Vínculos ideológicos y éxito electoral en América Latina

Bibliographic References

• Abramson, Paul R., John H. Aldrich, Phil Paolino y David W. Rohde (1992), “Sophisticated Voting in the 1988 Presidential Primaries”, American Political Science Review, 86, pp. 55-69.
• Adams, James (2001), Party Competition and Responsible Party Government, Ann Arbor, Michigan University Press.
• Aldrich, John H. y Richard D. McKelvey (1977), “A Method of Scaling with Applications to the 1968 and 1972 Presidential Elections”, American Political Science Review, 71 (1), pp. 111-130.
• American Political Science Association (apsa) (1950), Toward a More Responsible Two-Party System, Washington, D. C., American Political Science Association.
• Blais, André y Marc André Bodet (2006), “Does Proportional Representation Foster Closer Congruence between Citizens and Policymakers?”, Comparative Political Studies, 39, pp. 1243-1263.
• Cohen, Jacob (1960), “A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales”, Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20 (1), pp. 37-46.
• Converse, P. E. (1964), “The Nature of Belief Systems in Mass Publics”, en David E. Apter (ed.), Ideology and Discontent, Londres, Free Press of Glencoe.
• Coppedge, Michael (1998), “The Dynamic Diversity of Latin American Party Systems”, Party Politics, 4, pp. 547-568.
• Dalton, Russell J. (1985), “Political Parties and Political Representation: Party Supporters and Party Elites in Nine Nations”, Comparative Political Studies, 18, pp. 267-299.
• Dix, Robert (1989), “Cleavage Structures and Party Systems in Latin America”, Comparative Politics, 22 (1), pp. 23-37.
• Dow, Jay K. (1998), “A Spatial Analysis of the 1989 Chilean Presidential Election”, Electoral Studies, 17 (1), pp. 61-76.
• Downs, Anthony (1957), An Economic Theory of Democracy, Nueva York, Harper and Row.
• Duch, Raymond y Randy Stevenson (2008),The Economic Vote: How Political and Economic Institutions Condition Election Results, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
• Enelow, James y Melvin J. Hinich (1984), The Spatial Theory of Voting. An Introduction, Nueva York, Cambridge University Press.
• Fiorina, Morris (1978), “Economic Retrospective Voting in American National Elections: A Micro-Analysis”, American Journal of Political Science, 22, pp. 426-443.
• Fuchs, Dieter y Hans-Dieter Klingemann (1990), “The Left-Right Schema”, en M. Kent Jennings, Jan van Deth et al., Continuities in Political Action: A Longitudinal Study of Political Orientations in Three Western Democracies, Berlín y Nueva York, Walter de Gruyter.
• Funk, C. L. (1997), “Implications of Political Expertise in Candidate Trait Evaluations”, Political Research Quarterly, 50, pp. 675-697.
• Gibson, Edward L. (1996), Class and Conservative Parties: Argentina in Comparative Perspective, Baltimore, Johns Hopkins University Press.
• Golder, Matt y Jacek Stramski (2010), “Ideological Congruence and Electoral Institutions”, American Journal of Political Science, 54, pp. 90-106.
• Hinich, M. J. y M. C. Munger (1994), Ideology and the Theory of Public Choice, Ann Arbor, University of Michigan Press.
• Holland W. y H. Wainer (eds.) (1993), Differential Item Functioning, Hillsdale, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
• Huber, John D. (1989), “Values and Partisanship in Left-Right Orientations: Measuring Ideology”, European Journal of Political Research, 1, pp. 599-621.
• Huber, John D. y G. Bingham Powell (1994), “Congruence Between Citizens and Policymakers in Two Visions of Liberal Democracy”, World Politics, 46, pp. 291-326.
• Kedar, Orit (2009), Voting for Policy not for Parties: How Voters Compensate for Power Sharing, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
• King, Gary, Christopher J. L. Murray, Joshua A. Salomon y Ajay Tandon (2004), “Enhancing the Validity and Cross-Cultural Comparability of Measurement in Survey Research”, American Political Science Review, 98 (1), pp. 191-207.
• Kitschelt, H. (2000), “Linkages between Citizens and Politicians in Democratic Politics”, Comparative Political Studies, 33 (6), pp. 845-879.
• Kitschelt, H. y S. Wilkinson (2007), Patrons, Clients, and Policies. Patterns of Democratic Accountability and Political Competition, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
• Kitschelt, H., Z. Mansfeldova, R. Markowski y G. Tóka (1999), Post-Communist Party Systems: Competition, Representation, and Inter-Party Cooperation, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
• Kitschelt, Herbert, Kirk Hawkins, Juan Pablo Luna, Guillermo Rosas y Elizabeth-Jean Zechmeister (2010), Latin American Party Systems, Nueva York, Cambridge University Press.
• Knutsen, Oddbjørn (1997), “The Partisan and the Value-based Components of Left-right Self-placement: A Comparative Study”, International Political Science Review, 18 (2), pp.191-225.
• Lachat, Romain (2008), “The impact of party polarization on ideological voting”, Electoral Studies, 27 (4), pp. 687-698.
• Luna, Juan Pablo y Elizabeth-Jean Zechmeister (2005), “The Quality of Representation in Latin America”, Comparative Political Studies, 38, pp. 388-416.
• Luna, Juan Pablo (2010), “Segmented Party-Voter Linkages in Latin America: The Case of the udi”, Journal of Latin America Studies, 42, pp. 325- 356.
• Mainwaring, Scott y Timothy Scully (1995), Building Democratic Institutions: Party Systems in Latin America, Stanford, Stanford University Press.
• Mainwaring, Scott y Mariano Torcal (2006), “Party System Institutionalization and Party System Theory After the Third Wave of Democratization”, en Richard S. Katz y William Crotty (eds.), Handbook of Party Politics, Londres, Thousand Oaks, Sage Publications, pp. 204-227.
• Mattilla, Mikko y Tapio Raunio (2006), “Cautious Voters-Supportive Parties. Opinion, Congruence between Voters and Parties on the EU Dimension”, European Union Politics, 7 (4), pp. 427-449.
• Miller, Warren, Roy Pierce, Jacques Thomassen, Richard Herrera, Sören Holmberg, Peter Esaisson y Bernhard Webels (eds.) (1999), Policy Representation in Western Democracies, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
• Otero Felipe, Patricia y Juan Antonio Rodríguez Zepeda (2010), “Measuring Political Representation in Latin America: A Study of the Ideological Congruence between Parties and Voters”, trabajo presentado en la conferencia American Political Science Association, Washington, D. C., septiembre.
• Palfrey, Thomas y Keith Poole (1987), “The Relation between Information, Ideology, and Voting Behavior”, American Journal of Political Science, 31 (3), pp. 511-530.
• Papke, Leslie E. y Jeffrey M. Wooldridge (1996), “Econometric Methods for Fractional Response Variables with an Application to 401(K) Plan Participation Rates”, Journal of Applied Econometrics, 11 (6), pp. 619-32.
• Petrocik, John R. (1996), “Issue Ownership in Presidential Elections, with a 1980 Case Study”, American Journal of Political Science, 40 (3), pp. 825-850.
• Pierce, Roy (1999), “Mass-Elite Issue Linkages and the Responsible Party Model of Representation”, en Warren Miller et al. (eds.), Policy Representation in Western Democracies, Oxford, Oxford University Press, pp. 9-32.
• Rabinowitz, G. y S. E. McDonald (1989), “A Directional Theory of Issue Voting”, American Political Science Review, 83, pp. 93-121.
• Rahn, Wendy M., John Aldrich, Eugene Borgida y John Sullivan (1990), “A Social Cognitive Model of Candidate Appraisal”, en John A. Ferejohn y James H. Kuklinski (eds.), Information and the Democratic Process, Champaign, University of Illinois Press, pp. 136-159.
• Rosas, Guillermo (2005), “The Ideological Organization of Latin American Legislative Parties: An Empirical Analysis of Elite Policy Preferences”, Comparative Political Studies, 38 (7), pp. 824-849.
• Ruiz Rodríguez, Leticia (2007), Partidos y coherencia: Parlamentarios en América Latina, Madrid, Centro de Estudios Políticos y Constitucionales.
• Saiegh, Sebastian M. (2009), “Recovering a Basic Space from Elite Surveys: Evidence from Latin America”, Legislative Studies Quarterly, xxxiv (1).
• Schofield, Norman, D. Martin Andrew, Kevin M. Quinn y Andrew B. Whitfor (1998), “Multiparty Electoral Competition in the Netherlands and Germany: A Model Based on Multinomial Probit”, Public Choice, 97 (3), pp. 257-293.
• Thurner, Paul W. (2000), “The Empirical Application of the Spatial Theory of Voting in Multiparty Systems with Random Utility Models”, Electoral Studies, 19, pp. 493-517.
• Zechmeister, Elizabeth (2006), “What’s Left and Who’s Right? A Q-method Study of Individual and Contextual Influences of the Meaning of Ideological Labels”, Political Behavior, 28 (2), pp. 151-173.
• Zechmeister, Elizabeth y Margarita Corral (2013), “Individual and Contextual Constraints on Ideological Labels in Latin America”, Comparative Political Studies, 46 (6), pp. 675-701.