Una ruta de Kant a Hegel. Destino¿McDowell?

  1. Aragües Aliaga, Rafael 1
  1. 1 Doctor en Filosofía por la Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg
Revue:
Revista de filosofía

ISSN: 0034-8244,  1988-284X

Année de publication: 2021

Número: 46

Pages: 355-371

Type: Article

DOI: 10.5209/RESF.64590 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAccès ouvert editor

D'autres publications dans: Revista de filosofía

Objectifs de Développement Durable

Résumé

This paper focuses on the relation between the thinking of John McDowell and Hegel’s philosophy. The key issue is to explain the main argument that, within the framework of analytic philosophy, goes from a Kantian to a Hegelian position. Kant’s transcendental deduction of categories and its interpretation, seen from the perspective of Wilfrid Sellar’s criticism to the Myth of the Given, is the key point. Departing from that, my aim is to discuss whether this route from Kant to Hegel finally ends at John McDowell’s philosophy by contrasting the philosophy of these last two: to rethink the notion of idealism and the relationship between experience and metaphysics on both authors, Hegel and McDowell, in both their similarities and in their differences.

Références bibliographiques

  • deVries, W. A. (2019): “Hegel and Sellars on the Unity of Things”, International Journal of Philosophical Studies, 27:3, pp. 363-378.
  • Fulda, H. F. (2004): “Hegels Logik der Idee und ihre epistemologische Bedeutung”, en Halbig, C. (ed.), Hegels Erbe, Frankfurt am Main, Suhrkamp, pp. 78-137.
  • Fulda, H. F. (2012): “La philosophie de Hegel – avec la métaphisique et sans elle”, en Kervégan, J-F. (ed.), Hegel au présent. Une relève de la métaphysique?, Paris, CNRS, pp. 93-127.
  • Hegel, G. W. F. (1986): Werke in zwanzig Bände. Herausgegeben von Eva Moldenhauer und Karl Markus Michel (Theorie Werkausgabe), Frankfurt am Main, Suhrkamp.
  • Houlgate, S. (2006): “Thought and Experience in Hegel and McDowell”, European Journal of Philosophy, 14, pp. 242-261.
  • Kant, I. (1974): Werke in zwölf Bände. Herausgegeben von Wilhelm Weischedel, Frankfurt am Main, Suhrkamp.
  • McDowell, J. (1996): Mind and World, Cambridge and London, Harvard University Press.
  • McDowell, J. (2009): “Hegel’s Idealism as a Radicalization of Kant”, en McDowell, J., Having the World in View. Essays on Kant, Hegel and Sellars, Cambridge and London, Harvard University Press, pp. 69-89.
  • Pippin, R. (2015): “John McDowell’s Germans”, en Pippin, R., Interanimations. Receiving Modern German Philosophy, Chicago and London, The University of Chicago Press, pp. 63-90.
  • Rorty, R. (1997): “Introduction”, en Sellars, W., Empiricism and the Philosophy of Mind, Cambridge and London, Harvard University Press, pp. 1-12.
  • Sellars, W. (1997): Empiricism and the Philosophy of Mind, Cambridge and London, Harvard University Press.
  • Stern, D. (1991): “Foundationalism, Holism or Hegel?”, Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology, 22:1, pp. 21-32.
  • Wahsner, R. (1996): Zur Kritik der Hegeschen Naturphilosophie. Über ihren Sinn im Lichte der heutigen Naturerkenntnis, Frankfurt am Main, Peter Lang.
  • Wildenauer, M. (2003): Epistemologie freien Denkens. Die logische Idee in Hegels philosophie des endlichen Geistes, Hamburg, Felix Meiner Verlag.
  • Wolf, C. W. (2019): “The Myth of the Taken: Why Hegel is not a Conceptualist”, International Journal of Philosophical Studies, 27:3, pp. 399-421.
La source de données: Dialnet