Los procesos de investigación en tecnología desde una la perspectiva mixta

  1. Rubia Avi, Bartolomé 1
  1. 1 Universidad de Valladolid
    info

    Universidad de Valladolid

    Valladolid, España

    ROR https://ror.org/01fvbaw18

Journal:
Revista Interuniversitaria de Investigación en Tecnología Educativa

ISSN: 2529-9638

Year of publication: 2022

Issue Title: Metodologías aplicadas a la Tecnología Educativa

Issue: 13

Pages: 80-92

Type: Article

DOI: 10.6018/RIITE.546191 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDIGITUM editor

More publications in: Revista Interuniversitaria de Investigación en Tecnología Educativa

Sustainable development goals

Abstract

Technology has changed the way we understand society and human action. In research processes where technology plays a role, obtaining and analysing data has become an integral part since digitalisation, and since this process leaves traces of information that we can analyse comparatively in a qualitative and quantitative way. Educational processes are also integrated by technological uses, which, in some way, are helping us to improve and complete the processes of analysis and research. The mixed designs, where information is collected, organised, and analysed by mixing qualitative and quantitative information, have been supported by the information that technology provides us with on educational activities. This paper aims to situate, as well as to show the contributions that mixed methods research has made to improve educational research processes. These steps are shown with the support of educational experiences, supported by technology and mixed research designs. This has helped us to generate a better understanding of processes that previously only relied on a small glance, that of the observer looking at a group of learners or asking them how their learning was taking place.

Bibliographic References

  • Bauman, Z. (2000). Modernidad Líquida. Fondo de Cultura Económica.
  • Castells, M. (2001). La Galaxia Internet. Areté.
  • Castells, M. (2006). La era de la información: economía, sociedad y cultura. Alianza.
  • Carr, W. (1990). Una teoría para la educación. Hacia una investigación educativa crítica. Morata.
  • Creswell, J.W. (2003). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Method Approaches. SAGE publications.
  • Creswell, J.W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. Sage Publications.
  • Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approaches (4th ed.). Sage.
  • Creswell, J. W. y Cresewell, J.D. (2018). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approaches (5th ed.). Sage.
  • Gallego-Lema, V., Muñoz-Cristóbal, J.A., Arribas-Cubero, H.F. y Rubia-Avi, B. (2017). Orienteering in the natural environment: Ubiquitous learning through the use of technology. Movimento (ESEFID/UFRGS), 23(2), 755-770.
  • Gallego Lema, V., Muñoz-Cristóbal, J.A., Arribas-Cubero, H.F. y Rubia-Avi, B. (2019) El Prácticum en Educación Física en el Medio Natural: Conectando Espacios Físicos y Virtuales. Porto Alegre 25, e25017.
  • Greene, J. C. (2007). Mixed Methods in Social Inquiry. John Willey & Sons.
  • Greene, J.C., Caracelli, V. J. y Graham, W. F. (1989). Toward a Conceptual Framework for Mixed-Method Evaluation Designs. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis Fall 1989,11(3), 255-274
  • Giannakos, M., Spikol, D., Di Mitri, D., Sharma, K., Ochoa, X. y Hammad, R. (Eds.) (2022). The Multimodal Learning Analytics Handbook. Springer.
  • Harasim (2017). Teoría del aprendizaje y tecnologías en línea. Routledge.
  • Hesse-Biber, S. N. (2010). Mixed methods research: Merging theory with practice. Guilford Press.
  • Jorrín-Abellán, I.M., Fontana-Abad, M. y Rubia-Avi, B. (2021). Investigar en Educación. Ed. Síntesis.
  • Martínez Monés, A., Dimitriadis-Damoulis, I., Rubia-Avi, Goméz-Sanchez, E. y De la Fuente, P. (2003). Combining qualitative evaluation and social network analysis for the study of classroom social interactions. Computers and Education, 41, 353- 368
  • Mertens, D. M. (2010). Research and evaluation in education and psychology: Integrating diversity with quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods (3rd ed.). Sage.
  • Miles, M.B. y Huberman, A.M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: an expanded sourcebook (2nd Ed.). Sage.
  • Morse, J. M. (2010). Simultaneous and Sequential Qualitative Mixed Method Designs. Qualitative Inquiry, 16(6), 483–491. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800410364741
  • Rodríguez Gómez, G., Gil Flores, J. y García Jiménez, E. (1999). Metodología de la investigación cualitativa. Archidona: Ediciones Aljibe.
  • Peirano, M. (2019). El enemigo conoce el sistema: Manipulación de ideas, personas e influencias después de la economía de la atención. Ed. Debate.
  • Onwuegbuzie, A.J. y Combs, J.P. (2010). Emergent data analysis techniques in Mixed Methods Research. En Tashakkory, A. and Teddly, C. (Eds.), Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social & Behavioral Research (pp. 397-430). Sage publications.
  • Rubia Avi, B y Rodríguez Medin, J. (2018). Proyecto PASTEUR: Proyecto de Análisis Sistemático de Técnicas de Estudio Unidas a Resultados. Conference Papers CIPE 2018. Universidad de la Rioja-Logroño.
  • Rubia, B. y Greene, J.C., Jorrín, I., (2020). Metodologías mixtas emergentes en investigación social: El reto de la digitalización. Comunicar, 28(65).
  • Siemens, G. (2005). Connectivism: A learning theory for the digital age. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 2(1).
  • Grant, K., Dombrowski, Q., Ranaweera, K., Rodriguez-Arenas, O., Sinclair, S. y Rockwell, G. (2020). Absorbing DiRT: Tool Directories in the Digital Age. Digital Studies/le Champ Numérique, 10(1).
  • Tashakkori, A. y Teddlie, C. (2010). SAGE handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research. SAGE.
Data source: Dialnet