What Emotions do Pre-university Students Feel when Engaged in Computational Thinking Activities?

  1. Herrero-Álvarez, Rafael 1
  2. León, Coromoto 1
  3. Miranda, Gara 1
  4. Segredo, Eduardo 1
  5. Socas, Óscar 1
  6. Cuellar-Moreno, María 1
  7. Caballero-Juliá, Daniel 2
  1. 1 Universidad de La Laguna
    info

    Universidad de La Laguna

    San Cristobal de La Laguna, España

    ROR https://ror.org/01r9z8p25

  2. 2 Universidad de Salamanca
    info

    Universidad de Salamanca

    Salamanca, España

    ROR https://ror.org/02f40zc51

Journal:
International Journal of Computer Science Education in Schools

ISSN: 2513-8359

Year of publication: 2023

Volume: 6

Issue: 2

Type: Article

DOI: 10.21585/IJCSES.V6I2.180 GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openOpen access editor

More publications in: International Journal of Computer Science Education in Schools

Sustainable development goals

Abstract

Emotions play a crucial role in knowledge acquisition and can significantly impact motivation when studying a new field. Unfortunately, young people, especially girls, are often not drawn to Computer Science. To address this issue, we conducted an analysis of emotions among 8-9-year-old and 12-13-year-old students engaged in Computational Thinking activities, considering educational level, gender, and type of intervention.Our study sought to understand the lack of interest by examining the emotions present in primary and secondary school students. Hour-long in-personclasses were conducted, focusing on Computational Thinking activities. We used the Developmental Channels Questionnaire, which includes 13emotions rated on a Likert scale from 0 to 10, to measure emotions.The results showed that the predominant emotions were mostly positive and ambiguous, with low-intensity negative emotions, particularly in primary education. Gender differences were observed only in secondary education, while in primary education, the differences were not significant. Girls demonstrated an emotional evolution when engaging in these activities, unlike boys.These findings provide valuable quantitative insights for primary and secondary school teachers. Understanding the emotions experienced can help guide effective teaching approaches. By addressing emotional factors, educators can enhance students' interest in computer science, thus fostering a more inclusive and engaging learning environment

Bibliographic References

  • Achim, N., & Kassim, A. A. (2015). Computer usage: The impact of computer anxiety and computer self-efficacy. Procedia, Social and Behavioral Sciences, 172, 701-708. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.422
  • Barr, V., & Stephenson, C. (2011). Bringing computational thinking to K-12. ACM Inroads, 2(1), 48-54. https://doi.org/10.1145/1929887.1929905
  • Bisquerra Alzina, R. (2003). Educación emocional y competencias básicas para la vida. Revista De Investigación Educativa, 21(1), 7-43.
  • Brennan, K., & Resnick, M. (2012). New frameworks for studying and assessing the development of computational thinking. Paper presented at the Annual American Educational Research Association Meeting,
  • Dávila-Acedo, M. A., Airado-Rodríguez, D., Cañada-Cañada, F., & Sánchez-Martín, J. (2021). Detailed emotional profile of secondary education students toward learning physics and chemistry. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 659009. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.659009
  • Dou, R., Bhutta, K., Ross, M., Kramer, L., & Thamotharan, V. (2020). The effects of computer science stereotypes and interest on middle school boys' career intentions. ACM Transactions on Computing Education, 20(3), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1145/3394964
  • Force, C. T. (2020). Computing curricula 2020: Paradigms for global computing education (CC2020) (2020 December 31 ed.). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3456302
  • Fowler, R. R., & Su, M. P. (2018). Gendered risks of team-based learning: A model of inequitable task allocation in project-based learning. IEEE Transactions on Education, 61(4), 312-318. https://doi.org/10.1109/TE.2018.2816010
  • Funke, A., Berges, M., & Hubwieser, P. (2016). Different perceptions of computer science. Paper presented at the International Conference on Learning and Teaching in Computing and Engineering (LaTICE), 14-18. https://doi.org/10.1109/LaTiCE.2016.1
  • Giannakos, M. N., Jaccheri, L., & Leftheriotis, I. (2014). Happy girls engaging with technology: Assessing emotions and engagement related to programming activities. (pp. 398-409). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07482-5_38
  • Giannakos, M. N., Jaccheri, L., & Proto, R. (2013). Teaching computer science to young children through creativity: Lessons learned from the case of norway. Paper presented at the Computer Science Education Research Conference, 103-111.
  • Goldberger, M., Ashworth, S., & Byra, M. (2012). Spectrum of teaching styles retrospective 2012. Quest (National Association for Kinesiology in Higher Education), 64(4), 268-282. https://doi.org/10.1080/00336297.2012.706883
  • Goo, J. J., Park, K. S., Lee, M., Park, J., Hahn, M., Ahn, H., & Picard, R. W. (2006). Effects of guided and unguided style learning on user attention in a virtual environment. Lecture notes in computer science (pp. 1208-1222). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11736639_151
  • Henry, J., & Dumas, B. (2018). Perceptions of computer science among children after a hands-on activity: A pilot study. Paper presented at the 2018 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON), 1811-1817. https://doi.org/10.1109/EDUCON.2018.8363454
  • Honomichl, R. D., & Chen, Z. (2012). The role of guidance in children's discovery learning. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews. Cognitive Science, 3(6), 615-622. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcs.1199
  • Hubwieser, P., Armoni, M., Brinda, T., Dagiene, V., Diethelm, I., Giannakos, M., Knobelsdorf, M., Magenheim, J., Mittermeir, R., & Schubert, S. (2011). Computer science/informatics in secondary education. Proceedings of the 16th Annual Conference Reports on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education - Working Group Reports, , 19-38. https://doi.org/10.1145/2078856.2078859
  • Impagliazzo, J., & Pears, A. N. (2018). The CC2020 project—computing curricula guidelines for the 2020s. Paper presented at the 2018 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON), 2021-2024.
  • Kass, G. V. (1980). An exploratory technique for investigating large quantities of categorical data. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society.Series C (Applied Statistics), 29(2), 119-127. https://doi.org/10.2307/2986296
  • Kay, R. H. (2008). Exploring the relationship between emotions and the acquisition of computer knowledge. Computers and Education, 50(4), 1269-1283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2006.12.002
  • Kim, H. S., Kim, S., & Lee, W. J. (2021). Extending computational thinking into information and communication technology literacy measurement. ACM Transactions on Computing Education, 21(1), 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1145/3427596
  • Kurtz-Costes, B., Copping, K. E., Rowley, S. J., & Kinlaw, C. R. (2014). Gender and age differences in awareness and endorsement of gender stereotypes about academic abilities. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 29(4), 603-618. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-014-0216-7
  • Lazarus, R. S. (1991). Emotion and adaptation. Oxford University Press.
  • Lye, S. Y., & Koh, J. H. L. (2014). Review on teaching and learning of computational thinking through programming: What is next for K-12? Computers in Human Behavior, 41, 51-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.09.012
  • Master, A., Cheryan, S., & Meltzoff, A. N. (2016). Computing whether she belongs: Stereotypes undermine girls' interest and sense of belonging in computer science. Journal of Educational Psychology, 108(3), 424-437. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000061
  • Medeiros, R. P., Ramalho, G. L., & Falcao, T. P. (2019). A systematic literature review on teaching and learning introductory programming in higher education. IEEE Transactions on Education, 62(2), 77-90. https://doi.org/10.1109/TE.2018.2864133
  • Mellado Jiménez, V., Borrachero, A. B., Brígido, M., Melo, L. V., Dávila, M. A., Cañada, F., & ., E. a. (2014). Emotions in science teaching. Enseñanza De Las Ciencias, 32(3), 11-36. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/ensciencias.1478
  • Mosston, M., & Ashworth, S. (2002). Teaching physical education (Fifth ed.). Benjamin Cummings.
  • Osborne, J., Simon, S., & Collins, S. (2003). Attitudes towards science: A review of the literature and its implications. International Journal of Science Education, 25(9), 1049-1079. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069032000032199
  • Pekrun, R. (1992). The impact of emotions on learning and achievement: Towards a theory of cognitive/motivational mediators. Applied Psychology, 41(4), 359-376.
  • Plante, I., Théorêt, M., & Favreau, O. E. (2009). Student gender stereotypes: Contrasting the perceived maleness and femaleness of mathematics and language. Educational Psychology (Dorchester-on-Thames), 29(4), 385-405. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410902971500
  • Resnick, M., Maloney, J., Monroy-Hernández, A., Rusk, N., Eastmond, E., Brennan, K., Millner, A., Rosenbaum, E., Silver, J., Silverman, B., & Kafai, Y. (2009). Scratch: Programming for all. Commun.ACM, 52(11), 60-67. https://doi.org/10.1145/1592761.1592779
  • Riesco, M., Fondón, M., Gutiérrez, D. Á, Lopez, B., Cernuda, A., & Juan, A. (2014). La informática como materia fundamental en un sistema educativo del siglo XXI. Paper presented at the Xx Jenui, 27-32.
  • Seneviratne, O. (2017). Making computer science attractive to high school girls with computational thinking approaches: A case study. Emerging research, practice, and policy on computational thinking (pp. 21-32). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52691-1_2
  • Shim, J., Kwon, D., & Lee, W. (2017). The effects of a robot game environment on computer programming education for elementary school students. IEEE Transactions on Education, 60(2), 164-172. https://doi.org/10.1109/TE.2016.2622227
  • Strachan, R., Peixoto, A., Emembolu, I., & Restivo, M. T. (2018). Women in engineering: Addressing the gender gap, exploring trust and our unconscious bias. 2018 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON), , 2088-2093. https://doi.org/10.1109/EDUCON.2018.8363497
  • Tsolakidis, S., & Anagnostou, G. (2011). The impact of physical education teaching styles on the construction of pupils’ literate subjectivities. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 31st Annual Meeting of the Department of Linguistics of the Faculty of Philosophy, 145-154.
  • Webb, M., Davis, N., Bell, T., Katz, Y., Reynolds, N., Chambers, D., & Sysło, M. (2017). Computer science in K-12 school curricula of the 2lst century: Why, what and when? Education and Information Technologies, 22(2), 445-468. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-016-9493-x
  • Weiner, B. (1984). Attributional theory of motivation and emotion. Psychological Review, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-4948-1
  • Wing, J. (2006). Computational thinking. Communications of the ACM, 49(3), 33-35. https://doi.org/10.1145/1118178.1118215
  • Wong, B. (2016). 'I'm good, but not that good': Digitally-skilled young people's identity in computing. Computer Science Education, 26(4), 299-317. https://doi.org/10.1080/08993408.2017.1292604
  • Zatarain Cabada, R., María Lucía Barrón Estrada, José Mario Ríos Félix, & Giner Alor Hernández. (2018). A virtual environment for learning computer coding using gamification and emotion recognition. Interactive Learning Environments, 28(8), 1048-1063. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2018.1558256
  • Zendler, A., Spannagel, C., & Klaudt, D. (2011). Marrying content and process in computer science education. IEEE Transactions on Education, 54(3), 387-397. https://doi.org/10.1109/TE.2010.2062184