Las controversias científico-tecnológicas públicas desde la perspectiva CTSpanorama y desafíos

  1. Obdulia Torres González 1
  2. Camila López Echagüe 2
  1. 1 Departamento de Filosofía, Lógica y Estética de la Universidad de Salamanca, España
  2. 2 Unidad de Ciencia y Desarrollo de la Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de la República, Uruguay
Journal:
CTS: Revista iberoamericana de ciencia, tecnología y sociedad

ISSN: 1668-0030 1850-0013

Year of publication: 2022

Volume: 17

Issue: 50

Pages: 109-115

Type: Article

More publications in: CTS: Revista iberoamericana de ciencia, tecnología y sociedad

Bibliographic References

  • Beauchamp, T. L. (1987). Ethical theory and the problem of closure. En H. T. Engelhardt y A. L. Caplan (Eds.), Scientific controversies: Case studies in the resolution and closure of disputes in science and technology (27–48). Nueva York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Brante, T. (1993). Reasons for studying scientific and science-based controversies. En T. Brante, S. Fuller y W. Lynch (Eds.), Controversial science: From content to contention (177–191). Nueva York: New York University Press.
  • Brante, T. y Elzinga, A. (1990). Towards a theory of scientific controversies. Science Studies, 3(2), 33–46.
  • Engelhardt, H. T. y Caplan, A. L. (1987). Patterns of controversy and closure: the interplay of knowledge, values and political forces. En H. T. Engelhardt y A. L. Caplan (Eds.), Scientific controversies. Case studies in the resolution and closure of disputes in science and technology (1–23). Nueva York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Giere, R. (1987). Controversies involving science and technology: a theoretical perspective. En H. T. Engelhardt y A. L. Caplan (Eds.), Scientific Controversies: Case Studies in the Resolution and Closure of Dispute in Science and Technology (125–150). Nueva York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Jasanoff, S. (1990). The fifth branch: science advisers as policymakers. Cambridge y Londres: Harvard University Press.
  • Markle, G. E. y Petersen, J. C. (1981). Controversies in Science and Technology—A Protocol for Comparative Research. Science, Technology & Human Values, 6(1), 25–30.
  • Martin, B. y Richards, E. (1995). Scientific knowledge, controversy, and public decision making. En S. Jasanoff, G. Markle, J. Petersen y T. Pinch (Eds.), Handbook of science and technology studies (506–526). California: Sage Publications.
  • Martin, B. (1991). Scientific knowledge in controversy: The social dynamics of the fluoridation debate. Nueva York: State University of New York Press.
  • Martin, B. (2014). Controversy Manual. Sparsnäs: Irene Publishing.
  • Mazur, A. (1981). The Dynamics of Technical Controversy. Washington DC: Communications Press Inc.
  • McMullin, E. (1987). Scientific controversy and its termination. En H. T. Engelhardt y A. L. Caplan (Eds.), Scientific controversies: Case studies in the resolution and closure of disputes in science and technology (49–91). Nueva York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Nelkin, D. (1987). Controversies and the authority of science. En H. T. Engelhardt y A. L. Caplan (Eds.), Scientific Controversies: Case Studies in the Resolution and Closure of Disputes in Science and Technology (283–294). Nueva York: Communications Press Inc.
  • Nelkin, D. (1995). Science controversies: The dynamics of public disputes in the United States. En S. Jasanoff, G. Markle, J. Petersen y T. Pinch (Eds.), Handbook of science and technology studies (444–456). California: Sage Publications