Political communication on TikTokfrom the feminisation of discourse to incivility expressed in emoji form. An analysis of the Spanish political platform Sumar and reactions to its strategy

  1. Raquel Quevedo-Redondo 1
  2. Salvador Gómez-García 2
  1. 1 Universidad de Valladolid
    info

    Universidad de Valladolid

    Valladolid, España

    ROR https://ror.org/01fvbaw18

  2. 2 Universidad Complutense de Madrid
    info

    Universidad Complutense de Madrid

    Madrid, España

    ROR 02p0gd045

Aldizkaria:
El profesional de la información

ISSN: 1386-6710,  1699-2407

Argitalpen urtea: 2023

Zenbakien izenburua: Political polarization

Alea: 32

Zenbakia: 6

Mota: Artikulua

DOI: 10.3145/EPI.2023.NOV.11 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openSarbide irekia editor

Beste argitalpen batzuk: El profesional de la información

Garapen Iraunkorreko Helburuak

Laburpena

In a context of permanent electoral campaign, an increasing number of political communication specialists are trying to unravel the resources with which government officials and their parties seek to influence TikTok users. From a broad perspective, the theme is more current than novel, however, in the specific case of this research, an academic void is identified by combining the identification of idiosyncratic traits of the feminization of political discourse in TikTok with the study of reactions (text and emojis) that audiovisual content imbued with this trend provokes in users. The intention is to find out whether the inclusive tone of the feminized rhetorical style can be extrapolated to the Chinese-origin social network and, if so, whether its particular characteristics mitigate forms of incivility. To carry out the checks, the first se-ven months of activity on TikTok by the political platform Sumar with its leader, Yolanda Díaz, as the protagonist of most of the videos, are selected. The mixed methodology of analysis on audiovisual content and comments allows to verify that, although the new Spanish party does not apply a strategy perfectly adapted to the social network under study, the anti-polarization rhetoric and the storytelling techniques manage to neutralize extreme forms of flaming.

Erreferentzia bibliografikoak

  • Alshenqeeti, Hamza (2016). “Are emojis creating a new or old visual language for new generations? A socio-semiotic study”. Advances in language and literary studies, v. 7, n. 6, pp. 56-69. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.alls.v.7n.6p.56
  • Amaireh, Hanan A. (2022). “Corpus-based analysis of the feminine style of Kamala Harris’ discourse: Women (not men) are the backbone of America’s democracy and economy”. Theory and practice in language studies, v. 12, n. 9, pp. 1762-1769. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1209.08
  • Azher, Musarrat; Riaz, Attiqa; Ikram, Abdul-Ghaffar (2022). “Challenging stereotypes about gendered roles in Ted Talks”. Pakistan journal of women’s studies = Alam-e-niswan= Alam-i nisvan, v. 29, pp. 43-54. https://doi.org/10.46521/pjws.029.01.0110
  • Balmas, Meital; Sheafer, Tamir (2013). “Leaders first, countries after: Mediated political personalization in the international arena”. Journal of communication, v. 63, n. 3, pp. 454-475. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12027
  • Balocco, Anna-Elizabeth (2016). “O flaming (ou violência verbal em mídia digital) e suas funções na esfera pública”. Linguagem em (dis) curso, v. 16, n. 3, pp. 503-521. https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-4017-160308-2716
  • Becerra-Chávez, Ariel; Navia, Patricio (2022). “Gender-affinity voting in legislative elections under open-list proportional representation rules: the legislative elections in Chile in 2017”. Contemporary politics, v. 28, n. 1, pp. 99-119. https://doi.org/10.1080/13569775.2021.2007613
  • Blankenship, Jane; Robson, Deborah C. (1995). “A feminine style in women’s political discourse: An exploratory essay”. Communication quarterly, v. 43, n. 3, pp. 353-366. https://doi.org/10.1080/01463379509369982
  • Bligh, Michelle; Merolla, Jennifer; Schroedel, Jean; Gonzalez, Randall (2010). “Finding her voice: Hillary Clinton’s rhetoric in the 2008 presidential campaign”. Women’s studies, v. 39, n. 8, pp. 823-850. https://doi.org/10.1080/00497878.2010.513316
  • Bonnafous, Simone (2003). “Femme politique: une question de genre?”. Réseaux, n. 120, pp. 119-145. https://doi.org/10.3917/res.120.0119
  • Bormann, Marike; Ziegele, Marc (2023). “Incivility”. In: Strippel, Christian; Paasch-Colberg, Sünje; Emmer, Martin; Trebbe, Joachim (eds.). Challenges and perspectives of hate speech research, pp. 199-217. Berlin. ISBN: 978 3 945681121 https://doi.org/10.48541/dcr.v12.12
  • Campbell, Karlyn-Kohrs (1989). Man cannot speak for her. New York: Praeger. ISBN: 0275932699
  • Castro-Martínez, Andrea; Díaz-Morilla, Pablo (2021). “La comunicación política de la derecha radical en redes sociales. De Instagram a TikTok y Gab, la estrategia digital de Vox”. Dígitos. Revista de comunicación digital, n. 7, pp. 67-89. https://doi.org/10.7203/rd.v1i7.210
  • Cerezo, Pepe (2016). “La Generación Z y la información”. Revista de estudios de juventud, v. 114, pp. 95-109.
  • Cervi, Laura; Marín-Lladó, Carles (2021). “What are political parties doing on TikTok? The Spanish case”. Profesional de la información, v. 30, n. 4, e300403. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2021.jul.03
  • Cervi, Laura; Marín-Lladó, Carles (2022) “Freepalestine on TikTok: from performative activism to (meaningful) playful activism”. Journal of international and intercultural communication, v. 15, n. 4, pp. 414-434. https://doi.org/10.1080/17513057.2022.2131883
  • Cervi, Laura; Tejedor, Santiago; García-Blesa, Fernando (2023). “TikTok and political communication: The latest frontier of politainment? A case study”. Media and communication, v. 11, n. 2. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v11i2.6390
  • Cervi, Laura; Tejedor, Santiago; Marín-Lladó, Carles (2021). “TikTok and the new language of political communication”. Cultura, lenguaje y representación, v. 26, pp. 267-287. https://doi.org/10.6035/clr.5817
  • Chenou, Jean-Marie; Restrepo, Elvira-María (2023). “Una nación dividida: análisis del discurso político en redes sociales antes del plebiscito del acuerdo de paz con las FARC”. Análisis político, v. 36, n. 106, pp. 60-84. https://shorturl.at/atwZ3
  • Cuevas-Calderón, Elder; Yalán-Dongo, Eduardo; Kanashiro, Lilian (2022). “Conservadores en TikTok: polarización social en el Perú”. Prisma social: revista de investigación social, v. 39, n. 1, pp. 156-182. https://revistaprismasocial.es/article/view/4865
  • Dolan, Kathleen (2008). “Is there a ‘gender affinity effect’ in American politics? Information, affect, and candidate sex in U.S. house elections”. Political research quarterly, v. 61, pp. 79-89. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912907307518
  • Dow, Bonnie J.; Tonn, Mari-Boor (1993). “‘Feminine style’ and political judgment in the rhetoric of Ann Richards”. Quarterly journal of speech, v. 79, pp. 286-302. https://doi.org/10.1080/00335639309384036
  • Estrada-Rodríguez, José-Luis; Martínez-De-la-Rosa, Georgina (2023). “Comunicación política, redes sociales y polarización en Twitter. Estudio de caso: El Culiacanazo, 2019 en México”. Anagramas: rumbos y sentidos de la comunicación, v. 22, n. 43. https://revistas.udem.edu.co/index.php/anagramas/article/download/4317/3600/
  • Figuereo-Benítez, Juan-Carlos; De-Oliveira, Julieti-Sussi; Mancinas‐Chávez, Rosalba (2022). “TikTok como herramienta de comunicación política de los presidentes iberoamericanos”. In: Aguaded, Ignacio; Vizcaíno-Verdú; Arantxa; Hernando-Gómez, Ángel; Bonilla-del‐Río, Mónica (coords.). Redes sociales y ciudadanía: Ciber‐culturas para el aprendizaje. Madrid: Comunicar Ediciones, pp. 103-112. ISBN: 978 84 937316 9 4
  • Gamir-Ríos, José; Sánchez-Castillo, Sebastián (2022). “The political irruption of short video: Is TikTok a new window for Spanish parties?”. Communication & society, v. 35, n. 2, pp. 37-52. https://doi.org/10.15581/003.35.2.37-52
  • Garimella, Venkata-Rama-Kiran; Weber, Ingmar (2017). “A long-term analysis of polarization on Twitter”. In: Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on web and social media, v. 11, n. 1, pp. 528-531. https://doi.org/10.1609/icwsm.v11i1.14918
  • Gibson, Will; Huang, Pingping; Yu, Qianyun (2018). “Emoji and communicative action: The semiotics, sequence and gestural actions of ‘face covering hand’”. Discourse, context & media, v. 26, pp. 91-99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2018.05.005
  • Gómez-García, Salvador; Quevedo-Redondo, Raquel (2023). Political communication on TikTok: from the feminisation of discourse to incivility expressed in emoji form. Dataset. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.24599562.v1
  • Goodnow, Trischa (2013). “Facing off: A comparative analysis of Obama and Romney Facebook timeline photographs”. American behavioral scientist, v. 57, n. 11, pp. 1584-1595. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764213489013
  • Gotor-Cuairán, Marta; Martín, Dolores-Lucía; Sacristán-Navarro, María-Asunción (2022). “La escucha del consumidor centennial a través de la experiencia sensorial: El simulador profesional como instrumento de aprendizaje para el marketing experiencial”. Techno review. International technology, science and society review, v. 11, n. 2. https://doi.org/10.37467/revtechno.v11.3571
  • Hargrave, Lotte; Blumenau, Jack (2022). “No longer conforming to stereotypes? Gender, political style and parliamentary debate in the UK”. British journal of political science, v. 52, n. 4, pp. 1584-1601. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123421000648
  • Jane, Emma A. (2015). “Flaming? What flaming? The pitfalls and potentials of researching online hostility”. Ethics and information technology, v. 17, n. 1, pp. 65-87. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-015-9362-0
  • Jones, Jennifer J. (2016). “Talk like a man: The linguistic styles of Hillary Clinton, 1992-2013”. Perspectives on politics, v. 14, n. 3, pp. 625-642. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592716001092
  • Koelsch, Stefan (2005). “Investigating emotion with music: neuroscientific approaches”. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, v. 1060, n. 1, pp. 412-418. https://doi.org/10.1196/annals.1360.034
  • Krippendorff, Klaus (2004). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications. ISBN: 0 7619 1544 3
  • Lingam, Revathy-Amadera; Aripin, Norizah (2017). “Comments on fire! Classifying flaming comments on YouTube videos in Malaysia”. Malaysian journal of communication, v. 33, n. 4, pp. 104-118. https://doi.org/10.17576/JKMJC-2017-3304-07
  • López-Fernández, Víctor (2022). “Nuevos medios en campaña. El caso de las elecciones autonómicas de Madrid 2021 en TikTok”. Universitas-XXI, Revista de ciencias sociales y humanas, n. 36, pp. 221-241. https://doi.org/10.17163/uni.n36.2022.09
  • Lopezosa, Carlos; Codina, Lluís; Boté-Vericad, Juan-José (2023). Testeando Atlas.ti con OpenAI: hacia un nuevo paradigma para el análisis cualitativo de entrevistas con inteligencia artificial. Barcelona: Universitat Pompeu Fabra.
  • McConnell-Ginet, Sally (1988). “Language and gender”. Linguistics: The Cambridge survey, v. 4, pp. 75-99. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620577.006
  • Madrigal-Moreno, Flor; Madrigal-Moreno, Salvador; Béjar-Tinoco, Víctor (2021). “Estrategias de marketing orientadas al consumo de la generación centennial”. European scientific journal, v. 17, n. 4, pp. 268-286. https://doi.org/10.19044/esj.2021.v17n4p268
  • Mazzoleni, Gianpietro; Sfardini, Anna (2009). Politica pop. Bologna: Il Mulino. ISBN: 8815132732
  • Martín, Montserrat; Pla-Campas, Gil; Coromina, Òscar; Tejedor, Santiago (2023). “‘You are the best… but can you twerk?’ How Twitter users challenge the messaging around female professional footballers in the 2019 UEFA women’s champions league final in a postfeminist context”. Soccer & society, v. 24, n. 8. https://doi.org/10.1080/14660970.2023.2211535
  • Morejón-Llamas, Noemí (2023). “Política española en TikTok: Del aterrizaje a la consolidación de la estrategia comunicativa”. Revista prisma social, n. 40, pp. 238-261. https://revistaprismasocial.es/article/view/4833
  • Moschini, Ilaria (2016). “The ‘face with tears of joy’ emoji. A socio-semiotic and multimodal insight into a Japan-America mash-up”. Hermes, n. 55. https://doi.org/10.7146/hjlcb.v0i55.24286
  • Muñoz, Vladimir-Obando (2021). “El efecto Tiktok: Plataformas digitales y reconfiguración del escenario político electoral en Ecuador”. Sociología y política hoy, n. 5, pp. 175-184. https://revistadigital.uce.edu.ec/index.php/hoy/article/view/3257
  • O’Sullivan, Patrick-Brian; Flanagin, Andrew J. (2003). “Reconceptualizing ‘flaming’ and other problematic messages”. New media & society, v. 5, n. 1, pp. 69-94. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444803005001908
  • Pavalanathan, Umashanthi; Eisenstein, Jacob (2016). “More emojis, less :) The competition for paralinguistic function in microblog writing”. First Monday, v. 21, n. 11. https://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/6879/5647
  • Paz, María-Antonia; Mayagoitia-Soria, Ana; González-Aguilar, Juan-Manuel (2021). “From polarization to hate: Portrait of the Spanish political meme”. Social media + society, v. 7, n. 4. https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051211062920
  • Pennebaker, James W. (2011). The secret life of pronouns. What our words say about us. New York: Bloomsbury Press. ISBN: 1608194809
  • Prada, Marilia; Rodrigues, David L.; Garrido, Margarida V.; Lopes, Diniz; Cavalheiro, Bernardo; Gaspar, Rui (2018). “Motives, frequency and attitudes toward emoji and emoticon use”. Telematics and informatics, v. 35, n. 7, pp. 1925-1934. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2018.06.005
  • Quevedo-Redondo, Raquel (2021). “El estilo retórico femenino en la entrevista política. Una década de aplicación en Telva”. Index.comunicación, v. 11, n. 1, pp. 271-295. https://doi.org/10.33732/ixc/11/01Elesti
  • Quevedo-Redondo, Raquel (2022). “La feminización política y su extrapolación al discurso de líderes y lideresas. Estudio de caso de Yolanda Díaz”. IC. Revista científica de información y comunicación, n. 19, pp. 165-188. https://icjournal-ojs.org/index.php/IC-Journal/article/view/713
  • Quevedo-Redondo, Raquel; Rebolledo, Marta; Navarro-Sierra, Nuria (2023). “Music as soft power: The electoral use of Spotify”. Media and communication, v. 11, n. 2. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v11i2.6344
  • Robles, José-Manuel; Guevara, Juan-Antonio; Casas-Mas, Belén; Gómez, Daniel (2022). “When negativity is the fuel. Bots and political polarization in the Covid-19 debate. [Cuando la negatividad es el combustible. Bots y polarización política en el debate sobre el Covid-19]”. Comunicar, v. 30, n. 71, pp. 63-75. https://doi.org/10.3916/C71-2022-05
  • Rosenberg, Andrés (2018). “¿Qué me estás queriendo decir? Un nuevo acercamiento metodológico para entender la incivilidad de usuarios en comentarios de noticias online”. Index.comunicación, v. 8, n. 3, pp. 87-104. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=6711311
  • Sampietro, Agnese (2019). “Emoji and rapport management in Spanish WhatsApp chats”. Journal of pragmatics, v. 143, pp. 109-120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2019.02.009
  • Sánchez-Castillo, Sebastián (2021). “La construcción del liderazgo político y la identidad escenográfica en TikTok”. In: Sierra-Sánchez, Javier; Barrientos-Báez, Almudena. Cosmovisión de la comunicación en redes sociales en la era postdigital. Madrid: McGraw Hill, pp. 215-227. ISBN: 978 84 486 2583 2
  • Vijay, Darsana; Gekker, Alex (2021). “Playing politics: How Sabarimala played out on TikTok”. American behavioral scientist, v. 65, n. 5, pp. 712-734. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764221989769
  • Zurovac, Elisabetta (2022). “Le arti della politica. Il volto e il voto: Prove di posizionamento politico su TikTok fra performance e riflessività connessa”. Comunicazione politica, v. 23, n. 3, pp. 485-488. https://www.rivisteweb.it/doi/10.3270/105438
Datuen iturria: Dialnet