La obligación de motivación individualizada en las resoluciones judiciales de interceptación de las comunicaciones electrónicas

  1. Luis Ángel Ballesteros Moffa 1
  1. 1 Universidad de León
    info

    Universidad de León

    León, España

    ROR https://ror.org/02tzt0b78

Revista:
La Ley Unión Europea

ISSN: 2255-551X

Año de publicación: 2023

Número: 114

Tipo: Artículo

Otras publicaciones en: La Ley Unión Europea

Resumen

In accordance with articles 18.3 and 55.2 of the Constitution, and under the jurisprudence of the Constitutional Court, the Court of Justice of the European Union and the European Court of Human Rights, the authorization from the relevant judicial authority articulates the procedural guarantees against interception of telecommunications through advanced technological tools for a criminal investigation. This telephone tapping and other interventions of content and traffic data must be subject to the principles of specialty, suitability, exceptionality, necessity and proportionality, insofar as they limit the fundamental rights to secrecy of communications and protection of personal data. For which it is inexcusable to requere the specific grounds for the judicial authorization, from a procedural perspective derived from the right to a fair trial and the right to an effective remedy.