Lo que esconden tus ojosla metodología eye-tracking aplicada al estudio del lenguaje

Referències bibliogràfiques

• Allopenna, Paul D.; Magnuson, James S.; Tanenhaus, Michael K. 1998. Tracking the time course of spoken word recognition: Evidence for continuous mapping models. Journal of Memory and Language 38: 419-439.
• Altarriba, Jeanette; Kambe, Gretchen; Pollatsek, Alexander; Rayner, Keith. 2001. Semantic codes are not used in integrating information across eye fixations in reading: Evidence from fluent Spanish-English bilinguals. Perception & Psychophysics 63: 875-890.
• Altmann, Gerry T. M.; Kamide, Yuki. 1999. Incremental interpretation at verbs: Restricting the domain of subsequent reference. Cognition 73: 247-264.
• Altmann, Gerry. T. M.; Garnham, Alan; Dennis, Yvette. 1992. Avoiding the garden path: Eye movements in context. Journal of Memory and Language 31.5: 685- 712.
• Altmann, Gerry. T. M.; Garnham, Alan; Henstra, Judith-Ann. 1994. Effects of syntax in human sentence parsing: Evidence against a structure-based proposal mechanism. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 20.1: 209-216.
• Baccino, Thierry 2011. Eye movements and concurrent event-related potentials: Eye fixation-related potential investigations in reading. En S. P. Liversedge, I. D. Gilchrist, y S. Everling, eds. The Oxford handbook of eye movements. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 857-870.
• Balota, David A.; Pollatsek, Alexander; Rayner, Keith. 1985. The interaction of contextual constraints and parafoveal visual information in reading. Cognitive Psychology 17.3: 364-390.
• Bargary, Gary; Bosten, Jenny M.; Goodbourn, Patrick T.; Lawrance-Owen, Adam J.; Hogg, Ruth E.; Mollon, John D. 2017. Individual differences in human eye movements: An oculomotor signature? Vision Research 141: 157-169
• Betancort, Moises; Carreriras, Manuel; Sturt, Patrick. 2009. The processing of subject and object relative clauses in Spanish: An eye-tracking study. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 62.10: 1915-1929.
• Binder, Katherine S.; Duffy, Susan A.; Rayner, Keith. 2001. The effects of thematic fit and discourse context on syntactic ambiguity resolution. Journal of Memory and Language 44.2: 297-324.
• Bock, Kathryn; Irwin, David E.; Davidson, Douglas J.; Levelt, Willem J. M. 2003. Minding the clock. Journal of Memory and Language 48: 653-685.
• Boland, Julie E.; Blodgett, Allison. 2001. Understanding the constraints on syntactic generation: Lexical bias and discourse congruency effects on eye movements. Journal of Memory and Language 45.3: 391-411.
• Calvo, Manuel G.; Meseguer, Enrique. 2002. Eye movements and processing stages in reading: Relative contribution of visual, lexical and contextual factors. The Spanish Journal of Psychology 5.1: 66-77.
• Carpenter, Patricia A.; Just, Marcel A. 1983. What your eyes do while your mind is reading. En K. Rayner, ed. Eye movements in reading: Perceptual and language processes. San Diego: Academic Press, pp. 275-307.
• Carpenter, Patricia A.; Daneman, Meredyth. 1981. Lexical retrieval and error recovery in reading: A model based on eye fixations. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 28: 138-160.
• Carter, Benjamin T.; Luke, Steven G. 2020. Best practices in eye tracking research. International Journal of Psychology 155: 49-62.
• Clifton, Charles; Staub, Adrian; Rayner, Keith. 2007. Eye movements in reading words and sentences. En R. van Gompel, M. Fisher, W. Murray y R. L. Hill, eds. Eye Movements: A Window of Mind and Brain. Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 341- 371.
• Clifton, Charles; Traxler, Matthew J.; Mohamed, Taha; Williams, Rihana S.; Morris, Robin K.; Rayner, Keith. 2003. The use of thematic role information in parsing: Syntactic processing autonomy revisited. Journal of Memory and Language 49: 317-334.
• Cooper, Roger M. 1974. The control of eye fixation by the meaning of spoken language: A new methodology for the real-time investigation of speech perception, memory, and language processing. Cognitive Psychology 6: 84-107.
• Dahan, Delphine; Magnuson, James S.; Tanenhaus, Michael K. 2001. Time course of frequency effects in spoken-word recognition: Evidence from eye movements. Cognitive Psychology 42: 317-367.
• Dahan, Delphine; Tanenhaus, Michael K. 2005. Looking at the rope when looking for the snake: Conceptually mediated eye movements during spoken-word recognition. Psychological Bulletin & Review 12: 455-459.
• Dahan, Delphine; Tanenhaus, Michael, K.; Salverda, Anne P. 2007. The influence of visual processing on phonetically driven saccades in the “visual world” paradigm. En R. van Gompel, M. Fisher, W. Murray y R. L. Hill, eds. Eye Movements: A Window of Mind and Brain. Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 471-486.
• Drieghe, Denis. 2008. Foveal processing and word skipping during reading. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 15: 856-860.
• Drieghe, Denis; Brysbaert, Marc; Desmet, Timothy; De Baecke, Constantijn. 2004. Word skipping in reading: On the interplay of linguistic and visual factors. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology 16.1-2: 79-103.
• Duffy, Susan A.; Keir, Jessica A. 2004. Violating stereotypes: Eye movements and comprehension processes when text conflicts with world knowledge. Memory & Cognition 32.4: 551-559.
• Duffy, Susan A.; Morris, Robin K.; Rayner, Keith. 1988. Lexical ambiguity and fixation times in reading. Journal of Memory and Language 27.4: 429-446.
• Duffy, Susan A.; Rayner, Keith. 1990. Eye Movements and Anaphor Resolution: Effects of Antecedent Typicality and Distance. Language and Speech 33.2: 103-119.
• Ehrlich, Susan F.; Rayner, Keith. 1981. Contextual effects on word perception and eye movements during reading. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior 20.6: 641-655.
• Ehrlich, Susan F.; Rayner, Keith. 1983. Pronoun assignment and semantic integration during reading: eye movements and immediacy of processing. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior 22.1: 75-87.
• Esaulova, Yulia; Penke, Martina; Dolscheid, Sarah. 2019. Describing events: Changes in eye movements and language production due to visual and conceptual properties of scenes. Frontiers of Psychology, 10. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00835
• Ferreira, Fernanda; Clifton, Charles. 1986. The independence of syntactic processing. Journal of Memory and Language 25: 348-368.
• Ferreira, Fernanda; Henderson, John M. 1990. Use of verb information in syntactic parsing: Evidence from eye movements and word-by-word self-paced reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 16.4: 555-568.
• Fisher, Denis F.; Shebilske, Wayne L. 1985. There is more that meets the eye than the eyemind assumption. En R. Groner, G. W. McConkie, y C. Menz, eds. Eye movements and human information processing. Amsterdam: North Holland, pp. 149-158.
• Folk, Jocelyn R.; Morris, Robin K. 2003. Effects of syntactic category assignment on lexical ambiguity resolution in reading: An eye movement analysis. Memory & Cognition 31: 87-99.
• Frazier, Lyn. 1987. Sentence processing: A tutorial review. En M. Colheart, ed. Attention and performance, XII: The psychology of reading. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 559-586.
• Frazier, Lyn; Rayner, Keith. 1982. Making and correcting errors during sentence comprehension: Eye movements in the analysis of structurally ambiguous sentences. Cognitive Psychology 14.2: 178-210.
• Frazier, Lyn; Rayner, Keith. 1987. Resolution of syntactic category ambiguities: Eye movements in parsing lexically ambiguous sentences. Journal of Memory and Language 26: 505-526.
• Garnsey, Susan M.; Pearlmutter, Neal J.; Myers, Elizabeth; Lotocky, Melanie A. 1997. The contributions of verb bias and plausibility to the comprehension of temporarily ambiguous sentences. Journal of Memory and Language 37.1: 58- 93.
• Griffin, Zenzi M. 2001. Gaze durations during speech reflect word selection and phonological encoding, Cognition 82.1: B1-B14.
• Griffin, Zenzi M.; Bock, Kathryn. 2000. What the eyes say about speaking. Psychological Science 11: 274-279.
• Hanke, Michael; Mathôt, Sebastiaan; Ort, Eduard; Peitek, Norman; Stadler, Jörg; Wagner, Adina. 2020. A practical guide to functional magnetic resonance imaging with simultaneous eye tracking for cognitive neuroimaging research. En S. Pollmann, ed. Spatial learning and attention guidance. New York: Humana Press, pp. 291-305.
• Haro, Juan. 2022. Una introducción al uso de los potenciales evocados en el estudio del lenguaje. Estudios de Lingüística del Español 45: 185-204. https://doi.org/10.1007/7657_2019_31
• Henderson, John M.; Dixon, Peter; Petersen, Alan; Twilley, Leslie C.; Ferreira, Fernanda. 1995. Evidence for the use of phonological representations during transsaccadic word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 21.1: 82-97.
• Henderson, John M.; Ferreira, Fernanda. 1993. Eye movement control during reading: Fixation measures reflect foveal but not parafoveal processing difficulty. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology 47.2: 201-221.
• Hendrickson, Anita E. 2009. Fovea: Primate. En L. R. Squire, ed. Encyclopedia of Neuroscience. Cambridge: Academic Press, pp. 327-334.
• Hoeks, John C.; Hendriks, Petra; Vonk, Wietske; Brown, Colin M.; Hagoort, Peter. 2006. Processing the noun phrase versus sentence coordination ambiguity: Thematic information does not completely eliminate the processing difficulty. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 59.9: 1581-1599.
• Hoeks, John C.; Vonk, Wietske; Schriefers, Herbert. 2002. Processing coordinated structures in context: The effect of topic-structure on ambiguity resolution. Journal of Memory and Language 46.1: 99-119.
• Holmes, Virginia M.; O’Regan, J. Kevin. 1981. Eye Fixations Patterns during the Reading of Relative-Clause Sentences. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 20: 417-430.
• Hooge, Ignace T. C.; Holleman, Gijs A.; Haukes, Nina C.; Hessels, Roy S. 2019. Gaze tracking accuracy in humans: One eye is sometimes better than two. Behavior Research Methods 51.6: 2712-2721.
• Huettig, Falk; Altmann, Gerry T. M. 2004. The online processing of ambiguous and unambiguous words in context: Evidence from head mounted eye tracking. En M. Carreiras y C. Clifton, eds. The on-line study of sentence comprehension: Eyetracking, ERP and beyond. New York: Psychology Press, pp. 187-207.
• Huettig, Falk; McQueen, James M. 2007. The tug of war between phonological, semantic and shape information in language-mediated visual search. Journal of Memory and Language 57.4: 460-482.
• Humphreys, Gina F.; Mirkovic, Jelena; Gennari, Silvia P. 2016. Similarity-based competition in relative clause production and comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language 89: 200-221.
• Hyönä, Jukka; Pollatsek, Alexander. 1998. Reading Finnish compound words: Eye fixations are affected by component morphemes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 24.6: 1612-1627.
• Ikeda, Mitsuo; Saida, Shinya. 1978. Span of recognition in reading. Vision Research 18: 83-88.
• Inhoff, Albrecht W. 1984. Two stages of word processing during eye fixations in the reading of prose. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior 23.5: 612-624.
• Inhoff, Albrecht W. 1989a. Parafoveal processing of words and saccade computation during eye fixations in reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 15: 544-555.
• Inhoff, Albrecht W. 1989b. Lexical access during eye fixations in reading: Are word access codes used to integrate lexical information across interword fixations? Journal of Memory and Language 28: 444-461.
• Inhoff, Albrecht W.; Liu, Weimin. 1998. The perceptual span and oculomotor activity during the reading of Chinese sentences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 24: 20-34.
• Inhoff, Albrecht W.; Pollatsek, Alexander; Posner, Michael I.; Rayner, Keith. 1989. Covert attention and eye movements during reading. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 41A: 63-89.
• Inhoff, Albrecht W.; Radach, Ralph; Eiter, Brianna M.; Juhasz, Barbara. 2003. Distinct subsystems for the parafoveal processing of spatial and linguistic information during eye fixations in reading. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 56A: 803-828.
• Inhoff, Albrecht W.; Rayner, Keith. 1986. Parafoveal word processing during eye fixations in reading: Effects of word frequency. Perception & Psychophysics 40: 431-439.
• Johnson, Marcus L.; Lowder, Matthew W.; Gordon, Peter C. 2011. The SentenceComposition Effect: Processing of Complex Sentences Depends on the Configuration of Common Noun Phrase Versus Unusual Noun Phrases. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 140.4: 707-724
• Juhasz, Barbara J. 2005. Age-of-Acquisition Effects in Word and Picture Identification. Psychological Bulletin 131.5: 684-712.
• Juhasz, Barbara J. 2007. The influence of semantic transparency on eye movements during English compound word recognition. En M. J. Traxler y M. A. Gernsbacher, eds. Handbook of Psycholinguistics. Cambridge: Academic Press, pp. 373-389.
• Juhasz, Barbara J.; Rayner, Keith. 2003. Investigating the effects of a set of intercorrelated variables on eye fixation durations in reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 29.6: 1312-1318.
• Juhasz, Barbara J.; Rayner, Keith. 2006. The role of age of acquisition and word frequency in reading: Evidence from eye fixation durations. Visual Cognition 13.7-8: 846-863.
• Juhasz, Barbara J.; Starr, Matthew; Inhoff, Albrecht W.; Placke, Lars. 2003. The effects of morphology on the processing of compound words: Evidence from naming, lexical decisions, and eye fixations. British Journal of Psychology 94: 223-244.
• Just, Marcel A.; Carpenter, Patricia A. 1980. A theory of reading: From eye fixations to comprehension. Psychological Review 87: 329-354.
• Kaiser, Elsi; Trueswell, John C. 2004. The role of discourse context in the processing of a flexible word-order language. Cognition 94: 113-147.
• Knoeferle, Pia; Crocker, Matthew W.; Scheepers, Christoph; Pickering, Martin J. 2005. The influence of the immediate visual context on incremental thematic role-assignment: Evidence from eye-movements in depicted events. Cognition 95: 95-127.
• Kolb, Helga; Fernández, Eduardo; Nelson, Ralph. 1995. Webvision: The organization of the retina and visual system. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Health Sciences Center.
• Kreysa, Helene; Pickering, Martin J. 2011. Eye movements in dialogue. En S. P. Liversedge, I. D. Gilchrist y S. Everling, eds. The Oxford handbook of eye movements. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 943-959.
• Lew-Williams, Casey; Fernald, Anne. 2007. Young children learning Spanish make rapid use of grammatical gender in spoken word recognition. Psychological science 18.3: 193-198.
• Lima, Susan D. 1987. Morphological analysis in sentence reading. Journal of Memory and Language 26: 84-99.
• Liversedge, Simon P.; Rayner, Keith; White, Sarah J.; Findlay, John M.; McSorley, Eugene. 2006. Binocular coordination of the eyes during reading. Current Biology 16: 1726-1729.
• Liversedge, Simon P.; White, Sarah J.; Findlay, John M.; Rayner, Keith. 2006. The binocular coordination of eye movements during reading in children and adults. Vision Research 46: 3898-3908.
• MacDonald, Maryellen C. 1997. Lexical Representations and Sentence Processing: An Introduction. Language and Cognitive Processes 12.2/3: 121-136.
• Mak, Willem M.; Vonk, Wietske; Schriefers, Herbert. 2002. The Influence of Animacy on Relative Clause Processing. Journal of Memory and Language 47: 50-68.
• Mak, Willem M.; Vonk, Wietske; Schriefers, Herbert. 2006. Animacy in processing relative clauses: The hikers that rocks crush. Journal of Memory and Language 54: 466-490.
• Marrero-Aguiar, Victoria. 2022. Aportación de las investigaciones con neuroimagen funcional a los estudios lingüísticos: algunas preguntas y respuestas. Estudios de Lingüística del Español 45: 159-183.
• Matin, Ethel. 1974. Saccadic suppression: A review. Psychological Bulletin 81: 899- 917.
• McConkie, George W.; Kerr, Paul W.; Reddix, Michael D.; Zola, David; Jacobs, Arthur M. 1989. Eye movement control in reading: II. Frequency of refixating a word. Perception & Psychophysics 46: 245-253.
• McConkie, George W.; Rayner, Keith. 1975. The span of the effective stimulus during a fixation in reading. Perception & Psychophysics 17: 578-586.
• McConkie, George W.; Rayner, Keith. 1976. Asymmetry of the perceptual span in reading. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 8: 365-368.
• Meyer, Antjia S.; Roelofs, Ardi; Levelt, Willem J. M. 2003. Word length effects in object naming: The role of a response criterion. Journal of Memory and Language 48.1: 131-147.
• Meyer, Antjia S., Sleiderink, Astrid M.; Levelt, Willem J. M. 1998. Viewing and naming objects. Cognition 66: B25-B33.
• Meyer, Antjia S.; van der Meulen, Femke F. 2000. Phonological priming effects on speech onset latencies and viewing times in object naming. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 7: 314-319.
• O'Regan, J. Kevin; Lévy-Schoen, Ariane. 1987. Eye movement strategy and tactics in word recognition and reading. En M. Coltheart, ed. Attention and performance XII. The psychology of reading. Hillsdale: Erlbaum pp. 363-383.
• Orquin, Jacob, L.; Holmqvist, Kenneth. 2018. Threats to the validity of eye-movement research in psychology. Behavior Research Methods 50: 1645-1656.
• Osaka, Naoyuki. 1987. Effect of peripheral visual field size upon eye movements during Japanese text processing. En J. K. O'Regan y A. Levy-Schoen, eds. Eye movements: From physiology to cognition. Amsterdam: North Holland, pp. 421- 429.
• Osaka, Naoyuki; Oda, Koichi. 1991. Effective visual field size necessary for vertical reading during Japanese text processing. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 29: 345-347.
• Pickering, Martin J.; Traxler, Matthew J.; Crocker, Matthew W. 2000. Ambiguity Resolution in Sentence Processing: Evidence against Frequency-Based Accounts. Journal of Memory and Language 43: 447-475.
• Pollatsek, Alexander; Bolozky, Shmuel; Well, Arnold D.; Rayner Keith. 1981. Asymmetries in the perceptual span for Israeli readers. Brain and Language 14: 174-180.
• Pollatsek, Alexander; Hyönä, Jukka; Bertram, Raymond. 2000. The role of morphological constituents in reading Finnish compound words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 26.2: 820-833.
• Pollatsek, Alexander; Lesch, Mary; Morris, Robin K.; Rayner, Keith. 1992. Phonological codes are used in integrating information across saccades in word identification and reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 18.1: 148-162.
• Pollatsek, Alexander; Rayner, Keith; Balota, David A. 1986. Inferences about eye movement control from the perceptual span in reading. Perception & Psychophysics 40: 123-130.
• Raney, Gary E.; Cambell, Spencer J.; Bovee, Joanna C. 2014. Using eye movements to evaluate the cognitive processes involved in text comprehension. Journal of Visualized Experiments 83: 1-7.
• Rayner, Keith. 1975. The perceptual span and peripheral cues in reading. Cognitive Psychology 7: 65-81.
• Rayner, Keith. 1979. Eye guidance in reading: Fixation locations within words. Perception 8: 21-30.
• Rayner, Keith. 1986. Eye movements and the perceptual span in beginning and skilled readers. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 41: 211-236.
• Rayner, Keith. 1998. Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychological Bulletin 124: 372-422.
• Rayner, Keith. 2009. Eye movements and attention in reading, scene perception, and visual search. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 62: 1457- 1506.
• Rayner, Keith; Balota, David A.; Pollatsek, Alexander. 1986. Against parafoveal semantic preprocessing during eye fixations in reading. Canadian Journal of Psychology 40: 473-483.
• Rayner, Keith; Bertera, James H. 1979. Reading without a fovea. Science 206: 468- 469.
• Rayner, Keith; Carlson, Marcia; Frazier, Lyn. 1983. The interaction of syntax and semantics during sentence processing: Eye movements in the analysis of semantically biased sentences. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior 22.3: 358-374.
• Rayner, Keith; Duffy, Susan A. 1986. Lexical complexity and fixation times in reading: Effects of word frequency, verb complexity, and lexical ambiguity. Memory and Cognition 14: 191-201.
• Rayner, Keith; Liversedge, Simon P. 2011. Linguistic and cognitive influences on eye movements during reading. En S. P. Liversedge, I. D. Gilchrist y S. Everling, eds. The Oxford handbook of eye movements. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 751-766.
• Rayner, Keith; Pollatsek, Alexander. 1989. The psychology of reading. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.
• Rayner, Keith; Pollatsek, Alexander. 2007. Eye-movement control in reading. En M. J. Traxler y M. A. Gernsbacher, eds. Handbook of Psycholinguistics. Cambridge: Academic Press, pp. 613-657.
• Rayner, Keith; Raney, Gary E.; Pollatsek, Alexander. 1995. Eye movements and discourse processing. En R. F. Lorch y E. J. O’Brien, eds. Sources of coherence in reading. Hillsdale: Erlbaum, pp. 9-36.
• Rayner, Keith; Reichle, Erik D.; Stroud, Michael J.; Williams, Carrick C.; Pollatsek, Alexander. 2006. The effect of word frequency, word predictability, and font difficulty on the eye movements of young and older readers. Psychology and Aging 21.3: 448-465.
• Rayner, Keith; Sereno, Sara C.; Morris, Robin K.; Schmauder, A. Réne; Clifton, Charles. 1989. Eye movements and on-line language comprehension processes. Language and Cognitive Processes 4.3-4: SI21-SI49.
• Rayner, Keith; Sereno, Sara C.; Raney, Gary E. 1996. Eye movement control in reading: A comparison of two types of models. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 22.5: 1188-1200.
• Rayner, Keith; Warren, Tessa; Juhasz, Barbara J.; Liversedge, Simon P. 2004. The effect of plausibility on eye movements in reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 30: 1290-1301.
• Rayner, Keith; Well, Arnold D.; Pollatsek, Alexander. 1980. Asymmetry of the effective visual field in reading. Perception & Psychophysics 27: 537-544.
• Rayner, Keith; Well, Arnold D.; Pollatsek, Alexander; Bertera, James H. 1982. The availability of useful information to the right of fixation in reading. Perception & Psychophysics 31: 537-550.
• Rayner, Keith; White, Sarah J.; Kambe, Gretchen; Miller, Brett; Liversedge, Simon P. 2003. On the processing of meaning from parafoveal vision during eye fixations in reading. En J. Hyönä, R. Radach y H. Deubel, eds. The Mind's Eye: Cognitive and Applied Aspects of Eye Movement Research. Amsterdam: North Holland, pp. 213-234.
• Salverda, Anne P.; Tanenhaus, Michael, K. 2017. The visual world paradigm. En A. M. B. de Groot y P. Hagoort, eds. Research methods in psycholinguistics and the neurobiology of language: A practical guide. New York: Wiley Blackwell, pp. 89-110.
• Sedivy, Julie C.; Tanenhaus, Michael K.; Chambers, Craig G.; Carlson, Gregory N. 1999. Achieving incremental semantic interpretation through contextual representation. Cognition 71.2: 109-147.
• Spinner, Patti; Gass, Susan M.; Behney, Jennifer. 2013. Ecological validity in eyetracking: An empirical study. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 35.2: 389-415.
• Spivey, Michael J.; Tanenhaus, Michael K. 1998. Syntactic ambiguity resolution in discourse: Modeling the effects of referential context and lexical frequency. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 24.6: 1521-1543.
• Staub, Adrian. 2010. Eye movements and processing difficulty in object relative clauses. Cognition 116: 71-86.
• Sturt, Patrick. 2003. The time-course of the application of binding constraints in reference resolution. Journal of Memory and Language 48.3: 542-562.
• Swingley Daniel; Pinto John P.; Fernald Anne. 1999. Continuous processing in word recognition at 24 months. Cognition 71.2: 73-108.
• Tanenhaus, Michael, K. 2007. Eye movements and spoken language processing. En R. van Gompel, M. Fisher, W. Murray y R. L. Hill, eds. Eye Movements: A Window of Mind and Brain. Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 443-469.
• Tanenhaus Michael K.; Spivey-Knowlton Michael J.; Eberhard Kathleen M.; Sedivy Julie C. 1995. Integration of visual and linguistic information in spoken language comprehension. Science 268: 1632-1634.
• Tanenhaus, Michael K.; Trueswell, John C. 2006. Eye movements and spoken language comprehension. En M. J. Traxler y M. A. Gernsbacher, eds. Handbook of Psycholinguistics. Cambridge: Academic Press, pp. 863-900.
• Traxler, Matthew J.; Long, Debra L.; Tooley, Kristen M.; Johns, Clinton L.; Zirnstein, Megan; Jonathan, Eunike. 2012. Individual differences in eye-movements during reading: Working memory and speed-of-processing effects. Journal of eye movement research 5.1: 5.
• Traxler, Matthew J.; Morris, Robin K.; Seely, Rachel E. 2002. Processing subject and object relative clauses: Evidence from eye movements. Journal of Memory and Language 47: 69-90.
• Traxler, Matthew J.; Williams, Rihana S., Blozis, Shelley A.; Morris, Robin K. 2005. Working memory, animacy, and verb class in the processing of relative clauses. Journal of Memory and Language 53: 204-224.
• Trueswell, John C.; Tanenhaus, Michael K.; Garnsey, Susan M. 1994. Semantic influences on parsing: Use of thematic role information in syntactic ambiguity resolution. Journal of Memory and Language 33.3: 285-318.
• Trueswell, John C.; Tanenhaus, Michael K.; Kello, Christopher. 1993. Verb-specific constraints in sentence processing: Separating effects of lexical preference from garden-paths. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 19.3: 528-553.
• Underwood, N. Roderick; McConkie, George W. 1985. Perceptual span for letter distinctions during reading. Reading Research Quarterly 20: 153-162.
• van der Meulen, Femke F.; Meyer, AS. 2000. Coordination of eye gaze and speech in sentence production. Póster presentado en 41st Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society, noviembre 16-19, 2000. Nueva Orleans, LA.
• Vasishth, Shravan; von der Malsburg, Titus; Engelmann, Felix. 2013. What eye movements can tell us about sentence comprehension. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science 4.2: 125-134.
• Vitu, Françoise; McConkie, George W.; Zola, David. 1998. About regressive saccades in reading and their relation to word identification. En G. Underwood, ed. Eye guidance in reading and scene perception. Oxford: Elsevier Science, pp. 101- 124.
• Wade, Nicholas J.; Tatler, Benjamin W. 2005. The moving tablet of the eye. The origins of modern eye movement research. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Warren, Tessa; McConnell, Kerry; Rayner, Keith. 2008. Effects of context on eye movements when reading about possible and impossible events. Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition 34.4: 1001-1010.
• White, Sarah J.; Drieghe, Denis; Liversedge, Simon P.; Staub, Adrian. 2018. The word frequency effect during sentence reading: A linear or nonlinear effect of log frequency? The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 71.1: 46-55.
• White, Sarah J.; Rayner, Keith; Liversedge, Simon P. 2005a. The influence of parafoveal word length and contextual constraint on fixation durations and word skipping in reading. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 12: 466-471.
• White Sarah J; Rayner Keith; Liversedge Simon P. 2005b. Eye movements and the modulation of parafoveal processing by foveal processing difficulty: A reexamination. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 12.5: 891-896.
• Wilson, Michael P.; Garnsey, Susan M. 2009. Making simple sentences hard: Verb bias effects in simple direct object sentences. Journal of Memory and Language 60: 368-392.
• Wolverton, Gary S.; Zola, David. 1983. The temporal characteristics of visual information extraction during reading. En K. Rayner, ed. Eye movements in reading: Perceptual and language processes. New York: Academic Press, pp. 41-52.