Fostering historical learning in elementary education through whole class shared reading activities

Referencias bibliográficas

• Achugar, M., & Schleppegrell, M. J. (2005). Beyond connectors: The construction of cause in history textbooks. Linguistic and Education, 16(3), 298–318. https://doi-org.unican.idm.oclc.org/10.1016/j.linged.2006.02.003
• Anderson, C., & Pearson, D. (1984). A schema- theoric view of basic processes in reading comprehension. In P. D. Pearson (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (pp. 255–291). Longman.
• Britt, M. A., Rouet, J. F., & Perfetti, C. (1996). Using hypertext to study and reason about historical evidence. In J. F. Rouet, J. Levonen, A. Dillon, & R. Spiro (Eds.), Hypertext and cognition (pp. 43–72). LEA.
• Carretero, M., Asensio, M., & Pozo, J. I. (1991). Cognitive development, historical time representation and causal explanations in adolescence. In M. Carretero, M. Pope, R. J. Simons, & J. I. Pozo (Eds.), Learning and instruction. Vol.III. European research in an international context (pp. 27–48). Pergamon Press.
• Chapman, A., & Woodcock, J. (2006). Mussolini’s missing marbles: Simulating history at GCSE. Teaching History, 17–27.
• Cho, B.-Y., & Afflerbach, P. (2017). An evolving perspective of constructively responsive reading comprehension strategies in multilayered digital text environments. In S. Israel (Ed.), Handbook of research on reading comprehension (2nd ed., pp. 109–134). Guilford Publications.
• Clarke, S. N., Resnick, L. B., Penstein Rosé, C., Corno, L., & Anderman, E. M. (2016). Dialogic instruction: A new frontier. In L. Corno & E. M. Anderman (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology. 3rd edition (pp. 278–388). Erlbaum.
• De Keyser, R., & Vandepitte, P. (Eds.) (1998). Historical Formation. Design of Vision. Flemish Board for Catholic Secondary Education.
• Dole, J. A., Duffy, G. G., Roehler, L. R., & Pearson, D. D. (1991). Moving from the old to the new: research on reading comprehension instruction. Review of Educational Research, 61(2). http://dx.doi.org.unican.idm.oclc.org/10.2307/1170536 [
• Dole, J. A., Nokes, J. D., & Drits, D. (2009). Cognitive strategy instruction. In G. G. Duffy & S. E. Israel (Eds.), Handbook of research on reading comprehension (pp 347–372). Erlbaum.
• Donker, A., de Boer, H., Kostons, D., Dignath -van Ewijk, C., & van der Werf, M. (2014). Effectiveness of self-regulated learning strategies on academic performance: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 11, 1–26. https://doi-org.unican.idm.oclc.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2013.11.002
• Faggella-Luby, M. N., Graner, P. S., Desbler, D. D., & Drew, S. V. (2012). Building a house on sand. Why disciplinary literacy is not sufficient to replace general strategies for adolescent learners who struggle. Topics in Language Disorders, 32(1), 69–84. http://doi.org.unican.idm.oclc.org/10.1097/TLD.0b013e318245618e
• Fox, E., & Alexander, P. (2017). Text and comprehension. A retrospective, perspective and prospective. In S. E. Israel, & G. G. Duffy (Eds.), Handbook of research on reading comprehension (pp. 227–239). Routledge.
• Fox, E., & Alexander, P. (2011). Learning to read. In R. Mayer, & P. A. Alexander (Eds.), Handbook of research on learning and instruction (pp. 7–31). Routledge.
• García, J. R., Montanero, M., Lucero, M., Cañedo, I., & Sánchez, E. (2018). Comparing rhetorical devices in history textbooks and teachers’ lessons: Implication for the development of academic language skills. Linguistic and Education, 47, 16–26. https://doi-org.unican.idm.oclc.org/10.1016/j.linged.2018.07.004
• Goldman, S. R., Britt, M. A., Brown, W., Cribb, G., George, M., Greenleaf, C., Lee, C. D., Shanahan, C., & Readi, P. (2016). Disciplinary literacies and learning to lead for understanding: A conceptual framework for disciplinary literacy. Educational Psychologist, 51(2), 219–246. https://doi-org.unican.idm.oclc.org/10.1080/00461520.2016.1168741 [Taylor & Francis Online]
• Gómez Carrasco, C. J., & Miralles, Martínez, P. (2017). Los espejos de Clío. Usos y abusos de la Historia en el ámbito escolar (Clio’s mirrors. Uses and abuses of Historyin the school setting). Sílex.
• Graesser, A. C., & Bertus, E. L. (1998). The construction of causal inferences while reading expository texts on science and technology. Scientific Studies of Reading, 2(3), 247–269. https://doi-org.unican.idm.oclc.org/10.1207/s1532799xssr0203_4 [Taylor & Francis Online]
• Havekes, H., Coppen, P., Luttenberg, J., & van Boxtel, C. (2012). Knowing and doing history: A conceptual framework and pedagogy for teaching historical contextualization. International Journal of Historical Learning, Teaching and Research, 11(1), 72–93. https://doi-org.unican.idm.oclc.org/10.18546/HERJ.11.1.06
• Havekes, H., van Boxtel, C., Coppen, P.-A., & Luttenberg, J. (2017). Stimulating historical thinking in a classroom discussion: The role of the teacher. Historical Encounters: A Journal of Historical Consciousness, Historical Cultures, and History Education, 4(2), 71–93.
• Hiebert, E. H. (2017). The texts of literacy instruction: Obstacles to or opportunities for educational equity?. Literacy research: Theory, Method, and Practice, 66(1), 117–134. https://doi-org.unican.idm.oclc.org/10.1177/2381336917718521
• Kiuhara, S., Graham, S., & Hawken, L. (2009). Teaching writing to high school students: A national survey. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(1), 136–160. https://doi-org.unican.idm.oclc.org/10.1037/a0013097
• Lee, P., Dickinson, A., & Ashby, R. (1997). “Just another emperor”: Understanding action in the past. International Journal of Educational Research, 27(3), 233–244. https://doi-org.unican.idm.oclc.org/10.1016/S0883-0355(97)89731-5
• Linderholm, T., Everson, M. G., van den Broek, P., Mischinski, M., Crittenden, A., & Samuels, J. (2000). Effects of causal text revision on more- and less-skilled readers’ comprehension of easy and difficult texts. Cognition and Instruction, 18(4), 525–556. https://doi-org.unican.idm.oclc.org/10.1207/S1532690XCI1804_4 [Taylor & Francis Online]
• Litman, C., Marple, S., Greenleaf, C., Charney-Sirott, I., Bolz, M. J., Richardson, L. K., Hall, A. H., George, M., & Goldman, S. R. (2017). Text-based argumentation with multiple sources: A descriptive study of opportunity to learn in secondary English Language arts, history, and science. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 26(1), 79–130. https://doi-org.unican.idm.oclc.org/10.1080/10508406.2016.1256809 [Taylor & Francis Online]
• Lupo, S. M., Tortorelli, L., Invernizzi, M., Ryoo, J. H., & Strong, J. Z. (2019). An exploration of text difficulty and knowledge support on adolescents’ comprehension. Reading Research Quarterly, 54(4), 457–479. https://doi-org.unican.idm.oclc.org/10.1002/rrq.247
• Masterman, L., & Sharples, M. (2002). A theory-informed framework for designing software to support reasoning about causation in history. Computers and Education, 38(1–3), 165–185. https://doi-org.unican.idm.oclc.org/10.1016/S0360-1315(01)00072-0
• Montanero, M., & Lucero, M. (2011). Causal discourse and the teaching of history. How do teachers explain historical causality? Instructional Science, 39(2), 109–136. https://doi-org.unican.idm.oclc.org/10.1007/s11251-009-9112-y
• Monte-Sano, C., & Reisman, A. (2016). Studying historical understanding. In L. Corno, & E. Anderman (Eds.), The handbook of educational psychology (3rd ed., pp. 281–294). American Psychological Association.
• Murphy, P., Wilkinson, I., Soter, A., Hennessey, M., & Alexander, J. (2009). Examining the effects of classroom discussion on students´ high-level comprehension text: A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(3), 740–764. https://doi-org.unican.idm.oclc.org/10.1037/a0015576
• sign experiment to improve reading and United States history knowledge of poor readers in eighth grade. Exceptional Children, 48, 36–44. https://doi-org.unican.idm.oclc.org/10.1177/0014402914563706
• O’Connor, R. E., Bell, K. M., Harty, D. R., Larking, L. K., Sackor, S. M., & Zigmond, N. (2002). Teaching reading to poor readers in the inter- mediate grades: A comparison of text difficulty. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(3), 474–485. https://doi-org.unican.idm.oclc.org/10.1037/0022-0663.94.3.474
• Okkinga, M., Steensel, R., van Gelderen, A. J. S., van Schooten, E., Sleegers, P. J. C., & Arends, L. R. (2018). Effectiveness of reading-strategy interventions in whole classrooms: A meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 30(4), 1215–1239. https://doi-org.unican.idm.oclc.org/10.1007/s10648-018-9445-7
• Peck, C., & Seixas, P. (2008). Benchmarks of historical thinking: First steps. Canadian Journal of Education, 31(4), 1015–1038.
• Pressley, M., & Afflerbach, P. (1995). Verbal protocols of reading: The nature ofconstructively responsive reading. Erlbaum.
• Reisman, A., Enumah, L., & Jay, L. (2020) Interpretive frames for responding to racially stressful moments in history discussions. Theory & Research in Social Education, 48(3), 321–345. https://doi-org.unican.idm.oclc.org/10.1080/00933104.2020.1718569
• Schleppegrell, M. J., Achugar, M., & Oteíza, T. (2004). The grammar of history: Enhancing content-based instruction through a functional focus on language. TESOL Quarterly, 38(1), 67–93. https://doi-org.unican.idm.oclc.org/10.2307/3588259
• Schleppegrell, M. J., Greer, S., & Taylor, S. (2008). Literacy in history: Language and meaning. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 3(2), 174–181. https://search.informit.org/doi/10.3316/ielapa.180659010342538
• Shanahan, T., & Shanahan, C. (2008). Teaching disciplinary literacy to adolescents: Rethinking content area literacy. Harvard Educational Review, 78(1), 40–59. https://doi-org.unican.idm.oclc.org/10.17763/haer.78.1.v62444321p602101
• Shanahan, C., & Shanahan, T. (2014). Does disciplinary literacy have a place in elementary school? The Reading Teacher, 67(8), 636–639. https://doi-org.unican.idm.oclc.org/10.1002/trtr.1257
• Shanahan, C. (2017). Comprehension in the disciplines. In E. I. Susan (Ed.), Handbook of research on reading comprehension (pp. 479–499). The Gilford Press.
• Topolski, J. (1991). Towards and integrated model of historical explanation. History and Theory, 30(3), 324–338. https://doi-org.unican.idm.oclc.org/10.2307/2505561
• Trabasso, T., & Bouchard, E. (2002). Teaching readers how to comprehend text strategically. In C. C. Block & M. Pressley (Eds.), Comprehension instruction: Research-based best practices (pp. 176–200). Guilford Press.
• Van Boxtel, C., & van Drie, J. (2013). Historical reasoning in the classroom: What does it look like and how can we enhance it? Teaching History, 150, 44–52.
• Van Drie, J., & van Boxtel, C. (2008). Historical reasoning: Towards a framework for analyzing students’ reasoning about the past. Educational Psychology Review, 20(2), 87–110. https://doi-org.unican.idm.oclc.org/10.1007/s10648-007-9056-1
• Voss, J. F., Carretero, M., Kenner, J., & Ney, L. (1994). The collapse of the Soviet Union: A case study in causal reasoning. In M. Carretero, & J. F. Voss (Eds.), Cognitive and instructional processes in history and the social science (pp. 403–430). Erlbaum.
• Wansink, B. G. J., Akkerman, S. F., & Wubbels, T. (2016). The certainty paradox of student history teachers: Balancing between historical facts and interpretation. Teaching and Teacher Education, 56, 94–105. https://doi-org.unican.idm.oclc.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.02.005
• Welie, C., Schoonen, R., Kuiken, F., & van den Bergh, H. (2017). Expository text comprehension in secondary school: For which readers does knowledge of connectives contribute the most? Journal of Research in Reading, 40(1), 42–65. https://doi-org.unican.idm.oclc.org/10.1111/1467-9817.12090
• Wharton-McDonald, R., & Erickson, J. (2017). Reading comprehension in the middle grades: Characteristics, challenges, and effective supports. In S. Israel (Ed.), Handbook of research on reading comprehension (2nd ed., pp. 353–376). Guilford Publications.
• Wilkinson, I., Murphy, P., & Binici, S. (2015). Dialogue-intensive pedagogies for promoting reading comprehension: What we know, what we need to know. In L. Resnick, C. Asterhan, & S. Clarke (Eds.), socializing intelligence through academic talk and dialogue (pp. 35–48). AERA.
• Wineburg, S. S. (1998). Reading Abraham Lincoln: An expert/expert study in the interpretation of historical texts. Cognitive Science, 22, 319–346. https://doi-org.unican.idm.oclc.org/10.1207/s15516709cog2203_3
• Wineburg, S. S. (2001). Historical thinking and other unnatural acts: Charting the future of teaching the past. Temple University Press