PRUEBA PERICIAL Y CONOCIMIENTO PRIVADO DEL JUEZENTRE EL OPTIMISMO Y LA DEFERENCIA

  1. Soba Bracesco, Ignacio M. 1
  1. 1 Universidad de la República Oriental del Uruguay
Aldizkaria:
Revista de Ciencias Sociales: Facultad de Derecho

ISSN: 0719-8442 0716-7725

Argitalpen urtea: 2021

Zenbakia: 78

Orrialdeak: 48-64

Mota: Artikulua

DOI: 10.22370/RCS.2021.78.3025 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openSarbide irekia editor

Beste argitalpen batzuk: Revista de Ciencias Sociales: Facultad de Derecho

Laburpena

Facing the expert evidence in the judicial process was not, and is not, something simple. However, nowadays, it is easier for people (lawyers, judges) to access, on their own, knowledge or information regarding extra-legal issues that could be of interest to the process. What to do, then, with that private knowledge (which can, for example, be obtainedthrough the internet) is one of the questions that are analyzed in this paper. Adequate training will be key to not being surprised and understanding the particularities and limitations of that information or extra-legal knowledge, as well as to make better use of the expert evidence.