The Writing Rules of the Fictional Prototype

  1. Amores, Miguel
Revista:
452ºF: Revista de Teoría de la Literatura y Literatura Comparada

ISSN: 2013-3294

Año de publicación: 2022

Título del ejemplar: Cuerpo, visión y textualidad: poéticas y políticas de la mirada en la contemporaneidad

Número: 27

Páginas: 238-260

Tipo: Artículo

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: 452ºF: Revista de Teoría de la Literatura y Literatura Comparada

Resumen

Here we propose a new perspective regarding the difference between literary fiction and nonfiction: the very different nature of the writing rules they admit. Although with some limitations, non-fictional narratives admit more or less rigid writing rules because they are obligated to maintain a certain correspondence scheme with the real world. However, fictional literary narrations, freed from any strict or systematic correspondence with reality, do not admit these fixed rules. Given that in fiction it is not possible to have such a text-word correspondence scheme, we defend that the only rules (or rather, the only guidelines ) fictional literary narrations admit are those which affect the very creation of the text—that is, those which affect the subjective attitude of the writer.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • AAEN MAAGAARD, C; SCHÄBLER, D. and WOLFF LUNDHOLT, M. (eds.) (2020): Exploring fictionality: conceptions, test cases, discussions, Odense: Syddansk Universitetsforlag.
  • ADAMS, J-K. (1985): Pragmatics and Fiction, Amsterdam/Filadelfia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
  • AMORES, M. (2018): Ficción: anatomía de un potencial infinito, Madrid: Visor Libros.
  • AMORES, M. (2019): “La significación como nivel teórico para una diferencia estructural entre la ficción y la no ficción”, Actio Nova: Revista de Teoría de la Literatura y Literatura Comparada, 3, 142–165.
  • BREITENWISCHER, D., HÄGER, H-M. and MENNINGER, J. (eds.) (2020): Faktuales und fiktionales Erzählen II. Geschichte – Medien – Praktiken, Würzburg: Ergon.
  • COHN, D. (1999): The Distinction of Fiction, Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
  • DOLEŽEL, L. (1998): Heterocosmica. Fiction and Possible Worlds, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
  • ECO, U. (1989): “Report on Session 3: Literature and Arts” in Allén, S. (ed.) Possible Worlds in Humanities, Arts and Science: Porceedings of Nobel Symposium 65, New York: De Gruyter, 343-355.
  • FERRARIS, M. (2015): “New Realism: A Short Introduction” in Gironi, F., Austin M., and Jackson R. (eds.) Speculations VI, New York: Punctum Books, 141-164.
  • FLUDERNIK, M., FALKENHAYNER, N. and STEINER, J. (eds.) (2015): Faktuales und Fiktionales Erzählen. Interdisziplinäre Perspektiven, Würzburg: Ergon.
  • FLUDERNIK, M. (2018): “The Fiction of the Rise of Fictionality”, Poetics Today, vol. XXXIX, 1, 67-92.
  • FLUDERNIK, M. and SKOV-NIELSEN, H. (eds.) (2020): Travelling Concepts: New Fictionality Studies, Bern: Peter Lang.
  • FRANZEN J., et al (eds.) (2018): Geschichte der Fiktionalität. Diachrone Perspektiven auf ein kulturelles Konzept, Würzburg: Ergon.
  • GALLAGHER, C. (2006): “The Rise of Fictionality” in Moretti, F. (ed.), The Novel, History, Geography, andCulture, Princeton (New Jersey): Princeton University Press, Vol. I, 336-363.
  • GENETTE, G. (1990): “Fictional Narrative, Factual Narrative”, Poetics Today, vol. XI, 4, 755-774.
  • GENETTE, G. (1993): “Acts of Fiction” in Fiction & Diction, Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 30-54.
  • GRICE, H. P. (1975): “Logic and Conversation” in Cole, P. and Morgan, J. (eds.), Syntax and Semantics, Vol III: Speech Acts, New York: Academic Press, 41-58.
  • HAMBURGER, K. (1973): The Logic of Literature, Bloomington: Indiana University Press
  • HERACLITUS (2005): Homeric Problems, Russell, D. A. and Konstan D. (eds.), Atlanta: Society of Biblical Literature.
  • HOBSBAWM, E. (1994): The Age of Extremes, London: Abacus.
  • OHMANN, R. (1971): “Speech Acts and the Definition of Literature”, Philosophy and Rhetoric, 4, 1-19.
  • PAIGE, N. (2011): Before Fiction: The Ancien Régime of the Novel, Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
  • PORPHYRY (1983): On the Cave of the Nymphs, Lamberton, R. (ed.), New York: Station Hill.
  • PROPP, V. (1968): Morphology of the Folktale. Scott, L. (trans.), Austin: University of Texas Press.
  • PRATT, M. (1977): Towards a Speech Act Theory of Literary Discourse, Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
  • REUVEKAMP-FELBER, T. (2013): “Diskussion: Zur gegenwärtigen Situation mediävistischer Fiktionalitätsforschung. Eine kritsche Bestandsaufnahme“, Zeitschrift für deutsche Philologie, vol. CXXXII, 3, 417-444.
  • RÖSLER, W. (2014): “Fiktionalität in der Antike” in Köppe, T. and Klauk, T. (eds.), Fiktionalität: Ein Interdisziplinäres Handbuch, Berlin: De Gruyter, 363-384.
  • RYAN, M-L. (1991): Possible Worlds, Artificial Intelligence and Narrative Theory, Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
  • SCHAEFFER, J-M. (2010): Why Fiction? Cohn, D. (trans.), Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
  • SCHAEFFER, J-M. (2013): “Fictional vs. Factual Narration” in The Living Handbook of Narratology, Peter Hünh et al. (eds.), Hamburg: Hamburg University Press. ˂https://www.lhn.uni-hamburg.de/node/56.html>, [28/12/2020].
  • SEARLE, J. (1975): “The Logical Status of Fictional Discourse”, New Literary History, 6, 319-332.
  • SHANG, B. (2015): “Unnatural Narratology: Core Issues and Critical Debates”, Journal of Literary Semantics, 44, 169-194.
  • SIEGAL, A. and CONNOLLY, W. (1999): The New York Times Manual of Style and Usage, New York: Three Rivers Press.
  • SPERBER, D. and WILSON, D. (1995): Relevance. Communication and Cognition, Oxford: Blackwell.
  • THOMASSON, A. (1999): Fiction and Metaphysics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • WALSH, R. (2007): The Rhetoric of Fictionality. Narrative Theory and the Idea of Fiction, Columbus: The Ohio University Press.
  • WALTON, K. (1990): Mimesis as Make-Believe, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  • WATT, I. (1957): The Rise of the Novel: Studies in Defoe, Richardson, and Fielding, London: Chatto and Windus.
  • ZETTERBERG GJERLEVSEN, S. (2016): “Fictionality” in Hühn, P. et al. (eds.) The Living Handbook of Narratology, Hamburg: Hamburg University, ˂https://www.lhn.uni-hamburg.de/node/138.html>, [16/08/2021].
  • ZETTERBERG-NIELSEN, S. and ZETTERBERG-NIELSEN, H. (2019): “Fictionality” in Frow, J. (ed.), The Oxford Encyclopedia of Literary Theory, Oxford: Oxford University Press, ˂https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190201098.013.1061>, [16/08/2021].
  • KING, S. (2000): On writing, New York: Scribner.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet