2006). «New Perspectives on Trust». American Journal of Sociology, 112, 905-919. https://doi.org/10.1086/510993
• Wasserman, Stan y Faust, Katherine (1994). Social Network Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511815478
• Watts, Duncan J. (1999a). «Network, Dynamic and Small-World Phenomenon». American Journal of Sociology, 105, 493-527. https://doi.org/10.1086/210318
• Watts, Duncan J. (1999b). Small Worlds: The Dynamic between Order and Randomness. Princeton: Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv36zr5d
• Watts, Duncan J. (2003). Six Degrees: The Science of a Connected Age. Nueva York: Norton. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.40-6452
• Watts, Duncan J. (2004). «The new science of networks». Annual Review of Sociology, 30, 243-270. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.30.020404.104342
• Watts, Duncan J. y Strogatz, Steven H. (1998). «Collective dynamics of “small world” networks». Nature, 393, 440-442. https://doi.org/10.1038/30918
• Wilensky, Uri (1999). NetLogo. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University. Center for Connected Learning and Computer-Based Modeling. Recuperado de http://ccl.northwestern.edu/netlogo .
• Wu, Jian y Chiclana, Francisco (2014). «A social network analysis trust-consensus based approach to group decision-making problems with interval-valued fuzzy reciprocal preference relations». Knowledge-Based Systems, 59, 97-107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2014.01.017
• Zipf, George (1949). Human Behavior and the Principle of Least Effort: An Introduction to Human Ecology. Cambridge, Mass.: Addison-Wesley Press.